http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1885-0260
Figures
Abstract
Identifying post-breeding migration and wintering distributions of migratory birds is important for understanding factors that may drive population dynamics. Red-throated Loons (Gavia stellata) are widely distributed across Alaska and currently have varying population trends, including some populations with recent periods of decline. To investigate population differentiation and the location of migration pathways and wintering areas, which may inform population trend patterns, we used satellite transmitters (n = 32) to describe migration patterns of four geographically separate breeding populations of Red-throated Loons in Alaska. On average (± SD) Red-throated Loons underwent long (6,288 ± 1,825 km) fall and spring migrations predominantly along coastlines. The most northern population (Arctic Coastal Plain) migrated westward to East Asia and traveled approximately 2,000 km farther to wintering sites than the three more southerly populations (Seward Peninsula, Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, and Copper River Delta) which migrated south along the Pacific coast of North America. These migration paths are consistent with the hypothesis that Red-throated Loons from the Arctic Coastal Plain are exposed to contaminants in East Asia. The three more southerly breeding populations demonstrated a chain migration pattern in which the more northerly breeding populations generally wintered in more northerly latitudes. Collectively, the migration paths observed in this study demonstrate that some geographically distinct breeding populations overlap in wintering distribution while others use highly different wintering areas. Red-throated Loon population trends in Alaska may therefore be driven by a wide range of effects throughout the annual cycle.
Citation: McCloskey SE, Uher-Koch BD, Schmutz JA, Fondell TF (2018) International migration patterns of Red-throated Loons (Gavia stellata) from four breeding populations in Alaska. PLoS ONE 13(1): e0189954. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189954
Editor: Jonas Waldenström, Linnaeus University, SWEDEN
Received: August 31, 2017; Accepted: December 5, 2017; Published: January 10, 2018
This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
Data Availability: All relevant data are available from the U.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center and can be accessed at the following link: https://doi.org/10.5066/F7TH8KVH.
Funding: Funding was provided by the U.S. Minerals Management Service, the U.S. National Park Service, Royal Caribbean Cruiseline, Inc., and the U.S. Geological Survey’s Park Oriented Biological Research Program, Outer Continental Shelf Program, and Changing Arctic Ecosystems Initiative. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Until recently seabird migration patterns have been poorly understood. This knowledge gap is partly due to the past reliance on re-sighting and recovery data of banded birds to estimate movement, which limits information about actual migration paths, speeds, and stopover locations [1–2]. Recent developments in light-based geolocators and satellite transmitter technology now allow researchers to track individuals throughout breeding and non-breeding periods, both near and offshore, thus facilitating a better understanding of migratory patterns [3–5]. Despite new technology, there has been little synthesis of seabird migration patterns as they exhibit a diversity of migration patterns [6–9]. Consequently, we have little guidance for predicting migration behavior of unstudied species and genera. Information on migration and non-breeding distribution is important because anthropogenic effects and ecological processes during these times impact mortality and population abundance [10].
Red-throated Loons (Gavia stellata) are migratory seabirds that breed at high latitudes, nest in low-densities on small ponds in coastal tundra ecosystems, and spend the majority of the remaining year (~ 8 months) on coastal marine waters [11]. Similar to many seabird species, little information exists regarding the migratory patterns of loons, with only a few studies examining migration of Common Loons (G. immer) in the United States south of 50 degrees of latitude [12–15] and preliminary information from Yellow-billed Loons (G. adamsii) in Alaska [16–17]. Within North America, general migration patterns of Red-throated Loons have been assessed using re-sighting and point counts [18–19]. However, such data are limited to temporal patterns in Atlantic and inland regions and lack a large scale geographic scope of migration. Throughout their circumpolar distribution, migration patterns and wintering distributions of Red-throated Loons have never been quantified and published.
A variety of threats can impact Red-throated Loon populations during migration and winter and come from both natural [20] and anthropogenic sources [21]. These threats include contaminant exposure [21], oil spills [22–23], eutrophication [24–25], bycatch in fishing operations [23, 26–27], wind farms [28–29], or habitat loss or alteration [30–31]. Given that Red-throated Loons rely heavily on marine ecosystems throughout the annual cycle and that these ecosystems may be changing rapidly due to climate change [32], understanding their migratory pathways and wintering areas may help managers determine appropriate areas and management strategies to focus on for reducing impacts that may be driving loon population declines.
Red-throated Loon breeding populations in Alaska experienced a 53% decline from 1977 to 1993 [33]. The decline was most significant in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta and Seward Peninsula regions [33]. Recent data suggest that Red-throated Loon populations in northern Alaska have continued to decline [34], while populations elsewhere in the state have stabilized [35]. Since data about where Red-throated Loon breeding populations migrate and spend the winter are lacking, we are hampered in our ability to identify the geographic scale and nature of potential drivers on population trends as observed in Alaska.
In this study we use satellite telemetry to identify migratory patterns of four geographically distinct breeding populations of Red-throated Loons in Alaska: the Arctic Coastal Plain (ACP), Seward Peninsula (SP), Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta (YKD) and Copper River Delta (CRD). These populations are distributed across 10° of latitude and represent the populations with greatest abundance or density of this species throughout Alaska [33]. Our objectives were to contrast the annual geographic scope and timing of migration among the four populations, and determine whether multiple breeding populations share migration and wintering habitats.
Materials and methods
Capture and transmitter deployment
Between 2000 and 2010, we captured and marked breeding Red-throated Loons (n = 38) with satellite transmitters at four sample regions of Alaska (Fig 1). We captured individuals using bow-net nest traps [36] during incubation or a dive net when adults were tending broods [37]. At the field site, an experienced veterinarian surgically implanted satellite transmitters, i.e., platform terminal transmitters (PTTs), into the abdominal cavity with an antenna protruding out of the body [38–39]. Each PTT weighed approximately 40 g (Microwave Telemetry, Inc., Columbia, MD). All capture and surgical procedures were in accordance with U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Standard Operating Procedures [38–39] and approved by the USGS Animal Care and Use Committee. Any Red-throated Loons that died at the study area within two weeks of surgery were censored from the analysis (n = 5), attributing such mortality to the surgical process [38].
Satellite transmitters were deployed on Red-throated Loons at these locations between 2000 and 2010. The Copper River Delta is in an open boreal forest whereas the other study sites were in treeless tundra.
We programmed transmitters to elicit signals for 8 hours followed by a quiescent period of 48 to 120 hours, depending on season and year of study. We used the CLS Argos system (CLS America, Lanham, Maryland) to collect location data and filtered all data using the Douglas Argos-Filter Algorithm [40] to exclude improbable locations based on user thresholds. Locations of high quality class (L1, L2 and L3) were always retained, whereas retention of locations of class L0, LA and LB were assessed by the Douglas Argos-Filter Algorithm. For our analysis, we applied a threshold of 110 km/hr maximum sustainable rate for the ‘distance angle rate’ filter and 10 km distance threshold for ‘maximum redundant distance’ filter.
Many individuals (n = 9) experienced gaps in transmitter signals beyond that of the scheduled duty cycle, lasting days to months. In particular, after 2005, loons that traveled west of Hokkaido, Japan, were no longer detected until their easterly return in early spring. An unknown source of signal interference impeded the acquisition of Argos locations; a similar zone of signal interference exists in Western Europe (Microwave Telemetry, personal communication). Thus, portions of some specific migration paths near the winter terminus are unknown and arrival and departure dates may be biased. For an overview of each Red-throated Loon that was implanted with a PTT that includes sex, deployment dates, end dates, and fates, see supporting information (S1 Table).
Analysis
We defined the beginning of fall migration by an individual loon as the date the loon left the breeding area or adjacent marine waters. Because stopover and wintering sites varied spatially and temporally between individuals and among years, we chose not to define stopover and wintering sites by specific date ranges or distance constraints, but instead defined such sites as locations where a given loon did not progress in the general migration direction for more than a week. Some loons moved from their nest lake to adjacent marine waters following nest failure but we did not consider these as stopovers. Generally, we defined fall stopover as August–November, wintering area November—April and spring stopover as April–June. We defined the end of spring migration as the date the loon returned to the breeding area and no further movements were included in the analysis. PTTs were deployed over six separate years so ordinal date (month and day only) was used as the temporal variable allowing comparisons to be made across years.
We calculated distances to fall stopover and wintering sites by summing the lengths of vectors created from point to point PTT transmissions between first day of departure from the breeding grounds to the first day at stopover or wintering site. Duration of migration was the number of days between first day of departure from the breeding grounds to first day at stopover or wintering site. To calculate the pace of migration, we divided migration distance by migration duration.
We used Geographic Information Systems (ArcGIS v.10.1) and Geospatial Modeling Environment (GME v.0.7.2.0) [41] to quantify migration movements and ArcGIS to plot locations, calculate distances (azimuthal equidistant projection) and inspect migratory patterns. We used GME to create migration paths by generating straight-line vectors between PTT locations.
Results
Transmitters
We used data from 32 PTTs among four separate breeding populations from 2000–2010, including 14 from the ACP, 6 from the SP, 7 from the YKD, and 5 from the CRD (Table 1). We obtained a total of 19,943 Argos locations, 63.8% were of high quality (class L1, L2 or L3), 35.9% of low quality (class L0, LA or LB), and 0.3% were of class Z and were eliminated from the analysis. Ten of the 32 transmitters lasted a full annual cycle, including migration back to the initial breeding area.
General migration paths
For individual specific fall/spring stopover and wintering site information see supporting information (S2 Table). Red-throated Loons marked in the ACP were the only birds to migrate westward to East Asia. Thirteen of 14 ACP loons traveled through the Bering Strait or flew over the Chukotka Peninsula, and then migrated along the coast of the Kamchatka Peninsula, and across the Sea of Okhotsk to overwintering locations along the eastern coast Japan and southern coast of South Korea (Fig 2A). The remaining loon from the ACP migrated along the eastern Pacific coast and wintered along the Baja Peninsula in Mexico (Fig 2B). ACP loons had the lowest wintering latitude of all four populations (36°26’N, SD ± 3°50’). The return migration in spring was very similar geographically but quicker in pace (see below).
A) East Asian migration of Red-throated Loons. B) Pacific migration of a single Red-throated Loon from the Arctic Coastal Plain breeding area. Red dots represent breeding area locations, yellow dots are fall stopover sites, blue dots are wintering area locations, and green dots are spring stopover sites.
All six SP loons migrated southeast along the Alaska and Pacific coasts (Fig 3A). Two transmitters failed early in fall migration, two loons overwintered in southern Alaska, and the remaining two wintered within the Salish Sea near the United States and Canada border. We detected a spring migration for one SP loon which followed its fall migration route back to the western Alaska breeding area.
Red-throated Loon breeding areas in Alaska include the A) Seward Peninsula (SP), B) Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta (YKD), or C) Copper River Delta (CRD). Red dots represent breeding area locations, yellow dots are fall stopover sites, blue dots are wintering area locations, and green dots are spring stopover sites.
Six loons breeding on the YKD migrated along the eastern Pacific coast (Fig 3B). These individuals followed similar general migration paths as SP birds. One loon remained within Alaska and overwintered near Yakutat, AK. Three loons wintered in the Salish Sea, and two continued south along the Pacific coast and overwintered near San Francisco Bay, CA. All YKD transmitters failed before spring.
Two loons from the CRD had similar wintering areas as SP and YKD near the Salish Sea and San Francisco Bay area (Fig 3C). The final three CRD loons had similar wintering sites as the single ACP bird in northern Baja California, Mexico.
The mean wintering latitude of the three populations wintering in the eastern Pacific were 55°41’N (SD ± 7°34’) for SP, 46°04’N (SD ± 10°25’) for YKD, and 41°11’N (SD ± 3°50’) for CRD.
Stopover locations
Three loons from the ACP stayed within Alaska for fall stopover. Of the remaining nine individuals, three used fall stopovers along the eastern coast of Japan and six along coast of the Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia. Two ACP loons did not use a fall stopover location. We identified a spring stopover site for five ACP loons. Three individuals used spring stopover sites along the coast of Japan, one used a spring stopover site along the Kamchatka Peninsula, and the other within the Columbia River Mouth of Washington state.
Loons from the SP used fall stopover sites along the western Alaska coast (Fig 3A). The SP loon with the latest breeding ground departure forwent fall stopover. All other SP loons used at least one fall stopover and one bird used multiple fall stopover sites. Two individuals stopped over in Kuskokwim Bay on the YKD coast and three along the SP where one used a second stopover site along the northern coast of the Alaska Peninsula.
Loons from the YKD had similar fall stopover sites as the SP along the western Alaska coast (Fig 3B). The YKD loon with the latest breeding ground departure forwent fall stopover. All other YKD individuals used at least one fall stopover and more than half used multiple fall stopover sites. All but one loon stayed along the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta coast for fall stopover where two birds used a second stopover site in Bristol Bay, AK and another near Prince Wales Island, AK.
Loons from the CRD did not share fall stopover sites with any other population (Fig 3C). All CRD loons used at least one fall stopover and more than half used multiple fall stopover sites. Two individuals stayed within Alaska, one within the Kenai Peninsula and the second in Glacier Bay and Yakutat Bay. Two loons stopped over in the Salish Sea, one in the Columbia River Mouth, one in Grey’s Harbor, Washington and the other near Queen Charlotte Island, Canada. Average fall stopover and wintering site latitudes of SP birds were greater than YKD birds which, in turn, were greater than CRD birds (Fig 4).
Red-throated Loon breeding populations represent Alaska’s Arctic Coastal Plain (ACP), Seward Peninsula (SP), Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta (YKD), and Copper River Delta (CRD).
Migration distances and pace
Loons from the ACP traveled the farthest average distance (±SD) to first fall stopover sites (3,908 ± 1,990 km), over twice the distance of CRD loons (1,578 ± 1,344 km) and five times greater than that of SP (614 + 816 km) and YKD loons (489 + 224 km; Fig 5). Likewise for the 24 individuals who reached their respective wintering areas before transmitter failure, ACP loons underwent the longest total average migration to wintering site (7,993 ± 1,285 km, n = 9) generally ~2,000 km farther than the three other breeding populations who traveled similar distances, YKD (5,690 ± 1,165 km), SP (5,189 ± 1,481 km) and CRD (4,816 + 1,224 km). The average pace of migrations from the breeding area to wintering grounds was fastest for ACP loons (73.3 ± 13.7 km/day), followed by SP (68.6 ± 23.0 km/day) and CRD (48.8 ± 12.5 km/day) and YKD (48.0 ± 9.54 km/day).
Red-throated Loon breeding populations represent Alaska’s Arctic Coastal Plain (ACP), Seward Peninsula (SP), Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta (YKD), and Copper River Delta (CRD).
Temporal patterns
Arrival, departure and duration of stay for stopover and wintering sites as well as in-route migration intervals differed among breeding populations and years (Fig 6). The average day of departure (± SD) from the breeding site was earliest for YKD loons (8/13, ± 5.7) which was a week earlier than CRD (8/19, ± 15.2), three weeks before ACP (9/2, ± 9.2) and a month earlier than SP (9/10, ± 15.2). However, bias in these patterns may exist as breeding success is not known for many of these loons, yet departure time from breeding areas is likely influenced by breeding success, i.e., whether parents are attending young in late summer.
Line length represents date ranges from earliest arrival to latest departure. Average date of arrival denoted by diamond (◊), and average date of departure denoted by asterisk (*). Multiple lines represent different spatially distinct stopover or wintering areas used by loons from a breeding population. Breeding areas represent Alaska’s Arctic Coastal Plain (ACP), Seward Peninsula (SP), Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta (YKD), and Copper River Delta (CRD).
Duration of migration from breeding grounds to first fall stopover increased with distance to fall stopover (Fig 6). ACP loons averaged (± SD) the longest fall migration duration (28 ± 20.1 days) followed by CRD (20 ± 12.5), YKD (13 ± 7.5) and SP (8 ± 9.5). Average arrival date to fall stopover sites was earliest for YKD birds (8/25, range: 8/14–9/12), two weeks earlier than CRD (9/8, range: 8/22–10/13), three weeks before SP (9/15, range: 9/10–9/30) and six weeks earlier than ACP (10/1, range: 9/5–11/8). Average time spent at fall stopover sites was greatest for YKD loons (56.5 ± 17.6 days), followed by CRD (55.6 ± 21.5 days), ACP (44.6 ± 17.9 days), and SP loons (38.2 ± 16.8 days). Average departure date from fall stopover sites was earliest for SP (10/28, range: 10/6–11/26), a little over a week earlier than CRD (11/5, range: 9/16–12/9) and YKD birds (11/7, range: 9/26–11/29) and two weeks earlier than ACP (11/15, range: 10/9–12/16).
Duration of migration from fall stopover sites to wintering grounds increased with distance to wintering grounds. ACP birds averaged the longest migration duration from fall stopover to wintering site (35 ± 14.7 days) followed by YKD (25 ± 24.6), SP (24 ± 16.0) and CRD (16 ± 12.9). Average arrival date to a wintering site was earliest for CRD birds (11/26; range: 10/27–12/20), a day earlier than SP birds (11/27; range: 11/14–12/16), two weeks earlier than YKD birds (12/10; range: 11/25–12/28) and three weeks earlier than ACP (12/17; range: 11/18–1/14). Average time spent at the wintering site was greatest for SP birds (122.0 ± 8.6 days), then YKD birds (107.3 ± 48.5 days), ACP (80.4 ± 47.2), and CRD (71.8 ± 73.5).
Discussion
Migratory behavior
We found different patterns of migratory movement among breeding populations of Red-throated Loons in Alaska. For the most northerly breeding population (ACP), loons generally migrated along the western Pacific coastline, largely using the East Asian flyway [42]—a different migration pathway than the three more southerly breeding populations we studied.
For the three other populations, plus one bird from the ACP, all loons traveled down the west coast of North America, leading to some co-occurrence of loons from all populations at similar stopover and wintering sites. Nonetheless, in general, these three populations were geographically ordered in their migration extent and timing. Those wintering farthest north were those from the Seward Peninsula. In contrast, loons breeding at the Copper River Delta, the lowest latitude site, migrated to the southernmost extent. These latitudinal patterns of breeding and wintering locales suggest a chain migration strategy for Red-throated Loons. Chain migration behavior has also recently been identified in Northern Gannets (Morrus bassanus), another near-shore piscivorous bird that captures its prey underwater [43].
The difference in general migration patterns between the ACP and all other breeding areas in Alaska is also seen in a diverse suite of circumpolar bird species that migrate between breeding and wintering areas on opposite sides of the Beringian Divide [44–46]. This pattern may be a residual migratory pathway from when the Bering Land Bridge existed in the Bering Sea region and spanned Eurasian and North American continents [47].
Stopover and wintering area characteristics
Given that loons have high wing loading [48] and travel long distances, stopover and wintering sites likely function as both resting and refueling areas. Additionally, the availability and quality of prey at these sites may be important determinants to individual fitness during the non-breeding season [49–50]. For Red-throated Loons, stopover and wintering areas generally coincided with locations of major coastal upwelling (e.g., California current upwelling) [51–52]. The movement of cool, deep, nutrient rich water to the ocean surface increases levels of primary production [53], creating an abundance of food for seabirds during the non-breeding season. In addition many stopover and wintering sites were located near coastal estuaries, e.g., Fraser River mouth, Puget Sound, San Francisco Bay, which are also typically areas of high productivity [30] important for sub-surface foraging by piscivorous seabirds such as Red-throated Loons [54].
Pace of migration
Migratory birds can be categorized as those that frequently soar and those that predominantly use flapping flight. Heavy-bodied birds, such as loons, do not soar and thus expend energy in flapping flight and thus may be energetically constrained in how far they can migrate [55]. Nonetheless, Red-throated Loons in this study migrated further than expected, given their body size [55]. Large birds that use flapping flight are also typically constrained to shorter migration distances. Our results suggest that Red-throated Loons do not minimize the duration of migration; instead, they appear to minimize energy expenditure. In this study, Red-throated Loons rarely migrated across land and generally followed coastlines to stopover and wintering areas, minimizing fuel load but increasing overall travel time. Additionally, nearly half of all individuals used multiple stopover and wintering sites during migration and many stopover and wintering sites were subsequent to periods of prolonged migration bursts where individuals remained locally situated for a number of days before migrating again. Lastly, high wing loading may limit the amount of body reserves that Red-throated Loons can store between stopover areas. Multiple stopovers may allow loons to refuel frequently and may be advantageous over longer migration distances.
Migration distances
The distances traveled between breeding areas and wintering grounds were generally two to four times that of Common Loons [12] and farther than most documented seabird species [2].
The present distribution of Arctic breeding species and differential migration among breeding populations may be attributed to the physical-geographical conditions during the Last Glacial period [47]. All present North American low-arctic animals are postglacial immigrants from the Bering Sea area and current breeding populations generally coincide with ice-free areas during the Last Glacial period [47]. This information also provides insight into present day breeding population locations and differential migration we discovered among Alaska breeding Red-throated Loons. It is presumed that during the Last Glacial period much of the northern coast of the Bering Sea remained ice-bound while the southern coast was virtually ice-free due to warm Pacific Ocean currents [47]. Red-throated Loons depend on marine-derived food during both the breeding and non-breeding seasons, so it is likely that a majority of the population remained along the southern Bering Sea coast year-round. However, as conditions warmed, patterns of both migration and breeding area preference likely changed due to (i) the receding of ice sheets exposing more southern areas (ii) the rise of sea levels submerging wintering and breeding areas within the Bering Sea [47]. This may explain the differential migration we discovered among breeding populations, where ACP maintained the historical migration path across Beringia and eventually continued west as conditions warmed whereas SP, YKD and CRD forwent the western migration and began following a more southerly route as ice began receding southward. Given the differences in migration routes and wintering areas among Red-throated Loon breeding populations, studies of population genetic differentiation within this species could quantify if geographic separation and migratory behaviors have resulted in limited gene flow among breeding populations.
Conservation concerns
Like many seabirds, Red-throated Loons are a long-lived, low-fecundity species with delayed maturity [11]. These life-history characteristics make population growth rates highly sensitive to small changes in adult mortality. Therefore, understanding differential risks to Red-throated Loons during the non-breeding periods may inform differences observed in population trends among Alaska breeding populations. We found that individuals from the three more southerly breeding populations use similar stopover and wintering areas, indicating an increased risk of species level vulnerabilities. These areas were often found near estuaries and locations of major coastal upwelling and due to their inherent productivity are typically home to other competing bird species as well as high anthropogenic uses areas (e.g., Fraser River Estuary) [56].
Coastal and marine systems are continually inundated with terrestrial, atmospheric and marine derived pollutants [30, 57]. Red-throated Loons are inherently susceptible to marine contaminants as 1) species that undergo long distance migration, and use multiple stopover sites in areas with different environmental standards, and 2) pollutants, particularly lipid-soluble pollutants, bioaccumulate through the food chain affecting high trophic level marine feeders [58]. For example, higher polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) concentrations were found in ACP breeding birds compared to the other three populations [21]. These results strongly suggest that differences in contaminant profiles among populations is linked to contrasting migration strategies as the ACP is the only breeding population to migrate westward to East Asia. Preliminary satellite telemetry data in Yellow-billed Loons found a similar pattern in that populations breeding on the ACP and migrating to East Asia had higher rates of mercury exposure than breeding populations in Canada that winter in North America [16–17].
Conclusions
To our knowledge this is the first systematic effort to describe the migration patterns of Red-throated Loons. Results from this study highlight migration routes and important areas used for stopovers and winter by four different breeding populations. These shared pathways and locations by multiple breeding populations highlight key areas and flyways to aid in future conservation efforts. Since populations of Red-throated Loons breeding on the ACP continue to decline and this was the only breeding population to migrate outside of North America, future research should focus on this population, especially with the potential for contaminant exposure from sources in East Asia. Efforts should be made to expand satellite transmitter deployment to other Red-throated Loon breeding populations (e.g., Western Canada and Russia) since their breeding range is circumpolar and our efforts were restricted to populations breeding in Alaska. Red-throated Loons are also the only loon species to complete a simultaneous remigial molt in the fall [11] and identifying molting areas is important as this may be a vulnerable period of the annual cycle. Habitat analyses of core staging and wintering areas could also aid in determining potential impacts to loon populations.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Summary of satellite platform terminal transmitter (PTT) data for each individual Red-throated Loon from four Alaskan breeding populations.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189954.s001
(TIF)
S2 Table. Summary of stopover locations, and wintering sites for individual Red-throated Loons from four Alaskan breeding populations.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189954.s002
(TIF)
Acknowledgments
Disclaimer: Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Many individuals helped capture loons, including T. Arensberg, R. Askren, J. Ball, T. Donnelly, S. Earnst, A. Gorrill, B. Heindl, J. Kiesau, B. Lake, P. Lemons, D. Miller, S. Pavey, J. Reed, M. Sexson, and E. Wald. Veterinarians S. Larsen, D. Mulcahy, and C. Scott expertly performed surgeries to implant satellite transmitters. J. Pearce, I. Petersen and one anonymous reviewer provided helpful comments to an earlier version of this manuscript. All capture and handling procedures were reviewed and approved by the U.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center Animal Care and Use Committee. Data presented in this paper are publicly available via the U.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center [59].
References
- 1.
Alerstam T, Lindström Å. Optimal bird migration: the relative importance of time, energy, and safety. In: Gwinner E, editor. Bird migration. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1990. p. 331–351.
- 2.
Newton I. The migration ecology of birds. Academic, Oxford; 2008.
- 3. Hatch SA, Meyers PM, Mulcahy DM, Douglas DC. Seasonal movements and pelagic habitat use of murres and puffins determined by satellite telemetry. Condor. 2000;102(1):145–154.
- 4. Phillips RA, Silk JRD, Croxall JP, Afanasyev V, Briggs DR. Accuracy of geologcation estimates for flying seabirds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2004:266:265–272.
- 5. Burger AE, Shaffer SA. Application of tracking and data-logging technology in research and conservation of seabirds. Auk. 2008;125(2):253–264.
- 6. Hatch SA, Gill VA, Mulcahy DM. Migration and wintering sites of Pelagic Cormorants determined by satellite telemetry. J Field Ornithol. 2011;82(3):269–278.
- 7. Fifield DA, Montevecchi WA, Garthe S, Robertson GJ, Kubetzki U, Rail JF. Migratory tactics and wintering areas of northern gannets (Morus bassanus) breeding in North America. Ornithological Monographs. 2014;79:1–63.
- 8. Tranquilla LAM, Montevecchi WA, Fifield DA, Hedd A, Gaston AJ, Robertson GJ, et al. Individual Winter Movement Strategies in Two Species of Murre (Uria spp.) in the Northwest Atlantic. Plos One. 2014;9(4).
- 9. Orben RA, Irons DB, Paredes R, Roby DD, Phillips RA, Shaffer SA. North or south? Niche separation of endemic red-legged kittiwakes and sympatric black-legged kittiwakes during their non-breeding migrations. J Biogeogr. 2015;42(2):401–412.
- 10. Calvert AM, Walde SJ, Taylor PD. Nonbreeding-Season Drivers of Population Dynamics in Seasonal Migrants: Conservation Parallels Across Taxa. Avian Conserv Ecol. 2009;4(2).
- 11.
Barr JF, Eberl C, Mcintyre JW. Red-throated Loon (Gavia stellata). In: Poole A, Gill F, editors. The Birds of North America. Philadelphia; The Birds of North America, Inc. no. 513.
- 12. Kenow KP, Meyer MW, Evers DC, Douglas DC, Hines J. Use of satellite telemetry to identify Common Loon migration routes, staging areas and wintering range. Waterbirds. 2002;25(4):449–458.
- 13. Kenow KP, Adams D, Schoch N, Evers DC, Hanson W, Yates D, et al. Migration Patterns and Wintering Range of Common Loons Breeding in the Northeastern United States. Waterbirds. 2009;32(2):234–247.
- 14. Gray CE, Paruk JD, DeSorbo CR, Savoy LJ, Yates DE, Chickering MD, et al. Body Mass in Common Loons (Gavia immer) Strongly Associated with Migration Distance. Waterbirds. 2014;37(sp1):64–75.
- 15. Paruk J, Chickering M, Long D, Uher-Koch H, East A, Poleschook D, et al. Winter site fidelity and winter movements in Common Loons (Gavia immer) across North America. Condor. 2015;117(4):485–493.
- 16. Evers DC, Schmutz JA, Basu N, DeSorbo CR, Fair J, Gray CE, et al. Historic and contemporary mercury exposure and potential risk to Yellow-billed Loons (Gavia adamsii) breeding in Alaska and Canada. Waterbirds. 2014;37(sp1):147–159.
- 17.
Uher-Koch B, Schmutz J, Whalen M, Pearce J. Changing Arctic Ecosystems–Ecology of loons in a changing Arctic. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet. 2014;3093:2 p.
- 18. Powers KD, Cherry J. Loon migrations off the coast of the northeastern United States. Wilson Bull. 1983;95:125–132.
- 19. Sherony DF, Ewald BM, Kelling S. Inland fall migration of red-throated loons. J Field Ornithol. 2000;71(2):310–320.
- 20. Schmutz JA. Survival of adult Red-throated Loons (Gavia stellata) may be linked to marine conditions. Waterbirds. 2014;37(sp1):118–24.
- 21. Schmutz JA, Trust KA, Matz AC. Red-throated loons (Gavia stellata) breeding in Alaska, USA, are exposed to PCBs while on their Asian wintering grounds. Environ Poll. 2009;157(8–9):2386–2393.
- 22. Small AD, Ainley DG, Strong H. Notes on the birds killed in the 1971 San Francisco oil spill. Calif Birds. 1972;3:25–32.
- 23. Okill JD. Ringing recoveries of red-throated divers Gavia stellata in Britain and Ireland. Ringing and Migration. 1994;15:107–118.
- 24. Jessup DA, Miller MA, Ryan JP, Nevins HM, Kerkering HA, Mekebri A, et al. Mass Stranding of Marine Birds Caused by a Surfactant-Producing Red Tide. Plos One. 2009;4(2).
- 25. Phillips EM, Zamon JE, Nevins HM, Gibble CM, Duerr RS, Kerr LH. Summary of birds killed by a harmful algal bloom along the South Washingtion and North Oregon coasts during October 2009. Northwestern Naturalist. 2011;92:120–126.
- 26.
Forsell DJ. Mortality of migratory waterbirds in Mid-Atlantic Coastal anchored gillnets during March and April 1998. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. 1999.
- 27. Warden ML. Bycatch of wintering common and red-throated loons in gillnets off the USA Atlantic coast, 1996–2007. Aquat Biol. 2010;10(2):167–180.
- 28. Garthe S, Hüppop O. Scaling possible adverse effects of marine wind farms on seabirds: developing and applying a vulnerability index. J Appl Ecol. 2004;41(4):724–734.
- 29.
Hodges JI, Groves D,Breault A. Aerial survey of wintering waterbirds in the proposed Nai Kun Wind Farm Project of Hecate Strait. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Report. 2005.
- 30. Kennish MJ. Environmental threats and environmental future of estuaries. Environ Conserv. 2002;29(1):78–107.
- 31. Ford RG, Ainley DG, Casey JL, Keiper CA, Spear LB, Balance LT. The biogeographic patterns of seabirds in the central portion of the California Current. Marine Ornithology. 2004;32:77–96.
- 32. Grémillet D, Boulinier T. Spatial ecology and conservation of seabirds facing global climate change: a review. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2009;391:121–137.
- 33. Groves DJ, Contant B, King RJ, Hodges JI, King JG. Status and trends of loon populations summering in Alaska, 1971–1993. Condor. 1996;98(2):189–195.
- 34.
Larned W, Stehn R, Platte R. Waterfowl Breeding Population Survey Arctic Coastal Plain, Alaska 2011. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Migratory Bird Management Report. 2012.
- 35.
Mallek EJ, Groves DJ. Alaska-Yukon waterfowl breeding population survey. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Report. 2012.
- 36. Salyer JW. A bow-net trap for ducks. J Wildlife Manage. 1962;26:219–221.
- 37. Uher-Koch BD, Rizzolo DJ, Wright KG, Schmutz JA. A suspended dive-net technique for catching territorial divers. Ringing and Migration. 2016;31:19–22.
- 38. Mulcahy D, Esler D. Surgical and immediate post-release mortality of harlequin ducks (Histrionicus histrionicus) implanted with abdominal radio transmitters with percutaneous antennae. J Zoo Wildlife Med. 1999;30:397–401.
- 39. Korschgen CE, Kenow KP, GendronFitzpatrick A, Green WL, Dein FJ. Implanting intra-abdominal radiotransmitters with external whip antennas in ducks. J Wildlife Manage. 1996;60(1):132–137.
- 40. Douglas DC, Weinzierl R, Davidson SC, Kays R, Wikelski M, Bohrer G. Moderating Argos location errors in animal tracking data. Methods Ecol Evol. 2012;3(6):999–1007.
- 41.
Beyer HL. Geospatial Modeling Environment. 2012. (software). URL: http://www.spatialecology.com/gme.
- 42. Alerstam T, Backman J, Gudmundsson G, Hedenstrom A, Henningsson S, Karlsson H, et al. A polar system of intercontinental bird migration. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci. 2007;274(1625):2523–2530.
- 43. Fort J, Pettex E, Tremblay Y, Lorentsen S-H, Garthe S, Votier S, et al. Meta-population evidence of oriented chain migration in northern gannets (Morus bassanus). Front Ecol Environ. 2012;10(5):237–242.
- 44. Alerstam T, Backman J, Strandberg R, Gudmundsson G, Hedenstrom A, Henningsson S, et al. Great-circle migration of arctic passerines. Auk. 2008;125(4):831–838.
- 45. Oppel S, Powell AN, Dickson DL. Timing and distance of King Eider migration and winter movements. Condor. 2008;110(2):296–305.
- 46. Handel CM, Gill RE Jr. Wayward Youth: Trans-Beringian Movement and Differential Southward Migration by Juvenile Sharp-tailed Sandpipers. Arctic. 2010;63(3):273–288.
- 47. Ploeger PL. Geographical differentiation in arctic Anatidae as a result of isolation during the last glacial. Ardea. 1968;56:1–159.
- 48.
Pennycuick CJ. Bird flight performance: a practical calculation manual. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Univ. Press: 1989.
- 49. Alerstam T, Hedenstrom A, Akesson S. Long-distance migration: evolution and determinants. Oikos. 2003;103(2):247–260.
- 50. Ball J, Esler D, Schmutz J. Proximate composition, energetic value, and relative abundance of prey fish from the inshore eastern Bering Sea: implications for piscivorous predators. Polar Biol. 2007;30:699–708.
- 51. Huyer A. Coastal upwelling in the California current system. Prog Oceanogr. 1983;12:259–284.
- 52. Black BA, Schroeder ID, Sydeman WJ, Bograd SJ, Wells BK, Schwing FB. Winter and summer upwelling modes and their biological importance in the California Current Ecosystem. Global Change Biol. 2011;17:2536–2545.
- 53. Zaytsev O, Cervantes-Duarte R, Montante O, Gallegos-Garcia A. Coastal upwelling activity on the pacific shelf of the Baja California Peninsula. J Oceanogr. 2003;59(4):489–502.
- 54. Skov H, Prins E. Impact of estuarine fronts on the dispersal of piscivorous birds in the German Bight. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2001;214:279–287.
- 55. Watanabe YY. Flight mode affects allometry of migration range in birds. Ecol Lett. 2016;19:907–914. pmid:27305867
- 56.
Butler RW, Campbell RW. The birds of the Fraser River Delta: populations, ecology and international significance. British Columbia Ministry of the Environment. Canadian Wildlife Service Occasional Paper no 65.
- 57. Burger J, Gochfeld M. Marine birds as sentinels of environmental pollution. EcoHealth. 2004;1(3):263–274.
- 58. Islam MS, Tanaka M. Impacts of pollution on coastal and marine ecosystems including coastal and marine fisheries and approach for management: a review and synthesis. Mar Pollut Bull. 2004;48(7–8):624–649. pmid:15041420
- 59.
Uher-Koch BD. Satellite telemetry data for Red-throated Loons, Alaska, 2000–2011. U.S. Geological Survey Data Release. 2017; https://doi.org/5066/F7TH8KVH.