Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Correction

Correction: An economic analysis of the health-related benefits associated with bicycle infrastructure investment in three Canadian cities

  • David G. T. Whitehurst,
  • Danielle N. DeVries,
  • Daniel Fuller,
  • Meghan Winters
  • Article
  • Metrics
  • Comments
  • Media Coverage

There are errors in the in-text citations for the Supporting Information tables. SM1 refers to S1 Table, SM2 refers to S2 Table, and SM3 refers to S3 Table.

In the Methods section, the heading “Health economic assessment tool” should be written as “Health Economic Assessment Tool”.

The Fig 2 caption is formatted incorrectly. Please see the complete, correct Fig 2 caption here:

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2.

Findings from the univariate sensitivity analyses for the moderate change (2% increase) scenario in Victoria (Panel A), Kelowna (Panel B) and Halifax (Panel C), where variation in inputs led to a change in the respective benefit:cost ratio. Details of the changes made to the input parameters are provided in S2 Table. A ‘change’ in a ratio estimate is defined as an absolute difference for the benefit term equal to or greater than 0.05. The results of all sensitivity analyses (to one decimal place) are reported in S3 Table. In each panel, the dashed line indicates the point where the benefit:cost ratio is 1:1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251031.g001

The S3 Table caption is formatted incorrectly. Please see the complete, correct S3 Table caption here:

S3 Table. Benefit:cost ratios and the change in the benefit term (when compared with the respective primary analysis) for the 32 univariate sensitivity analyses, by study city. For comparison, the benefit:cost ratios in the primary analyses for Victoria, Kelowna and Halifax were 1.7:1, 1.9:1 and 2.1:1, respectively.

thumbnail
Download:

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251031.t001

Reference

  1. 1. Whitehurst DGT, DeVries DN, Fuller D, Winters M (2021) An economic analysis of the health-related benefits associated with bicycle infrastructure investment in three Canadian cities. PLOS ONE 16(2): e0246419. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246419 pmid:33556076

Citation: Whitehurst DGT, DeVries DN, Fuller D, Winters M (2021) Correction: An economic analysis of the health-related benefits associated with bicycle infrastructure investment in three Canadian cities. PLoS ONE 16(4): e0251031. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251031

Published: April 27, 2021

Copyright: © 2021 Whitehurst et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.