Open Access
Research (Published online: 03-11-2020)
2. Serotypes and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella enterica recovered from clinical swine samples
Siriporn Kongsoi, Suksun Chumsing, Darunee Satorn and Panisa Noourai
Veterinary World, 13(11): 2312-2318

Siriporn Kongsoi: Department of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand.
Suksun Chumsing: Department of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand.
Darunee Satorn: Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Panisa Noourai: Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.

doi: www.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.2312-2318

Share this article on [Facebook] [LinkedIn]

Article history: Received: 12-06-2020, Accepted: 22-09-2020, Published online: 03-11-2020

Corresponding author: Siriporn Kongsoi

E-mail: fvetsks@ku.ac.th

Citation: Kongsoi S, Chumsing S, Satorn D, Noourai P (2020) Serotypes and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella enterica recovered from clinical swine samples, Veterinary World, 13(11): 2312-2318.
Abstract

Background and Aim: Salmonella enterica is an important foodborne pathogen and is recognized as a major public health issue. The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) S. enterica represents a major challenge for national public health authorities. We investigated the distribution of serovars and antimicrobial resistance of S. enterica isolates from clinical swine samples stored at the Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University from 2016 to 2017.

Materials and Methods: Clinical samples were collected and subjected to standard microbiological techniques outlined in the Manual of Clinical Microbiology to identify Salmonella serovars. Susceptibility to antimicrobials was tested by the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method using a panel of 14 antimicrobials.

Results: A total of 144 Salmonella isolates were identified and the dominant serovar was Salmonella Choleraesuis (66.67%), followed by monophasic Salmonella Typhimurium (18.75%), S. Typhimurium (9.03%), and Rissen (5.56%). The isolates displayed high resistance rates to ampicillin (AMP [100%]), amoxicillin (AX [100%]), tetracycline (TE [100%]), cefotaxime (CTX [89.58%]), ceftriaxone (CRO [87.50%]), chloramphenicol (C [82.64%]), gentamicin (CN [79.17%]), nalidixic acid (NA [72.92%]), and ceftazidime (CAZ [71.53%]). All isolates were MDR, with 29 distinct resistance patterns. The dominant MDR pattern among serovars Choleraesuis and Rissen exhibited resistance to 9 antimicrobials: ( R7-14 AMP-AX-CAZ-CRO-CTX-NA-C-CN-TE). However, all tested isolates were susceptible to AX/ clavulanic acid and fosfomycin.

Conclusion: High resistance levels to the third generation of cephalosporins such as CAZ, CRO, and CTX highlight the need for careful and reasonable usage of antimicrobials in animals and humans, especially for S. Choleraesuis infections.

Keywords: clinical isolates, multidrug resistance, Salmonella Choleraesuis.