Chest
Volume 136, Issue 1, July 2009, Pages 245-252
Journal home page for Chest

Original Research
Thoracic surgery
Morphine With Adjuvant Ketamine vs Higher Dose of Morphine Alone for Immediate Postthoracotomy Analgesia

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-0246Get rights and content

Background

Thoracotomy is associated with severe pain. We hypothesized that the concomitant use of a subanesthetic dose of ketamine plus a two-third-standard morphine dose might provide more effective analgesia with fewer side effects than a standard morphine dose for early pain control.

Methods

We conducted a 6-month randomized, double-blind study in patients undergoing thoracotomy for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass or for lung tumor resection. After extubation, when objectively awake (≥ 5/10 visual analogue scale [VAS]) and complaining of pain (≥ 5/10 VAS), patients were connected to patient-controlled IV analgesia delivering 1.5 mg of morphine plus saline solution (MO) or 1.0 mg of morphine plus a 5-mg ketamine bolus (MK), with a 7-min lockout time. Rescue IM diclofenac, 75 mg, was available. Follow-up lasted 4 h.

Results

Forty-one patients completed the study. MO patients (n = 20) used 6.8 ± 1.9 mg/h (mean ± SD) and 5.5 ± 3.6 mg/h of morphine during the first and second hours, respectively; MK patients (n = 21) used 3.7 ± 1.2 mg/h and 2.8 ± 2.3 mg/h, respectively (p < 0.01). The 4-h activation rate of the device was double in the MO patients than in the MK patients (66 ± 54 vs 28 ± 20, p < 0.001). The maximal self-rated pain score was 5.6 ± 1.0 for the MO group vs 3.7 ± 0.7 for the MK group (p < 0.01). Four MO patients vs one MK patient required diclofenac; 6 MO patients but no MK patients had oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry < 94% on a fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.4 (p < 0.01); two MO patients required reintubation. Paco2 was higher in the MO group (40 ± 6 mm Hg vs 33 ± 5 mm Hg, p < 0.05). Heart rate, BP, and incidence of nausea/vomiting were similar; no ketamine-related hallucinations were detected.

Conclusions

Subanesthetic ketamine combined with a 35%-lower morphine dose provided equivalent pain control compared to the standard morphine dose alone, with fewer adverse side effects and a 45% reduction in morphine consumption.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00625911

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

This study is one part of a larger study conducted in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit on patients from the Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery at the Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center during the period 2001–2004 and had been approved by the Ethics Committee of the institution. The present cohort consisted of the first, more homogeneous group of patients, whereas data pertaining to the second and larger part of the cohort appear in a recent report elsewhere.22 Forty-four patients

Results

Of 62 screened patients, 44 patients fulfilled the study criteria for randomization. Three patients subsequently dropped out after surgery because they required continuous ventilation (CONSORT statement, Fig 1); no MIDCAB patient was converted to an on-pump procedure. Demographic, anesthesia, and surgical data were similar between the two drug study groups (Table 1); intraoperative blood replacement and fluid infusion were similar as well (data not shown). Baseline (immediately before starting

Discussion

Our study demonstrates that the administration of an IV subanesthetic dose (5 mg/bolus) of ketamine combined with two thirds of the standard (1.5-mg) morphine dose provided lower subjective measures of pain (by > 2 points on a scale of 1 to 10) than the standard morphine dose alone during the immediate (4 h) postthoracotomy period. The combined protocol was also associated with remarkably stable hemodynamic conditions and better respiratory parameters than the MO group. These objective effects

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Esther Eshkol, MA (institutional medical copyeditor, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center) for editorial assistance, and the nursing staff of the PACU for their collaboration and dedication.

References (30)

  • P Hartvig et al.

    Postoperative analgesia and sedation following pediatric cardiac surgery using a constant infusion of ketamine

    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth

    (1993)
  • SM Green et al.

    Ketamine sedation for pediatric procedures: part 1

    A prospective series, Ann Emerg Med

    (1990)
  • WJ Phillips et al.

    Analgesic pharmacology: II. Specific analgesics

    J Am Acad Orthop Surg

    (2004)
  • MH Fleron et al.

    A comparison of intrathecal opioid and intravenous analgesia for the incidence of cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal complications after abdominal aortic surgery

    Anesth Analg

    (2003)
  • B Beilin et al.

    The effects of postoperative pain management on immune response to surgery

    Anesth Analg

    (2003)
  • Cited by (56)

    • Challenges in acute postoperative pain management in thoracic surgery

      2024, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Anaesthesiology
    • Enhanced Recovery for Cardiac Surgery

      2018, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
    • Ketamine versus hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia for acute pain in trauma patients

      2018, Journal of Surgical Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      As such, ketamine has gained interest as an alternative or adjunctive analgesic for acute pain management in military and civilian medicine.16 Ketamine has been studied in PCA devices in combination with opioid agents, but no published studies have evaluated ketamine-only PCA in trauma patients.9-12 This pilot study aimed to assess the efficacy of ketamine PCA compared with hydromorphone PCA for baseline analgesia in nonintubated trauma patients with acute pain initially treated in the intensive care unit (ICU).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Parts of this study were presented at the Euroanaesthesia 2003 Meeting, Glasgow, Scotland May 31-June 3, 2003; and at the fifth International Congress on Coronary Artery Disease, Florence, Italy, October 19–22, 2003.

    No financial support was received for this clinical trial.

    The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

    Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians (www.chestjournal.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml).

    View full text