Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access November 30, 2017

Talking about Birth Control in 1877: Gender, Class, and Ideology in the Knowlton Trial

  • Flore Janssen EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Cultural Studies

Abstract

This article explores the debate around widening access to birth control information in the late nineteenth century through a case study of Annie Besant’s participation in the 1877 Knowlton Trial. Examining Besant’s rhetoric at the trial and in related publications, it highlights the public and performative nature of her campaign to facilitate access to birth control information for working-class married couples. With reference to the representation of issues of gender and social class and the shifting focus from the private to the public in Besant’s rhetoric, the article argues that the late nineteenth-century debate around birth control access was a middle-class debate about working-class life and experience.

References

Besant, Annie. Annie Besant: An Autobiography. London and Leipzig: T. Fisher Unwin, 1908.Search in Google Scholar

-------. The Law of Population: Its Consequences, and Its Bearing upon Human Conduct and Morals. London: Freethought Publishing Company, 1877. www.jstor.org. Bristol Selected Pamphlets. n.d. 15 August 2013.Search in Google Scholar

-------. Marriage, As It Was, As It Is, and As It Should Be: A Plea for Reform. London: Freethought Publishing Company, 1882 [1878]). www.jstor.org. Bristol Selected Pamphlets. n.d. 15 August 2013.Search in Google Scholar

-------. The Political Status of Women. London: Freethought Publishing Company, 1883 [1874]). galegroup.com. The Making Of The Modern World. Gale Cengage Learning, n.d. 22 April 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Besant, Annie and Charles Bradlaugh. In the High Court of Justice. Queen’s Bench Division, June 18th, 1877. The Queen v.Search in Google Scholar

Charles Bradlaugh and Annie Besant. London: Freethought Publishing Company, 1877.Search in Google Scholar

Branca, Patricia. Silent Sisterhood: Middle-Class Women in the Victorian Home. London: Croom Helm, 1977.Search in Google Scholar

Chandrasekhar, S. “A Dirty Filthy Book”: The Writings of Charles Knowlton and Annie Besant on Reproductive Physiology andSearch in Google Scholar

Birth Control and an Account of the Bradlaugh-Besant Trial. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 1981.Search in Google Scholar

Cook, Hera. The Long Sexual Revolution: English Women, Sex, and Contraception 1800-1975. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

Dinnage, Rosemary. Annie Besant. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

Kalsem, Kristin. “Law, Literature, and Libel: Victorian Censorship of Dirty Filthy Books on Birth Control.” Faculty Articles and Other Publications, paper 11 (2003). 633-68. Also available online at scholarship.law.uc.edu. 11 October 2014.Search in Google Scholar

MacPike, Loralee. “The New Woman, Childbearing and the Reconstruction of Gender, 1880-1900.” NWSA Journal, 1.3 (1989): 368-97. Also available online at jstor.org. 14 August 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Nead, Lynda. Myths of Sexuality: Representations of Women in Victorian Britain. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

Raw, Louise. Striking a Light: The Bryant and May Matchwomen and their Place in Labour History. London: Continuum, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, Ellen. Love and Toil: Motherhood in Outcast London, 1870-1918. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Anne. Annie Besant: A Biography. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-04-08
Accepted: 2017-11-10
Published Online: 2017-11-30
Published in Print: 2017-11-27

© 2017

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Downloaded on 1.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/culture-2017-0025/html
Scroll to top button