Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 19, 2006

Accuracy and influence of ascorbic acid on glucose-test with urine dip sticks in prenatal care

  • Claudia Ritterath , Tina Siegmund , Neda Talai Rad , Ursula Stein and Kai J. Buhling

Abstract

Objective: In Germany, urine analysis with dip sticks are used for screening of gestational diabetes. Our goal was to find the cut-off levels of glucose dip sticks and evaluate the influence of ascorbic acid on the result.

Study design: We took urine samples of 152 pregnant patients between 01/2004 and 10/2004. The glucose content of the urine was analyzed using several dip sticks (Combur10® Roche®, Multistix® 8SG Bayer®, Diabur5000® Roche®) and by the hexokinase method. The ascorbic acid concentration of the specimen was determined.

Results: Glycosuria test dip sticks have a good sensitivity and specificity of the expected positive/negative-reaction compared with the hexokinase method but showed a significant reduction of the color reaction at high concentrations of ascorbic acid.

Conclusion: High ascorbic acid concentrations cause a reduction in the color reaction of urine dip sticks. False-negative test stick measurements can appear in patients with low glycosuria. The rate of glycosuria shows high individual differences and dependent on the concentration of vitamin C. We conclude that dip sticks are not useful in prenatal management.

:

Corresponding author: Kai J. Buhling, MD, PhD Clinic of Obstetrics, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Campus Virchow-Klinikum Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany Tel.: +49 30 450 64072 Fax: +49 30 450 64901

References

1 American Diabetes Association: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 25 (Suppl 1) (2002) S9410.2337/diacare.25.2007.S94Search in Google Scholar

2 Bayer® Vital Product Information: Bayer®, Munich, Germany 2002Search in Google Scholar

3 Brigden ML, D Edgell, M McPherson, A Leadbeater, G Hoang: High incidence of the significant urinary ascorbic acid concentrations in a West Coast population – implications for routine urinanalysis. Clin Chem38 (1991) 426Search in Google Scholar

4 Buhling Kai J, L Elze, H Henrich, et al.: The usefulness of glycouria and the influence of maternal blood pressure in screening for gestation diabetes. Eur J Obstet Gyn Repro Biol113 (2004) 145Search in Google Scholar

5 Conrad KP. Mechanism use of renal vasodilatation and hyperfiltration during pregnancy. J Soc Gynecol Investig11 (2004) 43810.1016/j.jsgi.2004.05.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6 Deutsche Diabetes Gesellschaft: Diagnostik und Therapie des Gestations diabetes: http://www.deutsche-diabetes-gesellschaft.de, 2001Search in Google Scholar

7 Hooper DE: Detecting GD and preeclampsia. Effectiveness of routine urine screening for glucose and protein. J Reprod Med41 (1996) 885Search in Google Scholar

8 Roche® Product Information: Roche Diagnostics®, Mannheim, Germany 2001Search in Google Scholar

9 Sutherland HW, JM Stowers, RJ Christie: Factors affecting sensitivity of glucose-oxidase strips used to test for glycosuria. Lancet1 (1970) 1071Search in Google Scholar

10 Yamane N, F Sakamoto, F Matsuura, et al.: Quantification of urinary glucose and protein with test strips through reflectometric analysis. Clin Biochem21 (1988) 271Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2006-07-19
Published in Print: 2006-08-01

©2006 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Downloaded on 26.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/JPM.2006.054/html
Scroll to top button