http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3165-3640
Figures
Abstract
Paraoxonase-1 (PON1) is an intra-cellular antioxidant enzyme found also in the circulation associated with high-density lipoproteins. The activity of this enzyme has been shown to be decreased in breast cancer (BC) patients. The aims of our study were to investigate the changes produced by radiotherapy (RT) on activity and concentration of serum PON1 in BC patients, and to evaluate the observed variations in relation to clinical and pathological characteristics of patients and tumors, and the response to treatment. We studied 200 women with BC who were scheduled to receive RT following excision of the tumor. Blood for analyses was obtained before and after the irradiation procedure. The control group was composed of 200 healthy women. Relative to control, BC patients had significantly lower serum PON1 activities pre-RT, while PON1 concentrations were at similar levels. RT was associated with a significant increase in serum PON1 activities and concentrations. We observed significant differences in serum PON1 concentrations post-RT between patients with luminal A or luminal B tumors. Serum PON1 concentration post-RT was markedly lower in BC patients with metastases. We conclude that benefit from RT accrues to the BC patients not only through its direct effect on cancer cells but also indirectly by improving the organism’s anti-oxidant defense mechanisms. In addition, our preliminary evidence suggests that the measurement of serum PON1 concentration post-RT could be an efficient prognostic biomarker, and may be used as an index of the efficacy of the RT.
Citation: Arenas M, García-Heredia A, Cabré N, Luciano-Mateo F, Hernández-Aguilera A, Sabater S, et al. (2017) Effect of radiotherapy on activity and concentration of serum paraoxonase-1 in breast cancer patients. PLoS ONE 12(11): e0188633. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188633
Editor: Aamir Ahmad, University of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute, UNITED STATES
Received: August 10, 2017; Accepted: November 11, 2017; Published: November 27, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Arenas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data have been uploaded as Supporting Information. Data are from the Radiopon study, whose authors may be contacted at jcamps@grupsagessa.com.
Funding: This work was funded by a grant from Associació Oncològica Dr. Amadeu Pelegrí, Salou, Spain, AODAP/2015. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Breast cancer (BC) is the malignant disease with the highest incidence worldwide, and is the most common cancer-related cause of death in women [1]. Genetic factors, lifestyle, and environmental agents are important contributors to the etiology of BC but, nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms underlying BC onset and development have not, as yet, been elucidated [2]. For example, oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation products play a role in oncogenesis [3] while oxidized low-density lipoproteins (LDL) have been reported as being causally associated with oxidative stress-related cancers [4]. Recent investigations have suggested that paraoxonase-1 (PON1) plays a significant role in the molecular disorders associated with cancer. PON1 is an antioxidant enzyme found in the membranes of most cells and, as well, in the circulation bound to HDL [5–7]. The original function attributed to PON1 is that of a lactonase since lipophilic lactones constitute its primary substrates [8]. It is this catalytic capacity that enables PON1 to degrade lipid peroxides within the cell and in the lipoproteins in circulation [9]. In addition, PON1 has an esterase activity and degrades organophosphate xenobiotics such as paraoxon, phenylacetate and nerve agents [7]. PON1 levels are genetically determined; the polymorphisms Arg/Gln at position 192 (PON1192, with two alleles termed Q and R), and Leu/Met at position 55 (PON155, with two alleles termed L and M) being strongly associated with the enzyme’s activity. PON155 polymorphism indirectly influences serum PON1 activity and concentration i.e. it is in linkage disequilibrium with the PON1-108 promoter polymorphism; the mutation which is more clearly responsible for the observed changes [7]. Recent studies reported a decrease in serum PON1 activity in BC patients [2,10]. In addition, the M allele of the L55M polymorphism was associated with a higher incidence of BC [11–13].
The current preferred treatment of BC is surgery followed by loco-regional radiotherapy (RT) and, often, adjuvant chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy [14]. RT is an effective treatment but response is very variable and reflects the heterogeneity of the disease and its sensitivity to treatment. The efficacy of RT is reflected in the molecular classification of BC tumors; a classification which is based on the expression of certain proteins by the tumor cells. For example, the Her2 subtype has a positive expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; the luminal A subtype has positive expression of hormone receptors (estrogens and/or progesterone), is Her2 negative and has an expression of the nuclear regulator of the cell proliferation Ki67 of <14%; the luminal B subtype is positive for the hormone and Her2 receptors and has a Ki67 expression >14%; the triple negative subtype is negative for hormone receptors and Her2. Luminal subtypes are associated with a more favorable prognosis, and are more sensitive to ionizing radiation [15,16].
The aims of our study were: 1) to investigate the changes produced by RT on activity and concentration of serum PON1 in BC patients; 2) to assess the possible influence of PON1192 and PON155 polymorphisms; 3) to relate these changes with the clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients and their tumors, especially with respect to response-to-treatment.
Methods
Patients and samples
We included 200 women (mean age: 54 years, range: 37–84) diagnosed as having BC and attending the Department of Radiation Oncology of our Hospital after having undergone surgery for tumor extirpation. All patients had a Karnofsky Index > 70 and were classified as 0 or 1 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale [17]. The exclusion criteria included: having previously received RT at the same cancer site, and being pregnant or lactating. Six patients (3%) had metastases. Based on studies suggesting benefit in this subgroup of patients [18], the protocol of our Center indicates post-operative RT in metastatic BC patients following pathological complete response of the metastases to primary systemic treatment.
In the present study, 33 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy post-surgery, 80 patients received adjuvant hormone therapy post-surgery, and 87 received both treatments. The adjuvant chemotherapy treatment duration was for about 4 to 5 months, and concluded 1 to 2 months before RT commencement. The adjuvant hormone treatment commenced 1 to 2 months post-surgery and, usually, was administered simultaneously with RT. The radiation schedule was normofractionated RT (50 Gy at 2 Gy/day on the breast and 16 Gy at 2 Gy/day on the tumor bed, 5 days/week) or hypofractionated RT (40 Gy at 2.67 Gy/day, 5 days/week) [19,20]. Thirty percent of the patients received irradiation of regional lymph nodes, according to existing risk factors [21,22]. During RT, a weekly acute toxicity assessment was performed using the criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [23].
Prior to irradiation, and one month after completion of RT, blood samples were obtained and sera and leukocytes were stored at– 80°C until processed for biochemical and genetic analyses. The control group was composed of 200 healthy women (mean age: 47 years, range: 33–84) participating in a population-based study conducted in our geographical area. They had no clinical or analytical evidence of infectious disease, renal insufficiency, hepatic damage, neoplasia, oligophrenia, or dementia. A detailed description of this population has been published recently [24]. All patients and control subjects signed a written informed consent according to the declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee (Institutional Review Board) of the Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan (project code: 14/2017).
Biochemical measurements
Serum PON1 paraoxonase activity was determined as the rate of hydrolysis of paraoxon at 410 nm and 37°C in a 0.05 mM glycine buffer, pH 10.5 with 1 mM CaCl2 [25]. Activities were expressed as U/L (1 U = 1 μmol of paraoxon hydrolyzed per minute). Serum PON1 concentrations were determined by in-house ELISA with rabbit polyclonal antibodies generated against the synthetic peptide CRNHQSSYQTRLNALREVQ which is a sequence specific for mature PON1 [26,27]. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate amino transferase (AST) activities, and lipid profile were analyzed by standard tests in a Roche Modular Analytics P800 system (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland).
PON1 genotyping
Genomic DNA was obtained from leukocytes (Puregene DNA Isolation reagent set, Gentra Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN). PON1192 and PON155 single nucleotide polymorphisms were analyzed with GoTaq® qPCR Master Mix reagents (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) in a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
Statistical analysis
All the calculations were performed with SPSS 22.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Since PON1-related variables present with non-Gaussian distributions, differences between any two groups were assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the degree of association between quantitative variables. The χ-square test was employed to evaluate differences in qualitative variables. Linear regression analysis was employed to investigate the independent association between selected variables and serum PON1 activity and concentration in the overall population. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses were employed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the measured biochemical variables. This analysis employs plots of different sensitivity/specificity pairs based on varying decision thresholds. Sensitivity (or true positive rate) is the proportion of the sample correctly identified as associating with a specific disease. Specificity (or true negative rate) is the proportion of subjects correctly identified as not segregating with a specific disease. False positive rate is calculated as 1-specificity. The area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values are calculated. The AUC represents the ability of the test to correctly classify patients with the alteration being investigated. The values of AUC can range between 1 (perfect test) and 0.5 (worthless test) [28]. Results are shown as medians and 95%CI.
Results
Clinical characteristics of patients
The main clinical characteristics of the BC patients and their tumors are shown in Table 1. Patients attending the Department of Radiation Oncology already have their tumors operated upon. In the majority of cases the tumors were classified as luminal A or B, were positive for estrogen and progesterone receptors, were relatively small in size and had not developed metastases. The most common pathological diagnosis was that of invasive ductal carcinoma. Individual results of all the clinical, demographic and analytical variables are shown in the Supporting Information (S1 Table).
Changes in biochemical variables
Relative to control subjects, BC patients had significantly lower serum PON1 activities pre-RT, while PON1 concentrations were similar. They also had similar AST and ALT activities, and higher cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations. RT was associated with significant increases in serum PON1 activities and concentrations while other analyzed variables were not significantly altered (Table 2). Linear regression analyses showed that BC, together with PON1192 and PON155 polymorphisms, were independent predictors of serum PON1 activity (but not of PON1 concentration). Age was not significantly associated with these variables (Table 3).
Lack of relationship between PON1 genotypes and BC
The allele distributions of the PON1192 and PON155 polymorphisms followed Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in cases as well as in control subjects. There were no significant differences in the genotype frequencies of the analyzed PON1 gene polymorphisms between women with BC and the healthy control individuals (Table 4).
Differences were assessed with the χ-square test.
When we segregated all the subjects according to the PON1 genotypes, we observed that, relative to control subjects the degree of decrease of PON1 activity in BC patients pre-RT as well as the degree of increase post-RT were similar for each of the isoforms (Fig 1).
*: P < 0.05 with respect to the wild-type isoform (QQ and LL, respectively).
Relationships between PON1-related variables and the patients’ clinical characteristics
We observed significant differences in serum PON1 concentrations pre-RT depending on whether or not the patients were positive for progesterone receptors [88.5 (27.1–215.3) vs. 105.9 (38.1–259.1) mg/L, respectively; P = 0.029]. Also, the PON1 concentrations post-RT were significantly different between luminal A and luminal B patients [125.7 (16.1–242.5) vs. 99.9 (19.6–248.6) mg/L, respectively; P = 0.028]. Of note was that serum PON1 concentration post-RT was markedly lower in BC patients with metastases. The AUC of the ROC plot was high, indicating a good sensitivity and specificity of this measurement in distinguishing patients who had metastases from those patients who did not (Fig 2). We did not find any significant associations between the serum PON1 activity or concentration and any other tumor characteristic or toxicological response (Table 5).
AUC: Area under the curve.
Discussion
Recently, serum PON1 activity has been reported to be decreased in several types of cancer including BC. The studies, however, remain scarce and have been performed in relatively small numbers of subjects. For example, decreased serum PON1 activity and increased levels of lipid peroxidation have been reported in 45 Pakistani patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma [29], and 30 Turkish patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [30], and a further 25 Turkish patients with papillary thyroid cancer [31]. The activity of PON1 enzyme was shown to be low in 50 Egyptian patients with colorectal cancer but with significant increases one month post-surgery [32]; similar to 49 French patients with BC recurrence [33]. This latter study also showed an inverse relationship between serum PON1 activity and serum amyloid A concentrations. Both these proteins are carried in the circulation bound to HDL particles, and they tend to change in opposite directions in case of inflammation [34]. Conversely, serum PON1 activity has been found to be increased in a group of 23 Turkish patients with prostate cancer, while no changes in lipid peroxidation markers were observed [35]. In the present study, we observed a decrease in serum PON1 activity in BC patients pre-RT, while the serum PON1 concentrations remained unaltered. This latter result suggests that the decrease in the enzyme’s activity is due to enzyme inactivation and not to a decreased PON1 protein synthesis. Diseases involving oxidative stress are associated with decreased serum PON1 activities. This is due to the PON1 active site for lipid peroxide hydrolysis requiring a free sulfhydryl group at cysteine 284; PON1 degrades lipid peroxides by reacting covalently with this site leading to enzyme inactivation [36]. Hence, the net result of increased oxidative stress is decreased PON1 activity with unaltered PON1 concentration, as observed in the present study.
We did not find any significant differences in the frequencies of PON1192 and PON155 isoforms between BC patients and the control group of subjects. The relationship between PON1192 and PON155 genes and BC has been recently investigated, but the findings remain equivocal. The R allele of PON1192 polymorphism has been associated with a decreased risk of BC in some studies [11,37,38], while other studies did not find any significant association [13,39–41]. Greater consensus exists with respect to association of the M allele of PON155 polymorphism and an increased risk of BC; carriers of the M allele of PON155 polymorphism have lower serum PON1 activity and most studies agree in that the frequency of this allele is higher in BC patients than in the general population [11,13,37–41]. We have not found such an association. Some studies suggest that the relationship between this polymorphism and BC depends on alimentation such as vitamin supplement intake, or medication. Cheng et al. [42] reported an interaction between PON155 polymorphism and several single nucleotide polymorphisms related to homocysteine and folate metabolism. An explanation could be that the folate cycle regulates the availability of methyl groups through the sequential conversion of methionine to S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) and homocysteine and, hence, influences epigenetic modifications of DNA [43]. In addition, Stevens et al. [39] reported that the M allele of PON155 polymorphism is associated with increased risk of BC only in patients using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). These differences may, perhaps, explain the different findings of the present investigation.
To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to report an increase in activity and concentration of serum PON1 in BC patients post-RT. This could be of considerable clinical relevance since PON1 is considered a part of the innate immune system due to its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-infectious agent properties [44] and, as such, an increase in the activity of PON1 implies an improvement in the general clinical condition of the patient. Our results suggest, then, that the RT benefit for the BC patients could be not only through its direct effect on cancer cells, but also indirectly by improving the organism’s defense mechanisms.
Of further note is the scarcity of studies assessing relationships between the molecular characteristics of BC tumors and the PON1 system. The present study found lower serum PON1 concentrations post-RT in patients belonging to the luminal B subclass. These patients are positive for Her2 and have a high expression of Ki67 membrane antigen. Her2 antigen is a factor in unfavorable prognosis, and its high expression is an indicator of high metastatic liability of the tumor and its possible resistance to anti-hormonal therapy [45]. Similarly, Ki67 is a reliable prognostic marker in determining the number of tumor cells that are in the S phase of the cell cycle. Antigen Ki67 is seen as an independent prognostic factor in relation to tumor recurrence [46,47]. Factors underlying the relationship between PON1 and these antigens are, as yet, unknown. However, recent studies have shown that Her2 and Ki67 expressions are associated with increased expression of various antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione transferase and glutathione reductase) within the tumor cells. This leads to protection of cancer cells against oxidative stress and apoptosis, with subsequent amplification of the proliferative processes [48]. There is a real possibility that PON1 participates in this phenomenon, and the reduced serum concentrations of this protein are a reflection of an inhibited secretion tending towards an increase in the intra-tumor levels of this enzyme. Lykholat et al. [48] suggested that alterations in oxidative status together with higher Her2 and Ki67 expression are indicators of proliferative activity and, as such, could trigger recurrence and metastases in BC patients. In this regard, we observed that serum PON1 concentrations were severely reduced in patients with metastases. Our results are preliminary and should be interpreted with caution because comparisons of 194 patients without versus 6 patients with metastases could be considered statistically unreliable. However, we have decided to report these differences since, if confirmed in a wider series of patients, they could have considerable clinical importance. Perhaps the decrease in serum PON1 concentration in patients with metastasis is secondary to an inhibition of its secretion and an increase in its concentration in tissue. As such, the tumor cells would be more protected from death by apoptosis. If this were the case, RT would not be as beneficial in this subgroup of patients. We consider it important that this question is investigated by further studies with a larger number of patients from this subgroup and, in whom, tissue can be made available for the measurement of PON1.
ROC analysis is probably the best, and simplest, way to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of any biochemical biomarker. In this respect, our preliminary results showed a very high analytical sensitivity and specificity for the measurement of post-RT serum PON1 concentration. Indeed, we suggest the implementation of multicenter studies to confirm this finding because, if confirmed, it would indicate that the measurement of serum PON1 concentration post-RT can be a non-invasive and efficient prognostic biomarker of metastasis in BC and, as well, an index of the efficacy of the RT treatment.
We noted, as well, lower serum PON1 concentrations pre-RT in patients positive for progesterone receptors. The relationships between PON1 and the hormone system are largely unknown, and an explanation for this finding cannot be ascertained from the present investigation. Perhaps an explanation derives from tamoxifen treatment in hormone receptor-positive patients. This medication inhibits growth hormone secretion in women [49], and deficiency of this hormone is associated with increased oxidative stress and decreased serum PON1 activity in humans [50]. Hence, it is possible that tamoxifen inhibits PON1 synthesis through its effects on growth hormone. However, this hypothesis is merely speculative.
Conclusion
The main conclusion of the present study is that the RT benefit for BC patients results not only through its direct effect on cancer cells, but also indirectly by improving the organism’s defense mechanisms. Moreover, our findings, albeit preliminary, suggest that measurement of serum PON1 concentration post-RT could be an efficient prognostic biomarker and an index of the efficacy of the RT. Multicenter, long-term follow-up studies are necessary to ascertain whether PON1 levels (concentrations and/or activities) post-RT can be useful in predicting local relapses and metastases.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the members of the Associació Oncològica Dr. Amadeu Pelegrí together with all the volunteers from Salou and the surrounding areas for their unstinting support for our research, especially Murielle Reig, Noelia Fernández and Marta Formoso.
References
- 1. Simone V, D'Avenia M, Argentiero A, Felici C, Rizzo FM, De Pergola G, et al. Silvestris F. Obesity and Breast Cancer: Molecular interconnections and potential clinical applications. Oncologist. 2016; 21: 404–417. pmid:26865587
- 2. Kaya MO, Sinan S, Güler ÖÖ, Arslan O. Is there a relation between genetic susceptibility with cancer? A study about paraoxanase (PON1) enzyme activity in breast cancer cases. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2016; 31: 1349–1355. pmid:26763308
- 3. Elkiran ET, Mar N, Aygen B, Gursu F, Karaoglu A, Koca S. Serum paraoxonase and arylesterase activities in patients with lung cancer in a Turkish population. BMC Cancer. 2007; 7: 48. pmid:17362500
- 4. Barrera G. Oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation products in cancer progression and therapy. ISRN Oncol. 2012; 2012: 137289. pmid:23119185
- 5. Chander R, Kapoor NK. High-density lipoprotein is a scavenger of superoxide anions. Biochem Pharmacol. 1990; 40: 1663–1665. pmid:2171536
- 6. Aviram M, Rosenblat M. Paraoxonases 1, 2, and 3, oxidative stress, and macrophage cell formation during atherosclerosis development. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004; 37: 1304–1316. pmid:15454271
- 7. Camps J, Marsillach J, Joven J. The paraoxonases: role in human diseases and methodological difficulties in measurement. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2009; 46: 83–106. pmid:19255916
- 8. Khersonsky O, Tawfik D. Structure-reactivity studies of serum paraoxonase PON1 suggest that its native activity is lactonase. Biochemistry. 2005; 44: 6371–6382. pmid:15835926
- 9. Ponce-Ruiz N, Murillo-González FE, Rojas-García AE, Mackness M, Bernal-Hernández YY, Barrón-Vivanco BS, et al. Transcriptional regulation of human paraoxonase 1 by nuclear receptors. Chem Biol Interact. 2017;268:77–84. pmid:28223025
- 10. Bobin-Dubigeon C, Lefrançois A, Classe JM, Joalland MP, Bard JM. Paired measurement of serum amyloid A (SAA) and paraoxonase 1 (PON1) as useful markers in breast cancer recurrence. Clin Biochem. 2015;48:1181–1183. pmid:26188919
- 11. Saadat M. Paraoxonase 1 genetic polymorphisms and susceptibility to breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012; 36: e101–3. pmid:22133529
- 12. Chen L, Lu W, Fang L, Xiong H, Wu X, Zhang M, et al. Association between L55M polymorphism in Paraoxonase 1 and cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 21 studies. Onco Targets Ther. 2016; 9: 1151–1158. pmid:27019599
- 13. Wu J, Fang M, Zhou X, Zhu B, Yang Z. Paraoxonase 1 gene polymorphisms are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in a population of Chinese women. Oncotarget. 2017; 8: 25362–25371. pmid:28445984
- 14. Tenori L, Oakman C, Morris PG, Gralka E, Turner N, Cappadona S, et al. Serum metabolomic profiles evaluated after surgery may identify patients with oestrogen receptor negative early breast cancer at increased risk of disease recurrence. Results from a retrospective study. Mol Oncol. 2015; 9: 128–139. pmid:25151299
- 15. Langlands FE, Horgan K, Dodwell DD, Smith L. Breast cancer subtypes: response to radiotherapy and potential radiosensitisation. Br J Radiol. 2013; 86: 20120601. pmid:23392193
- 16. Tobin NP, Foukakis T, De Petris L, Bergh J. The importance of molecular markers for diagnosis and selection of targeted treatments in patients with cancer. J Intern Med. 2015; 278: 545–570. pmid:26373821
- 17. Sloan JA, Loprinzi CL, Laurine JA, Novotny PJ, Vargas-Chanes D, Krook JE, et al. A simple stratification factor prognostic for survival in advanced cancer: the good/bad/uncertain index. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19: 3539–3546. pmid:11481361
- 18. Rapiti E, Verkooijen HM, Vlastos G, Fioretta G, Neyroud-Caspar I, Sappino AP, et al. Complete excision of primary breast tumor improves survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24: 2743–2749. pmid:16702580
- 19. Montero A, Sanz X, Hernanz R, Cabrera D, Arenas M, Bayo E, et al. Accelerated hypofractionated breast radiotherapy: FAQs (frequently asked questions) and facts. Breast. 2014; 23: 299–309. pmid:24530095
- 20. Prades J, Algara M, Espinàs JA, Farrús B, Arenas M, Reyes V, et al. Understanding variations in the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy and its specific indications for breast cancer: A mixed-methods study. Radiother Oncol. 2017; 123: 22–28. pmid:28236538
- 21. Arenas M, Montero Á, de Las Peñas MD, Algara M. The position and current status of radiation therapy after primary systemic therapy in breast cancer: a national survey-based expert consensus statement. Clin Transl Oncol. 2016; 18: 582–591. pmid:26370420
- 22. Aristei C, Kaidar-Person O, Arenas M, Coles C, Offersen BV, Bourgier C, et al. The 2016 Assisi Think Tank Meeting on breast cancer: white paper. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 160: 211–221. pmid:27686462
- 23. Bots WT, van den Bosch S, Zwijnenburg EM, Dijkema T, van den Broek GB, Weijs WLJ, et al. Reirradiation of head and neck cancer: Long-term disease control and toxicity. Head Neck. 2017; 39:1122–1130. pmid:28263446
- 24. Fort-Gallifa I, García-Heredia A, Hernández-Aguilera A, Simó JM, Sepúlveda J, Martín-Paredero V, et al. Biochemical indices of oxidative stress and inflammation in the evaluation of peripheral artery disease. Free Radic Biol Med. 2016; 97: 568–576. pmid:27449545
- 25. Ferré N, Camps J, Prats E, Vilella E, Paul A, Figuera L, et al. Serum paraoxonase activity: a new additional test for the improved evaluation of chronic liver damage. Clin Chem. 2002; 48: 261–268. pmid:11805006
- 26. Marsillach J, Mackness B, Mackness M, Riu F, Beltrán R, Joven J, et al. Immunochemical analysis of paraoxonases-1, 2, and 3 expression in normal mouse tissues. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008; 45: 146–157. pmid:18440321
- 27. Martinelli N, García-Heredia A, Roca H, Aranda N, Arija V, Mackness B, et al. Paraoxonase-1 status in patients with hereditary hemochromatosis. J Lipid Res. 2013; 54: 1484–1492. pmid:23471031
- 28. Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem. 1993; 39: 561–577. pmid:8472349
- 29. Malik UU, Siddiqui IA, Hashim Z, Zarina S. Measurement of serum paraoxonase activity and MDA concentrations in patients suffering with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Chim Acta. 2014; 430: 38–42. pmid:24389054
- 30. Sehitogulları A, Aslan M, Sayır F, Kahraman A, Demir H. Serum paraoxonase-1 enzyme activities and oxidative stress levels in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Redox Rep. 2014; 19: 199–205. pmid:24731121
- 31. Korkmaz H, Tabur S, Özkaya M, Aksoy N, Yildiz H, Akarsu E. Paraoxonase and arylesterase activities in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2015; 75: 259–264. pmid:25723374
- 32. Ahmed NS, Shafik NM, Elraheem OA, Abou-Elnoeman SE. Association of paraoxonase-1(Q192R and L55M) gene polymorphisms and activity with colorectal cancer and effect of surgical intervention. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015; 16: 803–809. pmid:25684529
- 33. Bobin-Dubigeon C, Lefrançois A, Classe JM, Joalland MP, Bard JM. Paired measurement of serum amyloid A (SAA) and paraoxonase 1 (PON1) as useful markers in breast cancer recurrence. Clin Biochem. 2015; 48: 1181–1183. pmid:26188919
- 34. Uhlar CM, Whitehead AS. Serum amyloid A, the major vertebrate acute-phase reactant. Eur J Biochem. 1999; 265: 501–523. pmid:10504381
- 35. Eroglu M, Yilmaz N, Yalcinkaya S, Ay N, Aydin O, Sezer C. Enhanced HDL-cholesterol-associated anti-oxidant PON-1 activity in prostate cancer patients. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2013; 29: 368–373. pmid:23768700
- 36. Aviram M, Rosenblat M, Billecke S, Erogul J, Sorenson R, Bisgaier CL, et al. Human serum paraoxonase (PON 1) is inactivated by oxidized low density lipoprotein and preserved by antioxidants. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999; 26: 892–904. pmid:10232833
- 37. Gallicchio L, McSorley MA, Newschaffer CJ, Huang HY, Thuita LW, Hoffman SC, et al. Body mass, polymorphisms in obesity-related genes, and the risk of developing breast cancer among women with benign breast disease. Cancer Detect Prev. 2007; 31: 95–101. pmid:17428620
- 38. Antognelli C, Del Buono C, Ludovini V, Gori S, Talesa VN, Crinò L, et al. CYP17, GSTP1, PON1 and GLO1 gene polymorphisms as risk factors for breast cancer: an Italian case-control study. BMC Cancer. 2009; 9: 115. pmid:19379515
- 39. Stevens VL, Rodriguez C, Pavluck AL, Thun MJ, Calle EE. Association of polymorphisms in the paraoxonase 1 gene with breast cancer incidence in the CPS-II Nutrition Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15: 1226–1228. pmid:16775186
- 40. Liu C, Liu L. Polymorphisms in three obesity-related genes (LEP, LEPR, and PON1) and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2011; 32: 1233–1240. pmid:21887553
- 41. Wen Y, Huang Z, Zhang X, Gao B, He Y. Correlation between PON1 gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8: 20343–20348. pmid:26884950
- 42. Cheng TY, Makar KW, Neuhouser ML, Miller JW, Song X, Brown EC, et al. Folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism genes and interactions with nutritional factors on colorectal cancer risk: Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. Cancer. 2015; 121: 3684–3691. pmid:26108676
- 43. Luciano-Mateo F, Hernández-Aguilera A, Cabré N, Camps J, Fernández-Arroyo S, López-Miranda J, et al. Nutrients in energy and one-carbon metabolism: Learning from metformin users. Nutrients. 2017; 9. pmid:28208582
- 44. Camps J, Iftimie S, García-Heredia A, Castro A, Joven J. Paraoxonases and infectious diseases. Clin Biochem. 2017; 50: 804–811. pmid:28433610
- 45. Liu T, Zhang H, Sun L, Zhao D, Liu P, Yan M, et al. FSIP1 binds HER2 directly to regulate breast cancer growth and invasiveness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114: 7683–7688. pmid:28674022
- 46. Kilickap S, Kaya Y, Yucel B, Tuncer E, Babacan NA, Elagoz S. Higher Ki67 expression is associates with unfavorable prognostic factors and shorter survival in breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014; 15: 1381–1385. pmid:24606469
- 47. Soliman NA, Yussif SM. Ki-67 as a prognostic marker according to breast cancer molecular subtype. Cancer Biol Med. 2016; 13: 496–504. pmid:28154782
- 48. Lykholat T, Lykholat O, Antonyuk S. Immunohistochemical and biochemical analysis of mammary gland tumours of different age patients. Tsitol Genet. 2016; 50: 40–51. pmid:27266184
- 49. Birzniece V, Barrett PHR, Ho KKY. Tamoxifen reduces hepatic VLDL production and GH secretion in women: a possible mechanism for steatosis development. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017; 177: 137–143. pmid:28500244
- 50. Bayram F, Baskol G, Tanriverdi F, Baskol M, Kocer D, Caniklioğlu A. Paraoxonase is reduced in patients with growth hormone deficiency: A novel risk factor for atherosclerosis. J Res Med Sci. 2013; 18:291–296. pmid:24124425