Skip to main content

Protein Identification by Peptide Mass Fingerprinting

  • Protocol
The Proteomics Protocols Handbook

Part of the book series: Springer Protocols Handbooks ((SPH))

  • 4168 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes the database identification of proteins that have been separated by one-(or two-) dimensional gel electrophoresis followed by in-gel digestion of the protein bands or spots from the gels. Database searches using mass spectrometry data are particularly important to identify a specific protein and to determine whether post-translational modifications are present. Use of some of the many websites for “eomic”identification of proteins is described here. Various software, including commercial software packages such as SEQUEST (see Note 1), is available to use the information on the fragment ions obtained from a tandem MS experiment to search protein (and DNA translation) databases to identify the sequence and the protein from which it is derived. The increasing number and public availability of complete genome sequences has greatly increased the possibility of protein identification using intact peptide mass data (fingerprints). Fingerprints of digests of complex protein mixtures are unsuitable, since it would not be possible to ascertain which peptide(s) originated from which protein component in such a mixture. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization (MALDI)-time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) has a particular application here, due to the possibility of high throughput with the assistance of robotics to excise large numbers of spots from 2-D gels, digest, and spot onto a MALDI plate. Modern MALDI-TOF MS instruments now have the sufficiently high mass accuracy necessary for unambiguous identification based on fingerprint data (1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gevaert, K., and Vandekerckhove, J. (2000) Protein identification methods in proteomics. Electrophoresis. 21, 1145–1154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Muller, M., Gras, R., Appel, R. D., Bienvenut, W. V., and Hochstrasser, D. F. (2002) Visualization and analysis of molecular scanner peptide mass spectra. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 13, 221–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aitken, A., Geisow, M. J., Findlay, J. B. C., Holmes, C., and Yarwood, A. (1989). Peptide preparation and characterization. In Geisow, M. J., and Findlay, J. B. C. (eds), Protein Sequencing: A Practical Approach, IRL Press, Oxford,.43–68.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dubois, T., Zemlickova, E., Howell, S., and Aitken, A. (2003) Centaurin-α1 associates in vitro and in vivo with nucleolin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 301, 502–508.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J., Creasy, D.M., and Cottrell, J. S. (1999) Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20, 3551–3567.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Aitken, A. (2005). Protein Identification by Peptide Mass Fingerprinting. In: Walker, J.M. (eds) The Proteomics Protocols Handbook. Springer Protocols Handbooks. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-890-0:355

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-890-0:355

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-343-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-890-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics