Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Dementia and patient outcomes after hip surgery in older patients: A retrospective observational study using nationwide administrative data in Japan

  • Noriko Morioka ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    morioka.gh@tmd.ac.jp

    Affiliation Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan

  • Mutsuko Moriwaki,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Tokyo Metropolitan Health Policy Advisement, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan

  • Jun Tomio,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

  • Kiyohide Fushimi,

    Roles Data curation, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Health Policy and Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan

  • Yasuko Ogata

    Roles Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

Objective

To investigate whether dementia is associated with incidence of adverse events and longer hospital stays in older adults who underwent hip surgery, after adjusting for individual social and nursing care environment.

Design and setting

Retrospective observational study using the linked data between the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database and the reports of the medical functions of hospital beds database in Japan (April 2016—March 2017).

Participants

A total of 48,797 individuals aged 65 and older who underwent hip surgery and were discharged during the study period.

Methods

Outcomes included in-hospital death, in-hospital pneumonia, in-hospital fracture, and longer hospital stay. We performed two-level, multilevel models adjusting for individual and hospital characteristics.

Results

Among all participants, 20,638 individuals (42.3%) had dementia. The incidence of adverse events for those with and without dementia included in-hospital death: 2.11% and 1.11%, in-hospital pneumonia: 0.15% and 0.07%, and in-hospital fracture: 3.76% and 3.05%, respectively. The median (inter quartile range) length of hospital stay for those with and without dementia were 26 (19–39) and 25 (19–37) days, respectively. Overall, the odds ratios (95% confidence interval (CI)) of dementia for in-hospital death, in-hospital pneumonia, and in-hospital fracture were 1.12 (0.95–1.33), 0.95 (0.51–1.80), and 1.08 (0.92–1.25), respectively. Dementia was not associated with the length of hospital stay (% change) (-0.7%, 95% CI -1.6–0.3%). Admission from home, discharge to home, and lower nurse staffing were associated with prolonged hospital stays.

Conclusions

Although adverse events are more likely to occur in older adults with dementia than in those without dementia after hip surgery, we found no evidence of an association between dementia and adverse events or the length of hospital stay after adjusting for individual social and nursing care environment.

Introduction

Hip fracture is a major injury among older adults that can lead to substantial loss of healthy life-years [1]. Older adults with dementia are also more likely to incur hip fractures than those without dementia [24]. Due to the rapidly increasing prevalence of dementia in the general population [5], its occurrence among patients with hip fractures has also increased in acute care settings. Systematic reviews suggested that about 20–50% of the individuals admitted to acute care hospitals due to hip fractures have dementia or a cognitive impairment [6, 7]. Among people who underwent hip surgery, retrospective cohort studies investigated the association between dementia and patient outcomes, in Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, and Japan [812]. Compared to those without dementia, people with dementia were more likely to have a higher delirium rate [8], more post-surgical complications [12], be admitted to long-term care [13], and be readmitted within 30 days after discharge [9].

However, reports on the association between dementia and the length of hospital stay after hip surgery are inconsistent. A shorter hospital stay among people with dementia than in those without dementia has been indicated [8, 10]; however, this association varied depending on patients’ social factors such as type of residence before the hip fracture—a longer hospital stay was reported for community-dwelling people than for long-term care facility users [13]. A better understanding of the association between dementia and patient outcomes after hip surgery, considering residence type before and after hospitalization, will help promote integrated care for people with dementia in aging societies.

Moreover, providing adequate care for individuals with dementia in hospital settings has been challenging [14, 15]. Nursing care environment factors such as nurse staffing level, skill mix, and advanced skill for dementia and gerontological nursing care are essential for providing adequate care to people with dementia [16]. However, few studies have considered the effect of the nursing care environment when investigating the association between dementia and patient outcomes [14, 17]. We, therefore, aimed to investigate the associations between dementia, adverse events, and length of hospital stay among older adults who underwent hip surgery considering the participants’ social and nursing care environment.

Methods

Study design

We conducted a retrospective observational study using nationwide data in Japan.

Data source

We used the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database and reports of the medical functions of hospital beds in the Medical Care Act via hospital record number. The aforementioned database contains nationwide data of acute care in-patients, comprising administrative claims data and discharge information of approximately 5 million discharged patients (in 2016) from 1,667 acute care hospitals in Japan, which represents approximately 50% of all acute care in-patient hospitalizations in the country.

The database includes patients’ demographic information (i.e., age, sex, height, weight), activities of daily living (ADL) scores at admission and at discharge, patients’ place of residence before admission and after hospitalization, main diagnoses, pre-existing comorbidities, and post-admission complications as per the International Statistical Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes, and surgical procedures as per the Japanese original surgical coding system. Additional details of the database are provided elsewhere [18, 19]. In this study, we could not include ADL data in the analysis because almost one-fourth of such data were missing.

Reports of the medical functions of hospital beds include ward characteristics (e.g., the total number of in-patients during the past year), the number of full-time nurses and associate nurses, and the number of beds among others. The Medical Care Act [20] mandates all hospitals with general or long-term care beds to report their status to prefectural governors every year to build an appropriate regional medical care system.

Participant selection

We selected individuals aged 65 or older during hospital admission and underwent hip surgery, osteosynthesis, bipolar hip arthroplasty, or total hip arthroplasty at acute care hospitals (average number of in-patients per day was ≥ 200) from April 2016 to March 2017. Exclusion criteria were: unconscious at admission, which was assessed using the Japan Coma Scale (i.e., level II or worse; that is, incapable of opening eyes with stimulation) [21] and death within 24 hours of admission.

Outcomes

We used in-hospital mortality, in-hospital pneumonia, in-hospital fracture, and length of hospital stay as the health outcome variables. In-hospital mortality was defined as all-cause death during hospitalization. In-hospital pneumonia was identified by the type of pneumonia; in the database, pneumonia severity is classified into three categories: community-acquired, in-hospital, and other. In-hospital fracture was defined as at least one fracture post-admission: skull and facial bones fracture (S02), neck fracture (S12), fracture of rib(s), sternum, and thoracic spine (S22), fracture of lumbar spine and pelvis (S32), fracture of shoulder and upper arm (S42), forearm fracture (S52), wrist and hand level fracture (S62), femur fracture (S72), fracture of lower leg including ankle (S82), fracture of foot excluding ankle (S92), fractures in multiple body regions (T02), spine fracture (T08), upper-limb fracture (T10), lower limb fracture (T12), and fracture of unspecified body region (T142). Length of hospital stay was defined as the number of hospitalization days from admission to discharge. When calculating length of hospital stay, in-hospital death cases were excluded.

Dementia status

Dementia status was the primary explanatory variable. For dementia, the sensitivity and specificity in our database were 37.5% and 100%, respectively [22]; therefore, we used multiple definitions in addition to the diagnosis, in line with previous studies [9, 23]. Dementia was defined as the presence of at least one prescription of an antidementia drug (e.g., donepezil, galantamine, memantine, rivastigmine) during hospitalization, a diagnosis of dementia at admission (ICD-10 codes: F00–F03, F05.1, G30, and G31), or the level of “ADLs of people with dementia” being I or greater at hospital admission. “ADLs of people with dementia” is the scale used for the assessment of dementia in the long-term care insurance schema in Japan. In the database, the scale was classified into three categories: 0 (“without dementia”), I–II (“individuals with dementia who live independently with assistance”), and III–IV or M (“individuals with dementia who require moderate or full-time care”).

Individual characteristics

We selected covariates as potential confounders from previous studies. We obtained data regarding demographic characteristics (age and sex), clinical characteristics (body mass index [BMI], and comorbidities), type of surgery (osteosynthesis, bipolar hip arthroplasty, or total hip arthroplasty), and place of residence before admission (home, long-term care facilities, and others including another hospital). Comorbidity was classified using the modified form of the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) [24]. A CCI score of 0, 1, 2, or ≥ 3 at admission was calculated based on ICD-10 diagnoses for comorbidities. Psychotropic drug use was defined in at least one prescription for hypnotic, anxiolytic, or psychotropic medications during hospitalization.

Nursing staffing level, expertise for dementia care, and hospital size

In Japan, nurses and associate nurses are qualified under the Act on Public Health Nurses [25]. The former is a national license and the latter is a license by the prefectural government; however, both are effective anywhere in Japan. To measure nurse staffing levels, we used the patient-to-nurse ratio and skill mix which have been widely used in previous studies [26, 27].The average number of in-patients per nurse and associate nurses per shift at general acute care wards were calculated using the following equation:

The average number of in-patients per nurse per shift = (the number of in-patients in the general care wards during the past year* 3 * 8) / (the number of full-time equivalent nurses working at general wards/1800)

Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare defined the annual working hours of full-time equivalent nurses as 1,800 hours (three shifts a day; 8 hours each) when calculating the patient-to-nurse ratio per shift [28]. A lower number indicates a lower workload for nurses and better nurse staffing. As an indicator of skill mix, we used the percentage of nurses among the total nursing staff (nurse and associate nurse) in general acute care wards.

Special dementia care status was determined by the status of financial incentives for the same. In Japan, the financial incentives for special dementia care in the fee schedule were introduced in April 2016: Type 1 comprises a dementia-specific multidisciplinary team consisting of physicians skilled at dementia management, advanced practice nurses for dementia or gerontological nursing, and psychiatric social workers, and Type 2 comprises two or more nurses who have been trained regarding assessment and care for dementia in general wards [23, 29]. We addressed this as a categorical variable (e.g., none, Type 1, or Type 2). We also considered the hospital size (number of beds) and type of established organization (national; public; social; private; and others including public interest corporations, private university corporations, social welfare corporations, medical co-op, companies, and other corporations) as other hospital characteristics.

Statistical analyses

We removed all cases with missing data in any of the selected covariates and conducted chi-square tests for categorical data and t-tests or Mann-Whitney U test for numerical data to compare patients with and without dementia. To investigate the association between dementia and the length of hospital stay, after adjusting for covariates and taking the correlated structure of the data into account, we conducted a two-level random intercept model with patients nested within hospitals [30]. We took logarithm of length of hospital stay in the regression model because the distribution of length of hospital stay was skewed. In this “semi-logarithmic” model transformation regressed log y on X, the interpretation of regression coefficients was approximately the percentage change in y resulting from a one-unit change in X. The exact percentage change, %Δy = 100 * [exp (bjΔXj)−1], would give us a more accurate prediction of the change in length of hospital stay [31]. We also conducted two-level, multilevel logistic models to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of dementia for the other dichotomous outcomes (in-hospital pneumonia, in-hospital fracture, and in-hospital mortality) adjusting for the covariates. In all models, the intraclass correlation coefficient of the null models with no explanatory variables ≧0.1 suggested appropriateness of the use of multilevel analysis [30]. All analyses were performed with Stata version 15 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

Ethical considerations

Study approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at the Tokyo Medical and Dental University (No.M2000-788). The need for informed consent was waived because of the anonymous nature of the data.

Results

We obtained data from 48,049 eligible patients from 404 hospitals (S1 Fig). Of them, 20,638 (43.0%) had dementia (Table 1). The dementia group had more women, long-term care facility users before admission, and patients with higher CCI scores (Table 1) compared to those in the without dementia group.

thumbnail
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population with and without dementia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249364.t001

Table 2 shows the characteristics of all the 404 hospitals. Most were public and had no special care for dementia. Moreover, most of the nursing staff comprised nurses and, in average, 6.3 patients were allocated per nurse and associate nurse.

The overall number (proportions) of in-hospital deaths, in-hospital pneumonia, and in-hospital fractures were 748 (1.53%), 51 (0.10%), and 1,634 (3.35%), respectively. The prevalence of in-hospital death, in-hospital pneumonia, and in-hospital fracture for people with and without dementia were 2.11% vs. 1.11% (p < .001), 0.15% vs. 0.07% (p = .007) and 3.76% vs. 3.05% (p < .001), respectively (Table 3). The medians (inter quartile range) length of hospital stay in the total sample and in people with and without dementia were 26 (19–38), 26 (19–39) and 25 (19–37) days, respectively (p = .758).

thumbnail
Table 3. Length of hospital stay and prevalence of outcomes in people with and without dementia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249364.t003

The adjusted ORs (95% CI) of dementia for in-hospital death, in-hospital pneumonia, and in-hospital fracture were 1.12 (0.95–1.33), 0.95 (0.51–1.80), and 1.08 (0.92–1.25), respectively (Table 4 and S1 Table).

thumbnail
Table 4. Results of multilevel logistic regression analysis for in-hospital death, in-hospital pneumonia, and in-hospital fracture among people with and without dementia (n = 48,797).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249364.t004

Table 5 and S2 Table show that dementia was not significantly associated with the length of hospital stay after adjusting for individual and hospital characteristics (-0.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -1.6–0.3%). Shorter hospital stays were associated with individuals’ place of residence before admission and after discharge compared with from/to home, admission from long-term care facilities (-20.4%, 95% CI = -21.5–-19.3%) and other places including hospitals (-10.6%, 95% CI = -12.0–-9.2%), and discharge to long-term care facilities (-9.8%, 95% CI = -11.3–-8.4%) and to other institutions including hospitals (-10.7%, 95% CI = -11.6–-9.8%). Regarding hospital nursing care environment, a higher number of in-patients per nurse and associate nurse was significantly associated with 7.8% (95% CI = 4.2–11.5%) longer length of hospital stay.

thumbnail
Table 5. Results of multilevel analyses for length of hospital stay (n = 44,883).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249364.t005

Discussion

We conducted a retrospective observational study with a large sample using nationwide administrative data in Japan to explore the association between dementia and patient outcomes after hip surgery among older adults. Although in-hospital death, in-hospital pneumonia, and in-hospital fracture were more likely to occur in people with dementia than in those without dementia in the present study, they were not significantly associated with dementia after adjusting for potential confounders such as individual social factors, nurse staffing level, and dementia care expertise. The improvement of dementia care in acute care settings could explain our findings. A previous Japanese study using 2007–2010 data from the same database utilized in our research revealed that people with dementia are more likely to have post-surgical complications during hospitalization [12]. This discrepancy might be explained by the promotion of policies for dementia care in hospitals. In 2015, the Japanese government renewed its comprehensive strategy for the promotion of dementia care—the New Orange Plan—which aimed to create a friendly community for older adults with dementia [32]. This national strategy established the critical goal of providing appropriate medical care for patients with dementia in acute care facilities. Following this, financial incentives for appropriate medical care for patients with dementia were introduced in April 2016, which are included in a revision concerning the reimbursement of medical fees [29]. Such policy changes in dementia care may have reduced the disadvantages faced by people with dementia in acute care facilities; however, further studies are necessary to investigate the effect of policy changes on health outcomes of the patients.

In addition, there is another reason why dementia was not associated with longer hospital stays in the present study. Participants’ social factors may be key determinants of length of hospital stay in Japan rather than the dementia status. In the present study, people admitted from home or discharged to home were more likely to have longer hospitalizations than those admitted from and discharged to long-term care facilities and other hospitals, regardless of dementia status. Past research in other countries also reported that patients often quickly return to their previous nursing home and therefore have a shorter length of stay compared to those admitted from their own homes [8, 10].

In addition, Japan is well known for recording prolonged hospital stays than other countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) [33]. The median length of hospital stay for people with and without dementia in the present study was 26 days; almost the same as the average length of hospital stay in hip fracture cases overall in acute care hospitals in Japan [34] but longer than those in Canada (no dementia = 17.5 days, dementia = 24.0 days [13]) or Australia (dementia < 15 days [10]). Currently, the government has promoted the transition of the elderly from hospitalization to welfare homes, which is expected to contribute to reduced length of hospital stay. Fee-schedule introduced financial incentive to encourage hospital discharges and use post-discharge protocols, fostering co-operation among hospitals, clinics, and long-term-care facilities, especially for patients with hip fractures [35]. In this context, the places of residence before admission and after discharge are key determinants on the decision of time of discharge for elderly people after hip surgery. People with dementia who were admitted from home need more time to prepare the adequate post-hospitalization residence compared to those admitted from long-term care facilities [13]. Regarding hospital discharge, individuals going to another hospital and/or long-term care facility transition with no delays and seamlessly compared to those being discharged to their own homes, given that existing post-discharge protocols between acute and post-acute hospitals or long-term-care facilities work well [35].

Our study also contributed new findings concerning the factors related to older adult in-patients’ health outcomes after hip surgery. Remarkably, our study suggested that not only individual characteristics but also the nursing staffing level is related to these outcomes. The increase of one in-patient per nursing staff was associated with longer length of hospital stay, in other words, increased nursing workload might disturb early discharge. This finding supported the results of Kane’s meta-analysis, which concluded that an increase by one registered nurse per patient day was associated with a 31% shorter length of hospital stay in surgical patients (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55–0.86 [27]).

This study had several limitations. First, the data were obtained from relatively large hospitals in Japan. We selected hospitals that had an average of > 200 in-patients per day in order to adjust for the effect of surgeon procedure volumes, which are related to patient outcomes [36]. Our findings might thus not be generalizable. Second, there may be some unmeasured confounders that might affect patient outcomes (e.g., whether it was a scheduled or emergency surgery and the severity of dementia). Patients with severe dementia are more likely to choose non-operative treatment for hip fractures [37]. In this study, we focused on cases with hip surgery, which might have involved those with relatively mild dementia. The ADL of patients were also related to the length of hospital stay [8, 38]. Although our dataset included ADL, some ADL data were missing and thus had to be excluded from the analysis. Third, for the database used in this study, the validation study reported that the sensitivity of diagnoses was low and varied across conditions [22]. The prevalence of non-critical adverse events, such as mild pneumonia, might have been underestimated. This, however, would not affect our findings since underestimations could occur with or without dementia.

Conclusion

Adverse events were more likely to occur in people aged 65 or older with dementia than in those without dementia after hip surgery. These events were not significantly associated with dementia after adjusting for individual social and nursing care environment. Further studies are necessary to identify factors that mitigate the effect of dementia on poor outcomes.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Results of multivariate analyses for in-hospital death, in-hospital pneumonia, and in-hospital fracture and dementia (full model).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249364.s002

(PDF)

S2 Table. Results of multivariate analyses for length of hospital stay and dementia (full model).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249364.s003

(PDF)

References

  1. 1. Papadimitriou N, Tsilidis KK, Orfanos P, Benetou V, Ntzani EE, Soerjomataram I, et al. Burden of hip fracture using disability-adjusted life-years: a pooled analysis of prospective cohorts in the CHANCES consortium. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2: e239–e246. S2468-2667(17)30046-4 [pii]. pmid:29253489
  2. 2. Baker NL, Cook MN, Arrighi HM, Bullock R. Hip fracture risk and subsequent mortality among Alzheimer’s disease patients in the United Kingdom, 1988–2007. Age Ageing. 2011;40: 49–54. pmid:21087990
  3. 3. Harvey L, Mitchell R, Brodaty H, Draper B, Close J. The influence of dementia on injury-related hospitalisations and outcomes in older adults. Injury. 2016;47: 226–234. pmid:26534784
  4. 4. Tolppanen AM, Lavikainen P, Soininen H, Hartikainen S. Incident hip fractures among community dwelling persons with Alzheimer’s disease in a Finnish nationwide register-based cohort. PLoS One. 2013;8: e59124. pmid:23527106
  5. 5. GBD 2016 Dementia Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18: 88–106. S1474-4422(18)30403-4 [pii]. pmid:30497964
  6. 6. Mukadam N, Sampson EL. A systematic review of the prevalence, associations and outcomes of dementia in older general hospital inpatients. Int Psychogeriatr. 2011;23: 344–355. pmid:20716393
  7. 7. Seitz DP, Adunuri N, Gill SS, Rochon PA. Prevalence of dementia and cognitive impairment among older adults with hip fractures. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011;12: 556–564. pmid:21450227
  8. 8. Mosk CA, Mus M, Vroemen JP, van der Ploeg T, Vos DI, Elmans LH, et al. Dementia and delirium, the outcomes in elderly hip fracture patients. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12: 421–430. pmid:28331300
  9. 9. Sakata N, Okumura Y, Fushimi K, Nakanishi M, Ogawa A. Dementia and Risk of 30-Day Readmission in Older Adults After Discharge from Acute Care Hospitals. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66: 871–878. pmid:29460284
  10. 10. Scandol JP, Toson B, Close JC. Fall-related hip fracture hospitalisations and the prevalence of dementia within older people in New South Wales, Australia: an analysis of linked data. Injury. 2013;44: 776–783. pmid:23270698
  11. 11. Seitz DP, Gill SS, Gruneir A, Austin PC, Anderson G, Reimer CL, et al. Effects of cholinesterase inhibitors on postoperative outcomes of older adults with dementia undergoing hip fracture surgery. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011;19: 803–813. pmid:21873836
  12. 12. Tsuda Y, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Ogawa S, Kawano H, Tanaka S. Association between dementia and postoperative complications after hip fracture surgery in the elderly: analysis of 87,654 patients using a national administrative database. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135: 1511–1517. pmid:26487632
  13. 13. Seitz DP, Gill SS, Gruneir A, Austin PC, Anderson GM, Bell CM, et al. Effects of dementia on postoperative outcomes of older adults with hip fractures: a population-based study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15: 334–341. pmid:24524851
  14. 14. Moonga J, Likupe G. A systematic literature review on nurses’ and health care support workers’ experiences of caring for people with dementia on orthopaedic wards. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25: 1789–1804. pmid:26991944
  15. 15. World Health Organization (WHO). Global action plan on the public health response to dementia 2017–2025. 2017.
  16. 16. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Dementia: support in health and social care quality standard. 2010.
  17. 17. Digby R, Lee S, Williams A. The experience of people with dementia and nurses in hospital: an integrative review. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26: 1152–1171. pmid:27322590
  18. 18. Yasunaga H, Ide H, Imamura T, Ohe K. Impact of the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination-based Payment System on Cardiovascular Medicine-related Costs. International Heart Journal. 2005;46: 855–866. pmid:16272776
  19. 19. Yasunaga H, Hashimoto H, Horiguchi H, Miyata H, Matsuda S. Variation in cancer surgical outcomes associated with physician and nurse staffing: a retrospective observational study using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12: 129-6963-12-129. pmid:22640411
  20. 20. Ministry of Health,Labour and Welfare. Reporting on medical functions of hospital beds [byousyoukinouhoukoku]. 2016. (in Japanese).
  21. 21. Ota T, Waga S, Handa H, Saito I, Basugi N, Takeuchi K, et al. New grading of level of consciousness in acute stage. Surgery for Cerebral Stroke. 1975;3: 61–68. (in Japanese).
  22. 22. Yamana H, Moriwaki M, Horiguchi H, Kodan M, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H. Validity of diagnoses, procedures, and laboratory data in Japanese administrative data. J Epidemiol. 2017;27: 476–482. S0917-5040(17)30003-5 [pii]. pmid:28142051
  23. 23. Morioka N, Moriwaki M, Tomio J, Kashiwagi M, Fushimi K, Ogata Y. Structure and process of dementia care and patient outcomes after hip surgery in elderly people with dementia: A retrospective observational study in Japan. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;102: 103470. S0020-7489(19)30277-9 [pii]. pmid:31810019
  24. 24. Sundararajan V, Quan H, Halfon P, Fushimi K, Luthi JC, Burnand B, et al. Cross-national comparative performance of three versions of the ICD-10 Charlson index. Med Care. 2007;45: 1210–1215. pmid:18007172
  25. 25. Ministry of Justice. Act on Public Health Nurses, Midwives, and Nurses. http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=2075&vm=04&re=01/ (accessed 16.08.22).1948.
  26. 26. Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Bruyneel L, Van den Heede K, Griffiths P, Busse R, et al. Nurse staffing and education and hospital mortality in nine European countries: a retrospective observational study. Lancet. 2014;383: 1824–1830. pmid:24581683
  27. 27. Kane RL, Shamliyan TA, Mueller C, Duval S, Wilt TJ. The association of registered nurse staffing levels and patient outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Care. 2007;45: 1195–1204. pmid:18007170
  28. 28. Ministry of Health,Labour and Welfare. On the evaluation of inpatient medical fee [nyuuin iryo no hyoka no arikata ni tsuite]. 2005. (in Japanese).
  29. 29. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Medical service fee revision in FY2016 [Heisei 28 nendo sinryohousyu kaitei nituite]. 2016. (in Japanese).
  30. 30. Goldstein H. Multilevel Statistical Models, 4th Edition: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010.
  31. 31. Wooldridge JM, 1960-. Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. Fifth edition ed. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning; 2012.
  32. 32. Ministry of Health,Labour and Welfare. A comprehensive strategy for the promotion of dementia measures-towards a community friendly to the elderly with dementia (a New Orange Plan). 2015.
  33. 33. World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia. Japan health system review. Health systems in transition. 2018;Vol 8, Number 1.
  34. 34. Ministry of Health,Labour and Welfare. Annual Health, Labour and Welfare Report 2017. 2017.
  35. 35. OECD. OECD reviews of health care Quality, Japan 2015.. 2015.
  36. 36. Browne JA, Pietrobon R, Olson SA. Hip fracture outcomes: does surgeon or hospital volume really matter? J Trauma. 2009;66: 809–814. pmid:19276758
  37. 37. Sullivan NM, Blake LE, George M, Mears SC. Palliative Care in the Hip Fracture Patient. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019;10: 2151459319849801. pmid:31210998
  38. 38. Watne LO, Torbergsen AC, Conroy S, Engedal K, Frihagen F, Hjorthaug GA, et al. The effect of a pre- and postoperative orthogeriatric service on cognitive function in patients with hip fracture: randomized controlled trial (Oslo Orthogeriatric Trial). BMC Med. 2014;12: 63-7015-12-63. pmid:24735588