Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Congruent biogeographical disjunctions at a continent-wide scale: Quantifying and clarifying the role of biogeographic barriers in the Australian tropics

  • Robert D. Edwards ,

    bortedwards@gmail.com

    Current address: Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, MRC166, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, United States of America

    Affiliation School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

  • Michael D. Crisp,

    Affiliation Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

  • Dianne H. Cook,

    Affiliation Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

  • Lyn G. Cook

    Affiliation School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Abstract

Aim

To test whether novel and previously hypothesized biogeogaphic barriers in the Australian Tropics represent significant disjunction points or hard barriers, or both, to the distribution of plants.

Location

Australian tropics: Australian Monsoon Tropics and Australian Wet Tropics.

Methods

The presence or absence of 6,861 plant species was scored across 13 putative biogeographic barriers in the Australian Tropics, including two that have not previously been recognised. Randomizations of these data were used to test whether more species showed disjunctions (gaps in distribution) or likely barriers (range limits) at these points than expected by chance.

Results

Two novel disjunctions in the Australian Tropics flora are identified in addition to eleven putative barriers previously recognized for animals. Of these, eleven disjunction points (all within the Australian Monsoon Tropics) were found to correspond to range-ending barriers to a significant number of species, while neither of the two disjunctions found within the Australian Wet Tropics limited a significant number of species’ ranges.

Main conclusions

Biogeographic barriers present significant distributional limits to native plant species in the Australian Monsoon Tropics but not in the Australian Wet Tropics.

Introduction

Climatic and geographic barriers can play a major role in the diversification of organisms across landscapes by limiting species’ distributions, dispersal and gene flow. Identifying such barriers has the potential to contribute to explanations of the geographic limits of species and, ultimately, the genesis of species when isolation is sustained for prolonged periods of time. Strong and persistent barriers are particularly useful for understanding patterns of biogeography and speciation because they are expected to influence the histories of multiple species in similar ways [1,2]. Physical features with sharply defined borders (e.g. oceans, rivers, mountain ranges) are obvious candidates, however identifying and defining putative barriers when no obvious geophysical features are apparent, or where different species recognize the same barrier-edge along something of a gradient (as may be expected when climatic or geochemical factors are in play), can be difficult. Potential barriers can be detected indirectly by finding congruent breaks in the distributions of multiple species, especially if such organisms have similar ecological tolerances and are not closely related [3].

In Australia, up to 22 major zones of coincident turnover or common disjunction in species’ distributions have been identified as putative barriers to dispersal, primarily in vertebrates (e.g., [4,5,6]) and, while the timing and underlying causes have been robustly inferred for some (e.g., the uplift of the Nullarbor Plain dividing the temperate regions of southeast and southwest Australia [7], and the periodic connection and separation of Tasmania from the mainland [8,9]), most remain poorly defined and largely untested. Observing that many of these putative barriers coincide roughly with climatic and/or topographic features, authors have often invoked these as the processes causing—or having caused—divergence (e.g., [10,4,11,12]) despite little empirical evidence. Furthermore, putative barriers have had different names applied, or have been placed in differing locations (Fig 1), leading to confusion in comparisons across studies [13]. Defining a stable framework that uses consistent locations, names, and definitions for putative biogeographic barriers is essential for constructing and testing hypotheses about the causes of these phenomena, as well as their role in speciation and community assembly [14].

thumbnail
Fig 1. Diagrammatic summary of the variation in placement and size of biogeographic barriers previously illustrated or described in the Australian tropics.

Coloured blocks represent gaps or points of disjunction between species and populations, and typically extend from the coast towards the center of the continent. References for each putative barrier are provided in the table (see S1 Document for full references), with asterisks denoting where barriers are unnamed, or described but not explicitly illustrated. The underlying vegetation structure map is modified from the Joint Remote Sensing Project (persistent URL: http://auscover.org.au/purl/icesat-vegetation-structure) and is used under a CC BY 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174812.g001

Biogeography of the Australian tropics

The Australian Tropics (also Australian Tropical Zone [15]) comprises two distinct biomes, the extensive Australian Monsoon Tropics (AMT) and a small mosaic of highly mesic habitats that makes up the Australian Wet Tropics (AWT) (Fig 2). Together, these cover about one third of the Australian continent and carry a proportional fraction of described native plant species (about 6,800 of approximately 20,000). While up to 11 putative biogeographic barriers have been identified in the distributions of animals across the Australian Monsoon Tropics and Australian Wet Tropics [4,13], only one is well characterized using disparate taxa: studies on the Black Mountain Corridor region indicate that some plant and animal species have been subjected to multiple bouts of vicariance correlated with aridification and habitat fragmentation at glacial maxima [16]. Few studies have attempted to provide a broader synthesis, with most modern molecular work invoking barriers ad- or post-hoc and only considering the distribution of one or few taxa. The role of putative barriers in shaping the distributions of plants across northern Australia has been generally neglected.

thumbnail
Fig 2. The Australian continent with shading indicating the frequency of monsoonal conditions (modified from [17]).

Black dashed line indicates typically recognised southern limit of the monsoon zone. White dashed lines mark the three largest putative biogeographic barriers used as the a priori seed for this study, and thought to divide the monsoon tropics into four main regions (The Pilbara, The Kimberley, The Top End, and Cape York Peninsula). The Arnhemland Plateau, Wet Tropics and Great Dividing Range are also indicated. The map outline was modified from Geoscience Australia (http://www.ga.gov.au/metadata-gateway/metadata/record/61754/) and is used under a CC BY 4.0 license.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174812.g002

In this study, we compare the distributions of 6,861 plant species found in the Australian Tropics in order to determine whether plants across the Australian Tropics share common disjunctions, and to identify which of these disjunctions are congruent with those cited in previous studies. We address the question of whether the barriers could be real by testing whether the number of plant species disjunct across each putative biogeographic barrier is greater than expected by chance. We then address the question of whether the barriers are so severe that they represent range ends by testing whether plant species’ distributions end at a barrier more frequently than expected by chance. We also review and describe each putative barrier while attempting to resolve confusion around the naming and placement of putative barriers in previous studies.

Methods

Defining the Australian Monsoon tropics

Our dataset includes all Australian plant species that frequently encounter monsoonal conditions within the Australian continent (>85% of annual rainfall occurring between November and April, inclusive [12]) and those in the Australian Wet Tropics. Although not typically considered as part of the Australian Monsoon Tropics, we include the Pilbara (Western Australia) and coastal central Queensland because these areas experience monsoon-like rainfall patterns, even if rarely (Fig 2, modified from [17]), and because many plant species occurring in the traditionally recognised Australian Monsoon Tropics also occur in these regions.

The Australian Wet Tropics dataset includes the area along the east coast of Australia between Cooktown (-15° 28’ S) and Ingham (-18° 38’ S) and, although small fragments of wet tropical habitat are found further south, these are embedded in drier forest and are not considered part of the Australian Wet Tropics for this study.

Data assembly

Checklists of plant species were obtained for the three Australian states/territories that fall within the study areas: the Northern Territory (Checklist of NT Vascular Plant Species [18]); Queensland [19,20]; and Western Australia [21]). Lists were cross-referenced to eliminate duplicates and synonyms.

Where applicable, taxon names were checked against the Australian Plant Name Index [22] and relevant taxonomic papers were consulted if further clarification was needed. 9,101 plant species were identified as occurring within these three administrations, of which 2,240 were excluded as having ranges that do not fall within the Australian Monsoon Tropics or Australian Wet Tropics as defined above, as having insufficient locality data, or as being introduced exotics. It should be noted that most of the remaining 6,861 species are recognised on the basis of morphological classifications alone and future molecular investigation might reveal cryptic species not considered here.

Geographic outliers (isolated collections falling well outside the main distribution of a species’ collection records) were checked against state checklists, the Flora of Australia [23] and Flora of Australia online where available [24] and in primary literature, and removed if unverified.

Data scoring

There is considerable inconsistency in the number and location of putative barriers previously invoked across northern Australia (Fig 1). In an attempt to identify disjunctions, without confirmation bias, we used an agnostic iterative process whereby the distributions of an initial subset of 1,000 random species were scored for presence or absence of disjunctions across three major landscape features (Great Sandy Desert, Bonaparte Gulf, Carpentaria Basin). During this process the presence of further disjunctions was noted. The 1,000 taxa were re-scored to include these new disjunctions while refining their locations, and any further shared gaps were noted. Five iterations of gap discovery were conducted on this initial dataset leading to the identification of 13 disjunctions common across many taxa. Only subsequently were these disjunctions compared to putative barriers previously identified in the literature.

Distribution maps were generated for each of the 6,861 plant species using the Australian Virtual Herbarium [25]. The distribution of each species was scored with respect to the 13 putative biogeographic barriers identified in the initial training set (11 in the Australian Monsoon Tropics and two in the Australian Wet Tropics). Presence or absence was recorded for each species within the putative biogeographic barrier and also in each of the two flanks. Thus, for the region of each putative biogeographic barrier, we scored three binary variables. For example, a "disjunct" species, which is present on both sides but not within a putative barrier, was scored 101. A species present across the region and showing no apparent disjunction was coded 111; a species that is absent from the putative barrier and its flanks was coded 000; and so on. For those flanking regions where records were sparse (< 5 locality records per region) presence/absence was recorded as unknown. All such species with unknown occurrence data in the region of a given barrier were removed from the dataset prior to any statistical test relevant to that barrier (below). A spreadsheet of the data is available online via Mendeley Data (at: http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/8vgv4zzhhg.2).

Because of the disparity in climate and vegetation types between the Arnhem Land Plateau and Carpentaria Basin, and between the Carpentaria Basin and the Normanby Basin, these two flanking regions were more narrowly defined (dotted lines in Fig 3) to reduce potential bias in comparisons of flanking regions and putative barriers.

thumbnail
Fig 3. The thirteen shared disjunctions identified in this study.

Circled letters denote zones of common disjunction. Numbers indicate species recorded in each putative region of disjunction and associated flanking regions. White dotted lines indicate the divisions in flanking regions applied between the Carpentaria Basin and the Arnhem Land Plateau, and between the Carpentaria Basin and the Normanby Basin.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174812.g003

Pattern and significance of species’ responses to putative barriers

The distributional data were used to test two hypotheses. Firstly, we tested the hypothesis that barriers are impermeable; that is, a species occurring in the region of a barrier (but not in the barrier) is likely to occur in one flank or the other, but not in both. Each barrier was assessed in turn and occurrences outside its flanks were ignored. Permutation testing was conducted with the following steps using R v3.3.2 in RStudio v0.99.902 (script provided in supplementary material via Mendeley data: http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/thcpyyy7br.1):

  1. Subset data for each barrier to include only species present in either or both flanks of the barrier. Also remove species that have an unknown value in the barrier column.
  2. Calculate the proportion of each of the patterns “100”, “001”, “101” for the actual data (patterns are in the order of the columns in the spreadsheet lodged online).
  3. Permute column 2 and 3 independently, breaking any association between presence/absence of the barrier and the two flanks. Record the frequency of each pattern. Repeat 5000 times.
  4. Compute the proportions for the patterns for each permuted data set, and record the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles which provides a 95% confidence interval for the expected occurrence of the pattern, assuming that the proportion of times the patterns occur is purely random.
  5. If the actual proportion is lower than the interval, then it is lower than expected, and conversely is higher than expected if it is larger than the interval. “001”, “100” represent impermeable barrier patterns, and “101” would suggest permeable.
  6. Repeat the above but holding column 3 while permuting 1 and 2 to ensure robustness of results across alternative permutations.

We also conducted a series of the above tests for the Great Sandy Desert barrier using increasing numbers of permutations to assess stationarity of the results. No fluctuations were observed above 1000 replicates, and 5000 replicates used in the final analyses for surety (see http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/8vgv4zzhhg.2 for results).

Secondly, we asked whether species’ ranges end at barriers more frequently than expected by chance. In other words, do species’ ranges tend to stop at the flanks of barriers and extend no farther, either into the barrier itself or to the far side of the barrier? Under the first hypothesis, described above, the “barrier impermeable” category included some species that occurred only in one flank of the barrier in question but extended further away, beyond the flank on the far side of the barrier. Distributions of this kind, that did not end in the region of the barrier, were excluded from the second test. Using the same set of permuted data as for the first question, we counted the relative proportion of ranges that ended in a flank (…100) versus in a barrier (…110 or …010), i.e. in this example the range ends at the left flank (Fig 4). For testing whether the range ends at a right flank, we compared the converse patterns, i.e. (001…) versus (011… or 010…). We used the binomial test to evaluate whether these proportions are different from random, with the null expectation that 33% of distributions should end in a flank, i.e., with the pattern “001…” or “…100”. The tests were implemented using the SISA website as "SISA-Binomial” [26].

thumbnail
Fig 4. Disjunct and range-end patterns for species in or adjacent to putative barriers, and how they were scored.

Shaded regions represent occurrence of one species.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174812.g004

Results

Common disjunctions

Thirteen common disjunctions were identified across the Australian Tropics from the distributions of the 6,861 plant species (Fig 3). In 11 cases these can be broadly matched to gaps previously described in the distributions of animal species. From west to east these are: Great Sandy Desert (GSD); Fitzroy Basin, Ord Basin, Daly River Plains, Arnhem Land Plateau, Carpentaria Basin, Normanby Basin, Black Mountain Corridor, Atherton Tableland, Townsville Lowlands-Paluma Range, Burdekin Basin, Broad Sound, and Dawson-Mackenzie. Precise spatial definition of barrier boundaries is problematic due, in part, to the resolution of the spatial data—species have not been sampled exhaustively (or evenly)–and also to the likelihood that individual species boundaries are not fully congruent. This is likely to be particularly true where putative barriers are part of an environmental gradient, for example, the aridity gradient leading into the Great Sandy Desert. While noting that the exact delimitation of barriers is problematic, the two narrowest putative barriers identified in this study were both within the Australian Wet Tropics (Atherton Tableland ~30 km wide; Black Mountain Corridor ~50–60 km wide).

We provide a description of each putative barrier including estimated width, location, taxonomy, and notes on conflicting descriptions from previous studies in Table 1. In the many cases where several names have been used for what appear to be the same region, we use the name of the regional landform. A comprehensive map of previous demarcations of each barrier can be found in Fig 1 with an associated list of references. In the Australian Monsoon Tropics, all but one of the putative barriers are dry corridors compared with their flanking regions, sometimes also with differing soil type (Table 1). The exception is the Arnhem Plateau, newly recognized here as a region associated with plant disjunctions, and which is a dissected escarpment rather than a drier region. One region of disjunction in the Australian Wet Tropics is a drier corridor (BMC, Table 1) whereas the other, the newly recognized Atherton Tableland, is a region of high elevation.

thumbnail
Table 1. Description and notes on the 13 putative barriers identified in this study, as illustrated in Fig 3.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174812.t001

Species distributions.

Although the Australian Monsoon Tropics flora is not typically described as extending to the Pilbara region of Western Australia, we found that the Pilbara shares 714 species with the commonly accepted Australian Monsoonal Tropics. Almost 600 species have distributions spanning the entire Australian Tropics, although only two (Aristida holathera and Santalum lanceolatum) show no clear disjunctions, and no single species has disjunctions at every one of the 13 putative biogeographic barriers. 640 species were endemic to the Australian Wet Tropics.

One of the putative barriers in the Australian Monsoon Tropics (Fitzroy Basin) has greater species diversity than one of its flanking regions, but otherwise flanking regions in the Australian Monsoon Tropics are more species rich than the putative barriers (Fig 3). Little more can be made of the raw species counts because no correction was made for differences in the areas of barriers and their flanking regions. Most of the barriers are smaller in extent than their flanking areas (Fig 3).

Hypothesis tests

At each putative barrier in the Australian Tropics, fewer species than expected by chance are disjunct (pattern "101") yet, for all but one barrier (Atherton Tableland), more species than expected by chance occur in one flanking region but not the other (Table 2). These results are consistent whether the left flank and barrier region are permuted or the right flank and barrier are permuted (see supplementary material: http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/8vgv4zzhhg.2). Our second test showed that all barriers in the Australian Monsoon Tropics are hard range-ends to many distributions (Table 2), with more species than expected by chance occurring up to, but not beyond, a barrier than expected by chance. The two putative barriers in the Australian Wet Tropics (Black Mountain Corridor and Atherton Tableland) were not hard range-ends.

thumbnail
Table 2. Results of tests of the hypotheses (1) that putative barriers are impermeable (species occur more frequently in either flank and less frequently on both sides the barrier), and (2) that species’ ranges end at a barrier more frequently than expected by chance.

A plus sign (+) indicates a significantly higher frequency than expected, a minus sign (-) a significantly lower frequency than expected, and ‘ns’ indicates non-significance. As the second test was one-tailed, the only possible outcomes were ‘+’ or ‘ns’. Rows for the two barriers in the Australian Wet Tropics are shaded.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174812.t002

Discussion

The Australian Monsoon tropics vs. the Australian Wet tropics

Using a comprehensive and unbiased sample of contemporary plant distributions, we have found statistical support for the conjecture that congruent disjunctions reflect real barriers to species’ range expansions across the Australian Tropics. However, the nature of barriers differs between the Australian Monsoon Tropics and the Australian Wet Tropics. In the Monsoon Tropics a significant proportion of species’ distributions are limited by 11 biogeographic barriers, with the barriers themselves being generally species-poor compared to their flanking regions, suggesting that they limit both dispersal (permeability) and colonization.

In the Australian Wet Tropics, the two disjunction zones do not limit the distributions of a significant number of species. Compared to barriers within the Australian Monsoon Tropics, they are narrower and have a higher species diversity in proportion to their flanking regions. This is consistent with the Australian Wet Tropics being comprised of a series of mesic habitat fragments weakly separated by “suture zones” or permeable barriers that are less likely to persist as continuous or contemporary distributional gaps across suites of species [16,80]. These suture zones have been described as drier corridors of mosaic wet/dry habitat extending from the interior of the continent to the coast and are partly occupied by elements of the Australian Monsoon Tropics flora, explaining their relatively high species diversity when compared to the Wet Tropics regions that flank them. This highlights a paradox when attempting to identify common distributional patterns across species assemblages: habitat that is inhospitable and a barrier to one species may be suitable habitat to other species adapted to another biome. Similarly, in the Australian Monsoon Tropics, putative barriers might harbour more arid zone flora which, in general, is more depauperate than that of more mesic biomes. Identifying weaker disjunctions remains problematic, also where species recognize different barrier widths. The methods used in this study are time consuming and analog, but more or less reliable, providing hypotheses for cross-validation using more advanced statistical tools. Recent developments in computational spatial analyses for identifying zones of biotic turnover [3,81] will be important in further quantifying and refining the extent of barriers recognized here and elsewhere.

Taxonomy of barriers

It is hoped that our review of biogeographic barriers will stimulate clearer communication in future work on their role in the evolution of species across the Australian tropics. Of the 13 common barriers to plant distributions identified here, 11 can be directly compared to biogeographic breaks previously identified in the distributions of birds [4] and subsequently mammals [13], amphibians [82], Crustacea, and insects [12]. We have identified two novel disjunctions (Arnhem Land Plateau and Atherton Tableland) that have been previously noted as locations of high species endemism and turnover, but not as biogeographic barriers per se [64,83,84].

Two putative barriers identified by previous studies of the Australian Tropics (the Ord Arid Intrusion and Victoria River Drainage; [13]) were not recovered among our data. Both have been described as in close proximity to the Ord Basin and Daly River Plains barriers and failure to identify them here may be partly due to sparse sampling in that region. It was noted during scoring that a number of taxa in this area were absent across areas larger than the Ord Basin (depicted in Fig 3), consistent with a combined influence of multiple adjacent gaps—these taxa were scored as "unknown data" at these points. More specimen data are needed to resolve the biogeographic patterns across this region.

Given that most barriers identified here tend to run from the coast towards the center of the continent, it is likely that the arid interior and coastline provide bounds that prevent many species from dispersing around inhospitable habitat.

The role of barriers in speciation and community assembly

Many previous studies have hypothesised that biogeographic barriers led to vicariance and divergence of many taxa during Pleistocene glacial phases, when climates are expected to have been significantly more arid than at present ([4,32,71,85,86], but see [87]). Expansion and renewed contact among populations after the last glacial maximum are thought to have resulted in transition zones in vertebrates between phenotypic forms that are now distributed continuously across the Australian Monsoon Tropics [44,88,89]. Thus, most recent work has concentrated on the historic role of barriers when they were supposedly at their strongest, and there is less understanding of how they continue to disrupt species distributions in the present.

Our study highlights how little is known about the nature of the barriers for Australian tropical organisms in the present, let alone the past. Questions remain about how, or whether, the nature of the barriers has changed in the glacial cycles, for example: Were there additional barriers that are not currently obvious?; or have species dispersed around or across barriers, or did these barriers emerge and divide distributions? These questions are beyond the scope of our data, and the phylogenetic relationships of the vast majority of species’ considered in this study are not well enough known to infer a direct role of barriers in speciation. A recent study by Costion et al. [90] found genetic divergence in multiple plant species across three barriers in the Australian Wet Tropics: 5 of 19 species across the Burdekin Basin, 37 of 110 species across the Black Mountain Corridor, and 13 of 53 species across the Normanby Basin. This indicates that some level of disruption to gene flow occurs in the vicinity of the barriers but, at this stage, it is not possible to distinguish whether these are abrupt disjunctions or the results of clinal variation [90]. Comparative analyses using molecular data within and among plant species across Australian Monsoon Tropics are clearly needed to assess the role of barriers in structuring plant populations.

Our recognition of the location and contemporary influence of barriers is a step that allows further investigation into which environmental factors may correlate with each barrier and thus could be responsible for isolating populations or communities of species. However, it is worth noting that degrees of genetic isolation between rainforest trees across fragments of the Australian Wet Tropics have been linked to fruit size and dispersal mode in otherwise ecologically similar species [91,92]. This is an important observation and highlights that climate-based ecological modeling alone cannot fully explain species’ current distributions, nor adequately predict past ranges or barriers to gene-flow [93]. Examination of traits or ecophysiological responses shared by species whose ranges end at a barrier might also provide an important insight.

Further research into the cause and effect of biogeographic barriers will need to use multiple lines of investigation, from vegetation surveys to more accurately describe barrier boundaries, to comparative phylogeographic studies for estimating past and present limits to gene flow, and ecological data to establish what environmental factors are responsible for limiting distributions and, by inference, which distributional responses may have been to historical or future climate change.

Supporting information

S1 Document. References for Fig 1.

Previous literature describing or illustrating barriers or disjunctions identified in the Australian Monsoon Tropics and Australian Wet Tropics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174812.s001

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the ‘Coopers and Cladistics’ systematics discussion group at the ANU for comments on early versions of the manuscript. They would also like to acknowledge the University of Queensland for supporting RDE via a Postgraduate Research Scholarship and the Australian Research Council for supporting LGC and MDC via Discovery Grants.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: RDE LGC.
  2. Data curation: RDE.
  3. Formal analysis: RDE DHC MDC.
  4. Funding acquisition: LGC.
  5. Investigation: RDE.
  6. Methodology: RDE DHC MDC.
  7. Resources: LGC.
  8. Validation: RDE LGC MDC DHC.
  9. Visualization: RDE.
  10. Writing – original draft: RDE.
  11. Writing – review & editing: RDE MDC LGC DHC.

References

  1. 1. Sanmartín I, Enghoff H, Ronquist F. Patterns of animal dispersal, vicariance and diversification in the Holarctic. Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 2001; 73: 345–390.
  2. 2. Proches S. Latitudinal and longitudinal barriers in global biogeography. Biol Lett. 2006; 2: 69–72. pmid:17148329
  3. 3. Di Virgilio G, Laffan SW, Ebach MC. Fine-scale quantification of floral and faunal breaks and their geographic correlates, with an example from south-eastern Australia. J Biogeogr. 2012; 39: 1862–1876.
  4. 4. Schodde R, Mason I. Directory of Australian Birds. Vol. 2. Passerines. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing; 1999.
  5. 5. Rowe KC, Aplin KP, Baverstock PR, Moritz C. Recent and rapid speciation with limited morphological disparity in the genus Rattus. Syst Biol. 2011; 60: 188–203. pmid:21239388
  6. 6. Unmack PJ. Biogeography of Australian freshwater fishes. J Biogeog. 2001; 28: 1053–1089
  7. 7. Crisp MD, Cook LG. A congruent molecular signature of vicariance across multiple plant lineages. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007; 43: 1106–1117. pmid:17434758
  8. 8. Dawson MN. Incipient speciation of Catostylus mosaicus (Scyphozoa, Rhizostomeae, Catostylidae), comparative phylogeography and biogeography in south-east Australia. J Biogeog. 2005; 32: 515–533.
  9. 9. McKinnon G, Jordan G, Vaillancourt R, Steane DA, Potts BM. Glacial refugia and reticulate evolution: the case of the Tasmanian eucalypts. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004; 359: 275–284. pmid:15101583
  10. 10. Ford J. Hybrid Zones in Australian Birds. Emu. 1987; 87: 158–178.
  11. 11. James C, Moritz C. Intraspecific phylogeography in the sedge frog Litoria fallax (Hylidae) indicates pre-Pleistocene vicariance of an open forest species from eastern Australia. Mol Ecol. 2000; 9: 349–358. pmid:10736032
  12. 12. Bowman DMJS, Brown GK, Braby MF, Brown JR, Cook LG, Crisp M.D, et al. Biogeography of the Australian monsoon tropics. J Biogeog. 2010; 37, 201–216.
  13. 13. Eldridge M, Potter S, Cooper SJ. Biogeographic barriers in north-western Australia: an overview and standardisation of nomenclature. Aust J Zool. 2012; 59: 270–272.
  14. 14. Glor RE, Warren D. Testing ecological explanations for biogeographic boundaries. Evolution. 2011; 65: 673–83. pmid:21054358
  15. 15. Burbidge NT. The phytogeography of the Australian region. Aust J Bot. 1960; 8 75–211.
  16. 16. Moritz C, Hoskin C, Mackenzie J, Phillips B, Tonione M, Silva N, et. al. Identification and dynamics of a cryptic suture zone in tropical rainforest. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009; 276: 1235–1244.
  17. 17. Moise, A. Tracking the monsoon using models. Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology. 2007. http://www.bom.gov.au/announcements/media_releases/ho/20071004_tm.shtml. Accessed 1 August 2013.
  18. 18. Kerrigan RA, Albrecht D. Check list of NT Vascular Plant Species. Darwin: Department of Natural Resources, Environment, the Arts and Sport; 2007.
  19. 19. Bostock PD, Holland A. Census of the Queensland Flora 2007. Brisbane: Queensland Herbarium; 2007.
  20. 20. Bostock PD, Holland A. Census of the Queensland Flora 2008. Brisbane: Queensland Herbarium; 2008.
  21. 21. Florabase—The Western Australian Flora. Department of Parks and Wildlife, Western Australia. http://florabase.dec.wa.gov.au/. Accessed January-June 2010
  22. 22. Australian Plant Name Index. Australian National Botanic Gardens. http://www.anbg.gov.au/cpbr/databases/apni-search-full.html. Accessed November 2009-April 2010
  23. 23. The Flora of Australia. Canberra: Australian Biological Resources Study; 1991–2007
  24. 24. The Flora of Australia Online. Australian Biological Resources Study. http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/flora/main/. Accessed January-June 2010.
  25. 25. The Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria. Australia's Virtual Herbarium. http://avh.chah.org.au/. Accessed January-November 2010.
  26. 26. Uitenbroek DG. Simple Interactive Statistical Analysis. http://www.quantitativeskills.com/sisa/distributions/binomial.htm. Accessed: 5 May 2016.
  27. 27. Keast A. Variation and speciation in the genus Climacteris Temminck (Aves: Sittidae). Aust J Zool. 1957; 5: 474–495.
  28. 28. Cracraft J. Geographic Differentiation, Cladistics, and Vicariance Biogeography: Reconstructing the Tempo and Mode of Evolution. Am Zool. 1982; 22: 411–424.
  29. 29. Melville J, Ritchie EG, Chapple SNJ, Glor RE, Schulte JA. Evolutionary origins and diversification of dragon lizards in Australia’s tropical savannas. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2011; 58: 257–270. pmid:21145401
  30. 30. Speck NH, Wright RL, Rutherford GK, Fitzgerald K, Thomas F, Arnold J.M, et al. General Report on the Lands of the West Kimberley Area, Western Australia. Land Research Surveys of Northern Australia, CSIRO. 1964; 1–228.
  31. 31. Eliot I, Bird E. Western Australia. In: Bird E editor, Encyclopedia of the World's Coastal Landforms. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 2010.
  32. 32. Ford J. Geographical Isolation and Morphological and Habitat Differentiation between Birds of the Kimberley and the Northern Territory. Emu. 1978; 78: 25–35.
  33. 33. Ford J. Origin, evolution and speciation of birds specialized to mangroves in Australia. Emu. 1982; 82: 12–33
  34. 34. Braby MF. Biogeography of butterflies in the Australian monsoon tropics. Aust J Zool. 2008; 56: 41–56.
  35. 35. Rollins LA, Svedin N, Pryke SR, Griffith SC. The role of the Ord Arid Intrusion in the historical and contemporary genetic division of long-tailed finch subspecies in northern Australia. Ecol Evol. 2012; 2: 1208–1219. pmid:22833795
  36. 36. Toon A, Hughes JM, Joseph L. Multilocus analysis of honeyeaters (Aves: Meliphagidae) highlights spatio-temporal heterogeneity in the influence of biogeographic barriers in the Australian monsoonal zone. Mol Ecol. 2010; 19: 2980–2994. pmid:20609078
  37. 37. Potter S, Eldridge MDB, Taggart DA, Cooper SJB. Multiple biogeographical barriers identified across the monsoon tropics of northern Australia: phylogeographic analysis of the brachyotis group of rock-wallabies. Mol Ecol. 2012; 21: 2254–2269. pmid:22417115
  38. 38. Jennings WB, Edwards SV. Speciational history of Australian grass finches (Poephila) inferred from thirty gene trees. Evolution. 2005; 59: 2033–2047. pmid:16261740
  39. 39. Perry RA. Pasture Lands of the Northern Territory Australia. Melbourne: CSIRO Land Research Series No.5. 1960.
  40. 40. Rowley I. The Purple-crowned Fairy-wren Malurus coronatus. I. History, Distribution and Present Status. Emu. 1993; 93: 220–234.
  41. 41. Woinarski JCZ, Hempel C, Cowie I, Brennan K, Kerrigan R, Leach G, et al. Distributional pattern of plant species endemic to the Northern Territory, Australia. Aust J Bot. 2006; 54: 627–640.
  42. 42. MacDonald J. Notes on the taxonomy of Neositta. Emu. 1969; 69: 169–174.
  43. 43. Kearns AM, Joseph L, Omland KE, Cook LG. Testing the effect of transient Plio-Pleistocene barriers in monsoonal Australo-Papua: did mangrove habitats maintain genetic connectivity in the Black Butcherbird? Mol Ecol. 2011; 20: 5042–5059. pmid:22060632
  44. 44. Lee JY, Edwards SV. Divergence Across Australia's Carpentarian Barrier: Stastical Phylogeography of the Red-Backed Fairy Wren (Malurus melanocephalus). Evolution. 2008; 62: 3117–3134. pmid:19087188
  45. 45. Kench P. Geomorphology of Australian estuaries: Review and prospect. Australian J Ecol. 1999; 24: 367–380.
  46. 46. Hopley D, Smithers S. Queensland. In: Bird E, editor, Encyclopedia of the World's Coastal Landforms. Heidelberg: Springer, Verlag; 2010.
  47. 47. Ford J. Avian hybridization and allopatry in the region of the Einasleigh Uplands and Burdekin-Lynd Divide, north-eastern Queensland. Emu. 1986; 86: 87–110.
  48. 48. Schodde R. Origin, adaptation and evolution of birds in arid Australia. In: Barker WR, Greenslade PJM, editors, Evolution of the Flora and Fauna of Arid Australia. Peacock Publications, South Australia. 1982. pp. 191–224.
  49. 49. Schodde R, Mason I. The Nocturnal Birds of Australia. Melbourne: Landsdowne Press; 1980.
  50. 50. Cracraft J. Origin and Evolution of Continental Biotas: Speciation and Historical Congruence within the Australian Avifauna. Evolution. 1986; 40: 977–996.
  51. 51. Moritz C, Hoskin C, Graham CH, Hugall A, Moussalli A. Historical biogeography, diversity & conservation of Australia's tropical rainforest herpetofauna. Cambridge: Conservation Biology Series. 2005 243–264.
  52. 52. Barlow BA, Hyland BPM. The origins of the flora of Australia’s Wet Tropics. Proc Eco Soc Aust. 1988; 15: 1–17
  53. 53. Wannan B. Review of the phytogeography of Cape York Peninsula: a flora that illustrates the development of the Australian sclerophyll biota. Aust J Bot. 2014; 62: 85–113.
  54. 54. Winter JW, Bell FC, Pahl LI, Atherton RG. The specific habitats of selected northeastern Australian rainforest mammals. Sydney: Report to the World Wildlife Fund, Australia; 1984.
  55. 55. Moritz C, Hoskin C, Mackenzie J, Phillips B, Tonione M, Silva N, et al. Identification and dynamics of a cryptic suture zone in tropical rainforest. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009; 276: 1235–1244.
  56. 56. Hugal A, Moritz C, Moussalli A, Stanisic J. Reconciling paleodistribution models and comparative phylogeography in the Wet Tropics rainforest land snail Gnarosophia bellendenkerensis (Brazier 1875). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002; 99: 6112–6117. pmid:11972064
  57. 57. Ebach M. A history of biogeographical regionalisation in Australia. Zootaxa. 2012; 3392: 1–34.
  58. 58. Crowley LELM, Ivantsoff W. Genetic similarity among populations of rainbowfishes (Pisces: Melanotaeniidae) from Atherton Tableland, northern Queensland. Ichthyol Explor Freshw. 1991; 2: 129–137.
  59. 59. Graham C, Moritz C, Williams S. Habitat history improves prediction of biodiversity in rainforest fauna. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103: 632–636. pmid:16407139
  60. 60. Webb LJ, Tracey JG. Australian rainforest: patterns and change. In: Keast A, editor, Ecological Biogeography of Australia. W Junk, The Hague, 1981. Pp 605–694.
  61. 61. Dolman G. Evidence for Differential Assortative Female Preference in Association with Refugial Isolation of Rainbow Skinks in Australia's Tropical Rainforests. PLoS ONE. 2008; 3, e3499. pmid:18958149
  62. 62. Bell KL, Moritz C, Moussalli A, Yeates DK. Comparative phylogeography and speciation of dung beetles from the Australian Wet Tropics rainforest. Mol Ecol. 2007; 16: 4984–4998. pmid:17927709
  63. 63. Williams SE. Patterns of mammalian species richness in the Australian tropical rainforests: are extinctions during historical contractions of the rainforest the primary determinants of current regional patterns in biodiversity? Wildlife Research. 1997; 24, 513–530.
  64. 64. Williams SE, Pearson RG, Walsh PJ. Distributions and biodiversity of the terrestrial vertebrates of Australia's Wet Tropics: a review of current knowledge. Pac. Conserv. Biol. 1996; 2: 327–362.
  65. 65. Oliver PM, Adams M, Doughty P. Molecular evidence for ten species and Oligo-Miocene vicariance within a nominal Australian gecko species (Crenadactylus ocellatus, Diplodactylidae). BMC Evol Biol. 2010; 10: 386. pmid:21156080
  66. 66. Moussalli A, Hugall A, Moritz C. A mitochondrial phylogeny of the rainforest skink genus Saproscincus, Wells and Wellington (1984). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005; 34: 190–202. pmid:15579392
  67. 67. Schauble C, Moritz C. Comparative phylogeography of two open forest frogs from eastern Australia. Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 2001; 74: 157–170.
  68. 68. Wong BBM, Keogh JS, McGlashan DJ. Current and historical patterns of drainage connectivity in eastern Australia inferred from population genetic structuring in a widespread freshwater fish Pseudomugil signifer (Pseudomugilidae). Mol Ecol. 2004; 13: 391–401. pmid:14717894
  69. 69. Brown M, Cooksley H, Carthew SM, Cooper SJB. Conservation units and phylogeographic structure of an arboreal marsupial, the yellow-bellied glider (Petaurus australis). Aust J Zool. 2006; 54: 305–317.
  70. 70. Nicholls J., Austin J. Phylogeography of an east Australian wet-forest bird, the satin bowerbird (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus), derived from mtDNA, and its relationship to morphology. Mol Ecol. 2005; 14: 1485–1496. pmid:15813786
  71. 71. Keast A. Bird Speciation on the Australian Continent. Bull Mus Comp Zool. 1961; 123: 307–495.
  72. 72. Chapple DG, Hoskin CJ, Chapple SN, Thompson MB. Phylogeographic divergence in the widespread delicate skink (Lampropholis delicata) corresponds to dry habitat barriers in eastern Australia. BMC Evol Biol. 2011; 11: 191. pmid:21726459
  73. 73. Lucky A. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the spider ants, genus Leptomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2011; 59: 281–292. pmid:21406240
  74. 74. Colgan DJ, O'Meally D, Sadlier RA. Phylogeographic patterns in reptiles on the New England Tablelands at the south-western boundary of the McPherson Macleay Overlap. Aust J Zool. 2009; 57: 317–328.
  75. 75. McDonald M, Maslin B. Taxonomic revision of the salwoods: Acacia aulacocarpa Cunn. ex Benth. and its allies (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae: section Juliflorae). Aust Syst Bot. 2000; 13: 21–78.
  76. 76. Baker CH, Graham GC, Scott KD, Cameron SL, Yeates DK, Merritt DJ. Distribution and phylogenetic relationships of Australian glow-worms Arachnocampa (Diptera, Keroplatidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008; 48: 506–514. pmid:18583158
  77. 77. Joseph L, Omland KE. Phylogeography: its development and impact in Australo-Papuan ornithology with special reference to paraphyly in Australian birds. Emu. 2009; 109: 1–23.
  78. 78. Edwards DL, Melville J. Phylogeographic analysis detects congruent biogeographic patterns between a woodland agamid and Australian wet tropics taxa despite disparate evolutionary trajectories. J Biogeog. 2010; 37: 1543–1556.
  79. 79. Nix H. Environment determinants of biogeography and evolution in Terra Australis. In: Barker WR, Greenslade PJM, editors. Evolution of the Flora and Fauna of Arid Australia. South Australia: Peacock Publications. 1982. pp 47–66.
  80. 80. Schneider C, Moritz C. Rainforest refugia and evolution in Australia's Wet Tropics. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999; 266: 191–196.
  81. 81. Laffan SW, Rosauer DF, Di Virgilio G, Miller JT, Gonzalez-Orozco CE, Knerr N et. al. Range-weighted metrics of species and phylogenetic turnover can better resolve biogeographic transition zones. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2016; 7: 580–588.
  82. 82. Catullo RA, Lanfear R, Doughty P, Keogh SJ. The biogeographical boundaries of northern Australia: evidence from ecological niche models and a multi-locus phylogeny of Uperoleia toadlets (Anura: Myobatrachidae). J Biogeog. 2014; 41: 659–672.
  83. 83. Crisp M, Laffan S, Linder H, Monro A. Endemism in the Australian flora. J Biogeog. 2001; 28: 183–198.
  84. 84. Thornhill AH, Mishler BD, Knerr NJ, Gonzalez-Orozco CE, Costion CM, Crayn DM, Laffan SW, Miller JT. Continental-scale spatial phylogenetics of Australian angiosperms provide insights into ecology, evolution and conservation. J Biogeog. 2016; 43: 2085–2098.
  85. 85. Whitehead P, Bowman D, Tideman S. Biogeographic Patterns, Environmental Correlates and Conservation of Avifauna in the Northern Territory, Australia. J Biogeog. 1992; 19: 151–161.
  86. 86. Byrne M, Yeates DK, Joseph L, Kearney M, Bowler J, Williams MA, et al. Birth of a biome: insights into the assembly and maintenance of the Australian arid zone biota. Mol Ecol. 2008; 17: 4398–4417. pmid:18761619
  87. 87. Kearns AM, Joseph L, Toon A, Cook LG. Australia's arid-adapted butcherbirds experienced range expansions during Pleistocene glacial maxima. Nat Commun. 2014; 5, 3994. pmid:24876071
  88. 88. Edwards S. Long-Distance Gene Flow in a Cooperative Breeder Detected in Genealogies of Mitochondrial DNA Sequences. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1993; 252: 177–185.
  89. 89. Toon A, Mather P, Baker A, Durrant K, Hughes J. Pleistocene refugia in an arid landscape: analysis of a widely distributed Australian passerine. Mol Ecol. 2007; 16: 2525–2541. pmid:17561911
  90. 90. Costion CM, Lowe AJ, Rossetto M, Kooyman RM, Breed M, Ford A, et al. Building a Plant DNA Barcode Reference Library for a Diverse Tropical Flora: An Example from Queensland, Australia. Diversity. 2016; 8: 1–9.
  91. 91. Rossetto M, Crayn D, Ford A, Ridgeway P, Rymer P. The comparative study of range-wide genetic structure across related, co-distributed rainforest trees reveals contrasting evolutionary histories. Aust J of Bot. 2007; 55: 416–424.
  92. 92. Rossetto M, Crayn D, Ford A, Mellick R, Sommerville K. The influence of environment and life-history traits on the distribution of genes and individuals: a comparative study of 11 rainforest trees. Mol Ecol. 2009; 18: 1422–1438. pmid:19284473
  93. 93. Eriksson O, Friis EM, Lofgren P. Seed size, fruit size, and dispersal systems in angiosperms from the early cretaceous to the late tertiary. Am Nat. 2000; 156: 47–58. pmid:10824020