For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
2,610
views
39
references
 Top references
cited by
0
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      46
      similar
       All similar

      Celebrating 65 years of The Computer Journal - free-to-read perspectives - bcs.org/tcj65

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      Female Self-presentation through Online Dating Applications

      Published
      proceedings-article
      Author(s): ,
      Publication date (Print):
      Conference name: Proceedings of EVA London 2022 (EVA 2022)
      Conference theme: Use of new and emerging technologies in Digital Art, Data, Scientific and Creative Visualisation, Digitally Enhanced Reality and Everyware, 2D and 3D Imaging, Display and Printing, Mobile Applications, Museums and Collections, Music, Performing arts, and Technologies, Open Source and Technologies, Preservation of Digital Visual Culture, Virtual Cultural Heritage, Ethical Issues, Historical Issues, Digital Culture, Artificial Intelligence, NFTs
      Conference date: 4–8 July 2022
      Keywords: Digital culture, Gender studies, Online dating, Online self-presentation
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Online self-presentation plays a vital role in online dating applications due to online filtering and contacting the desirable potential partners through presentational clues. Applying qualitative data collected from young female participants and the theoretical Two-Component Model of Leary & Kowalski (1990) on the motivation process and construction process, this paper presents an overview of a study based on the comprehension of participants’ motivation process for dating profiles to explore the construction process of online dating self-presentational approaches. The results indicate that through the self-presentational clues of photography, text, and video display for constructing online dating profiles, young women can selectively and strategically demonstrate the partial and ornamental self with physical and ideological attractiveness. Simultaneously, they struggle with their ideal and real self in the process of online dating self-presentation.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Jing Li
            Jonathan P. Bowen
            Conference
            Publication date: July 2022
            Publication date (Print): July 2022
            Pages: 103-110
            Affiliations
            [0001]Department of Sociology

            University of York

            York, UK

            &

            Jing’an District

            Shanghai, China
            [0002]School of Engineering

            London South Bank University

            London, UK

            &

            Southwest University

            Chongqing, China
            Article
            DOI: 10.14236/ewic/EVA2022.22
            SO-VID: 2e665301-89bd-4ce7-b7aa-662022f603fb
            Copyright © © Li et al. Published by BCS Learning & Development Ltd. Proceedings of EVA London 2022, UK
            License:

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            Conference name: Proceedings of EVA London 2022
            Conference acronym: EVA 2022
            Conference number:
            Conference location: London
            Conference date: 4–8 July 2022
            Conference sponsor: Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            Conference theme: Use of new and emerging technologies in Digital Art, Data, Scientific and Creative Visualisation, Digitally Enhanced Reality and Everyware, 2D and 3D Imaging, Display and Printing, Mobile Applications, Museums and Collections, Music, Performing arts, and Technologies, Open Source and Technologies, Preservation of Digital Visual Culture, Virtual Cultural Heritage, Ethical Issues, Historical Issues, Digital Culture, Artificial Intelligence, NFTs
            History
            Product

            1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

            Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/EVA2022.22
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Series title: Electronic Workshops in Computing

            ScienceOpen disciplines: Applied computer science,Computer science,Security & Cryptology,Graphics & Multimedia design,General computer science,Human-computer-interaction
            Keywords: Digital culture,Online self-presentation,Online dating,Gender studies

            REFERENCES

            1. and (1987) Self-presentation theory: self-construction and audience pleasing. In and (eds.), Theories of Group Behavior, pp. 71–87. Springer, Series in Social Psychology. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            2. , and (2008) Gender issues in HCI design for web access. In (ed.), Global Information Technologies: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, Chapter 7.20, pp. 3175–3202. IGI Global, Information Science Reference. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            3. and (2021) The rise of digital citizenship and the participatory museum. In et al(2021), pp. 20–27. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            4. (1999) Only connect. Museum International, 51(4):4–7. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            5. and (2014) Digitalism: The new realism? In , and (eds.), EVA London 2014: Electronic Visualisation and the Arts. BCS, eWiC, pp. 324–331. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            6. and (2021) Digitality: A reality check. In et al(2021), pp. 12–19. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            7. and (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2):77–101. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            8. and (2000) Gender, communication, and social influence: A developmental perspective. In and (eds.), The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender, pp. 295–332. Psychology Press. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            9. , and (2018) Sex, gender identity, and perceived employability among Spanish employed and unemployed youngsters. Frontiers in Psychology, 9:2467. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            10. , and (2013) 3D virtual worlds and the metaverse: Current status and future possibilities. ACM Computing Surveys, 45(3):1–38. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            11. and (1997) Gender differences in self-presentation: A comparison of the roles of flatteringness and intimacy in self-disclosure to friends. Sex Roles, 36:371–380. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            12. and (2008) Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2):245–264. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            13. , and (2011) Profile as promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. New Media & Society, 14(1):45–62. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            14. (2015) Convenience sampling, random sampling, and snowball sampling: How does sampling affect the validity of research? Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 109(2):164–168. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            15. , and (2016) Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1):1–4. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            16. , and (2012) Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1):3–66. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            17. and (2005) The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34(1):523–548. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            18. (2019) Contested space: Activism and protest. In & (2019b), chapter 5, pp. 91–111. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            19. and (2019a) Digital culture. In & (2019b), chapter 1, pp. 3–26. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            20. and (eds.) (2019b) Museums and Digital Culture: New perspectives and research. Springer, Series on Cultural Computing. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            21. , and (2012) Men are from Mars, women are from Venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(2):91–98. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            22. (2019) ‘Rice Bunnies’ – #MeToo in China: A hashtag movement and women’s empowerment through social media. In , and (eds.), EVA London 2019: Electronic Visualisation and the Arts. BCS, eWiC, pp. 68–70. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            23. and (2009) Putting your best face forward: The accuracy of online dating photographs. Journal of Communication, 59(2):367–386. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            24. (1996) Self-presentation: Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior. Routledge.

            25. and (1990) Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1):34–47. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            26. (2021) Exploring the Self-presentations of Young Women through Profiles on Online Dating Applications. PGT Dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of York, UK.

            27. (2017) Video Games as Dating Platforms: Exploring Digital Intimacies through a Chinese Online Dancing Video Game. Television and New Media, 20(1):36–55. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            28. , and (2008) Self-presentation and gender on MySpace. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6):446–458. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            29. , and (2014) Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(3):418–428. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            30. (2017) In China women ‘hold up half the sky’ but can’t touch the political glass ceiling. The Guardian, 14 October 2017. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/oct/14/in-china-women-hold-up-half-the-sky-but-cant-touch-the-political-glass-ceiling

            31. , and (2019) Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the United States displaces other ways of meeting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(36):17753–17758. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            32. and (1999) The body and face of woman: One ornament that signals quality? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(2):105–120. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            33. , and (2008) Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8):1023–1036. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            34. , and (eds.) (2021) EVA London 2021: Electronic Visualisation and the Arts. BCS, Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC), ScienceOpen. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            35. (2001) Digital Beauties: 2D & 3D computer generated digital models, virtual idols and characters. Taschen.

            36. and (2012) Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. In and (eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, volume 46, chapter 2, pp. 55–123. Elsevier. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            37. and (2015) Two traditions of research on gender identity. Sex Roles, 73(11–12):461–473. DOI: [Cross Ref]

            38. , and (2021) Love, life, and “leftover ladies” in urban China: Staying modernly single in patriarchal traditions. China Economic Review, 68:101626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101626

            39. (2021) Peng Shuai needs more than ‘quiet diplomacy’. The Guardian, 2 December 2021. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2021/dec/02/pen g-shuai-needs-more-than-quiet-diplomacy-jessica-shuran-yu

            Comments

            Comment on this article