549
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0
shares
    • Review: found
    Is Open Access

    Review of 'Time‐Efficient Inspiratory Muscle Strength Training Lowers Blood Pressure and Improves Endothelial Function, NO Bioavailability, and Oxidative Stress in Midlife/Older Adults With Above‐Normal Blood Pressure'

    Bookmark
    5
    Time‐Efficient Inspiratory Muscle Strength Training Lowers Blood Pressure and Improves Endothelial Function, NO Bioavailability, and Oxidative Stress in Midlife/Older Adults With Above‐Normal Blood PressureCrossref
    The safety and efficacy of high-resistance inspiratory muscle strength training for lowering blood p
    Average rating:
        Rated 4.5 of 5.
    Level of importance:
        Rated 4 of 5.
    Level of validity:
        Rated 4 of 5.
    Level of completeness:
        Rated 5 of 5.
    Level of comprehensibility:
        Rated 5 of 5.
    Competing interests:
    None

    Reviewed article

    • Record: found
    • Abstract: found
    • Article: found
    Is Open Access

    Time‐Efficient Inspiratory Muscle Strength Training Lowers Blood Pressure and Improves Endothelial Function, NO Bioavailability, and Oxidative Stress in Midlife/Older Adults With Above‐Normal Blood Pressure

    Background High‐resistance inspiratory muscle strength training (IMST) is a novel, time‐efficient physical training modality. Methods and Results We performed a double‐blind, randomized, sham‐controlled trial to investigate whether 6 weeks of IMST (30 breaths/day, 6 days/week) improves blood pressure, endothelial function, and arterial stiffness in midlife/older adults (aged 50–79 years) with systolic blood pressure ≥120 mm Hg, while also investigating potential mechanisms and long‐lasting effects. Thirty‐six participants completed high‐resistance IMST (75% maximal inspiratory pressure, n=18) or low‐resistance sham training (15% maximal inspiratory pressure, n=18). IMST was safe, well tolerated, and had excellent adherence (≈95% of training sessions completed). Casual systolic blood pressure decreased from 135±2 mm Hg to 126±3 mm Hg ( P <0.01) with IMST, which was ≈75% sustained 6 weeks after IMST ( P <0.01), whereas IMST modestly decreased casual diastolic blood pressure (79±2 mm Hg to 77±2 mm Hg, P =0.03); blood pressure was unaffected by sham training (all P >0.05). Twenty‐four hour systolic blood pressure was lower after IMST versus sham training ( P =0.01). Brachial artery flow‐mediated dilation improved ≈45% with IMST ( P <0.01) but was unchanged with sham training ( P =0.73). Human umbilical vein endothelial cells cultured with subject serum sampled after versus before IMST exhibited increased NO bioavailability, greater endothelial NO synthase activation, and lower reactive oxygen species bioactivity ( P <0.05). IMST decreased C‐reactive protein ( P =0.05) and altered select circulating metabolites (targeted plasma metabolomics) associated with cardiovascular function. Neither IMST nor sham training influenced arterial stiffness ( P >0.05). Conclusions High‐resistance IMST is a safe, highly adherable lifestyle intervention for improving blood pressure and endothelial function in midlife/older adults with above‐normal initial systolic blood pressure. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03266510.
      Bookmark

      Review information


      Review text

      To the Editor:

      We read with great interest this article detailing the randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial performed by Craighead et al. (1). In this article, the authors investigated the safety, adherence, and efficacy of high-resistance inspiratory muscle strength training (IMST) for lowering systolic blood pressure (SBP) and improving vascular function. We would like to comment on some concerns.

      First, despite the fact that the mean 24-hour SBP did not change after 6 weeks of IMST, the conclusion states that IMST lowers the 24-hour SBP compared with sham training. As the authors mentioned that the “Twenty-four-hour daytime and nighttime SBP were lower in the IMST group compared with sham group at end-intervention attributable to a trend for reductions in SBP with IMST concomitant with modest increases in the sham control group.”(1), the significant difference in 24-hour SBP at end-intervention between the IMST and sham groups was due to SBP increases in the sham control group. This result does not support the conclusion that IMST improves the 24-hour blood pressure.

      Second, the safety of high-resistance IMST should be carefully assessed. Several studies have reported adverse events caused by IMST, such as cephalalgia, dyspnea, hypertension, headache, and arrhythmias (2,3). Notably, in a previous study, 33% of elderly patients experienced cardiac arrhythmias (3). Because asymptomatic patients with arrhythmias could not be recognized without electrocardiogram monitoring, the safety of IMST in potentially high-risk patients requires further investigation. In the next confirmatory trial, it may be useful to use a smart watch to monitor arrhythmia during IMST at home.

      Third, in the present study, 25% (16/64 participants) of the patients did not meet the inclusion criteria, and over 40% of the patients (26/64 participants) were either excluded or withdrew before study randomization. However, a description of the reasons for exclusion was lacking. We would like to know the reasons for exclusion in order to discuss the application of IMST in clinical practice (4).

      Finally, we respect the authors for their excellent work, and we hope that our comments will help in conducting future research.

      References

      1. Craighead DH, Heinbockel TC, Freeberg KA, Rossman MJ, Jackman RA, Jankowski LR, Hamilton MN, Ziemba BP, Reisz JA, D'Alessandro A, Brewster LM, DeSouza CA, You Z, Chonchol M, Bailey EF, Seals DR. Time-efficient inspiratory muscle strength training lowers blood pressure and improves endothelial function, NO bioavailability, and oxidative stress in midlife/older adults with above-normal blood pressure. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jun 29:e020980. doi:10.1161/JAHA.121.020980.
      2. Ramos PS, Da Costa Da Silva B, Gomes Da Silva LO, Araújo CG. Acute hemodynamic and electrocardiographic responses to a session of inspiratory muscle training in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med.2015;51:773-779.
      3. Nepomuceno BRV Jr, Barreto MS, Almeida NC, Guerreiro CF, Xavier-Souza E, Neto MG. Safety and efficacy of inspiratory muscle training for preventing adverse outcomes in patients at risk of prolonged hospitalisation. Trials. 2017;18:626.
      4. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332.

      Comments

      Comment on this review

      Version and Review History