Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Evaluating the Return in Ecosystem Services from Investment in Public Land Acquisitions

Figure 8

Natural log of the post-1988 publically acquired acres for each 8-digit watershed as explained by the annual (a) cost per acre, and the baseline LULC (b) benefits per acre in 2052 (in 2010 $) and (c) return on investment.

Here we use the low-end of service values. Solid line represents the best fitting model, dashed lines represent ±1 standard error (SE). Robust standard errors shown in parentheses. a indicates indicates significance at the 10% level. The best fit in panel (a) based on the residual sum of squares criterion is a non-linear quadratic.

Figure 8

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062202.g008