Abstract
Looking at the fate of the concept of exaptation in historical linguistics, this article attempts an extension of exaptation from morphosyntactic change to phonological change. It argues that explicit recognition of the links between language change and other manifestations of Darwinian evolution can provide a context in which the use of this concept might be justified. First, an overview of the applications of exaptation in linguistics is provided (Section 2). Next, the historical data, that is the raisings of the close–mid long vowels as part of the Great Vowel Shift, as well as the lowerings of the short vowels as part of the Short Vowel Shift, adduced in this paper to verify the usefulness of exaptation in studying sound change are presented (Section 3). Consequently, two ways in which exaptation can be applied in the analysis of these data are presented: first (Section 4.1), a superficially evolutionary approach, which treats exaptation as a biologically inspired metaphorical label, and second (Section 4.2), a strictly evolutionary approach, which goes beyond metaphorical extensions of biological terms to linguistics, and which instead treats languages as truly evolutionary systems.
References
Blevins, Juliette. 2006. Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns, 4th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bloch, Jules. 1965. Indo-Aryan from the Vedas to modern times. Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve.Search in Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric & Massimo Piatelli-Palmarini. 2005. Language as a natural object – linguistics as a natural science. The Linguistic Review 22. 447–466.10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.447Search in Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle & Mauricio J. Mixco. 2007. A glossary of historical linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748630196Search in Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1999. The origins of complex language: An inquiry into the evolutionary beginnings of sentences, syllables, and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Casasanto, Daniel. 2010. Space for thinking. In Vyvyan Evans & Paul Chilton (eds.), Language, cognition, and space: State of the art and new directions, 453–478. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi L. & Marcus W. Feldman. 1973. Cultural versus biological inheritance: phenotypic transmission from parents to children: A theory of the effect of parental phenotypes on children’s phenotypes. American Journal of Human Generics 25. 618–637.Search in Google Scholar
Cooper, Christopher. 1687. The English teacher. London: Author.Search in Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach (Longman Linguistics Library). Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2002. The Darwinization of linguistics. Selection 3(1). 75–91.10.1556/Select.3.2002.1.7Search in Google Scholar
Cuypere, Ludovic de. 2005. Exploring exaptation in language change. Folia Linguistica Historica 26(1–2). 13–26.10.1515/flih.2005.26.1-2.13Search in Google Scholar
Dankovičová, Jana. 1999. Czech. In Handbook of the International Phonetic Association, 70–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 1983. Universal Darwinism. In D. S. Bendall (ed.), Evolution from molecules to men, 403–425. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. 1995. Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster.Search in Google Scholar
Donegan, Patricia Jane. 1978. On the natural phonology of vowel. The Ohio State University PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna. 2002. Beats-and-binding phonology. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Engstrand, Olle. 1999. Swedish. In Handbook of the International Phonetic Association, 140–142. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna. 1998. Testing the boundaries of grammaticalization. In Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), The limits of grammaticalization, 107–127. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.37.05giaSearch in Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen J. & Richard C. Lewontin. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 205(1161). 581–598.10.1098/rspb.1979.0086Search in Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen J. & Elisabeth S. Vrba. 1982. Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8(1). 4–15.10.1017/S0094837300004310Search in Google Scholar
Hamann, Silke. 2006. On the use of evolutionary phonology for phonological theory. Theoretical Linguistics 32(2). 197–204.10.1515/TL.2006.013Search in Google Scholar
Hanulíková, Adriana & Silke Hamann. 2010. Slovak. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 40(3). 373–378.10.1017/S0025100310000162Search in Google Scholar
Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky & W. T. Fitch. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298. 1569–1579.10.1017/CBO9780511817755.002Search in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Mechthild Reh. 1984. Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Search in Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard M. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Richard M. Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol I. The beginnings to 1066, 67–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521264747.004Search in Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1994. Phonogenesis. In William Pagliuca (ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization, 19–45. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.109.09hopSearch in Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elisabeth C. Traugott. 1993 [2003]. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Search in Google Scholar
House, Arthur S. 1961. On vowel duration in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33(9). 1174–1178.10.1121/1.1908941Search in Google Scholar
House, Arthur S. & Grant Fairbanks. 1953. The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25(1). 105–113.10.1121/1.1906982Search in Google Scholar
Hull, David L. 1988. Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226360492.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hurford, James R. 1990. Nativist and functional explanations in language acquisition. In Iggy M. Roca (ed.), Logical issues in language acquisition, 85–136. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110870374-007Search in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1976. Phonologization. In Alphonse Juilland, A. M. Devine & Laurence D. Stephens (eds.), Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, 407–418. Saratoga: Anma Libri.Search in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2008. Enlarging the scope of phonologization. Proceedings of the symposium on phonologization, University of Chicago, April 25–26, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2006. The amphichronic program vs. evolutionary phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 32. 217–236.10.1515/TL.2006.015Search in Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1990. How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics 26(1). 79–102.10.1017/S0022226700014432Search in Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Norman Francis Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol II. 1066–1476, 23–155 (The Cambridge History of the English Language 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.003Search in Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620928Search in Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1999. Phonology and morphology. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol III. 1476–1776, 3rd edn, 56–186 (The Cambridge History of the English Language 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521264761.004Search in Google Scholar
Lewens, Tim. 2008. Cultural evolution. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Fall 2008 edn. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/evolution-cultural/ (accessed 24 July 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele. 2011. Phonological processes. In Martin Maiden, John C. Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages. Volume 1: Structures, 109–154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521800723.005Search in Google Scholar
MacNeilage, Peter F. 1998. The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21(4). 499–511.10.1017/S0140525X98001265Search in Google Scholar
Masica, Colin P. 1993. The Indo-Aryan languages (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1921. L’évolution des formes grammaticales. In Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, 130–148. Paris: E. Champion.Search in Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The ecology of language evolution (Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511612862Search in Google Scholar
Peterson, Godon E. & Ilse Lehiste. 1960. Duration of syllable nuclei in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32(6). 693–703.10.1121/1.1908183Search in Google Scholar
Ritt, Nikolaus. 2004. Selfish sounds: A Darwinian approach to language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486449Search in Google Scholar
Ritt, Nikolaus. 2012. 26. Middle English: Phonology. In Alexander Bergs & Laurel J. Brinton (eds.), Historical linguistics of English: An international handbook, 399–414. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110251593.399Search in Google Scholar
Samuels, Bridget. 2011. A minimalist program for phonology. In Cedric Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism (Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics), 574–594. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0025Search in Google Scholar
Schendl, Herbert & Nikolaus Ritt. 2002. Of vowel shifts great, small, long and short. Language Sciences 24(3–4). 409–421.10.1016/S0388-0001(01)00041-9Search in Google Scholar
Schenker, Alexander M. 1993. Proto-Slavonic. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages (Routledge Language Family Descriptions), 60–121. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Schleicher, August. 1863 [1873]. Die Darwinsche Theorie und die Sprachwissenschaft. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.Search in Google Scholar
Schmid, Stephan. 2004. Zur Vokalquantität in der Mundart der Stadt Zürich. Linguistik Online 20. 93–116.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, Jeremy J. 2007. Sound change and the history of English (Oxford Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199291953.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Sussex, Roland & Paul V. Cubberley. 2006. The Slavic languages (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486807Search in Google Scholar
Szende, Tamás. 1999. Hungarian. In Handbook of the international phonetic association, 104–107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Þráinsson, Höskuldur. 1994. Icelandic. In Ekkehard König & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Germanic languages (Routledge Reference), 142–189. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2004. Exaptation and grammaticalization. In Minoji Akimoto (ed.), Linguistic studies based on corpora, 133–156. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Search in Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel. 1992. Abduction and exaptation: Paper delivered at 4th Krems International Morphology Meeting.Search in Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel. 1995. Exaptation and grammaticalization. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Historical linguistics: Selected papers from the 11th international conference on historical linguistics, Los Angeles, 16–20 August 1993, 433–445. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.124.34vinSearch in Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & M. I. Herzog. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 95–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton
