Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter November 11, 2022

Entropy bounds, compactness and finiteness theorems for embedded self-shrinkers with rotational symmetry

  • John Man Shun Ma ORCID logo , Ali Muhammad ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Niels Martin Møller ORCID logo

Abstract

In this work, we study the space of complete embedded rotationally symmetric self-shrinking hypersurfaces in n + 1 . First, using comparison geometry in the context of metric geometry, we derive explicit upper bounds for the entropy of all such self-shrinkers. Second, as an application we prove a smooth compactness theorem on the space of all such shrinkers. We also prove that there are only finitely many such self-shrinkers with an extra reflection symmetry.

Award Identifier / Grant number: DFF Sapere Aude 7027-00110B

Award Identifier / Grant number: CPH-GEOTOP-DNRF151

Funding source: Carlsberg Foundation

Award Identifier / Grant number: CF21-0680

Funding statement: The authors were partially supported by DFF Sapere Aude 7027-00110B, by CPH-GEOTOP-DNRF151 and by CF21-0680 from respectively the Independent Research Fund Denmark, the Danish National Research Foundation and the Carlsberg Foundation.

A The sequence ( E n )

In this appendix, we show the following lemma.

Lemma A.1.

The sequence ( E n ) defined in (3.1) satisfies 2 < E n E 2 and

(A.1) lim n E n = 4 π 3 .

Proof.

It is proved in [38, A.4 Lemma] that the entropy of the n-sphere λ ( 𝕊 n ) satisfies

(A.2) λ ( 𝕊 n ) = ( n 2 π e ) n 2 ω n

and the sequence ( λ ( 𝕊 n ) ) is strictly decreasing. Also,

(A.3) lim n λ ( 𝕊 n ) = 2 .

From (3.1) and (A.2) we obtain

(A.4) E n = 2 π 3 1 + x n 1 + 2 x n 3 ( 1 e ( 1 + x n ) 1 x n ) a n 4 λ ( 𝕊 n - 1 ) ,

where

a n = y n - 2 ( n - 1 ) , x n = a n 2 ( n - 1 ) .

Direct calculations give

(A.5) 1 2 < a n < 2 3 , 0 < x n < 1

and

(A.6) lim n a n = 2 3 , lim n x n = 0 .

Using (A.4), (A.3) and (A.6), one obtains (A.1).

Next we show 2 < E n E 2 . By the Taylor expansion of ln ( 1 + x ) , we have

x + x 3 3 > ln ( 1 + x ) > x - x 2 2 for all  x ( 0 , 1 ) .

Thus

e x 2 3 > 1 e ( 1 + x ) 1 x > e - x 2 for all  x ( 0 , 1 ) .

Together with λ ( 𝕊 n - 1 ) > 2 , (A.5) and (A.4),

(A.7) 2 π ( 3 + ( n - 1 ) - 1 ) 3 e 1 162 ( n - 1 ) 2 λ ( 𝕊 n - 1 ) > E n > 4 π 3 e - 1 36 ( n - 1 ) .

Since λ ( 𝕊 n - 1 ) is decreasing, the upper bound in (A.7) is strictly decreasing in n. Also, the lower bound in (A.7) is strictly increasing in n. Plugging in n = 4 in the upper and lower bound of (A.7) gives

2.21823 10 π e 1093 / 729 > E n > 4 π 3 e - 1 108 2.02780 for all  n 4 .

The inequality implies 2 < E n < E 2 for all n 4 . The cases n = 2 and n = 3 can be checked directly. ∎

References

[1] U. Abresch and J. Langer, The normalized curve shortening flow and homothetic solutions, J. Differential Geom. 23 (1986), no. 2, 175–196. 10.4310/jdg/1214440025Search in Google Scholar

[2] S. B. Angenent, Shrinking doughnuts, Nonlinear diffusion equations and their equilibrium states. 3, Progr. Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. 7, Birkhäuser, Boston (1992), 21–38. 10.1007/978-1-4612-0393-3_2Search in Google Scholar

[3] Y. Berchenko-Kogan, Bounds on the index of rotationally symmetric self-shrinking tori, Geom. Dedicata 213 (2021), 83–106. 10.1007/s10711-020-00569-9Search in Google Scholar

[4] Y. Berchenko-Kogan, The entropy of the Angenent torus is approximately 1.85122, Exp. Math. 30 (2021), no. 4, 587–594. 10.1080/10586458.2019.1583616Search in Google Scholar

[5] J. Bernstein and L. Wang, A sharp lower bound for the entropy of closed hypersurfaces up to dimension six, Invent. Math. 206 (2016), no. 3, 601–627. 10.1007/s00222-016-0659-3Search in Google Scholar

[6] S. Brendle, Embedded self-similar shrinkers of genus 0, Ann. of Math. (2) 183 (2016), no. 2, 715–728. 10.4007/annals.2016.183.2.6Search in Google Scholar

[7] M. R. Bridson and A. Haefliger, Metric spaces of non-positive curvature, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 319, Springer, Berlin 2013. Search in Google Scholar

[8] D. Burago, Y. Burago and S. Ivanov, A course in metric geometry, Grad. Stud. Math. 33, American Mathematical Society, Providence 2001. 10.1090/gsm/033Search in Google Scholar

[9] R. Buzano, H. T. Nguyen and M. B. Schulz, Noncompact self-shrinkers for mean curvature flow with arbitrary genus, preprint (2021), https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.06027. Search in Google Scholar

[10] J. Chen and J. M. S. Ma, The space of compact self-shrinking solutions to the Lagrangian mean curvature flow in 2 , J. reine angew. Math. 743 (2018), 229–244. 10.1515/crelle-2015-0110Search in Google Scholar

[11] J. Chen and J. M. S. Ma, Geometry of Lagrangian self-shrinking tori and applications to the piecewise Lagrangian mean curvature flow, Amer. J. Math. 143 (2021), no. 1, 227–264. 10.1353/ajm.2021.0003Search in Google Scholar

[12] O. Chodosh, K. Choi, C. Mantoulidis and F. Schulze, Mean curvature flow with generic initial data, preprint (2020), https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.14344. Search in Google Scholar

[13] T. H. Colding, T. Ilmanen, W. P. Minicozzi, II and B. White, The round sphere minimizes entropy among closed self-shrinkers, J. Differential Geom. 95 (2013), no. 1, 53–69. 10.4310/jdg/1375124609Search in Google Scholar

[14] T. H. Colding and W. P. Minicozzi, II, Generic mean curvature flow I: Generic singularities, Ann. of Math. (2) 175 (2012), no. 2, 755–833. 10.4007/annals.2012.175.2.7Search in Google Scholar

[15] T. H. Colding and W. P. Minicozzi, II, Smooth compactness of self-shrinkers, Comment. Math. Helv. 87 (2012), no. 2, 463–475. 10.4171/CMH/260Search in Google Scholar

[16] Q. Ding and Y. L. Xin, Volume growth, eigenvalue and compactness for self-shrinkers, Asian J. Math. 17 (2013), no. 3, 443–456. 10.4310/AJM.2013.v17.n3.a3Search in Google Scholar

[17] G. Drugan and S. J. Kleene, Immersed self-shrinkers, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 369 (2017), no. 10, 7213–7250. 10.1090/tran/6907Search in Google Scholar

[18] G. Drugan, H. Lee and X. H. Nguyen, A survey of closed self-shrinkers with symmetry, Results Math. 73 (2018), no. 1, Paper No. 32. 10.1007/s00025-018-0763-3Search in Google Scholar

[19] G. Drugan and X. H. Nguyen, Shrinking doughnuts via variational methods, J. Geom. Anal. 28 (2018), no. 4, 3725–3746. 10.1007/s12220-017-9976-zSearch in Google Scholar

[20] D. Fischer-Colbrie and R. Schoen, The structure of complete stable minimal surfaces in 3-manifolds of nonnegative scalar curvature, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 33 (1980), no. 2, 199–211. 10.1002/cpa.3160330206Search in Google Scholar

[21] H. Garcke and R. Nürnberg, Numerical approximation of boundary value problems for curvature flow and elastic flow in Riemannian manifolds, Numer. Math. 149 (2021), no. 2, 375–415. 10.1007/s00211-021-01231-6Search in Google Scholar

[22] O. Hershkovits and B. White, Sharp entropy bounds for self-shrinkers in mean curvature flow, Geom. Topol. 23 (2019), no. 3, 1611–1619. 10.2140/gt.2019.23.1611Search in Google Scholar

[23] G. Huisken, Asymptotic behavior for singularities of the mean curvature flow, J. Differential Geom. 31 (1990), no. 1, 285–299. 10.4310/jdg/1214444099Search in Google Scholar

[24] T. Ilmanen, Elliptic regularization and partial regularity for motion by mean curvature, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 520 (1994), 1–90. 10.1090/memo/0520Search in Google Scholar

[25] D. Impera, S. Pigola and M. Rimoldi, The Frankel property for self-shrinkers from the viewpoint of elliptic PDEs, J. reine angew. Math. 773 (2021), 1–20. 10.1515/crelle-2020-0044Search in Google Scholar

[26] N. Kapouleas, S. J. Kleene and N. M. Møller, Mean curvature self-shrinkers of high genus: Non-compact examples, J. reine angew. Math. 739 (2018), 1–39. 10.1515/crelle-2015-0050Search in Google Scholar

[27] N. Kapouleas and P. McGrath, Generalizing the Linearized Doubling approach, I: General theory and new minimal surfaces and self-shrinkers, preprint (2020), https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.04240. Search in Google Scholar

[28] D. Ketover, Self-shrinking Platonic solids, preprint (2016), https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.07271. Search in Google Scholar

[29] S. Kleene and N. M. Møller, Self-shrinkers with a rotational symmetry, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 366 (2014), no. 8, 3943–3963. 10.1090/S0002-9947-2014-05721-8Search in Google Scholar

[30] W. Klingenberg, Riemannian geometry, De Gruyter Stud. Math., Walter de Gruyter, Berlin 2011. Search in Google Scholar

[31] A. Magni and C. Mantegazza, Some remarks on Huisken’s monotonicity formula for mean curvature flow, Singularities in nonlinear evolution phenomena and applications, CRM Ser. 9, Edizioni della Normale, Pisa (2009), 157–169. Search in Google Scholar

[32] N. M. Møller, Closed self-shrinking surfaces in 3 via the torus, preprint (2011), https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.7318. Search in Google Scholar

[33] A. Mramor, Compactness and finiteness theorems for rotationally symmetric self-shrinkers, J. Geom. Anal. 31 (2021), no. 5, 5094–5107. 10.1007/s12220-020-00470-7Search in Google Scholar

[34] X. H. Nguyen, Construction of complete embedded self-similar surfaces under mean curvature flow, Part III, Duke Math. J. 163 (2014), no. 11, 2023–2056.10.1215/00127094-2795108Search in Google Scholar

[35] J. Serrin, Removable singularities of solutions of elliptic equations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 17 (1964), 67–78. 10.1007/BF00283867Search in Google Scholar

[36] L. Simon, Asymptotics for a class of nonlinear evolution equations, with applications to geometric problems, Ann. of Math. (2) 118 (1983), no. 3, 525–571. 10.2307/2006981Search in Google Scholar

[37] A. Song, A maximum principle for self-shrinkers and some consequences, preprint (2014), https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.4755. Search in Google Scholar

[38] A. Stone, A density function and the structure of singularities of the mean curvature flow, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 2 (1994), no. 4, 443–480. 10.1007/BF01192093Search in Google Scholar

[39] A. Sun and Z. Wang, Compactness of self-shrinkers in 3 with fixed genus, Adv. Math. 367 (2020), Article ID 107110. 10.1016/j.aim.2020.107110Search in Google Scholar

[40] G. Wei and W. Wylie, Comparison geometry for the Bakry–Emery Ricci tensor, J. Differential Geom. 83 (2009), no. 2, 377–405. 10.4310/jdg/1261495336Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-05-25
Revised: 2022-09-02
Published Online: 2022-11-11
Published in Print: 2022-12-01

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/crelle-2022-0073/html
Scroll to top button