Chalmers, Iain. "Statistical Theory Was Not the Reason That Randomization Was Used in the British Medical Research Council’s Clinical Trial of Streptomycin for Pulmonary Tuberculosis".
Body Counts: Medical Quantification in Historical and Sociological Perspective / La quantification medicale, perspectives historiques et sociologiques, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2005, pp. 309-334.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773572478-015Chalmers, I. (2005). Statistical Theory Was Not the Reason That Randomization Was Used in the British Medical Research Council’s Clinical Trial of Streptomycin for Pulmonary Tuberculosis. In
Body Counts: Medical Quantification in Historical and Sociological Perspective / La quantification medicale, perspectives historiques et sociologiques (pp. 309-334). Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773572478-015Chalmers, I. 2005. Statistical Theory Was Not the Reason That Randomization Was Used in the British Medical Research Council’s Clinical Trial of Streptomycin for Pulmonary Tuberculosis.
Body Counts: Medical Quantification in Historical and Sociological Perspective / La quantification medicale, perspectives historiques et sociologiques. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, pp. 309-334.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773572478-015Chalmers, Iain. "Statistical Theory Was Not the Reason That Randomization Was Used in the British Medical Research Council’s Clinical Trial of Streptomycin for Pulmonary Tuberculosis" In
Body Counts: Medical Quantification in Historical and Sociological Perspective / La quantification medicale, perspectives historiques et sociologiques, 309-334. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2005.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773572478-015Chalmers I. Statistical Theory Was Not the Reason That Randomization Was Used in the British Medical Research Council’s Clinical Trial of Streptomycin for Pulmonary Tuberculosis. In:
Body Counts: Medical Quantification in Historical and Sociological Perspective / La quantification medicale, perspectives historiques et sociologiques. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press; 2005. p.309-334.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773572478-015Copied to clipboard
