Skip to main content
Log in

Characteriztion of a novel feather-degrading Bacillus sp. strain

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Feather waste is generated in large amounts as a byproduct of commercial poultry processing. This residue is almost pure keratin, which is not easily degradable by common proteolytic enzymes. A feather-degrading bacterium was isolated from poultry feathers in decomposition. The strain identified as kr16 showed important feather-degrading activity when grown on basal medium containing 10 g/L of native feather as the source of energy, carbon, and nitrogen. The isolate was characterized according to the phenotypical characteristics and biochemical profiling that belong to the Bacillus genus. Keratinolytic activity of this isolate was monitored during cultivation of the bacterium on raw feathers at different temperatures. Maximum growth and feather-degrading activity were observed at 30–37°C. The keratinolytic enzyme had a pH optimum ranging from 8.0 to 11.0 and a temperature optimum of 45–65°C. The keratinase was strongly inhibited by EDTA and the metal ions Hg2+ and Sn2+.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Noval, J. J. and Nickerson, W. J. (1958), J. Bacteriol. 77, 251–263.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Böckle, B., Galunsky, B., and Müller, R. (1995), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 3705–3710.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams, C. M., Richter, C. S., Mackenzie, J. M., and Shih, J. C. S. (1990), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 1509–1515.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zaghloul, T. I., Al-Bahra, M., and Al-Azmeh, H. (1998), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 70–72, 207–213.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wawrzkiewicz, K., Wolski, T., and Lobarzewski, J. (1991), Mycopathologia 114, 1–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gradisar, H., Kern, S., and Friedrich, J. (2000), Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 62, 2875–2882.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sangali, S. and Brandelli, A. (2000), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 87, 17–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lucas, F. S., Broennimann, O., Febbraro, I., and Heeb, P. (2003), Microb. Ecol. 45, 282–290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Steiner, R. J., Kellems, R. O., and Church, D. C. (1983), J. Anim. Sci. 57, 495–502.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, X. and Parsons, C. M. (1997), Poultry Sci. 76, 491–496.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Williams, C. M., Lee, C. G., Garlin, J. D., and Shih, J. C. H. (1991), Poultry Sci. 70, 85–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, G. G., Ferket, P. R., and Shih, J. C. H. (1991), FASEB J. 59, 1312.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peeler, J. T. and Maturin, L. J. (1992), in Bacteriological Analytical Manual, 7th ed., AOAC International, Arlington, VA, pp. 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Holt, J. D. (1993), Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 9th ed., Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951), J. Biol. Chem. 193, 267–275.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Riffel, A., Lucas, F., Heeb, P., and Brandelli, A. (2003), Arch. Microbiol. 179, 258–265.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shama, G. and Berwick, P. G. (1991), Biotechnol. Techniques 5, 359–362.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dalev, P., Ivanov, I., and Liubomirova, A. (1997), J. Sci. Food Agric. 73, 242–244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Young, R. A. and Smith, R. E. (1975), Can. J. Microbiol. 21, 583–586.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Atalo, K. and Gashe, B. A. (1993), Biotechnol. Lett. 15, 1151–1156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim, J. M., Lim, W. J., and Suh, H. J. (2001), Process Biochem. 37, 287–291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Raju, A. A., Chandrababu, N. K., Samivelu, N., Rose, C., and Rao, N. M. (1996), J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc. 91, 115–119.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Letourneau, F., Soussotte, V., Bressollier, P., Branland, P., and Verneuil, B. (1998), Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 26, 77–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lusterio, D. D., Suizo, F. G., Labunos, N. M., Valledor, M. N., Ueda, S., Kawai, S., Koike, K., Shikata, S., Yomatsu, T., and Ito, S. (1992), Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 56, 1671, 1672.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. de Médicis, E. (1986), FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37, 137–143.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Auld, D. S. (1995), Methods Enzymol. 248, 228–242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adriano Brandelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Werlang, P.O., Brandelli, A. Characteriztion of a novel feather-degrading Bacillus sp. strain. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 120, 71–79 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:120:1:71

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:120:1:71

Index Entries

Navigation