Repression of nuclear CELF activity can rescue CELF-regulated alternative splicing defects in skeletal muscle models of myotonic dystrophy

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is caused by the expansion of CUG repeats in the 3’ UTR of DMPK transcripts. DM1 pathogenesis has been attributed in part to alternative splicing dysregulation via elevation of CUG-BP, Elav-like family member 1 (CELF1). Several therapeutic approaches have been tested in cells and mice, but no previous studies had specifically targeted CELF1. Here, we show that repressing CELF activity rescues CELF-dependent alternative splicing in cell culture and transgenic mouse models of DM1. CELF-independent splicing, however, remained dysregulated. These data highlight both the potential and limitations of targeting CELF1 for the treatment of DM1.


INTRODUCTION
Myotonic dystrophy ( dystrophia myotonica , DM) is the most common form of adult-onset muscular dystrophy [1] .It is an autosomal dominant disease caused by expansion of CTG (DM1) or CCTG (DM2) repeats in the 3? UTR of the DMPK gene or intron 1 of the ZNF9 gene, respectively [2] [3] [4] [5] .DM is a multi-system disease characterized by myotonia, muscle wasting, insulin resistance, cardiac conduction defects, cataracts, testicular atrophy, and cognitive dysfunction [1] .Congenital forms of DM are even more severe, exhibiting deficiencies in muscle formation, including poor fiber type differentiation [1] .The mechanism of pathogenesis is not fully understood, but several lines of evidence indicate that expanded CUG or CCUG repeatcontaining RNA disrupts normal processing of other mRNAs [6] .These effects are mediated at least in part via disruption of the alternative splicing factor CUG-BP, Elav-like family member 1 (CELF1) [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] .
CELF1 protein is normally down-regulated in striated muscle after birth [12] [13] .The postnatal down-regulation of CELF1 is post-transcriptional, and involves both changes in CELF1 phosphorylation that affect protein stability and microRNA-mediated repression of CELF1 protein production [14] [15] .In heart and skeletal muscle of adult DM1 patients, however, CELF1 protein levels are elevated [8] [16] .Activation of protein kinase C (PKC) in DM1 by an as yet unknown mechanism leads to the hyperphosphorylation and stabilization of CELF1 protein [15] .CELF1 is also up-regulated in heart and skeletal muscle in transgenic mice following induction of expanded CUG repeat RNA expression [17] [18] .Interestingly, transgenic mice that constitutively over-express CELF1 in skeletal muscle share many of the same pathological features of congenital DM1 patients [10] [19] , while mice that are induced to over-express CELF1 in adult skeletal muscle develop many of the features of adultonset DM1, including muscle wasting [20] .
The dysregulation of the alternative splicing of CELF targets in DM1 has been directly linked to skeletal muscle symptoms.Alternative splicing of insulin receptor ( IR ) contributes to insulin resistance [8] , whereas alternative splicing of a musclespecific chloride channel ( ClC-1 ) leads to myotonia [9] [21] [22] [23] .Splicing patterns in adult DM1 patient muscle tissues are consistent with elevated CELF activity, and resemble normal fetal splicing patterns despite a lack of extensive regeneration in DM1 muscle [8] [24] .This suggests that pathogenesis is due to aberrant regulation of alternative splicing that leads to an inappropriate reiteration of the fetal CELF splicing program in adult.
Up-regulation of CELF1 is not the only mechanism by which alternative splicing is dysregulated in DM1.Another alternative splicing regulator, muscleblind-like 1 (MBNL1) co-localizes with expanded CUG repeat RNA [25] [26] , and it has been proposed sequestration of MBNL1 into expanded repeat-containing RNA foci leads to loss of MBNL1 function.Skeletal muscles from mice lacking MBNL1 do exhibit changes in alternative splicing, histology, and function that are characteristic of DM1, though they do not develop a full DM1 phenotype [11] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] .Taken all together, the body of evidence indicates that upregulation of CELF1 and loss of MBNL1 function both play important roles in DM1 pathogenesis.
Based on what is known about the causative factors that contribute to DM1 pathogenesis, a number of therapeutic approaches have been tested in cultured cells and mouse models with encouraging results.Morpholino antisense oligonucleotides targeting a splice site in ClC-1 was able to reverse the ClC-1 alternative splicing defect in skeletal muscle and eliminate myotonia in two

INTRODUCTION
Myotonic dystrophy ( dystrophia myotonica , DM) is the most common form of adult-onset muscular dystrophy [1] .It is an autosomal dominant disease caused by expansion of CTG (DM1) or CCTG (DM2) repeats in the 3? UTR of the DMPK gene or intron 1 of the ZNF9 gene, respectively [2] [3] [4] [5] .DM is a multi-system disease characterized by myotonia, muscle wasting, insulin resistance, cardiac conduction defects, cataracts, testicular atrophy, and cognitive dysfunction [1] .Congenital forms of DM are even more severe, exhibiting deficiencies in muscle formation, including poor fiber type differentiation [1] .The mechanism of pathogenesis is not fully understood, but several lines of evidence indicate that expanded CUG or CCUG repeatcontaining RNA disrupts normal processing of other mRNAs [6] .These effects are mediated at least in part via disruption of the alternative splicing factor CUG-BP, Elav-like family member 1 (CELF1) [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] .
CELF1 protein is normally down-regulated in striated muscle after birth [12] [13] .The postnatal down-regulation of CELF1 is post-transcriptional, and involves both changes in CELF1 phosphorylation that affect protein stability and microRNA-mediated repression of CELF1 protein production [14] [15] .In heart and skeletal muscle of adult DM1 patients, however, CELF1 protein levels are elevated [8] [16] .Activation of protein kinase C (PKC) in DM1 by an as yet unknown mechanism leads to the hyperphosphorylation and stabilization of CELF1 protein [15] .CELF1 is also up-regulated in heart and skeletal muscle in transgenic mice following induction of expanded CUG repeat RNA expression [17] [18] .Interestingly, transgenic mice that constitutively over-express CELF1 in skeletal muscle share many of the same pathological features of congenital DM1 patients [10] [19] , while mice that are induced to over-express CELF1 in adult skeletal muscle develop many of the features of adultonset DM1, including muscle wasting [20] .
The dysregulation of the alternative splicing of CELF targets in DM1 has been directly linked to skeletal muscle symptoms.Alternative splicing of insulin receptor ( IR ) contributes to insulin resistance [8] , whereas alternative splicing of a musclespecific chloride channel ( ClC-1 ) leads to myotonia [9] [21] [22] [23] .Splicing patterns in adult DM1 patient muscle tissues are consistent with elevated CELF activity, and resemble normal fetal splicing patterns despite a lack of extensive regeneration in DM1 muscle [8] [24] .This suggests that pathogenesis is due to aberrant regulation of alternative splicing that leads to an inappropriate reiteration of the fetal CELF splicing program in adult.
Up-regulation of CELF1 is not the only mechanism by which alternative splicing is dysregulated in DM1.Another alternative splicing regulator, muscleblind-like 1 (MBNL1) co-localizes with expanded CUG repeat RNA [25] [26] , and it has been proposed sequestration of MBNL1 into expanded repeat-containing RNA foci leads to loss of MBNL1 function.Skeletal muscles from mice lacking MBNL1 do exhibit changes in alternative splicing, histology, and function that are characteristic of DM1, though they do not develop a full DM1 phenotype [11] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] .Taken all together, the body of evidence indicates that upregulation of CELF1 and loss of MBNL1 function both play important roles in DM1 pathogenesis.
Based on what is known about the causative factors that contribute to DM1 pathogenesis, a number of therapeutic approaches have been tested in cultured cells and mouse models with encouraging results.Morpholino antisense oligonucleotides targeting a splice site in ClC-1 was able to reverse the ClC-1 alternative splicing defect in skeletal muscle and eliminate myotonia in two

INTRODUCTION
Myotonic dystrophy ( dystrophia myotonica , DM) is the most common form of adult-onset muscular dystrophy [1] .It is an autosomal dominant disease caused by expansion of CTG (DM1) or CCTG (DM2) repeats in the 3? UTR of the DMPK gene or intron 1 of the ZNF9 gene, respectively [2] [3] [4] [5] .DM is a multi-system disease characterized by myotonia, muscle wasting, insulin resistance, cardiac conduction defects, cataracts, testicular atrophy, and cognitive dysfunction [1] .Congenital forms of DM are even more severe, exhibiting deficiencies in muscle formation, including poor fiber type differentiation [1] .The mechanism of pathogenesis is not fully understood, but several lines of evidence indicate that expanded CUG or CCUG repeatcontaining RNA disrupts normal processing of other mRNAs [6] .These effects are mediated at least in part via disruption of the alternative splicing factor CUG-BP, Elav-like family member 1 (CELF1) [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] .
CELF1 protein is normally down-regulated in striated muscle after birth [12] [13] .The postnatal down-regulation of CELF1 is post-transcriptional, and involves both changes in CELF1 phosphorylation that affect protein stability and microRNA-mediated repression of CELF1 protein production [14] [15] .In heart and skeletal muscle of adult DM1 patients, however, CELF1 protein levels are elevated [8] [16] .Activation of protein kinase C (PKC) in DM1 by an as yet unknown mechanism leads to the hyperphosphorylation and stabilization of CELF1 protein [15] .CELF1 is also up-regulated in heart and skeletal muscle in transgenic mice following induction of expanded CUG repeat RNA expression [17] [18] .Interestingly, transgenic mice that constitutively over-express CELF1 in skeletal muscle share many of the same pathological features of congenital DM1 patients [10] [19] , while mice that are induced to over-express CELF1 in adult skeletal muscle develop many of the features of adultonset DM1, including muscle wasting [20] .
The dysregulation of the alternative splicing of CELF targets in DM1 has been directly linked to skeletal muscle symptoms.Alternative splicing of insulin receptor ( IR ) contributes to insulin resistance [8] , whereas alternative splicing of a musclespecific chloride channel ( ClC-1 ) leads to myotonia [9] [21] [22] [23] .Splicing patterns in adult DM1 patient muscle tissues are consistent with elevated CELF activity, and resemble normal fetal splicing patterns despite a lack of extensive regeneration in DM1 muscle [8] [24] .This suggests that pathogenesis is due to aberrant regulation of alternative splicing that leads to an inappropriate reiteration of the fetal CELF splicing program in adult.
Up-regulation of CELF1 is not the only mechanism by which alternative splicing is dysregulated in DM1.Another alternative splicing regulator, muscleblind-like 1 (MBNL1) co-localizes with expanded CUG repeat RNA [25] [26] , and it has been proposed sequestration of MBNL1 into expanded repeat-containing RNA foci leads to loss of MBNL1 function.Skeletal muscles from mice lacking MBNL1 do exhibit changes in alternative splicing, histology, and function that are characteristic of DM1, though they do not develop a full DM1 phenotype [11] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] .Taken all together, the body of evidence indicates that upregulation of CELF1 and loss of MBNL1 function both play important roles in DM1 pathogenesis.
Based on what is known about the causative factors that contribute to DM1 pathogenesis, a number of therapeutic approaches have been tested in cultured cells and mouse models with encouraging results.Morpholino antisense oligonucleotides targeting a splice site in ClC-1 was able to reverse the ClC-1 alternative splicing defect in skeletal muscle and eliminate myotonia in two mouse models of DM1 [23] .Approaches to restore the loss of MBNL1 function in skeletal muscle have included overexpression of MBNL1 protein via a recombinant adeno-associated viral vector [32] , and the administration of either a drug or morpholino antisense oligonucleotide to disrupt the interaction of MBNL1 with expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA [33] [34] .In each case, an increase in MBNL1 function at least partially rescued alternative splicing defects in mice.Administration of a PKC inhibitor reduced CELF1 protein levels, rescued alternative splicing of some transcripts, and improved cardiac function in an inducible heart-specific mouse model of DM1 [35] .Finally, oligonucleotides or peptides targeted against the expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA reduced foci formation and alternative splicing dysregulation in a DM1 mouse model [36] [37] .
Despite the evidence that an increase in CELF1 protein contributes to DM1 pathogenesis, to date no one has directly targeted CELF1 in DM1 muscle.In this study, we tested whether repression of CELF activity in skeletal muscle would restore normal alternative splicing patterns in cultured cells and a mouse model of DM1.We demonstrate that expression of a dominant negative CELF protein, NLSCELF?, is sufficient to reverse dysregulation of a splicing minigene by expanded CUG repeatcontaining RNA in differentiated C2C12 cells.In mice, NLSCELF? was also able to rescue dysregulation of alternative splicing of a CELF target RNA, but had no effect on a CELF1-independent transcript.These data highlight the potential and limitations of CELF1 as a therapeutic target for the treatment of DM1.
C2C12 murine myoblasts (ATCC) were maintained in growth medium (low-glucose DMEM supplemented with 20% FBS, 0.5% chick embryo extract, and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic). C2C12 cells were transfected with 100 ng R35C, 0 or 250 ng DMPKS or DT960, 0 or 2 µg NLSCELF?, and carrier plasmid as needed to a total of 3.1 µg DNA per 60 mm plate at 30-40% confluency (d - 1 ) using Fugene 6 (Roche Applied Science).Two days later when cells had reached 95-100% confluency (d 1 ), medium was changed to differentiation medium (low-glucose DMEM supplemented with 5% horse serum, and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic). Medium was replaced with fresh differentiation medium the following day (d 2 ), and samples were collected the day after that (d 3 ).By d 3 , C2C12 cells had differentiated into large, multi-nucleated myotubes.Total protein and RNA samples were harvested from parallel plates.Protein samples were collected and NLSCELF? protein expression was confirmed by western blotting as previously described [38] .RNA was harvested using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen), and the extent of minigene exon inclusion was determined by semi-quantitative RT-PCR as previously described [38].

Bitransgenic mice
Animal husbandry and experiments were performed under the approval of the Cleveland Clinic Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol number ARC 08612) and in accordance with the recommendations of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

Statistics
Comparisons between the mean values for the extent of exon inclusion and skipping in different experimental groups were performed via non-parametric, one-tailed Mann-Whitney U -test.Differences were considered statistically significant when P ?0.05.

Repression of CELF activity rescues alternative splicing of a minigene reporter in a C2C12 cell culture model of DM1
Since an increase in CELF protein expression likely contributes to pathogenic changes in alternative splicing in skeletal muscle of DM1 patients, we reasoned that repression of CELF activity should restore normal alternative splicing patterns.It has been mouse models of DM1 [23] .Approaches to restore the loss of MBNL1 function in skeletal muscle have included overexpression of MBNL1 protein via a recombinant adeno-associated viral vector [32] , and the administration of either a drug or morpholino antisense oligonucleotide to disrupt the interaction of MBNL1 with expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA [33] [34] .In each case, an increase in MBNL1 function at least partially rescued alternative splicing defects in mice.Administration of a PKC inhibitor reduced CELF1 protein levels, rescued alternative splicing of some transcripts, and improved cardiac function in an inducible heart-specific mouse model of DM1 [35] .Finally, oligonucleotides or peptides targeted against the expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA reduced foci formation and alternative splicing dysregulation in a DM1 mouse model [36] [37] .
Despite the evidence that an increase in CELF1 protein contributes to DM1 pathogenesis, to date no one has directly targeted CELF1 in DM1 muscle.In this study, we tested whether repression of CELF activity in skeletal muscle would restore normal alternative splicing patterns in cultured cells and a mouse model of DM1.We demonstrate that expression of a dominant negative CELF protein, NLSCELF?, is sufficient to reverse dysregulation of a splicing minigene by expanded CUG repeatcontaining RNA in differentiated C2C12 cells.In mice, NLSCELF? was also able to rescue dysregulation of alternative splicing of a CELF target RNA, but had no effect on a CELF1-independent transcript.These data highlight the potential and limitations of CELF1 as a therapeutic target for the treatment of DM1.
C2C12 murine myoblasts (ATCC) were maintained in growth medium (low-glucose DMEM supplemented with 20% FBS, 0.5% chick embryo extract, and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic). C2C12 cells were transfected with 100 ng R35C, 0 or 250 ng DMPKS or DT960, 0 or 2 µg NLSCELF?, and carrier plasmid as needed to a total of 3.1 µg DNA per 60 mm plate at 30-40% confluency (d - 1 ) using Fugene 6 (Roche Applied Science).Two days later when cells had reached 95-100% confluency (d 1 ), medium was changed to differentiation medium (low-glucose DMEM supplemented with 5% horse serum, and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic). Medium was replaced with fresh differentiation medium the following day (d 2 ), and samples were collected the day after that (d 3 ).By d 3 , C2C12 cells had differentiated into large, multi-nucleated myotubes.Total protein and RNA samples were harvested from parallel plates.Protein samples were collected and NLSCELF? protein expression was confirmed by western blotting as previously described [38] .RNA was harvested using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen), and the extent of minigene exon inclusion was determined by semi-quantitative RT-PCR as previously described [38].

Bitransgenic mice
Animal husbandry and experiments were performed under the approval of the Cleveland Clinic Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol number ARC 08612) and in accordance with the recommendations of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

Statistics
Comparisons between the mean values for the extent of exon inclusion and skipping in different experimental groups were performed via non-parametric, one-tailed Mann-Whitney U -test.Differences were considered statistically significant when P ?0.05.

Repression of CELF activity rescues alternative splicing of a minigene reporter in a C2C12 cell culture model of DM1
Since an increase in CELF protein expression likely contributes to pathogenic changes in alternative splicing in skeletal muscle of DM1 patients, we reasoned that repression of CELF activity should restore normal alternative splicing patterns.It has been mouse models of DM1 [23] .Approaches to restore the loss of MBNL1 function in skeletal muscle have included overexpression of MBNL1 protein via a recombinant adeno-associated viral vector [32] , and the administration of either a drug or morpholino antisense oligonucleotide to disrupt the interaction of MBNL1 with expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA [33] [34] .In each case, an increase in MBNL1 function at least partially rescued alternative splicing defects in mice.Administration of a PKC inhibitor reduced CELF1 protein levels, rescued alternative splicing of some transcripts, and improved cardiac function in an inducible heart-specific mouse model of DM1 [35] .Finally, oligonucleotides or peptides targeted against the expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA reduced foci formation and alternative splicing dysregulation in a DM1 mouse model [36] [37] .
Despite the evidence that an increase in CELF1 protein contributes to DM1 pathogenesis, to date no one has directly targeted CELF1 in DM1 muscle.In this study, we tested whether repression of CELF activity in skeletal muscle would restore normal alternative splicing patterns in cultured cells and a mouse model of DM1.We demonstrate that expression of a dominant negative CELF protein, NLSCELF?, is sufficient to reverse dysregulation of a splicing minigene by expanded CUG repeatcontaining RNA in differentiated C2C12 cells.In mice, NLSCELF? was also able to rescue dysregulation of alternative splicing of a CELF target RNA, but had no effect on a CELF1-independent transcript.These data highlight the potential and limitations of CELF1 as a therapeutic target for the treatment of DM1.
C2C12 murine myoblasts (ATCC) were maintained in growth medium (low-glucose DMEM supplemented with 20% FBS, 0.5% chick embryo extract, and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic). C2C12 cells were transfected with 100 ng R35C, 0 or 250 ng DMPKS or DT960, 0 or 2 µg NLSCELF?, and carrier plasmid as needed to a total of 3.1 µg DNA per 60 mm plate at 30-40% confluency (d - 1 ) using Fugene 6 (Roche Applied Science).Two days later when cells had reached 95-100% confluency (d 1 ), medium was changed to differentiation medium (low-glucose DMEM supplemented with 5% horse serum, and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic). Medium was replaced with fresh differentiation medium the following day (d 2 ), and samples were collected the day after that (d 3 ).By d 3 , C2C12 cells had differentiated into large, multi-nucleated myotubes.Total protein and RNA samples were harvested from parallel plates.Protein samples were collected and NLSCELF? protein expression was confirmed by western blotting as previously described [38] .RNA was harvested using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen), and the extent of minigene exon inclusion was determined by semi-quantitative RT-PCR as previously described [38].

Bitransgenic mice
Animal husbandry and experiments were performed under the approval of the Cleveland Clinic Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol number ARC 08612) and in accordance with the recommendations of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

Statistics
Comparisons between the mean values for the extent of exon inclusion and skipping in different experimental groups were performed via non-parametric, one-tailed Mann-Whitney U -test.Differences were considered statistically significant when P ?0.05.

Repression of CELF activity rescues alternative splicing of a minigene reporter in a C2C12 cell culture model of DM1
Since an increase in CELF protein expression likely contributes to pathogenic changes in alternative splicing in skeletal muscle of DM1 patients, we reasoned that repression of CELF activity should restore normal alternative splicing patterns.It has been previously shown that cardiac troponin T exon 5 inclusion is elevated in DM1 [7] , and co-expression of cTNT minigenes with RNAs containing expanded CUG repeats by transient transfection recapitulates this effect in both fibroblasts and skeletal muscle cells [7] [25] .Likewise, we observed that co-transfection of a cTNT minigene (R35C) with a plasmid expressing a partial DMPK transcript containing 960 CUG repeats (DT960) induced a modest but significant increase in exon inclusion compared to the minigene alone in C2C12 myoblasts that had been differentiated into myotubes (Figure 1).An identical DMPK transcript lacking the CUG repeats (DMPKS) had no significant affect on exon inclusion (data not shown).The R35C minigene has also been shown to respond to CELF-mediated regulation.CELF protein over-expression promotes exon inclusion in fibroblasts [38] , reminiscent of the effects of the DT960 expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA.In contrast, repression of endogenous CELF activity in primary embryonic cardiomyocytes by expression of a dominant negative CELF protein, NLSCELF?, promotes R35C exon skipping [13] .To determine whether repression of CELF activity would counteract the induction of exon inclusion induced by expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA in skeletal muscle cells, we co-transfected C2C12 cells with R35C, DT960, and NLSCELF?expression plasmids and induced myotube differentiation.Expression of the NLSCELF?protein was confirmed by western blotting (data not shown).Exon inclusion of the minigene following co-expression of both DT960 and NLSCELF? was similar to that of the minigene alone (Figure 1), suggesting that repression of CELF activity in the nucleus is sufficient to ameliorate the affects of expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA on alternative splicing of this transcript in skeletal muscle cells.

Repression of CELF activity partially rescues alternative splicing in a DM1 mouse model in vivo
Unfortunately, expression of an expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA by transient transfection was insufficient to disrupt alternative splicing of endogenous transcripts in C2C12 myotubes (data not shown), perhaps due to inadequate transfection efficiency in these cells.To extend these studies to endogenous skeletal muscle transcripts in vivo , we employed two preexisting transgenic mouse models.The Thornton laboratory developed the HSA LR mouse model of DM1, in which 250 untranslated CUG repeats are expressed in skeletal muscle under the human skeletal actin promoter [40] .Skeletal muscles in HSA LR mice display alternative splicing changes associated with DM1, as well as myopathy and myotonia, common clinical manifestations of DM [11] [22] [40] .Our laboratory has generated Myo-CELF?transgenic mice in which CELF activity is specifically repressed in skeletal muscles by expression of the NLSCELF?dominant negative protein under the mouse myogenin promoter [41] .Myo-CELF?mice exhibit dysregulation of alternative splicing of some CELF targets in skeletal muscle, as well as changes in muscle fiber properties [41] .Myo-CELF?mice have reduced, not elevated, CELF activity, and therefore are not themselves a model of DM1.Many of the same muscle properties (i.e.interstitial spacing, fiber size variability, and fiber type composition) are affected, however, consistent with a role for CELF-mediated alternative splicing in regulating these characteristics of skeletal muscle pathogenesis in DM1 [41] .
To test whether repression of CELF activity would rescue alternative splicing defects in an in vivo model of DM1 skeletal muscle, we crossed HSA LR mice to a line of Myo-CELF?mice to generate bitransgenic HSA LR /Myo-CELF?mice.Thigh muscle was collected from age-and sex-matched wild type, HSA LR transgenic, and HSA LR /Myo-CELF?bitransgenic littermates, and the alternative splicing of Nrap exon 12 was evaluated by RT-PCR (Figure 2).This alternative splicing event was chosen because it is known to be dysregulated in DM1, and to be regulated by CELF proteins.Nrap exon 12 inclusion is reduced in skeletal muscles of DM1 patients and HSA LR mice [11] , but elevated in Myo-CELF?mice [41] .Consistent with previous reports [11] , we saw a significant decrease in Nrap exon 12 inclusion in thigh muscle from hemizygous HSA LR mice relative to their wild type littermates (Figure 2).In contrast, bitransgenic HSA LR /Myo-CELF?mice exhibited a level of inclusion previously shown that cardiac troponin T exon 5 inclusion is elevated in DM1 [7] , and co-expression of cTNT minigenes with RNAs containing expanded CUG repeats by transient transfection recapitulates this effect in both fibroblasts and skeletal muscle cells [7] [25] .Likewise, we observed that co-transfection of a cTNT minigene (R35C) with a plasmid expressing a partial DMPK transcript containing 960 CUG repeats (DT960) induced a modest but significant increase in exon inclusion compared to the minigene alone in C2C12 myoblasts that had been differentiated into myotubes (Figure 1).An identical DMPK transcript lacking the CUG repeats (DMPKS) had no significant affect on exon inclusion (data not shown).The R35C minigene has also been shown to respond to CELF-mediated regulation.CELF protein over-expression promotes exon inclusion in fibroblasts [38] , reminiscent of the effects of the DT960 expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA.In contrast, repression of endogenous CELF activity in primary embryonic cardiomyocytes by expression of a dominant negative CELF protein, NLSCELF?, promotes R35C exon skipping [13] .To determine whether repression of CELF activity would counteract the induction of exon inclusion induced by expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA in skeletal muscle cells, we co-transfected C2C12 cells with R35C, DT960, and NLSCELF?expression plasmids and induced myotube differentiation.Expression of the NLSCELF?protein was confirmed by western blotting (data not shown).Exon inclusion of the minigene following co-expression of both DT960 and NLSCELF? was similar to that of the minigene alone (Figure 1), suggesting that repression of CELF activity in the nucleus is sufficient to ameliorate the affects of expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA on alternative splicing of this transcript in skeletal muscle cells.

Repression of CELF activity partially rescues alternative splicing in a DM1 mouse model in vivo
Unfortunately, expression of an expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA by transient transfection was insufficient to disrupt alternative splicing of endogenous transcripts in C2C12 myotubes (data not shown), perhaps due to inadequate transfection efficiency in these cells.To extend these studies to endogenous skeletal muscle transcripts in vivo , we employed two preexisting transgenic mouse models.The Thornton laboratory developed the HSA LR mouse model of DM1, in which 250 untranslated CUG repeats are expressed in skeletal muscle under the human skeletal actin promoter [40] .Skeletal muscles in HSA LR mice display alternative splicing changes associated with DM1, as well as myopathy and myotonia, common clinical manifestations of DM [11] [22] [40] .Our laboratory has generated Myo-CELF?transgenic mice in which CELF activity is specifically repressed in skeletal muscles by expression of the NLSCELF?dominant negative protein under the mouse myogenin promoter [41] .Myo-CELF?mice exhibit dysregulation of alternative splicing of some CELF targets in skeletal muscle, as well as changes in muscle fiber properties [41] .Myo-CELF?mice have reduced, not elevated, CELF activity, and therefore are not themselves a model of DM1.Many of the same muscle properties (i.e.interstitial spacing, fiber size variability, and fiber type composition) are affected, however, consistent with a role for CELF-mediated alternative splicing in regulating these characteristics of skeletal muscle pathogenesis in DM1 [41] .
To test whether repression of CELF activity would rescue alternative splicing defects in an in vivo model of DM1 skeletal muscle, we crossed HSA LR mice to a line of Myo-CELF?mice to generate bitransgenic HSA LR /Myo-CELF?mice.Thigh muscle was collected from age-and sex-matched wild type, HSA LR transgenic, and HSA LR /Myo-CELF?bitransgenic littermates, and the alternative splicing of Nrap exon 12 was evaluated by RT-PCR (Figure 2).This alternative splicing event was chosen because it is known to be dysregulated in DM1, and to be regulated by CELF proteins.Nrap exon 12 inclusion is reduced in skeletal muscles of DM1 patients and HSA LR mice [11] , but elevated in Myo-CELF?mice [41] .Consistent with previous reports [11] , we saw a significant decrease in Nrap exon 12 inclusion in thigh muscle from hemizygous HSA LR mice relative to their wild type littermates (Figure 2).In contrast, bitransgenic HSA LR /Myo-CELF?mice exhibited a level of inclusion previously shown that cardiac troponin T exon 5 inclusion is elevated in DM1 [7] , and co-expression of cTNT minigenes with RNAs containing expanded CUG repeats by transient transfection recapitulates this effect in both fibroblasts and skeletal muscle cells [7] [25] .Likewise, we observed that co-transfection of a cTNT minigene (R35C) with a plasmid expressing a partial DMPK transcript containing 960 CUG repeats (DT960) induced a modest but significant increase in exon inclusion compared to the minigene alone in C2C12 myoblasts that had been differentiated into myotubes (Figure 1).An identical DMPK transcript lacking the CUG repeats (DMPKS) had no significant affect on exon inclusion (data not shown).The R35C minigene has also been shown to respond to CELF-mediated regulation.CELF protein over-expression promotes exon inclusion in fibroblasts [38] , reminiscent of the effects of the DT960 expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA.In contrast, repression of endogenous CELF activity in primary embryonic cardiomyocytes by expression of a dominant negative CELF protein, NLSCELF?, promotes R35C exon skipping [13] .To determine whether repression of CELF activity would counteract the induction of exon inclusion induced by expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA in skeletal muscle cells, we co-transfected C2C12 cells with R35C, DT960, and NLSCELF?expression plasmids and induced myotube differentiation.Expression of the NLSCELF?protein was confirmed by western blotting (data not shown).Exon inclusion of the minigene following co-expression of both DT960 and NLSCELF? was similar to that of the minigene alone (Figure 1), suggesting that repression of CELF activity in the nucleus is sufficient to ameliorate the affects of expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA on alternative splicing of this transcript in skeletal muscle cells.

Repression of CELF activity partially rescues alternative splicing in a DM1 mouse model in vivo
Unfortunately, expression of an expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA by transient transfection was insufficient to disrupt alternative splicing of endogenous transcripts in C2C12 myotubes (data not shown), perhaps due to inadequate transfection efficiency in these cells.To extend these studies to endogenous skeletal muscle transcripts in vivo , we employed two preexisting transgenic mouse models.The Thornton laboratory developed the HSA LR mouse model of DM1, in which 250 untranslated CUG repeats are expressed in skeletal muscle under the human skeletal actin promoter [40] .Skeletal muscles in HSA LR mice display alternative splicing changes associated with DM1, as well as myopathy and myotonia, common clinical manifestations of DM [11] [22] [40] .Our laboratory has generated Myo-CELF?transgenic mice in which CELF activity is specifically repressed in skeletal muscles by expression of the NLSCELF?dominant negative protein under the mouse myogenin promoter [41] .Myo-CELF?mice exhibit dysregulation of alternative splicing of some CELF targets in skeletal muscle, as well as changes in muscle fiber properties [41] .Myo-CELF?mice have reduced, not elevated, CELF activity, and therefore are not themselves a model of DM1.Many of the same muscle properties (i.e.interstitial spacing, fiber size variability, and fiber type composition) are affected, however, consistent with a role for CELF-mediated alternative splicing in regulating these characteristics of skeletal muscle pathogenesis in DM1 [41] .
To test whether repression of CELF activity would rescue alternative splicing defects in an in vivo model of DM1 skeletal muscle, we crossed HSA LR mice to a line of Myo-CELF?mice to generate bitransgenic HSA LR /Myo-CELF?mice.Thigh muscle was collected from age-and sex-matched wild type, HSA LR transgenic, and HSA LR /Myo-CELF?bitransgenic littermates, and the alternative splicing of Nrap exon 12 was evaluated by RT-PCR (Figure 2).This alternative splicing event was chosen because it is known to be dysregulated in DM1, and to be regulated by CELF proteins.Nrap exon 12 inclusion is reduced in skeletal muscles of DM1 patients and HSA LR mice [11] , but elevated in Myo-CELF?mice [41] .Consistent with previous reports [11] , we saw a significant decrease in Nrap exon 12 inclusion in thigh muscle from hemizygous HSA LR mice relative to their wild type littermates (Figure 2).In contrast, bitransgenic HSA LR /Myo-CELF?mice exhibited a level of inclusion that is significantly higher than that seen in HSA LR mice, and that is similar to that of wild type.Not all transcripts that are dysregulated in DM1 are sensitive to CELF regulation.For example, Serca1 exon 22 skipping is observed in skeletal muscle of DM1 patients and HSA LR mice, but not in healthy muscle [42] .Over-expression of CELF1 did not, however, affect the alternative splicing of a mouse Serca1 minigene or endogenous Serca1 transcripts in C2C12 cells [43] .MBNL1, on the other hand, is a positive regulator of Serca1 exon 22 inclusion [43] .Together, these results suggest that the dysregulation of Serca1 exon 22 alternative splicing in DM1 is due primarily to the disruption of MBNL1 activity, with no contribution from the up-regulation of CELF1.Consistent with this, the decrease in Serca1 exon 22 inclusion observed in HSA LR mice was not rescued in HSA LR /Myo-CELF?bitransgenic animals (Figure 3).

DISCUSSION
that is significantly higher than that seen in HSA LR mice, and that is similar to that of wild type.Not all transcripts that are dysregulated in DM1 are sensitive to CELF regulation.For example, Serca1 exon 22 skipping is observed in skeletal muscle of DM1 patients and HSA LR mice, but not in healthy muscle [42] .Over-expression of CELF1 did not, however, affect the alternative splicing of a mouse Serca1 minigene or endogenous Serca1 transcripts in C2C12 cells [43] .MBNL1, on the other hand, is a positive regulator of Serca1 exon 22 inclusion [43] .Together, these results suggest that the dysregulation of Serca1 exon 22 alternative splicing in DM1 is due primarily to the disruption of MBNL1 activity, with no contribution from the up-regulation of CELF1.Consistent with this, the decrease in Serca1 exon 22 inclusion observed in HSA LR mice was not rescued in HSA LR /Myo-CELF?bitransgenic animals (Figure 3).

DISCUSSION
that is significantly higher than that seen in HSA LR mice, and that is similar to that of wild type.Not all transcripts that are dysregulated in DM1 are sensitive to CELF regulation.For example, Serca1 exon 22 skipping is observed in skeletal muscle of DM1 patients and HSA LR mice, but not in healthy muscle [42] .Over-expression of CELF1 did not, however, affect the alternative splicing of a mouse Serca1 minigene or endogenous Serca1 transcripts in C2C12 cells [43] .MBNL1, on the other hand, is a positive regulator of Serca1 exon 22 inclusion [43] .Together, these results suggest that the dysregulation of Serca1 exon 22 alternative splicing in DM1 is due primarily to the disruption of MBNL1 activity, with no contribution from the up-regulation of CELF1.Consistent with this, the decrease in Serca1 exon 22 inclusion observed in HSA LR mice was not rescued in HSA LR /Myo-CELF?bitransgenic animals (Figure 3).

DISCUSSION
There is currently no cure or specific treatment for DM1.Although one can argue that targeting the mutant expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA would be the most direct and comprehensive approach, we believe that until a safe and effective therapy has been validated in human DM1 patients alternative therapeutic targets should continue to be explored.In addition to the expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA, MBNL1 and PKC have shown some promise as therapeutic targets in cell culture and mouse models of DM1 [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] .Although Wang and colleagues demonstrated that inhibition of PKC resulted in reduced CELF1 expression in a heart-specific mouse model of DM1 [35] , this is the first study to specifically target CELF activity.Our data suggest that CELF1 is a viable therapeutic target, as repression of CELF activity restores normal alternative splicing of CELF-responsive dysregulated transcripts in cell culture and transgenic mouse models of DM1 skeletal muscle.
Elevated CELF1 protein levels have been proposed to underlie muscle wasting, one of the more devastating clinical manifestations of DM1 [17] .The 250 CUG expanded repeat HSA LR and MBNL1 knockout mouse models of DM1 show sequestration of MBNL1 but not up-regulation of CELF1, and exhibit only partial DM1 phenotypes with no muscle wasting [31] [40] .In contrast, the inducible 960 CUG expanded repeat EpA960/HSA-Cre-ERT2 (+tam) mouse model, which shows both sequestration of MBNL1 and elevated levels of CELF1 protein in skeletal muscle, has a more complete DM1 phenotype including muscle wasting [17] .In addition, fetal splicing patterns of Ank2 , Capzb , and Fxr1 transcripts were seen in EpA960/HSA-Cre-ERT2 (+tam) mice and DM1 muscle tissue, but not in HSA LR and MBNL1-null muscle [17] .Alternative splicing of these transcripts is regulated by CELF1, but not MBNL1, during normal heart development [12] .These studies indicate that there are alternative splicing events dysregulated in DM1 that can be attributed specifically to CELF1, and these may underlie some symptoms of the disease.
Several alternative splicing events that are dysregulated in DM1 respond to both elevation of CELF1 and loss of MBNL1, including cTNT [7] [38] [44] , IR [8] [45] [46] , ClC-1 [9] [31] , and Nrap [11] [41] .It is worth noting that although CELF1 is not elevated in HSA LR mice, we found that repression of CELF activity was still sufficient to restore normal alternative splicing of Nrap exon 12 in this model (Figure 2).We did not observe restoration of normal Serca1 exon 22 alternative splicing, however, an alternative exon that is regulated by MBNL1 but not CELF1 [43] .Thus, just as therapies targeted specifically to MBNL1 would presumably not alleviate CELF1-dependent symptoms, neither would therapies targeted against CELF1 alleviate all aspects of DM1 pathogenesis.Nonetheless, partial therapies may improve quality of life for patients who currently have no treatment options.
7. Philips A, Timchenko L, Cooper T (1998) Disruption of splicing regulated by a CUG-binding protein in myotonic dystrophy.
There is currently no cure or specific treatment for DM1.Although one can argue that targeting the mutant expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA would be the most direct and comprehensive approach, we believe that until a safe and effective therapy has been validated in human DM1 patients alternative therapeutic targets should continue to be explored.In addition to the expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA, MBNL1 and PKC have shown some promise as therapeutic targets in cell culture and mouse models of DM1 [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] .Although Wang and colleagues demonstrated that inhibition of PKC resulted in reduced CELF1 expression in a heart-specific mouse model of DM1 [35] , this is the first study to specifically target CELF activity.Our data suggest that CELF1 is a viable therapeutic target, as repression of CELF activity restores normal alternative splicing of CELF-responsive dysregulated transcripts in cell culture and transgenic mouse models of DM1 skeletal muscle.
Elevated CELF1 protein levels have been proposed to underlie muscle wasting, one of the more devastating clinical manifestations of DM1 [17] .The 250 CUG expanded repeat HSA LR and MBNL1 knockout mouse models of DM1 show sequestration of MBNL1 but not up-regulation of CELF1, and exhibit only partial DM1 phenotypes with no muscle wasting [31] [40] .In contrast, the inducible 960 CUG expanded repeat EpA960/HSA-Cre-ERT2 (+tam) mouse model, which shows both sequestration of MBNL1 and elevated levels of CELF1 protein in skeletal muscle, has a more complete DM1 phenotype including muscle wasting [17] .In addition, fetal splicing patterns of Ank2 , Capzb , and Fxr1 transcripts were seen in EpA960/HSA-Cre-ERT2 (+tam) mice and DM1 muscle tissue, but not in HSA LR and MBNL1-null muscle [17] .Alternative splicing of these transcripts is regulated by CELF1, but not MBNL1, during normal heart development [12] .These studies indicate that there are alternative splicing events dysregulated in DM1 that can be attributed specifically to CELF1, and these may underlie some symptoms of the disease.
Several alternative splicing events that are dysregulated in DM1 respond to both elevation of CELF1 and loss of MBNL1, including cTNT [7] [38] [44] , IR [8] [45] [46] , ClC-1 [9] [31] , and Nrap [11] [41] .It is worth noting that although CELF1 is not elevated in HSA LR mice, we found that repression of CELF activity was still sufficient to restore normal alternative splicing of Nrap exon 12 in this model (Figure 2).We did not observe restoration of normal Serca1 exon 22 alternative splicing, however, an alternative exon that is regulated by MBNL1 but not CELF1 [43] .Thus, just as therapies targeted specifically to MBNL1 would presumably not alleviate CELF1-dependent symptoms, neither would therapies targeted against CELF1 alleviate all aspects of DM1 pathogenesis.Nonetheless, partial therapies may improve quality of life for patients who currently have no treatment options.
7. Philips A, Timchenko L, Cooper T (1998) Disruption of splicing regulated by a CUG-binding protein in myotonic dystrophy.
There is currently no cure or specific treatment for DM1.Although one can argue that targeting the mutant expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA would be the most direct and comprehensive approach, we believe that until a safe and effective therapy has been validated in human DM1 patients alternative therapeutic targets should continue to be explored.In addition to the expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA, MBNL1 and PKC have shown some promise as therapeutic targets in cell culture and mouse models of DM1 [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] .Although Wang and colleagues demonstrated that inhibition of PKC resulted in reduced CELF1 expression in a heart-specific mouse model of DM1 [35] , this is the first study to specifically target CELF activity.Our data suggest that CELF1 is a viable therapeutic target, as repression of CELF activity restores normal alternative splicing of CELF-responsive dysregulated transcripts in cell culture and transgenic mouse models of DM1 skeletal muscle.
Elevated CELF1 protein levels have been proposed to underlie muscle wasting, one of the more devastating clinical manifestations of DM1 [17] .The 250 CUG expanded repeat HSA LR and MBNL1 knockout mouse models of DM1 show sequestration of MBNL1 but not up-regulation of CELF1, and exhibit only partial DM1 phenotypes with no muscle wasting [31] [40] .In contrast, the inducible 960 CUG expanded repeat EpA960/HSA-Cre-ERT2 (+tam) mouse model, which shows both sequestration of MBNL1 and elevated levels of CELF1 protein in skeletal muscle, has a more complete DM1 phenotype including muscle wasting [17] .In addition, fetal splicing patterns of Ank2 , Capzb , and Fxr1 transcripts were seen in EpA960/HSA-Cre-ERT2 (+tam) mice and DM1 muscle tissue, but not in HSA LR and MBNL1-null muscle [17] .Alternative splicing of these transcripts is regulated by CELF1, but not MBNL1, during normal heart development [12] .These studies indicate that there are alternative splicing events dysregulated in DM1 that can be attributed specifically to CELF1, and these may underlie some symptoms of the disease.
Several alternative splicing events that are dysregulated in DM1 respond to both elevation of CELF1 and loss of MBNL1, including cTNT [7] [38] [44] , IR [8] [45] [46] , ClC-1 [9] [31] , and Nrap [11] [41] .It is worth noting that although CELF1 is not elevated in HSA LR mice, we found that repression of CELF activity was still sufficient to restore normal alternative splicing of Nrap exon 12 in this model (Figure 2).We did not observe restoration of normal Serca1 exon 22 alternative splicing, however, an alternative exon that is regulated by MBNL1 but not CELF1 [43] .Thus, just as therapies targeted specifically to MBNL1 would presumably not alleviate CELF1-dependent symptoms, neither would therapies targeted against CELF1 alleviate all aspects of DM1 pathogenesis.Nonetheless, partial therapies may improve quality of life for patients who currently have no treatment options.

Fig. 1 :
Fig. 1: Alternative splicing changes induced by an expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA can be rescued in cultured cells by repression of CELF activity.Expression of an RNA containing 960 CUG repeats promotes exon inclusion of the R35C chicken cTNT minigene reporter in differentiated C2C12 myotubes.This effect is rescued by additional co-expression with NLSCELF?, a dominant negative CELF protein.(A) A representative RT-PCR gel showing R35C alternative exon included and exon skipped products.(B) Quantitation of the extent of R35C exon inclusion and exon skipping in multiple independent transfection experiments (n = 4 to 6 samples per group).

Fig. 1 :
Fig. 1: Alternative splicing changes induced by an expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA can be rescued in cultured cells by repression of CELF activity.Expression of an RNA containing 960 CUG repeats promotes exon inclusion of the R35C chicken cTNT minigene reporter in differentiated C2C12 myotubes.This effect is rescued by additional co-expression with NLSCELF?, a dominant negative CELF protein.(A) A representative RT-PCR gel showing R35C alternative exon included and exon skipped products.(B) Quantitation of the extent of R35C exon inclusion and exon skipping in multiple independent transfection experiments (n = 4 to 6 samples per group).

Fig. 1 :
Fig. 1: Alternative splicing changes induced by an expanded CUG repeat-containing RNA can be rescued in cultured cells by repression of CELF activity.Expression of an RNA containing 960 CUG repeats promotes exon inclusion of the R35C chicken cTNT minigene reporter in differentiated C2C12 myotubes.This effect is rescued by additional co-expression with NLSCELF?, a dominant negative CELF protein.(A) A representative RT-PCR gel showing R35C alternative exon included and exon skipped products.(B) Quantitation of the extent of R35C exon inclusion and exon skipping in multiple independent transfection experiments (n = 4 to 6 samples per group).

Fig. 2 :
Fig. 2: Alternative splicing of a known CELF target is rescued in bitransgenic HSALR/Myo-CELF?mice.Nrap exon 12 skipping is induced in the thigh muscle of expanded CUG repeat RNA-expressing HSA LR mice, but is normal in bitransgenic HSA LR /Myo-CELF?transgenic mice that also express a dominant negative CELF protein.(A) A representative RT-PCR gel showing Nrap exon 12 included and exon skipped products in thigh muscle total RNA samples from wild type, transgenic, and bitransgenic mice.(B) Quantitation of the extent of exon inclusion and exon skipping in thigh muscle samples from multiple individuals (n = 6 for wild type, n = 5 for HSA LR , and n = 6 for HSA LR /Myo-CELF?).

Fig. 3 :
Fig. 3: Alternative splicing of a non-CELF target RNA is not rescued in bitransgenic HSALR/Myo-CELF?mice.Serca1 exon 22 is aberrantly skipped in the skeletal muscle of HSA LR mice, which express an RNA containing 250 CUG repeats.Aberrant Serca1 exon 22 alternative splicing is not rescued by crossing HSALR mice with Myo-CELF?transgenic mice, which express a dominant negative CELF protein in skeletal muscle.(A) A representative RT-PCR gel showing Serca1 exon 22 included and exon skipped products in thigh muscle total RNA samples from wild type, transgenic, and bitransgenic mice.(B) Quantitation of the extent of exon inclusion and exon skipping in thigh muscle samples from multiple individuals (n = 2 for wild type, n = 6 for HSA LR , and n = 5 for HSA LR /Myo-CELF?).

Fig. 2 :
Fig. 2: Alternative splicing of a known CELF target is rescued in bitransgenic HSALR/Myo-CELF?mice.Nrap exon 12 skipping is induced in the thigh muscle of expanded CUG repeat RNA-expressing HSA LR mice, but is normal in bitransgenic HSA LR /Myo-CELF?transgenic mice that also express a dominant negative CELF protein.(A) A representative RT-PCR gel showing Nrap exon 12 included and exon skipped products in thigh muscle total RNA samples from wild type, transgenic, and bitransgenic mice.(B) Quantitation of the extent of exon inclusion and exon skipping in thigh muscle samples from multiple individuals (n = 6 for wild type, n = 5 for HSA LR , and n = 6 for HSA LR /Myo-CELF?).

Fig. 3 :
Fig. 3: Alternative splicing of a non-CELF target RNA is not rescued in bitransgenic HSALR/Myo-CELF?mice.Serca1 exon 22 is aberrantly skipped in the skeletal muscle of HSA LR mice, which express an RNA containing 250 CUG repeats.Aberrant Serca1 exon 22 alternative splicing is not rescued by crossing HSALR mice with Myo-CELF?transgenic mice, which express a dominant negative CELF protein in skeletal muscle.(A) A representative RT-PCR gel showing Serca1 exon 22 included and exon skipped products in thigh muscle total RNA samples from wild type, transgenic, and bitransgenic mice.(B) Quantitation of the extent of exon inclusion and exon skipping in thigh muscle samples from multiple individuals (n = 2 for wild type, n = 6 for HSA LR , and n = 5 for HSA LR /Myo-CELF?).

Fig. 2 :
Fig. 2: Alternative splicing of a known CELF target is rescued in bitransgenic HSALR/Myo-CELF?mice.Nrap exon 12 skipping is induced in the thigh muscle of expanded CUG repeat RNA-expressing HSA LR mice, but is normal in bitransgenic HSA LR /Myo-CELF?transgenic mice that also express a dominant negative CELF protein.(A) A representative RT-PCR gel showing Nrap exon 12 included and exon skipped products in thigh muscle total RNA samples from wild type, transgenic, and bitransgenic mice.(B) Quantitation of the extent of exon inclusion and exon skipping in thigh muscle samples from multiple individuals (n = 6 for wild type, n = 5 for HSA LR , and n = 6 for HSA LR /Myo-CELF?).

Fig. 3 :
Fig. 3: Alternative splicing of a non-CELF target RNA is not rescued in bitransgenic HSALR/Myo-CELF?mice.Serca1 exon 22 is aberrantly skipped in the skeletal muscle of HSA LR mice, which express an RNA containing 250 CUG repeats.Aberrant Serca1 exon 22 alternative splicing is not rescued by crossing HSALR mice with Myo-CELF?transgenic mice, which express a dominant negative CELF protein in skeletal muscle.(A) A representative RT-PCR gel showing Serca1 exon 22 included and exon skipped products in thigh muscle total RNA samples from wild type, transgenic, and bitransgenic mice.(B) Quantitation of the extent of exon inclusion and exon skipping in thigh muscle samples from multiple individuals (n = 2 for wild type, n = 6 for HSA LR , and n = 5 for HSA LR /Myo-CELF?).