Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter August 14, 2019

Isolate-specific resistance to the algicidal bacterium Kordia algicida in the diatom Chaetoceros genus

  • Nils Meyer

    Nils Meyer is a PhD researcher at the Institute for Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena. After obtaining a Master’s degree in Chemical Biology (University Jena) he joined the collaborative research center ChemBioSys to study the chemical interaction of phytoplankton and algicidal bacteria.

    and Georg Pohnert

    In his PhD at the University of Bonn Georg Pohnert investigated the biosynthesis and function of algal pheromones. He then moved to Cornell University where he did a postdoc in biophysics. His independent research career started at the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology where he focused on chemical interactions of micro- and macroalgae – a topic that is also his current research focus at the Friedrich Schiller University Jena where he holds a chair in Bioorganic Analytics.

    EMAIL logo
From the journal Botanica Marina

Abstract

Algicidal bacteria can lyse phytoplankton cells, thereby contributing to algal bloom dynamics in the oceans. The target specificity of these bacteria determines their ecological impact. While species specificity of algicidal bacteria is documented, little is known about intra-species variability of their activity against phytoplankton. We describe variability in the Chaetoceros genus (Bacillariophyceae) to resist the lytic activity of the algicidal Flavobacterium Kordia algicida. This variability is evident between different Chaetoceros species, but even intra-specific variability of resistance is observed within one phytoplankton sample. This proves an ecological role of the individuality of diatom cells within a bloom.

Introduction

Phytoplankton is the basis of marine food webs and accounts for approximately 50% of the global primary production (Behrenfeld et al. 2006). Phytoplankton performance depends on numerous abiotic and biotic factors. Among the biotic factors phytoplankton pathogens play an important role in population control including bacteria, viruses and fungi (Brussaard and Martínez-Martínez 2008, Gachon et al. 2010, Meyer et al. 2017). Interactions with marine bacteria can include anything ranging from symbiotic to algicidal processes (Amin et al. 2012). If bacteria are algicidal they have the ability to impair phytoplankton proliferation and lyse algal cells in order to exploit the rich nutrient source (Meyer et al. 2017). Due to this potential they are discussed as causes for phytoplankton bloom collapse. For all pathogens including algicidal bacteria, a crucial factor for the ecological role in the environment is their host specificity that is often determined by phytoplankton resistance (Paul and Pohnert 2011). As a consequence of this specificity the lysis of a dominant susceptible phytoplankton species might open niches for resistant competitors, subsequently leading to a shift in phytoplankton composition. Such a shift has recently been shown in mesocosms after infection of a natural community with the algicidal bacterium Kordia algicida (Sohn) (Bigalke et al. 2019). The topic of specificity is also intensely studied in the fields of biotechnology and environmental engineering, especially in the control of harmful algal blooms (Gumbo et al. 2008, Seong and Jeong 2013, Shao et al. 2013). In these fields specificity is especially desirable since it allows the development of biocompatible tools that affect only the targeted species. In contrast to pathogenic bacteria, more is known about viruses that are highly abundant in marine systems as well (Brussaard and Martínez-Martínez 2008, Rohwer and Thurber 2009). One of the best-studied model systems is the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi (Lohmann) and its viruses (EhV) (Bidle and Vardi 2011, Rosenwasser et al. 2016). Infection of E. huxleyi with EhV even terminates blooms with large-scale ecological impact on plankton dynamics (Brussaard et al. 1996, Schroeder et al. 2002). However, both E. huxleyi and its viruses are heterogeneous populations in nature leading to survival of part of the E. huxleyi cells (Jacquet et al. 2002), Schroeder et al. 2002, 2003). This difference in susceptibility has been linked to the metabolic activity of individuals (Rosenwasser et al. 2016) as well as to dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP)-lyase activity (Schroeder et al. 2002). Also shifting from susceptible diploid to resistant haploid life form has been identified as an escape strategy in E. huxleyi (Frada et al. 2008). Other phytoplankton such as Phaeocystis pouchetii (Hariot) may escape viruses by colony formation (Jacobsen et al. 2007). Compared to viruses little is known about marine fungi that infect planktonic microalgae. In freshwater ecosystems chytrids have been intensely studied for their ability to modulate diatoms communities (Ibelings et al. 2004). Primarily, fungal effects on macroalgae are studied in marine environments (Gachon et al. 2010, Gleason et al. 2011, Richards et al. 2012). Reports on microalgae as fungal host are increasing (Sparrow 1969, Hanic et al. 2009, Garvette et al. 2018, Gladfelter et al. 2019) and also other parasitoids are studied (Tillmann et al. 1999, Peacock et al. 2014). However, reports on host range and resistance are scarce (Siano et al. 2011).

Most studies on the specificity of algicidal bacteria test only a very limited number of phytoplankton species and strains. Nevertheless, many generalize their findings to the species, genus or higher phylogenetic groups, potentially underestimating intra-species variability. Such variability has been shown on a genetic level but evidence for a functional diversity within a bloom is rather scarce (Medlin et al. 2000). We hypothesize here that resistance of algae and therewith specificity of bacteria can be species- and even strain dependent. In other fields of phycology many examples for intra-species variability have been found. This includes variability on the genetic level (Medlin et al. 1996, Bolch et al. 1999, Rynearson and Armbrust 2000), the concentration of secondary metabolites (Loret et al. 2002, Heil et al. 2005, Wichard et al. 2005, Taylor et al. 2009, Thessen et al. 2009, Rodriguez et al. 2017) as well as physiological and behavioral responses (Rynearson and Armbrust 2000, Laurion and Roy 2009, Fredrickson et al. 2011, Kremp et al. 2012, Harvey et al. 2015, Menden-Deuer and Montalbano 2015). However, only very few studies cover several strains of the same algal species when testing algicidal activity of bacteria (Mitsutani et al. 1992, Roth et al. 2008b, van Tol et al. 2016) making it difficult to systematically predict intra-specific variation in susceptibility. Furthermore, the studied strains are usually isolated from different locations at varying times. This difference in life history reduces comparability between the strains, especially when taking into account that the natural algal microbiome might influence resistance (Mayali and Doucette 2002, Roth et al. 2008a). This microbiome associated with the algae can vary depending on the time and place of isolation as has recently been shown in a comprehensive study (Ajani et al. 2018).

This study aims to systematically investigate the variability of susceptibility to the algicidal bacterium Kordia algicida within the genus Chaetoceros. The Flavobacterium K. algicida was isolated from a Skeletonema costatum (Greville) bloom at Masan Bay, Korea (Sohn et al. 2004). The Chaetoceros genus was chosen, since variability in susceptibility to K. algicida has already been observed with one resistant and one susceptible species identified (Paul and Pohnert 2011, Bigalke et al. 2019). The strains under study were isolated from one habitat and therefore share common life histories.

Materials and methods

Isolation of Chaetoceros spp.

Two water samples were taken from Scheldt Estuary (Netherlands) on 12th September 2015. Sample 1 was surface water from the quayside of the Havenkanaal (51.538791 N 3.927477 E). Sample 2 was surface water from the dyke (51.540310 N 3.929907 E). Samples were concentrated via a 10-μm phytoplankton net and single cells or cell chains were subsequently isolated under a light microscope. Isolated cells grew into seven monoclonal cultures of Chaetoceros spp. (Table 1).

Table 1:

Sampling information on newly isolated strains of Chaetoceros spp.

Accession numberSampling
LocationSource
MK421350At the dyke

51.540310 N 3.929907 E
Surface water; phytoplankton net 10 μm
MK421351At the dyke

51.540310 N 3.929907 E
Surface water; phytoplankton net 10 μm
MK421352At the dyke

51.540310 N 3.929907 E
Surface water; phytoplankton net 10 μm
MK421353Quayside of the Havenkanaal

51.538791 N 3.927477 E
Surface water; scooping
MK421354Quayside of the Havenkanaal

51.538791 N 3.927477 E
Surface water; scooping
MK421355Quayside of the Havenkanaal

51.538791 N 3.927477 E
Surface water; scooping
MK421356Quayside of the Havenkanaal

51.538791 N 3.927477 E
Surface water; scooping
  1. All strains were isolated on 12th September 2015.

Chaetoceros socialis (Schutt) (accession number MH992142.1) was previously isolated from surface water at Helgoland Roads (Bigalke et al. 2019). Chaetoceros didymus (Cleve) (accession number MG914538.1) was isolated by W. Kooistra from the Mediterranean Sea (Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Naples, Italy). Both, C. socialis and C. didymus, are maintained in our culture collection.

Diatom culturing and antibiotic treatment

Diatoms were cultivated in artificial seawater medium (Maier and Calenberg 1994) at 50 μmol photons m−2 s−1 in a 14 h/10 h light and dark cycle. For antibiotic treatment 300 μg ml−1 penicillin G sodium salt, 2 μg ml−1 chloramphenicol, 2.4 μg ml−1 neomycin and 12 I·U. ml−1 polymyxin B sulfate for 24 h. Then 260 μg ml−1 cefotaxime sodium salt and 520 μg ml−1 carbenicillin disodium salt were added to the cultures and after 24–48 h cells were transferred to fresh culture medium.

Genetic identification of Chaetoceros spp.

Cells of Chaetoceros spp. were concentrated by centrifugation (850 g, 4°C for 20 min), cell pellets were frozen (−80°C) and freeze-dried. Dried cell pellets were lysed with zirconium beads (0.9 mm) for 1 min at 30 Hz in a TissueLyser II (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands) precooled to −80°C. Genomic DNA was isolated using the Isolate II Plant DNA Kit (Bioline GmbH, Berlin-Brandenburg, Germany) with lysis buffer PA1 without RNase. D1-D3 LSU rDNA was amplified based on an established protocol (Lundholm et al. 2002). The following primers were used: D1R-F [ACC CGC TGA ATT TAA GCA TA; (Nunn et al. 1996)], D3B-R [TCG GAG GGA ACC AGC TAC TA; (Lundholm et al. 2002)] and D3Ca [ACG AAC GAT TTG CAC GTC AG; (Scholin et al. 1994)] obtained from biomers.net GmbH (Ulm, Germany). The PCR mix contained OneTaq standard reaction buffer, 200 μm dNTPs, forward and reverse primer (see Table 2), tetramethylammonium chloride or tetramethylammonium oxalate as additive (see Table 2) and 1.25 U OneTaq® DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs, Frankfurt, Germany). The temperature program was: initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min; 30 cycles of denaturation (94°C, 30 s), annealing (for temperature see Table 2, 30 s) and elongation (68°C, 60 s); final elongation at 68°C for 5 min. The PCR product was purified from an HDGreen-stained (Intas Science Imaging Instruments GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) 1% agarose gel using the GenElute™ Gel Extraction kit (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sanger sequencing was performed by GATC Biotech AG (Konstanz, Germany) using the same primers as for PCR. Sequences were aligned with selected sequences retrieved from GenBank using Clustal W (Thompson et al. 1994). The alignment was manually cropped in BioEdit (Hall 1999) to 731 nucleotides and used for maximum likelihood analysis in MEGA vers. 7.0.21 (Kumar et al. 2016). Tamura-Nei with discrete Gamma distribution (five categories; +G parameter=0.3501) was determined as the best model (Tamura and Nei 1993). Nearest-Neighbor-Interchange was used as the heuristic method for tree inference. A log likelihood value of −2850.0182 was achieved by the most suitable tree after 1000 bootstraps.

Table 2:

PCR parameters.

Accession numberMK421350MK421351MK421352MK421353
fv Primer200 nm D1R-F1 μm D1R-F200 nm D1R-F1 μm D1R-F
rv Primer200 nm D3Ca1 μm D3B-R200 nm D3Ca1 μm D3B-R
Additive1 mm TMA oxalate20 mm TMA Cl
Tannealing49°C60°C49°C60°C
MK421354MK421355MK421356
fv Primer1 μm D1R-F1 μm D1R-F1 μm D1R-F
rv Primer1 μm D3B-R1 μm D3B-R1 μm D3B-R
Additive1 mm TMA oxalate1 mm TMA oxalate20 mm TMA Cl
Tannealing60°C60°C60°C
  1. The forward and reverse primer with the used concentration are given as well as the additive and annealing temperature.

Algicidal bioassay

Susceptibility of Chaetoceros spp. to the lytic activity of Kordia algicida OT-1 was tested via algal-bacterial co-incubation. Therefore, K. algicida was cultured on marine broth agar plates for up to 2 days before being carefully removed with a cotton swab and resuspended in artificial seawater medium. Triplicates of exponentially growing algal cultures (40 ml) were infected with this K. algicida suspension to a bacterial optical density of OD550 0.01. An equal volume of medium without bacteria was added to control cultures in triplicates. Algal growth was monitored by in vivo chlorophyll a fluorescence for 9–10 days using a Mithras LB 940 plate reader (Berthold Technologies, Bad Wildbad, Germany). The diatom Skeletonema costatum was used as a positive control to test for algicidal activity of the bacteria used.

Results

Monoclonal cultures were isolated from two water samples taken from the Scheldt Estuary (Netherlands). Cultures tentatively identified as Chaetoceros spp. by light microscopy were further purified by serial transfer and antibiotic treatments. Analysis of 28S rDNA confirmed the morphological identification and provided the basis to include the strains in the Chaetoceros phylogeny (Li et al. 2015). The newly isolated strains cluster with Chaetoceros elegans, Chaetoceros curvisetus, Chaetoceros pseudo-curvisetus and Chaetoceros protuberans (Figure 1 ).

Figure 1: Phylogeny of Chaetoceros genus including isolated strains.Strains resistant to Kordia algicida are marked in blue, strains susceptible in yellow. Newly isolated strains are marked with encircled numbers representing the sample from which the strain was isolated (1, quayside of the Havenkanaal; 2, at the dyke, concentrated via 10-μm phytoplankton net). Chaetoceros didymus and C. socialis were used as known resistant and susceptible strains, respectively. Reference sequences for phylogenetic inference from GenBank of strains not tested in bioassays are marked in black. Maximum likelihood analysis of LSU rDNA with 1000 bootstraps using Tamura-Nei model with 5 discrete gamma categories and nearest-neighbor-interchange. Branch length depicts the number of substitutions per site.
Figure 1:

Phylogeny of Chaetoceros genus including isolated strains.

Strains resistant to Kordia algicida are marked in blue, strains susceptible in yellow. Newly isolated strains are marked with encircled numbers representing the sample from which the strain was isolated (1, quayside of the Havenkanaal; 2, at the dyke, concentrated via 10-μm phytoplankton net). Chaetoceros didymus and C. socialis were used as known resistant and susceptible strains, respectively. Reference sequences for phylogenetic inference from GenBank of strains not tested in bioassays are marked in black. Maximum likelihood analysis of LSU rDNA with 1000 bootstraps using Tamura-Nei model with 5 discrete gamma categories and nearest-neighbor-interchange. Branch length depicts the number of substitutions per site.

All seven newly isolated strains were subjected to bioassays to test for resistance against the algicidal bacterium Kordia algicida (Figure 1). Additionally, a strain of Chaetoceros didymus and of Chaetoceros socialis was included in the bioassays, as strains known to be resistant or susceptible from previous studies. The strains of C. elegans and C. socialis were susceptible to lysis by K. algicida (Figure 2F, J ) while the strains of C. didymus and C. curvisetus were resistant (Figure 2B, I). For C. pseudo-curvisetus and C. protuberans multiple strains were isolated. One of three C. pseudo-curvisetus and one of two C. protuberans strains were resistant (Figure 2C, H). Resistant isolates showed similar growth in control and bacteria-treated cultures, while susceptible isolates died completely if treated with bacteria before control cultures reached maximum density (Figure 2). Demise of susceptible cultures differed in speed. Some isolates did not grow at all in the presence of the bacteria (e.g. C. pseudo-curvisetus MK421354, Figure 2D) while others showed initial growth for a few days before cultures collapsed (e.g. C. pseudo-curvisetus MK421355, Figure 2E).

Figure 2: Growth of Chaetoceros strains in the absence and presence of Kordia algicida.Growth was monitored by in-vivo chlorophyll a fluorescence (RFU, relative fluorescent units). Skeletonema costatum was used as a positive control for algicidal activity of K. algicida.
Figure 2:

Growth of Chaetoceros strains in the absence and presence of Kordia algicida.

Growth was monitored by in-vivo chlorophyll a fluorescence (RFU, relative fluorescent units). Skeletonema costatum was used as a positive control for algicidal activity of K. algicida.

Discussion

The results presented here show that susceptibility of a diatom to an algicidal bacterium can vary between species of the same genus and even between isolates of a single species obtained at one time within one habitat. The reason for the heterogeneity in susceptibility of Chaetoceros spp. to K. algicida is unknown. Since proteases and oxylipins are potentially involved in the resistance of Chaetoceros didymus (Paul and Pohnert 2013, Meyer et al. 2018) strain-specific differences on the level of enzymes or secondary metabolites may play a role for the plasticity of susceptibility and should be investigated further. This hypothesis is in agreement with studies from other algae that report intra-species variability in the level of secondary metabolites (Loret et al. 2002, Heil et al. 2005, Wichard et al. 2005, Taylor et al. 2009, Thessen et al. 2009, Rodriguez et al. 2017).

Broadening the view to other phytoplankton pathogens, the results obtained here for interaction with bacteria are in agreement with observations on algal viruses. In mesocosm experiments, individual cells of Emiliania huxleyi survived bloom termination by viruses (Jacquet et al. 2002). For E. huxleyi variance in resistance and susceptibility could be correlated to DMSP-lyse activity (Schroeder et al. 2002). Strains with high enzyme activity, which enables breakdown of DMSP to dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and acrylate, were resistant to viral infection. Other anti-viral strategies that have been reported, like E. huxleyi changing from a susceptible diploid to a resistant haploid life form (Frada et al. 2008) or colony formation in Phaeocystis pouchetii (Jacobsen et al. 2007) are not possible due to the life cycle of Chaetoceros (French and Hargraves 1985). However, diatoms have the ability to form resting stages (McQuoid and Hobson 1996) that could potentially confer resistance.

Despite all these indications, susceptibility to algicidal bacteria is generally considered a common trait of a species or higher phylogenetic group but our work calls for revision of this view. Variability of resistance against bacteria has already been observed for other diatoms as well, thus, for example, in two strains of Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries from different sources, the growth inhibition by Croceibacter atlanticus differed greatly (van Tol et al. 2016). For Phaeodactylum tricornutum two morphotypes with different antibacterial activity have been identified (Desbois et al. 2010). Also among dinoflagellates from the Karenia and Alexandrium genus, strain-specific resistance to algicidal bacteria has been described, but resistance was attributed to the associated microbial community (Mayali and Doucette 2002, Roth et al. 2008b). Our study now demonstrates specificity even within one population in the field and sheds light on the individuality of cells even within a mono species plankton population.

Antibiotic treatment during algal isolation partly removed the natural microbiome. However, cultures used for our experiments were likely xenic due to survival of closely associated bacteria. Bacteria within the phycosphere may be additional interaction partners and may modulate algicidal activity (Mayali and Doucette 2002, Roth et al. 2008a, Seymour et al. 2017). The associated microbiome can differ depending on the time and place of algal isolation (Ajani et al. 2018). To minimize this effect, algal isolates from the same natural population were studied here.

In conclusion, the heterogeneity in plankton communities documented here shown as an example for the Chaetoceros genus should be taken into account when discussing the ecological role of algicidal bacteria. Especially when their use in ecosystem engineering is considered, the complexity and heterogeneity of the plankton should not be oversimplified. Survival of a few resistant cells within a bloom could even select for resistance traits.

Award Identifier / Grant number: CRC 1127 ChemBioSys

Funding statement: The authors acknowledge all trainers and participants of the course “Algal Biodiversity” at Ghent University in 2015, especially Pieter Vanormelingen, for support in diatom isolation. Wiebe Kooistra is acknowledged for providing the Chaetoceros didymus strain. The authors acknowledge financial support from the German Research Foundation (Funder Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659) within the framework of the CRC 1127 ChemBioSys.

About the authors

Nils Meyer

Nils Meyer is a PhD researcher at the Institute for Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena. After obtaining a Master’s degree in Chemical Biology (University Jena) he joined the collaborative research center ChemBioSys to study the chemical interaction of phytoplankton and algicidal bacteria.

Georg Pohnert

In his PhD at the University of Bonn Georg Pohnert investigated the biosynthesis and function of algal pheromones. He then moved to Cornell University where he did a postdoc in biophysics. His independent research career started at the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology where he focused on chemical interactions of micro- and macroalgae – a topic that is also his current research focus at the Friedrich Schiller University Jena where he holds a chair in Bioorganic Analytics.

References

Ajani, P.A., T. Kahlke, N. Siboni, R. Carney, S.A. Murray and J.R. Seymour. 2018. The microbiome of the cosmopolitan diatom Leptocylindrus reveals significant spatial and temporal variability. Front. Microbiol. 9: 2758.10.3389/fmicb.2018.02758Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Amin, S.A., M.S. Parker and E.V. Armbrust. 2012. Interactions between diatoms and bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 76: 667–684.10.1128/MMBR.00007-12Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Behrenfeld, M.J., R.T. O’Malley, D.A. Siegel, C.R. McClain, J.L. Sarmiento, G.C. Feldman, A.J. Milligan, P.G. Falkowski, R.M. Letelier and E.S. Boss. 2006. Climate-driven trends in contemporary ocean productivity. Nature 444: 752–755.10.1038/nature05317Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Bidle, K.D. and A. Vardi. 2011. A chemical arms race at sea mediates algal host-virus interactions. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 14: 449–457.10.1016/j.mib.2011.07.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Bigalke, A., N. Meyer, L. Papanikolopoulou, K.H. Wiltshire and G. Pohnert. 2019. The algicidal bacterium Kordia algicida shapes a natural plankton community. Appl. Environ. Microb. 85: e02779–18.10.1128/AEM.02779-18Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Bolch, C.J.S., S.I. Blackburn, G.M. Hallegraeff and R.E. Vaillancourt. 1999. Genetic variation among strains of the toxic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum (Dinophyceae). J. Phycol. 35: 356–367.10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.3520356.xSearch in Google Scholar

Brussaard, C.P.D. and J. Martínez-Martínez. 2008. Algal bloom viruses. Plant Viruses 2: 1–13.Search in Google Scholar

Brussaard, C.P.D., R.S. Kempers, A.J. Kop, R. Riegman and M. Heldal. 1996. Virus-like particles in a summer bloom of Emiliania huxleyi in the North Sea. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 10: 105–113.10.3354/ame010105Search in Google Scholar

Desbois, A.P., M. Walton and V.J. Smith. 2010. Differential antibacterial activities of fusiform and oval morphotypes of Phaeodactylum tricornutum (Bacillariophyceae). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 90: 769–774.10.1017/S0025315409991366Search in Google Scholar

Frada, M., I. Probert, M.J. Allen, W.H. Wilson and C. de Vargas. 2008. The “Cheshire Cat” escape strategy of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi in response to viral infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105: 15944–15949.10.1073/pnas.0807707105Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Fredrickson, K.A., S.L. Strom, R. Crim and K.J. Coyne. 2011. Interstrain variability in physiology and genetics of Heterosigma Akashiwo (Raphidophyceae) from the west coast of North America. J. Phycol. 47: 25–35.10.1111/j.1529-8817.2010.00942.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

French, F.W. and P.E. Hargraves. 1985. Spore formation in the life cycles of the diatoms Chaetoceros diadema and Leptocylindrus danicus. J. Phycol. 31: 477–483.10.1111/j.0022-3646.1985.00477.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gachon, C.M.M., T. Sime-Ngando, M. Strittmatter, A. Chambouvet and G.H. Kim. 2010. Algal diseases: spotlight on a black box. Trends Plant Sci. 15: 633–640.10.1016/j.tplants.2010.08.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Garvette, A., E. Nezan, Y. Badis, G. Bilien, P. Arce, E. Bresnan, C.M.M. Gachon and R. Siano. 2018. Novel widespread marine oomycetes parasitising diatoms, including the toxic genus Pseudo-nitzschia: genetic, morphological, and ecological characterisation. Front. Microbiol. 9: 2918.10.3389/fmicb.2018.02918Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Gladfelter, A.S., T.Y. James and A.S. Amend. 2019. Marine fungi. Curr. Biol. 29: R191–R195.10.1016/j.cub.2019.02.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Gleason, F.H., F.C. Kuepper, J.P. Amon, K. Picard, C.M.M. Gachon, A.V. Marano, T. Sime-Ngando and O. Lilje. 2011. Zoosporic true fungi in marine ecosystems: a review. Mar. Freshwater Res. 62: 383–393.10.1071/MF10294Search in Google Scholar

Gumbo, R.J., G. Ross and E.T. Cloete. 2008. Biological control of Microcystis dominated harmful algal blooms. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 7: 4765–4773.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, T.A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser. 41: 95–98.Search in Google Scholar

Hanic, L.A., S. Sekimoto and S.S. Bates. 2009. Oomycete and chytrid infections of the marine diatom Pseudo-nitzschia pungens (Bacillariophyceae) from Prince Edward Island, Canada. Botany 87: 1096–1105.10.1139/B09-070Search in Google Scholar

Harvey, E.L., S. Menden-Deuer and T.A. Rynearson. 2015. Persistent intra-specific variation in genetic and behavioral traits in the Raphidophyte Heterosigma akashiwo. Front. Microbiol. 6: 1277.10.3389/fmicb.2015.01277Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Heil, C.A., P.M. Glibert and C.L. Fan. 2005. Prorocentrum minimum (Pavillard) Schiller – a review of a harmful algal bloom species of growing worldwide importance. Harmful Algae 4: 449–470.10.1016/j.hal.2004.08.003Search in Google Scholar

Ibelings, B.W., A. De Bruin, M. Kagami, M. Rijkeboer, M. Brehm and E. van Donk. 2004. Host parasite interactions between freshwater phytoplankton and chytrid fungi (Chytridiomycota). J. Phycol. 40: 437–453.10.1111/j.1529-8817.2004.03117.xSearch in Google Scholar

Jacobsen, A., A. Larsen, J. Martinez-Martinez, P.G. Verity and M.E. Frischer. 2007. Susceptibility of colonies and colonial cells of Phaeocystis pouchetii (Haptophyta) to viral infection. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 48: 105–112.10.3354/ame048105Search in Google Scholar

Jacquet, S., M. Heldal, D. Iglesias-Rodriguez, A. Larsen, W. Wilson and G. Bratbak. 2002. Flow cytometric analysis of an Emiliana huxleyi bloom terminated by viral infection. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 27: 111–124.10.3354/ame027111Search in Google Scholar

Kremp, A., A. Godhe, J. Egardt, S. Dupont, S. Suikkanen, S. Casabianca and A. Penna. 2012. Intraspecific variability in the response of bloom-forming marine microalgae to changed climate conditions. Ecol. Evol. 2: 1195–1207.10.1002/ece3.245Search in Google Scholar

Kumar, S., G. Stecher and K. Tamura. 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33: 1870–1874.10.1093/molbev/msw054Search in Google Scholar

Laurion, I. and S. Roy. 2009. Growth and photoprotection in three Dinoflagellates (including two strains of Alexandrium tamarense) and one diatom exposed to four weeks of natural and enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation. J. Phycol. 45: 16–33.10.1111/j.1529-8817.2008.00618.xSearch in Google Scholar

Li, Y., S.Y. Zhu, N. Lundholm and S.H. Lu. 2015. Morphology and molecular phylogeny of Chaetoceros dayaensis sp. nov. (Bacillariophyceae), characterized by two 90 degrees rotations of the resting spore during maturation. J. Phycol. 51: 469–479.10.1111/jpy.12290Search in Google Scholar

Loret, P., T. Tengs, T.A. Villareal, H. Singler, B. Richardson, P. McGuire, S. Morton, M. Busman and L. Campbell. 2002. No difference found in ribosomal DNA sequences from physiologically diverse clones of Karenia brevis (Dinophyceae) from the Gulf of Mexico. J. Plankton Res. 24: 735–739.10.1093/plankt/24.7.735Search in Google Scholar

Lundholm, N., N. Daugbjerg and O. Moestrup. 2002. Phylogeny of the Bacillariaceae with emphasis on the genus Pseudo-nitzschia (Bacillariophyceae) based on partial LSU rDNA. Eur. J. Phycol. 37: 115–134.10.1017/S096702620100347XSearch in Google Scholar

Maier, I. and M. Calenberg. 1994. Effect of extracellular Ca2+ and Ca2+-antagonists on the movement and chemoorientation of male gametes of Ectocarpus siliculosus (Phaeophyceae). Bot. Acta 107: 451–460.10.1111/j.1438-8677.1994.tb00820.xSearch in Google Scholar

Mayali, X. and G.J. Doucette. 2002. Microbial community interactions and population dynamics of an algicidal bacterium active against Karenia brevis (Dinophyceae). Harmful Algae 1: 277–293.10.1016/S1568-9883(02)00032-XSearch in Google Scholar

McQuoid, M.R. and L.A. Hobson. 1996. Diatom resting stages. J. Phycol. 32: 889–902.10.1111/j.0022-3646.1996.00889.xSearch in Google Scholar

Medlin, L.K., G.L.A. Barker, L. Campbell, J.C. Green, P.K. Hayes, D. Marie, S. Wrieden and D. Vaulot. 1996. Genetic characterisation of Emiliania huxleyi (Haptophyta). J. Marine Syst. 9: 13–31.10.1016/0924-7963(96)00013-9Search in Google Scholar

Medlin, L.K., M. Lange and E.M. Nothig. 2000. Genetic diversity in the marine phytoplankton: a review and a consideration of Antarctic phytoplankton. Antarct. Sci. 12: 325–333.10.1017/S0954102000000389Search in Google Scholar

Menden-Deuer, S. and A.L. Montalbano. 2015. Bloom formation potential in the harmful dinoflagellate Akashiwo sanguinea: clues from movement behaviors and growth characteristics. Harmful Algae 47: 75–85.10.1016/j.hal.2015.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, N., A. Bigalke, A. Kaulfuss and G. Pohnert. 2017. Strategies and ecological roles of algicidal bacteria. Fems Microbiol. Rev. 41: 880–899.10.1093/femsre/fux029Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Meyer, N., J. Rettner, M. Werner, O. Werz and G. Pohnert. 2018. Algal oxylipins mediate the resistance of diatoms against algicidal bacteria. Mar. Drugs 16. doi: 10.3390/md16120486.10.3390/md16120486Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Mitsutani, A., K. Takesue, M. Kirita and Y. Ishida. 1992. Lysis of Skeletonema costatum by Cytophaga sp. isolated from the coastal water of the Ariake Sea. Nippon Suisan Gakk. 58: 2159–2167.10.2331/suisan.58.2159Search in Google Scholar

Nunn, G.B., B.F. Theisen, B. Christensen and P. Arctander. 1996. Simplicity-correlated size growth of the nuclear 28S ribosomal RNA D3 expansion segment in the crustacean order Isopoda. J. Mol. Evol. 42: 211–223.10.1007/BF02198847Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Paul, C. and G. Pohnert. 2011. Interactions of the algicidal bacterium Kordia algicida with diatoms: regulated protease excretion for specific algal lysis. PLoS One 6: e21032.10.1371/journal.pone.0021032Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Paul, C. and G. Pohnert. 2013. Induction of protease release of the resistant diatom Chaetoceros didymus in response to lytic enzymes from an algicidal bacterium. PLoS One 8: e57577.10.1371/journal.pone.0057577Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Peacock, E.E., R.J. Olson and H.M. Sosik. 2014. Parasitic infection of the diatom Guinardia delicatula, a recurrent and ecologically important phenomenon on the New England Shelf. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 503: 1–10.10.3354/meps10784Search in Google Scholar

Richards, T.A., M.D.M. Jones, G. Leonard and D. Bass. 2012. Marine fungi: their ecology and molecular diversity. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 4: 495–522.10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100802Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Rodriguez, I., A. Alfonso, E. Alonso, J.A. Rubiolo, M. Roel, A. Vlamis, P. Katikou, S.A. Jackson, M.L. Menon, A. Dobson and L.M. Botana. 2017. The association of bacterial C-9-based TTX-like compounds with Prorocentrum minimum opens new uncertainties about shellfish seafood safety. Sci. Rep. 7: 40880.10.1038/srep40880Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Rohwer, F. and R.V. Thurber. 2009. Viruses manipulate the marine environment. Nature 459: 207–212.10.1038/nature08060Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Rosenwasser, S., C. Ziv, S.G. Van Creveld and A. Vardi. 2016. Virocell metabolism: metabolic innovations during host-virus interactions in the Ocean. Trends Microbiol. 24: 821–832.10.1016/j.tim.2016.06.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Roth, P.B., C.M. Mikulskil and G.J. Doucette. 2008a. Influence of microbial interactions on the susceptibility of Karenia spp. to algicidal bacteria. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 50: 251–259.10.3354/ame01167Search in Google Scholar

Roth, P.B., M.J. Twiner, C.M. Mikulski, A.B. Barnhorst and G.J. Doucette. 2008b. Comparative analysis of two algicidal bacteria active against the red tide dinoflagellate Karenia brevis. Harmful Algae 7: 682–691.10.1016/j.hal.2008.02.002Search in Google Scholar

Rynearson, T.A. and E.V. Armbrust. 2000. DNA fingerprinting reveals extensive genetic diversity in a field population of the centric diatom Ditylum brightwellii. Limnol. Oceanogr. 45: 1329–1340.10.4319/lo.2000.45.6.1329Search in Google Scholar

Scholin, C.A., M.C. Villac, K.R. Buck, J.M. Krupp, D.A. Powers, G.A. Fryxell and F.P. Chavez. 1994. Ribosomal DNA sequences discriminate among toxic and non-toxic Pseudonitzschia species. Nat. Toxins 2: 152–165.10.1002/nt.2620020403Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Schroeder, D.C., J. Oke, G. Malin and W.H. Wilson. 2002. Coccolithovirus (Phycodnaviridae): Characterisation of a new large dsDNA algal virus that infects Emiliana huxleyi. Arch. Virol. 147: 1685–1698.10.1007/s00705-002-0841-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Schroeder, D.C., J. Oke, M. Hall, G. Malin and W.H. Wilson. 2003. Virus succession observed during an Emiliania huxleyi bloom. Appl. Environ. Microb. 69: 2484–2490.10.1128/AEM.69.5.2484-2490.2003Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Seong, K.A. and H.J. Jeong. 2013. Interactions between marine bacteria and red tide organisms in Korean waters. Algae-Seoul 28: 297–305.10.4490/algae.2013.28.4.297Search in Google Scholar

Seymour, J.R., S.A. Amin, J.B. Raina and R. Stocker. 2017. Zooming in on the phycosphere: the ecological interface for phytoplankton-bacteria relationships. Nat. Microbiol. 2: 17065.10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.65Search in Google Scholar

Shao, J.H., R.H. Li, J.E. Lepo and J.D. Gu. 2013. Potential for control of harmful cyanobacterial blooms using biologically derived substances: problems and prospects. J. Environ. Manage. 125: 149–155.10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Siano, R., C. Alves-de-Souza, E. Foulon, E.M. Bendif, N. Simon, L. Guillou and F. Not. 2011. Distribution and host diversity of Amoebophryidae parasites across oligotrophic waters of the Mediterranean Sea. Biogeosciences 8: 267–278.10.5194/bg-8-267-2011Search in Google Scholar

Sohn, J.H., J.H. Lee, H. Yi, J. Chun, K.S. Bae, T.Y. Ahn and S.J. Kim. 2004. Kordia algicida gen. nov., sp nov., an algicidal bacterium isolated from red tide. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Micr. 54: 675–680.10.1099/ijs.0.02689-0Search in Google Scholar

Sparrow, F.K. 1969. Zoosporic marine fungi from the Pacific Northwest (U.S.A.). Arch. Mikrobiol. 66: 129–146.10.1007/BF00410220Search in Google Scholar

Tamura, K. and M. Nei. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial-DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 512–526.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, R.L., K. Abrahamsson, A. Godhe and S.A. Wangberg. 2009. Seasonal variability in polyunsaturated aldehyde production potential among strains of Skeletonema marinoi (Bacillariophyceae). J. Phycol. 45: 46–53.10.1111/j.1529-8817.2008.00625.xSearch in Google Scholar

Thessen, A.E., H.A. Bowers and D.K. Stoecker. 2009. Intra- and interspecies differences in growth and toxicity of Pseudo-nitzschia while using different nitrogen sources. Harmful Algae 8: 792–810.10.1016/j.hal.2009.01.003Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, J.D., D.G. Higgins and T.J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673–4680.10.1093/nar/22.22.4673Search in Google Scholar

Tillmann, U., K.J. Hesse and A. Tillmann. 1999. Large-scale parasitic infection of diatoms in the Northfrisian Wadden Sea. J. Sea Res. 42: 255–261.10.1016/S1385-1101(99)00029-5Search in Google Scholar

van Tol, H.M., S.A. Amin and E.V. Armbrust. 2016. Ubiquitous marine bacterium inhibits diatom cell division. ISME J. 11: 31–42.10.1038/ismej.2016.112Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Wichard, T., S.A. Poulet, C. Halsband-Lenk, A. Albaina, R. Harris, D. Liu and G. Pohnert. 2005. Survey of the chemical defence potential of diatoms: Screening of fifty one species for α,β,γ,δ-unsaturated aldehydes. J. Chem. Ecol. 31: 949–958.10.1007/s10886-005-3615-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2019-01-23
Accepted: 2019-07-05
Published Online: 2019-08-14
Published in Print: 2019-12-18

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 9.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bot-2019-0007/html
Scroll to top button