There are errors in several figure captions in the published article. The name of the species E. tellinii is spelled incorrectly in the captions for Fig 7 and S2 Fig. The captions for S1 and S3 Figs are missing their component designations. Please view correct captions for Fig 7 and S2 Fig here. The correctly labelled S1 and S3 Figs and their captions can also be found here.
Fig 7. NMDS scatter plot of the Setal ratio in E. tellinii and E. crodabepis sp. nov. specimens. Splitting between E. tellinii group (broken line) and E. crodabepis group (solid line) (Stress = 0.06956; First axis R2 = 0.8664). The two groups have different setal ratios.
In references 12 and 15 the species name was not properly italicized. The correct references are:
12. Braido V, Ecologia e distribuzione geografica di un lombricide di grandi dimensioni: Eophila tellinii (Rosa, 1888), Tesi di laurea discussa alla Facoltà di Scienze Biologiche, Università degli Studi di Padova,1993.
15. Braido V, Toniello V, Paoletti MG, Eophila tellinii (Rosa, 1888): inconsueto lombrico variopinto di grandi dimensioni. Speleologia Veneta, 1997; (5): 122–130.
Supporting Information
S1 Fig. Eophila tellinii morphological and anatomical details.
a)Livery pattern in Travesio specimen and b) peristomial detail (Ragogna 1 specimen); c)7.98 µm and 4.35 µm ventral, dorsal and lateral views of specimen (Ragogna 2); d)virtual sections of hindmost segments: schematic and transversal sections of last ten segments lacking typhlosole, hindmost body segment- (middle) mesial-middle section (upper right), and sagittal medial section (bottom) from Clauzetto specimen.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160218.s001
(DOC)
S2 Fig. Eophila tellinii ecological details.
Wood near Travesio (PN) in which Eophila tellinii was found along with its casts.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160218.s002
(DOC)
S3 Fig. Eophila crodabepis sp. nov. anatomical details.
a)7.98 µm on ventral, dorsal and lateral views and 3.08µm from Crevada (Crevada 6); b)virtual sections of hindmost segments: schematic and transversal sections of last ten segments where no typhlosole occurs; hindmost body segment- (middle) mesial-middle section (upper right), and sagittal medial section (bottom); transversal sections at level of the penultimate segment (middle right); c)cross section of longitudinal pinnate musculature (HNHM 6899 specimen).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160218.s003
(DOC)
Reference
- 1. Paoletti MG, Blakemore RJ, Csuzdi C, Dorigo L, Dreon AL, Gavinelli F, et al. (2016) Barcoding Eophila crodabepis sp. nov. (Annelida, Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae), a Large Stripy Earthworm from Alpine Foothills of Northeastern Italy Similar to Eophila tellinii (Rosa, 1888). PLoS ONE 11(3): e0151799. pmid:27019284
Citation: Paoletti MG, Blakemore RJ, Csuzdi C, Dorigo L, Dreon AL, Gavinelli F, et al. (2016) Correction: Barcoding Eophila crodabepis sp. nov. (Annelida, Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae), a Large Stripy Earthworm from Alpine Foothills of Northeastern Italy Similar to Eophila tellinii (Rosa, 1888). PLoS ONE 11(8): e0160218. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160218
Published: August 1, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Paoletti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.