Skip to main content
Log in

The Multi-domain Lifestyle Intervention for Cognitive Impairment in Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Hangzhou (The Heritage Study): Study Design and Protocol

  • Original Research
  • Published:
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The globe has been working to promote a multi-domain lifestyle intervention for dementia prevention in older adults, referring to the Worldwide-FINGERS (Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability) initiative. In China, the multi-domain lifestyle intervention has been implemented in rural communities (MIND-China), yet the adaptability of such intervention based on the urban communities in China has not been verified.

Objective

To examine the effectiveness and feasibility of the multi-domain lifestyle intervention on dementia prevention in at-risk community-dwelling older adults in China.

Design, Setting, Participants

The multi-domain lifestyle intervention study is a community-based 2-year cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT). A total of 1200 participants aged 60–80 years old will be recruited from twelve communities in Hangzhou, Zhejiang. Inclusion criteria were the Montreal Cognitive Assessment 5 minutes protocol (5 min MoCA) score of 6–9 or the Ascertain Dementia 8 (AD 8) score of ≥2, and having modifiable lifestyle factors.

Intervention, Measurements, Results

Participating communities will be randomized into either the structured multi-domain intervention (SMI) arm or the self-guided intervention (SGI, general health education) arm. The SMI consists of cognitive training, physical exercise, and nutritional and dietary instruction for the first 12 months; and vascular risks monitoring and control for 24 months. The primary outcome is the global cognitive performance, measured by the comprehensive Neuropsychological Test Battery (NTB). The secondary outcomes include domain-specific cognitive performances, physical function, mental health, physiological and biochemical indices, adherence to healthy lifestyles, and neuroimaging metrics. The feasibility of intervention will be evaluated around the five dimensions of the RE-AIM framework and in conjunction with quantitative data, operational data and results of focus group discussions.

Conclusions

Following the Worldwide-FINGERS, this cluster RCT will verify the adaptability of the multi-domain lifestyle intervention in the urban community settings in China. This study will add evidence for global dementia prevention and management among older adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu, Y.-T., et al., Dementia in western Europe: epidemiological evidence and implications for policy making. The Lancet Neurology, 2016. 15(1): p. 116–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00092-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jia, L., et al., Prevalence, risk factors, and management of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults aged 60 years or older in China: a cross-sectional study. The Lancet. Public Health, 2020. 5(12): p. e661–e671. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30185-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Knopman, D.S., Alzheimer disease biomarkers and insights into mild cognitive impairment. Neurology, 2013. 80(11): p. 978–980. doi: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828728ac

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rodakowski, J., et al., Non-pharmacological interventions for adults with mild cognitive impairment and early stage dementia: An updated scoping review. Molecular Aspects of Medicine, 2015. 43–44: p. 38–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2015.06.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Livingston, G., et al., Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet (London, England), 2020. 396(10248): p. 413–446. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ho, R.T.H., et al., A 3-arm randomized controlled trial on the effects of dance movement intervention and exercises on elderly with early dementia. BMC Geriatrics, 2015. 15: p. 127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0123-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Xue, B., et al., The effect of a game training intervention on cognitive functioning and depression symptoms in the elderly with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Methods In Psychiatric Research, 2021. 30(4): p. e1887. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1887

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lisko, I., et al., How can dementia and disability be prevented in older adults: where are we today and where are we going? Journal of Internal Medicine, 2021. 289(6): p. 807–830. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell, E.B., et al., Cognitive Improvement Following Physical Exercise and Cognitive Training Intervention for Older Adults With MCI. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 2023. 78(3): p. 554–560. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glac189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Andrieu, S., et al., Effect of long-term omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation with or without multidomain intervention on cognitive function in elderly adults with memory complaints (MAPT): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet. Neurology, 2017. 16(5): p. 377–389. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30040-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ngandu, T., et al., A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England), 2015. 385(9984): p. 2255–2263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60461-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kivipelto, M., et al., World-Wide FINGERS Network: A global approach to risk reduction and prevention of dementia. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association, 2020. 16(7): p. 1078–1094. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenberg, A., et al., Multidomain Interventions to Prevent Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer’s Disease, and Dementia: From FINGER to WorldWide FINGERS. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease, 2020. 7(1): p. 29–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2019.41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chew, K.A., et al., SINgapore GERiatric intervention study to reduce physical frailty and cognitive decline (SINGER)-pilot: A feasibility study. Alzheimer’s & Dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2021. 7(1): p. e12141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu, X., et al., The SINgapore GERiatric Intervention Study to Reduce Cognitive Decline and Physical Frailty (SINGER): Study Design and Protocol. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease, 2022. 9(1): p. 40–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2022.5

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, Y., et al., P4-004: Multimodal interventions to delay dementia and disability in China (MIND-CHINA): Baseline assessment. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 2019. 15(7S_Part_24): p. P1275–P1275. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2019.06.3699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. General Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Bulletin of the Seventh National Census. https://www.gov.cn/guoqing/2021-05/13/content_5606149.htm (In Chinese)

  18. Zhou, M., et al., Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet (London, England), 2019. 394(10204): p. 1145–1158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30427-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ryan, P., Integrated Theory of Health Behavior Change: background and intervention development. Clinical Nurse Specialist CNS, 2009. 23(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0b013e3181a42373

  20. Shen, J.H., et al., Validation of an Alzheimer’s disease assessment battery in Asian participants with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Neurodegener Dis, 2014. 3(3): p. 158–69.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Tzeng, R.C., et al., Sum of boxes of the clinical dementia rating scale highly predicts conversion or reversion in predementia stages. Front Aging Neurosci, 2022. 14: p. 1021792. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.1021792

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Potashman, M., et al., Psychometric properties of the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living for Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-MCI-ADL) scale: a post hoc analysis of the ADCS ADC-008 trial. BMC Geriatr, 2023. 23(1): p. 124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03527-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, J., et al., Two-minute walk distance reference equations for middle-aged and elderly Chinese individuals with obesity. PLoS One, 2022. 17(8): p. e0273550. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Grgic, J., et al., Test-Retest Reliability of the One-Repetition Maximum (1RM) Strength Assessment: a Systematic Review. Sports Medicine - Open, 2020. 6(1): p. 31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-020-00260-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, W., et al., Effects of aerobic and combined aerobic-resistance exercise on motor function in sedentary older adults: A randomized clinical trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/bmr-220414

  26. Snowdon, J., Validity of the Geriatric Depression Scale. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1990. 38(6): p. 722–3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb01438.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Guo, X., et al., Associations between neuropsychiatric symptoms and cognition in Chinese idiopathic Parkinson’s disease patients. J Clin Neurosci, 2015. 22(3): p. 578–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2014.09.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaufer, D.I., et al., Validation of the NPI-Q, a brief clinical form of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, 2000. 12(2): p. 233–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.12.2.233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Buysse, D.J., et al., The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res, 1989. 28(2): p. 193–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gao, J., Association of dietary patterns and physical activities with total body fat proportions and metabolic syndrome among middle-aged and elderly people: a cross-sectional study. Fudan University, 2013. (In Chinese)

  31. Craig, C.L., et al., International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-Country Reliability and Validity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2003. 35(8). doi: https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB

  32. Wu, K.G., et al., The relationship between physical activity and depression among community-dwelling adults in Wuhan, China. Front Psychiatry, 2023. 14: p. 1179417. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1179417

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Glasgow, R.E., T.M. Vogt, and S.M. Boles, Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health, 1999. 89(9): p. 1322–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Davis, R., et al., Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review. Health Psychology Review, 2015. 9(3): p. 323–344. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2014.941722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Head, K.J. and S.M. Noar, Facilitating progress in health behaviour theory development and modification: the reasoned action approach as a case study. Health Psychology Review, 2014. 8(1): p. 34–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2013.778165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bargh, J.A. The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc 1994.

  37. Fazio, R.H., Multiple Processes by which Attitudes Guide Behavior: The Mode Model as an Integrative Framework, in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, M.P. Zanna, Editor. 1990, Academic Press. p. 75–109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60318-4

  38. Prochaska, J.O., Systems of psychotherapy: A transtheoretical analysis. Systems of psychotherapy: A transtheoretical analysis. 1979, Oxford, England: Dorsey. xv, 407–xv, 407.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hemming, K., et al., Sample size calculations for cluster randomised controlled trials with a fixed number of clusters. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011. 11(1): p. 102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-102

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Adams, G., et al., Patterns of intra-cluster correlation from primary care research to inform study design and analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2004. 57(8): p. 785–794. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ni, Y., et al., Socioeconomic inequalities in physical, psychological, and cognitive multimorbidity in middle-aged and older adults in 33 countries: a cross-sectional study. The Lancet. Healthy Longevity, 2023. 4(11): p. e618–e628. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(23)00195-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to acknowledge the Medical and Healthcare Bureau of Gongshu District, Hangzhou, China for the support. We also acknowledge Huawei Ltd., for the development and optimization of the device and HUAWEI Research platform to this study.

Funding

Funding: The project is funded by grant No. 72274170 from Natural Science Foundation of China (Dr Xu Xin) and grant AARG-22-928604 from the Alzheimer’s Association (Dr Yuan).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest: On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards: The Heritage study has been approved by ZGL20230123-5 and is registered under ClinicalTrial.gov (ID: NCT05886114). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before enrolment into the study. The study will be conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, X., Pang, T., Zhou, Y. et al. The Multi-domain Lifestyle Intervention for Cognitive Impairment in Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Hangzhou (The Heritage Study): Study Design and Protocol. J Prev Alzheimers Dis (2024). https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2024.59

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2024.59

Key words

Navigation