Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Somite-Derived Retinoic Acid Regulates Zebrafish Hematopoietic Stem Cell Formation

  • Laura M. Pillay,

    Affiliation Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9, Canada

    ⨯
  • Kacey J. Mackowetzky,

    Affiliation Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9, Canada

    ⨯
  • Sonya A. Widen,

    Affiliation Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9, Canada

    ⨯
  • Andrew Jan Waskiewicz

    aw@ualberta.ca

    Affiliations Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9, Canada, Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9, Canada, Women & Children’s Health Research Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9, Canada

    ⨯

Correction

25 Jan 2017: Pillay LM, Mackowetzky KJ, Widen SA, Waskiewicz AJ (2017) Correction: Somite-Derived Retinoic Acid Regulates Zebrafish Hematopoietic Stem Cell Formation. PLOS ONE 12(1): e0171058. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171058 View correction

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are multipotent progenitors that generate all vertebrate adult blood lineages. Recent analyses have highlighted the importance of somite-derived signaling factors in regulating HSC specification and emergence from dorsal aorta hemogenic endothelium. However, these factors remain largely uncharacterized. We provide evidence that the vitamin A derivative retinoic acid (RA) functions as an essential regulator of zebrafish HSC formation. Temporal analyses indicate that RA is required for HSC gene expression prior to dorsal aorta formation, at a time when the predominant RA synthesis enzyme, aldh1a2, is strongly expressed within the paraxial mesoderm and somites. Previous research implicated the Cxcl12 chemokine and Notch signaling pathways in HSC formation. Consequently, to understand how RA regulates HSC gene expression, we surveyed the expression of components of these pathways in RA-depleted zebrafish embryos. During somitogenesis, RA-depleted embryos exhibit altered expression of jam1a and jam2a, which potentiate Notch signaling within nascent endothelial cells. RA-depleted embryos also exhibit a severe reduction in the expression of cxcr4a, the predominant Cxcl12b receptor. Furthermore, pharmacological inhibitors of RA synthesis and Cxcr4 signaling act in concert to reduce HSC formation. Our analyses demonstrate that somite-derived RA functions to regulate components of the Notch and Cxcl12 chemokine signaling pathways during HSC formation.

Citation: Pillay LM, Mackowetzky KJ, Widen SA, Waskiewicz AJ (2016) Somite-Derived Retinoic Acid Regulates Zebrafish Hematopoietic Stem Cell Formation. PLoS ONE 11(11): e0166040. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166040

Editor: Bruce B. Riley, Texas A&M University, UNITED STATES

Received: April 5, 2016; Accepted: October 11, 2016; Published: November 18, 2016

Copyright: © 2016 Pillay et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This research was supported by an operating grant from Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada) RGPIN 06184 (http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/index_eng.asp). Laura Pillay was supported by a PhD Studentship from Alberta Innovates Health Solutions (http://www.aihealthsolutions.ca). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

All adult vertebrate hematopoietic lineages arise from a common multipotent progenitor, the hematopoietic stem cell (HSC). This definitive hematopoietic cell type is able to self renew, differentiate into all major blood lineages, and maintain adult hematopoiesis for life. HSC transplants are used to treat a spectrum of disease ranging from congenital blood disorders to acute leukemia. Unfortunately, these cells are present in restrictive quantities, and recent ex vivo methods for expanding human HSCs for clinical therapies have achieved limited success. Identifying the molecular pathways that regulate HSC formation is therefore a major goal of both basic and clinical biology.

The HSC arises intraembryonically, in an anatomically distinct site from primitive hematopoietic cells [1, 2]. HSCs emerge from mesoderm-derived hemogenic endothelium, in close association with the dorsal aorta [2, 3]. In mice, this region is termed the aorta-gonad-mesonephros (AGM). Following their emergence, mammalian HSCs then migrate to the fetal liver and spleen before becoming established in the bone marrow [4, 5]. Although much is known about the cellular and functional properties of vertebrate HSCs, the genetic regulatory mechanisms that govern HSC induction from the AGM, expansion, and homeostasis remain incompletely understood. One candidate regulator of HSC formation is the vitamin A derivative retinoic acid (RA).

RA is an extremely potent diffusible morphogen. Consequently, its levels are tightly regulated within the developing embryo. The aldehyde dehydrogenase 1a (aldh1a/Raldh) genes encode the rate-limiting enzymes in RA synthesis, and high levels of RA occur in or near tissues that express them [6–8]. Mouse Aldh1a2 (Raldh2) mutants recapitulate phenotypes associated with vitamin A deficiency, suggesting that Aldh1a2 is the rate-limiting source of RA in the vertebrate embryo [7, 8]. Once synthesized, RA binds nuclear retinoic acid receptor and retinoid X receptor heterodimers to activate target gene transcription [9–11].

RA has been shown to enhance the short and long-term repopulating activity of HSCs in suspension culture and serial transplantation assays [12, 13]. Conversely, treatment of HSCs with the RAR antagonist AGN 193109 reduces HSC repopulating activity [13], implicating RA signaling in HSC maintenance. In vivo evidence for the role of RA signaling in definitive hematopoiesis has emerged from analyses of Aldh1a2-mutant mice. These mice exhibit decreased numbers of yolk sac hemogenic endothelial cells, and a corresponding loss of multipotent blood progenitors that give rise to myeloid and erythroid lineages [14]. At embryonic day 8.0, Aldh1a2-mutants exhibit normal endothelial cell-specific gene expression, and normal circulation [14, 15]. These data suggest that RA signaling is not required for general endothelial cell formation, but rather for vascular endothelial cells to adopt a hemogenic fate. Support for this hypothesis comes from recent analyses of mice with a conditional deletion of Aldh1a2 in VE-cadherin-positive endothelial cells [16], as AGM-derived endothelial cells isolated from these mice fail to contribute to the peripheral blood of recipients following transplant. Notably, Aldh1a2-mutant mice die of severe vascular defects by embryonic day 10.5 [7], prior to HSC emergence. This early embryonic lethality makes mice a challenging model in which to examine the native developmental functions of RA in definitive hematopoiesis.

Zebrafish have recently become one of the most powerful model organisms with which to study embryonic hematopoieisis. Unlike mice, Aldh1a2-depleted zebrafish survive up to five days post fertilization (dpf) [17]. Zebrafish HSC emergence occurs by 30 hours post fertilization (hpf), making zebrafish an ideal model to study the role of RA in definitive hematopoiesis. In the present study, we provide evidence that RA is an essential regulator of zebrafish HSC specification. We demonstrate that RA regulates the formation of HSCs prior to dorsal aorta hemogenic endothelial cell formation, at a time when aldh1a2 is expressed in the paraxial mesoderm and somites. Recent evidence suggests that these mesodermal derivatives contribute to HSC formation in a Notch and Cxcl12 chemokine-dependent fashion [18–25]. We therefore sought to determine if and how these two signaling pathways are regulated by RA signaling. To do this, we conducted a comprehensive survey of Notch and Cxcl12 pathway component gene expression in RA-depleted embryos. We find that RA-depleted embryos display altered expression of the junctional adhesion molecules jam1a and jam2a, which enhance Notch signaling in pre-hematopoietic endothelial cells [26]. cxcl12b and its receptor cxcr4a are initially expressed within the somites, and later within the dorsal aorta. We find that somitic cxcr4a expression is strongly downregulated in RA-depleted embryos. Our work reveals a novel, early role for RA in definitive hematopoiesis and suggests that RA may regulate HSC formation by modulating the expression of Notch and Cxcl12b chemokine signaling pathway components.

Materials and Methods

Animal care, fish lines, and morpholino injection

Care of adult and embryonic zebrafish was conducted according to standard protocols [27], in accordance with Canadian Council for Animal Care (CCAC) guidelines. This study was approved by the University of Alberta Animal Care and Use Committee for Biosciences (protocol AUP00000082). Embryos were grown at room temperature (RT), 25.5°C, 28.5°C, or 33°C in embryo media (EM) and staged according to standardized morphological criteria [28]. EM was supplemented with 0.003%– 0.006% 1-phenyl 2-thiourea (PTU) (Sigma), to prevent pigment formation in post-24 hours post fertilization (hpf) embryos.

Unless noted, AB strain zebrafish were used for all experiments. Transgenic fish lines used in experiments include Tg(gata1:DsRed)sd2Tg [29], and Tg(kdrl:GFP)la116Tg [30]. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A2 (Aldh1a2)-depleted embryos were generated by injecting one-cell AB embryos with 5 ng of translation-blocking aldh1a2 morpholino oligonucleotide (MO; Gene Tools); GCAGTTCAACTTCACTGGAGGTCAT, as previously described [17].

Pharmacological treatments

A 10 μM solution of the Cxcr4 receptor antagonist AMD3100 (EMD Millipore) in EM, was used to inhibit Cxcr4 chemokine signaling [25]. Embryos were treated with AMD3100 from 4 hpf to 24 hpf. All other compounds were dissolved in Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and diluted to a working concentration in EM. Equivalent solutions of DMSO/EM were used as solvent controls. A 1 μM, 2.5 μM or 5 μM solution of Diethylaminobenzaldehyde (DEAB; Sigma) was used to inhibit retinoic acid (RA) synthesis by aldehyde dehydrogenase enzymes [31, 32]. Embryos were treated with DEAB from 4 hpf onward. A 1 nM solution of all-trans RA (Sigma) was applied to live, dechorionated embryos at various stages to activate retinoic acid signaling. All embryos were then grown at 28.5°C in the dark, and were assessed for phenotypes, washed into EM, or fixed in 4% PFA/PBS overnight at 4°C.

mRNA in situ hybridization and imaging

Examination of gene expression by whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed essentially as previously described [33–37]. Prior to mRNA in situ hybridization analyses, embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)/phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) overnight at 4°C or 4–5 hours at RT with gentle agitation on a rotating platform. Embryos were permeabilized in 10 μg/ml proteinase K for 10 seconds (10–12 hpf embryos), 30 seconds (14–17 hpf embryos), 3 minutes (24–32 hpf embryos), or 1 hour (3–4 days post fertilization embryos) at RT.

Following in situ hybridization, embryos were manually deyolked, and cleared in 30%, 50%, and 70% glycerol/PBS. Mounted in situ hybridized embryos and live Tg(gata1:DsRed)sd2Tg embryos were photographed using a Zeiss AxioImager Z1 compound microscope with an Axiocam HR digital camera. Mounted Tg(kdrl:GFP)la116Tg embryos were photographed using a Zeiss LSM510 confocal microscope. Whole embryos were photographed using an Olympus stereoscope with a QImaging micropublisher camera. Images were assembled in ImageJ or Zen (Zeiss), and figures were assembled in Photoshop (Adobe).

Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR)

mRNA was extracted from dissected (head and tail removed) embryos using RNAqueous-4PCR (Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s specifications, then treated with DNase I (Ambion), 19 μl of diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water, and 10 μl of 10X DNase I Buffer (Ambion) for 30 min at 37°C to remove DNA. Extracted mRNA was purified using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. RNA quantity and quality was assessed by spectrophotometry. First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using the AffinityScript QPCR cDNA Synthesis Kit (Agilent), with random primers, according to the manufacturer’s specifications.

qPCR analysis of cDNA was performed using the Brilliant II SYBR Green QPCR Master Mix (Agilent) and the Rotor-Gene Q System (Qiagen). All cDNA samples were run in replicates of 6, and each experiment was repeated three times. The PCR cycle conditions were 95°C for 10 min (initial denaturation), then 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 s (denaturation), 55°C for 1 min (annealing), and 72°C for 30 s (extension). Fluorescence readings were taken after the 55°C annealing step. The Ct value data were analyzed using the comparative Ct method (2-ΔΔCt method) [38], using eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1a (ef1a) as an endogenous control. Previously published qPCR primer sequences are cxcr4a-F, TGGCTTATTACGAACACATCG; cxcr4a-R GAGCCGAATTCAGAGCTGTT [39]; ef1a-F, CCTTCGTCCCAATTTCAGG; ef1a-R, CCTTGAACCAGCCCATGT [34]. Intron-spanning her9 (her9-F, GAATGCCAGCGAGCATAG; her9-R, GCTTGACTGTCATCTCCA G) qPCR primers were selected from the Universal Probe Library Assay Design Center for Zebrafish (Roche), Prior to real-time qPCR analysis, these primer sets were validated as follows: An amplification plot was produced from a standard cDNA two-fold dilution series. This plot was used to generate a linear regression curve. The validated her9 primer sets produced a linear regression slope of -3.3 ± 0.1 (within 0.1 of the ef1a primer set), with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.99.

Morphometric Analysis

For morphometric analysis, data from three independent replicates with separate cohorts of zebrafish embryos were analyzed for the main effects of treatment. All measurements were performed using ImageJ software. Width of somitic jam2a expression was measured as a fraction of the length of the domain of expression along the medio-lateral axis (denoted y), divided by length of the domain of expression along the anterior-posterior axis (denoted x) of the eighth jam2a-expressing somite on the right side of the embryo (fraction y/x). Notably, the length of the domain of jam2a expression along the anterior-posterior axis (x) of the eighth jam2a-expressing somite did not significantly differ in control (DMSO) versus DEAB-treated embryos (P ≥ 0.2624).

Statistical analyses

For in situ hybridization experiments, and analyses of circulation in Tg(gata1:DsRed)sd2Tg embryos, data from two to three independent replicates with separate cohorts of zebrafish embryos were analyzed for the main effects of treatment. Homogeneity across replicates was determined using the G-test of independence, and homogenous datasets (heterogeneity G-value ≥ 0.05) were combined for statistical analysis. Heterogeneous replicate datasets were analyzed separately, and combined when statistical analyses yielded identical results for each replicate dataset. Significant differences among treatments were determined using two-tailed Fisher’s exact tests on cumulative raw counts, with Bonferroni correction applied to multiple comparisons (alpha = 0.05). For DEAB and AMD3100 treatment experiments, significant differences in cmyb-expressing dorsal aorta cell counts among treatments were determined using unpaired t-tests, with Bonferonni correction applied to multiple comparisons (alpha = 0.05). For qPCR analyses and morphometric analysis, significant differences among treatments were determined using unpaired t-tests (alpha = 0.05).

For analyses of dorsal aorta morphology in Tg(kdrl:GFP)la116Tg embryos, data from three independent replicates with separate cohorts of zebrafish embryos were analyzed for the main effects of treatment. Significant differences among treatments and phenotypes were determined by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-test (alpha = 0.05).

Results

Retinoic acid regulates hematopoietic stem cell formation

Of the known aldh1a genes expressed in early zebrafish development, only aldh1a2 is expressed in pre-hematopoietic posterior mesoderm (Fig 1A–1C; [40–42]). Consequently, to determine if RA regulates zebrafish HSC formation, we generated RA-deficient embryos by injecting embryos with aldh1a2 morpholino (hereafter referred to as aldh1a2-morphants) [41, 43], or by treating them with Diethylaminobenzaldehyde (DEAB), a competitive inhibitor of aldehyde dehydrogenases including Aldh1a2 [31, 32]. Published analyses indicate that aldh1a2-morphants and DEAB treatment accurately phenocopy aldh1a2 (nlsi26)-mutants [31, 41]. Zebrafish HSCs first emerge from dorsal aorta hemogenic endothelium, a region analogous to the mammalian aorta-gonad-mesonephros, at 30 hours post fertilization (hpf) [44–47]. These cells express cmyb, a transcription factor essential for HSC emergence [47]. As shown by in situ hybridization, both aldh1a2-morphants and DEAB-treated embryos display severely reduced dorsal aorta cmyb-expression at 32 hpf (Fig 1D–1F; S1 Table).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. RA-deficient embryos demonstrate impaired HSC formation.

(A-C) In situ hybridization analyses of aldh1a2 gene expression in wild type (WT) embryos. (A) Expression within the somites at 11 hpf, shown in dorsal view with anterior to the left. Somitic expression persists in 16 hpf (B) and 20 hpf (C) embryos, shown in lateral view with anterior to the left. (D-F) Representative flat-mounted embryos following in situ hybridization analysis of cmyb gene expression at 32 hpf. Lateral view of gene expression in the dorsal aorta region of the trunk is shown with anterior to the left. Compared to DMSO-treated controls (D) aldh1a2-morphants (E), and 5 μM DEAB-treated embryos (F) exhibit nearly abolished cmyb expression. (G-H’) In situ hybridization analyses of common lymphoid progenitor gene expression in 3 dpf embryos. Lateral view of gene expression in the head is shown with anterior to the left. Arrowheads and asterisks indicate thymus. Compared to WT embryos (G, H), aldh1a2-morphants exhibit nearly abolished thymic rag1 (G’) and ikaros (H’) expression. (I, I’) Representative embryos following in situ hybridization analysis of foxn1 thymic epithelial cell gene expression in 4 dpf embryos. Lateral view of gene expression in the head is shown with anterior to the left. Arrowheads indicate thymus. WT embryos (I) and aldh1a2-morphants (I’) exhibit similar thymic foxn1 expression levels.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166040.g001

Following their emergence, zebrafish HSCs migrate posteriorly to the caudal hematopoietic tissues, before becoming established in the thymus by 3 dpf [48, 49], where they differentiate to form rag1- and ikaros-expressing lymphoid progenitors [48, 49]. Subsequently, in order to further determine if HSCs are specified in RA-deficient zebrafish embryos, we examined their rag1 and ikaros expression. aldh1a2-morphant embryos completely lack thymic rag1 and ikaros expression at 3 dpf, as shown by in situ hybridization (Fig 1G and 1H’; S2 Table).

Thymic epithelial cells support lymphoid progenitor development and maturation. These cells differentiate from the thymus primordium, which is derived from the third pharyngeal endodermal pouch in zebrafish [50]. As perturbations in RA signaling have been shown to produce defects in endodermal pouch morphogenesis [51], we wanted to verify that the thymic epithelium of RA-deficient embryos is correctly specified. We therefore examined the expression of the thymic epithelial cell marker foxn1, and find that it is expressed at wild type levels in 4 dpf aldh1a2-morphant embryos (Fig 1I and 1I’; S2 Table). Combined, our data suggest that RA is required for the proper specification of zebrafish HSCs and their thymocyte progeny.

As HSC formation is also dependent upon intact blood flow [52], and HSCs originate from dorsal aorta hemogenic endothelium [44–46], we next wanted to determine if the hematopoietic defects that we observe in RA-deficient embryos are due to aberrant vasculogenesis. To do this, we first visualized circulating primitive erythrocytes in wild type and aldh1a2-morphant embryos. The majority of aldh1a2-morphants (71% ± 1.0%) exhibit circulating blood cells by 28 hpf (Fig 2D; S3 Table). However, this represents a significant reduction when compared to wild type embryos (87% ± 3.0%, P = 0.0196; Fig 2D; S3 Table). Examination of live 48 hpf, aldh1a2-morphant Tg(gata1:DsRed)sd2Tg [29] embryos reveals beating hearts, intact circulation, and a functional dorsal aorta (Fig 2A and 2A’). At 48 hpf, the proportion of aldh1a2-morphants with intact circulation (97% ± 3.5%) is not statistically different from that of wild type embryos (97% ± 3.0%, P = 0.5633; Fig 2D; S3 Table). Combined, these data suggest that some aldh1a2-morphants experience a mild delay in the formation of their mature circulatory system.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. RA-deficient embryos exhibit relatively normal gross embryonic vasculogenesis.

(A, A’) Lateral view of live 48 hpf Tg(gata1:DsRed)sd2Tg embryos with anterior to the left. Compared to wild type (WT) embryos (A), aldh1a2-morphants (A’) display visible circulating blood cells, and an intact dorsal aorta and posterior cardinal vein. (B-C’) Representative embryos following in situ hybridization analysis of kdrl vasculature marker gene expression (B, B’) or efnb2a arterial marker gene expression (C, C’) in 28 hpf embryos. Lateral view of gene expression in the dorsal aorta region of the trunk is shown in flat-mount embryos, with anterior to the left. Compared to WT embryos (B), aldh1a2-morphants (B’) exhibit normal dorsal aorta kdrl gene expression. Compared to DMSO-treated controls (C), embryos treated with 5 μM DEAB (C’) exhibit normal levels, but a reduced domain of dorsal aorta efnb2a gene expression. (D) Graph demonstrating the mean proportion of WT or aldh1a2-morphant embryos with intact circulation at 28 hpf and 48 hpf. Error bars represent standard error. *Indicates statistically significant difference compared to WT (P = 0.0196). See text for statistical tests. (E-G) Lateral view of dorsal aorta region of the trunk is shown in representative flat-mount Tg(kdrl:GFP)la116Tg 28 hpf embryos, with anterior to the left. Brackets indicate dorsal aorta. Compared to DMSO-treated controls (E), 2.5 μM DEAB-treated embryos (F) exhibit normal dorsal aorta morphology, while 5 μM DEAB-treated embryos (G) exhibit thinning of the dorsal aorta.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166040.g002

To determine if the hematopoietic defects of RA-deficient embryos are attributable to alterations in dorsal aorta morphogenesis and patterning, we examined dorsal aorta morphology in Tg(kdrl:GFP)la116Tg transgenic zebrafish embryos [30] at 28 hpf, following the onset of circulation (Fig 2E–2G; S4 Table). Compared to control embryos (Fig 2E; 100% ± 0%), the majority of embryos treated with 2.5 μM DEAB exhibit grossly normal vasculature (Fig 2F; 69% ± 20%; P ≥ 0.05). Conversely, only 19% ± 13% of embryos treated with a higher 5 μM dose of DEAB exhibit wild type dorsal aorta morphology (P < 0.05; Fig 2G). As shown by in situ hybridization, RA-deficient embryos exhibit wild type kdrl vasculature marker expression and wild type levels of efnb2a arterial marker gene expression at 28 hpf (Fig 2B and 2C’; S5 Table). Our combined data therefore suggest that RA does not regulate vascular or arterial gene expression. Our data also suggest that low doses of DEAB (2.5 μM) can be used to block RA synthesis without causing gross maldevelopment of the embryonic vasculature. To avoid generating confounding hematopoietic phenotypes that result from impaired circulation, we used 2.5 μM DEAB or aldh1a2 morpholino to deplete RA when assessing circulation-stage (26–32 hpf) embryos in all subsequent experiments.

RA is dispensable for zebrafish dorsal aorta Notch1 signaling

Previous studies have revealed an essential role for the Notch signaling pathway in regulating vertebrate HSC development [18, 19, 24, 53–55]. Binding of the transmembrane Notch receptor to its Delta or Jagged transmembrane ligand on a neighboring cell induces a conformational change in Notch that renders it susceptible to cleavage by γ-secretase. This cleavage event releases the Notch intracellular domain (NICD), permitting it to enter the nucleus where it acts as a transcriptional activator [56, 57]. The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors Hairy and enhancer of split (Hes) are transcriptional targets of the Notch signaling pathway, and serve to mediate the majority of Notch function [58].

Previous research in both mouse and zebrafish has established a cell-autonomous function for Notch signaling in HSC specification, whereby Notch1-expressing cells within the dorsal aorta are instructed by adjacent cells to form HSCs [19–24]. The yolk sac endothelial cells of Aldh1a2-mutant mice exhibit downregulated Notch1 and Notch1-target gene (Hes1) expression [59], implicating RA as a potential modulator of Notch signaling. We therefore wanted to determine if hematopoietic defects that we observe in RA-deficient zebrafish are the result of impaired Notch1 signaling. To do this, we first examined the expression of dorsal aorta Notch signaling pathway components and their downstream transcriptional targets in RA-deficient embryos. Zebrafish possess four Notch receptors: Notch1a, Notch1b, Notch2, and Notch3. Of these, only Notch2 is completely dispensable for HSC formation [20–22]. notch1a, notch1b, and notch3 are initially expressed within the somitic mesoderm, with their domain of expression expanding to include nascent endothelial cells and the dorsal aorta [21, 53, 60]. As shown through in situ hybridization, RA-deficient embryos exhibit wild type expression of notch1a, and notch1b, while the somitic expression of notch3 is mildly increased at 26 hpf (Fig 3A–3C’; S6 Table). Our combined data suggest that RA is dispensable for dorsal aorta Notch receptor expression in zebrafish.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. RA-deficient embryos demonstrate normal dorsal aorta notch and Notch1-target gene expression.

Representative flat-mount 26 hpf embryos following in situ hybridization analyses. Lateral view of gene expression in the dorsal aorta region of the trunk is shown with anterior to the left. Compared to DMSO-treated controls (A, B), embryos treated with 2.5 μM DEAB exhibit normal notch1a (A’), and notch1b (B’) gene expression within the trunk and dorsal aorta. notch3 is expressed at normal levels in the dorsal aorta (C, C’), but is mildly upregulated in the somites of 2.5 μM DEAB-treated versus DMSO-treated control embryos (data not shown). Compared to DMSO-treated controls (D, E) embryos treated with 2.5 μM DEAB exhibit normal gene expression levels of the Notch1-signaling pathway transcriptional targets dlc (D’) and her6 (E’).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166040.g003

Previous research has shown that both global NICD induction after 20 hpf, and vascular (but not somite)-specific induction of the NICD rescues the HSC gene expression defects of notch1a- and notch1b-morphant zebrafish embryos [21]. Conversely, global or somite-specific NICD induction at 14 hpf, but not 20 hpf, rescues HSC formation in notch3-morphant embryos [21]. As the dorsal aorta begins to form at 20 hpf [61], these combined data suggest that the definitive hematopoietic roles of zebrafish Notch1a/b and murine Notch1 are likely functionally conserved. These data also suggest that there is a distinct temporal and spatial requirement for Notch3 in zebrafish hematopoiesis, which occurs prior to formation of the dorsal aorta. Consequently, to further determine if RA regulates zebrafish dorsal aorta Notch signaling, we next examined the expression of transcriptional targets of the Notch1-signaling pathway in RA-deficient embryos (Fig 3D and 3E’; S6 Table). Expression of the Notch ligand deltaC (dlc) is strongly reduced in the dorsal aorta of notch1a- and notch1b-morphant zebrafish embryos [21]. We therefore examined its expression in RA-deficient embryos. dlc is expressed at wild type levels in 26 hpf DEAB-treated embryos (Fig 3D and 3D’; S6 Table). We also examined the expression of her6 (the zebrafish orthologue of mammalian Hes1 [62, 63]), finding that is also expressed at wild type levels in 26 hpf aldh1a2-morphant embryos (Fig 3E and 3E’; S6 Table). These data suggest that, unlike its mammalian orthologue Hes1, zebrafish her6 is not RA-responsive. These combined data also suggest that RA does not regulate the Notch1-signaling pathway in zebrafish.

RA signaling regulates HSC formation prior to 19 hpf

Our analyses indicate that the hematopoietic defects of RA-deficient embryos are not due to impaired dorsal aorta Notch signaling. Consequently, to gain a better understanding of how RA regulates zebrafish definitive hematopoiesis, we next wanted to elucidate the temporal requirement for RA signaling in HSC formation. To accomplish this, we treated aldh1a2-morphant embryos with RA at different time points, and examined their cmyb HSC gene expression at 32 hpf through in situ hybridization (Fig 4, S7 Table). We demonstrate that RA treatment beginning at 4 hpf rescues dorsal aorta cmyb gene expression in aldh1a2-morphant embryos (Fig 4C). Conversely, RA treatment beginning at 19 hpf (Fig 4E) or 24 hpf (Fig 4F) fails to rescue cmyb expression in aldh1a2-morphant embryos. Combined, these data suggest that RA is required prior to 19 hpf to specify HSCs. Notably, aldh1a2 is expressed in the paraxial mesoderm and somites during this period, and the dorsal aorta has not yet formed [61].

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 4. RA is required prior to 19 hpf for HSC formation.

Shown are representative flat-mount embryos following in situ hybridization analyses of cmyb gene expression in wild type (WT; A, D) or aldh1a2-morphant (B, C, E, F) 32 hpf embryos treated with DMSO (A, B) or 1 nM RA (C-F) at indicated time points. Lateral view of gene expression in the dorsal aorta region of the trunk is shown with anterior to the left. Compared to WT embryos (A), embryos treated with 1 nM RA (D) exhibit normal cmyb expression (two-tailed P = 1.000). aldh1a2-morphants (B) exhibit nearly abolished cmyb expression compared to WT embryos (two-tailed P = 0.01). cmyb expression is significantly restored in aldh1a2-morphant embryos treated with 1 nM RA at 4 hpf (C; two-tailed P = 1.000 compared to WT). cmyb expression is not significantly restored in aldh1a2-morphants treated with 1 nM RA at 19 hpf (E; two-tailed P < 0.0005) or 24 hpf (F; two-tailed P < 0.0005). See text for statistical tests.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166040.g004

RA does not positively regulate Wnt16 –Notch3 signaling within the somites

The Wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 16 (Wnt16) participates in a non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway [18]. Its depletion causes defects in Notch signaling and HSC formation [18]. Given that RA and Wnt16 are required for HSC formation prior to 19 hpf, and aldh1a2 and wnt16 are both expressed in the paraxial mesoderm and somites at this time [18], we hypothesized that perturbations in Wnt16 or its downstream effectors may be responsible for the hematopoietic defects that we observe in RA-depleted embryos. We demonstrate that wnt16 is expressed at wild type levels DEAB-treated embryos at 17 hpf (Fig 5A and 5B’; S8 Table). In addition to hematopoietic defects, Wnt16-depleted embryos exhibit reduced somitic expression of the Notch ligands dlc and dld, and dlc/dld overexpression rescues HSC gene expression in wnt16-morphants [18]. In comparison to wild type embryos, DEAB-treated embryos exhibit normal levels of somitic dlc expression (Fig 5C and 5D’; S8 Table), and mildly upregulated dld expression (Fig 5E and 5F’; S8 Table). Dlc/Dld and Notch3 proteins cooperate as regulators of HSC formation, as partial loss of Dlc and Notch3, or Dld and Notch3 produces greater HSC gene expression defects than partial loss of Dlc, Dld, or Notch3 alone [21]. When compared to wild type embryos (Fig 5G and 5G’), DEAB-treated embryos exhibit increased somitic notch3 expression at 17 hpf (Fig 5H and 5H’; S8 Table). her9 is partially downregulated in both notch1a-mutant and notch3-morphant zebrafish embryos [60, 64]. Like notch3, her9 expression is upregulated in 17 hpf DEAB-treated embryos, as shown by qPCR (Fig 5K). However, this upregulation in expression is not observable by in situ hybridization (Fig 5I and 5J’; S8 Table). Taken together, our data provide evidence that RA negatively regulates Notch3-mediated signal transduction, without altering somitic Wnt16.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 5. RA does not regulate the somitic expression of Wnt16-Notch3 signaling pathway components.

Shown are representative 17 hpf embryos following in situ hybridization analyses (A-J’). Lateral view (A-J) or dorsal view (A’-J’) of gene expression is shown with anterior oriented to the left. A’-J’ represent different views of the embryos shown in A-J. Compared to DMSO-treated controls (A, A’, C, C’, E, E’, G, G’), DEAB-treated embryos exhibit normal somitic expression levels of wnt16 (B, B’), and dlc (D, D’), mildly increased dld expression (F, F’), and increased notch3 somitic gene expression (H, H’). DEAB-treated embryos also exhibit normal expression levels of the Notch3 signaling pathway transcriptional target her9 (J, J’), when compared to DMSO-treated controls (I, I’). (K) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of her9 expression in 17 hpf DMSO-treated controls and embryos treated with 5 μM DEAB. Shown is the relative quantity of her9 expression. Samples were normalized to ef1a and DMSO-treated was set to 1. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. *Indicates the difference compared to control is significant by Student t test, P = 0.0198.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166040.g005

RA regulates jam1a and jam2a expression

The dorsal aorta forms from angioblasts that arise from bilateral stripes of posterior lateral-plate mesoderm. These angioblasts migrate medially and aggregate [61]. Recent evidence suggests that the junctional adhesion molecules Jam1a and Jam2a physically interact, and are required for zebrafish HSC formation [26]. jam1a is expressed within angioblasts that migrate across jam2a-, dlc-, and dld-expressing somites [26]. Jam1a- and Jam2a-deficient embryos exhibit impaired Notch signal transduction, and their hematopoietic defects are rescued by heat-shock induction of the NICD during angioblast migration [26]. Combined, the data generated by Kobayashi et al. (2014) suggest that Notch signal transduction in pre-hematopoietic angioblasts requires Jam-mediated intercellular contact.

Angioblast migration occurs between 14 and 18 hpf. We demonstrate that the diffusible morphogen RA is required prior to 19 hpf for HSC formation. Furthermore, like Jam1a- and Jam2a-depleted embryos, RA-deficient embryos do not display reduced expression of notch1a, notch1b, notch3, dlc, and dld [26]. We therefore sought to determine if RA is an upstream regulator of jam1a and/or jam2a by examining their expression in 17 hpf control and DEAB-treated embryos through in situ hybridization (Fig 6; S8 Table). DEAB-treated embryos express jam1a at wild type levels (Fig 6A and 6A’). However, unlike in controls, the anterior-most jam1a-expressing posterior lateral-plate mesoderm cells do not contact the somites in DEAB-treated embryos (Fig 6A and 6A’; arrowheads). Compared to controls, 17 hpf DEAB-treated embryos display increased levels of somitic jam2a expression, and lateral expansion of the jam2a expression domain (Fig 6B, 6B’ and 6C). Combined, these data suggest that RA is required for the proper expression of jam1a and jam2a within somitogenesis stage embryos.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 6. RA-deficient embryos exhibit abnormal jam1a and jam2a expression.

Representative flat-mount 17 hpf embryos following in situ hybridization analyses. Dorsal view of gene expression is shown with anterior to the left. Compared to DMSO-treated controls (A), embryos treated with 5 μM DEAB (A’) exhibit wild type levels of jam1a expression, and extreme lateral positioning of the anterior-most domains of jam1a expression (double-headed arrows). Compared to DMSO-treated controls (B), embryos treated with 5 μM DEAB (B’) display strongly increased somitic jam2a expression, and lateral expansion of the jam2a expression domain. (C) Graph demonstrating length of the domain of jam2a expression along the medio-lateral axis, divided by length of the domain of expression along the anterior-posterior axis of the eighth jam2a-expressing somite on the right side of the embryo (see asterisk in B, B’). Error bars represent standard error *Indicates statistically significant difference in ratio compared to DMSO-treated controls (P < 0.0001). See text for statistical tests.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166040.g006

RA regulates cxcl12b and cxcr4a expression

The CXC-motif chemokine receptor Cxcr4a and its ligand Cxcl12b regulate brain [65], coronary [66], gastrointestinal [67, 68], kidney [69], and arterial [70] vessel development, as well as lateral dorsal aorta formation [71]. Cxcl12 signaling has also been implicated in hematopoietic cell migration [72–75], engraftment [74] and hematopoietic stem cell maintenance [73, 74, 76, 77]. Recently, Nguyen et al (2014) demonstrated that Cxcl12b is required for zebrafish HSC formation, as HSC gene expression is reduced in both cxcl12b-morphants and embryos treated with a pharmacological inhibitor of Cxcl12 signaling from 14 to 24 hpf. Combined, these data suggest that Cxcl12b signaling within the somites contributes to zebrafish HSC formation between 14 and 24 hpf. aldh1a2 is expressed within the somites during this period, and our data suggest that RA is required for HSC formation prior to 19 hpf. We therefore hypothesized that the HSC gene expression defects that we observe in RA-depleted embryos may be due to reduced Cxcl12 signaling, and so examined the expression of cxcr4a and cxcl12b in 17 hpf control and DEAB-treated embryos through in situ hybridization (Fig 7A–7C’; S9 Table). Compared to controls, 17 hpf DEAB-treated embryos exhibit narrowing of the cxcr4a expression domain within each somite, along with an overall strong reduction in cxcr4a expression (Fig 7A and 7A’; S9 Table). Conversely, cxcl12b expression is subtly upregulated within the somites of DEAB-treated embryos (Fig 7B and 7B’; S9 Table). We performed real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) on 17 hpf control and DEAB-treated embryos to quantitatively measure the observed changes in cxcr4a expression. Consistent with the in situ hybridization analyses, DEAB-treated embryos exhibit a significant reduction in cxcr4a expression (Fig 7D) when compared to controls.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 7. RA-deficient embryos exhibit altered Cxcl12b chemokine signaling pathway component gene expression.

(A-C’) Representative flat-mount 17 hpf embryos following in situ hybridization analyses. Dorsal of gene expression is shown with anterior to the left. Compared to DMSO-treated controls (A), embryos treated with 5 μM DEAB (A’) exhibit strongly reduced somitic cxcr4a gene expression, and narrowing of the cxcr4a expression domain within each somite. Compared to DMSO-treated controls (B, C), embryos treated with 5 μM DEAB exhibit subtly increased levels of somitic cxcl12b expression (B’), and subtly decreased levels of somitic meox1 expression (C’). (D) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of cxcr4a expression in 17 hpf DMSO-treated controls and embryos treated with 5 μM DEAB. Shown is the relative quantity of cxcr4a expression. Samples were normalized to ef1a and DMSO-treated was set to 1. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. *Indicates the difference compared to control is significant by Student t test, P < 0.0382. (E-H) Representative flat-mount 36 hpf embryos following in situ hybridization analyses of cmyb gene expression. Lateral view of gene expression in the dorsal aorta region of the trunk is shown with anterior to the left. Compared to DMSO-treated controls (E), embryos treated with 1 μM DEAB (F) or 10 μM AMD3100 (G) exhibit a small reduction cmyb-expressing cell numbers. Embryos treated with both 1 μM DEAB and 10 μM AMD310 (H) exhibit a more severe reduction in cmyb-expressing cell numbers. (I) Graph demonstrating the mean number of dorsal aorta cmyb-expressing cells in DMSO-treated controls, embryos treated with 1 μM DEAB, 10 μM AMD3100, or both 1 μM DEAB and 10 μM AMD310. Error bars represent standard error. *Indicates statistically significant difference compared to control (P ≤ 0.0144). **Indicates statistically significant difference compared to 1 μM DEAB, and 10 μM AMD3100 (P ≤ 0.0028). See text for statistical tests.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166040.g007

meox1-null (cho) zebrafish mutants exhibit an increase in somitic cxcl12b expression, and a corresponding increase in HSC number [25]. Given that we observe a subtle increase in somitic cxcl12b expression within RA-depleted embryos, we next wanted to determine if meox1 expression is also affected by loss of embryonic RA. As shown by in situ hybridization, 17 hpf DEAB-treated embryos display a subtle decrease in somitic meox1 expression, when compared to controls (Fig 7C and 7C’; S9 Table).

Given that RA-depleted embryos exhibit strongly decreased somitic cxcr4a expression, we next wanted to determine if this decrease is consistent with reduced chemokine signalling. We therefore examined if RA signalling functions in association with Cxcr4-mediated chemokine signalling to regulate HSC formation. To test this, we examined cmyb HSC gene expression in 36 hpf embryos treated with a suboptimal dose DEAB (1 μM) and/or a suboptimal dose of Cxcr4 chemokine receptor antagonist AMD3100 (10 μM) by in situ hybridization. Compared to DMSO-treated controls (Fig 7E and 7I), embryos treated with 1 μM DEAB or 10 μM AMD3100 exhibit a small reduction in cmyb-expressing cell numbers (Fig 7F, 7G and 7I). Embryos treated with both 1 μM DEAB and 10 μM AMD3100 exhibit a severe reduction in cmyb-expressing cell numbers (Fig 7H and 7I), a phenotype that resembles treatment with a higher dose of DEAB (5 μM) alone (Fig 1F). Taken together, these data support a role for somitic retinoids in regulating Cxcr4-mediated chemokine signaling during the developmental period in which RA functions to regulate HSC formation.

From 28–30 hpf, meox1 is expressed within cells found immediately adjacent to the dorsal aorta, while cxcr4a, and cxcl12b display weak, punctate expression throughout the dorsal aorta (Fig 8A–8C; [25]). It is possible that Cxcl12b-Cxcr4a signaling within the dorsal aorta is required for HSC formation. We therefore wanted to determine if RA-depleted embryos exhibit alterations to cxcr4a, cxcl12b, and meox1 expression at 28 hpf, just prior to HSC emergence. When compared to controls, DEAB-treated embryos exhibit a strong increase in dorsal aorta cxcr4a (Fig 8A and 8A’) and cxcl12b (Fig 8B and 8B’) expression at 28 hpf, as shown by in situ hybridization. DEAB-treated embryos also display a strong increase in meox1 expression at 28 hpf, when compared to controls (Fig 8C and 8C’). Combined, these data suggest that RA negatively regulates Cxcl12b-Cxcr4a pathway component gene expression at 28 hpf.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 8. 28 hpf RA-deficient embryos exhibit increased Cxcl12b chemokine signaling pathway component gene expression.

(A-C’) Representative flat-mount 28 hpf embryos following in situ hybridization analyses. Lateral view of gene expression in the dorsal aorta region of the trunk is shown with anterior to the left. Compared to DMSO-treated controls (A, B, C), embryos treated with 2.5 μM DEAB exhibit strongly increased levels of dorsal aorta cxcr4a (A’), and cxcl12b (B’) gene expression, and upregulated somitic meox1 expression (C’).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166040.g008

Discussion

Previous research has shown that RA treatment of hematovascular precursors increases their ability to generate definitive hematopoietic precursors [16, 78], suggesting that RA signaling plays an instructive role in definitive hematopoiesis. This data is in line with previous analyses of RA function in mice, as Aldh1a2-mutants fail to correctly specify yolk sac hemogenic endothelial cells [14], and loss of Aldh1a2 in VE-cadherin-positive endothelial cells is sufficient to abrogate HSC formation [16]. Aldh1a2-mutant mice die of severe vascular defects prior to HSC emergence [7], precluding global analyses of Aldh1a2-function in murine definitive hematopoiesis. We therefore used zebrafish as a model to study the role of RA signaling in definitive hematopoiesis.

Our study describes a novel role for RA signaling in definitive hematopoiesis. We propose that RA functions within the paraxial mesoderm or somites to regulate hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) formation. By impairing RA synthesis in the developing zebrafish embryo, we demonstrate that RA is required for proper HSC gene expression. In the absence of RA, embryos exhibit a severe reduction in HSC number and a corresponding failure to produce thymic lymphoid progenitors.

RA regulates HSC formation independent of the Notch1-signaling pathway

Previous research in both mouse and zebrafish has established a model whereby Notch1-expressing cells within the dorsal aorta are instructed by adjacent cells to form HSCs [19, 20, 22–24]. Notch1-mutant embryonic stem cells fail to contribute to the wild type adult hematopoietic system in mouse chimeras [20], supporting this cell-autonomous role for Notch1 in definitive hematopoiesis. The yolk sac endothelial cells of Aldh1a2-mutant mice exhibit downregulated Notch1 and Notch-target gene expression [59], implicating RA as a critical regulator of murine Notch1 signaling. Notch1 specifies HSCs [19, 20, 23, 24]. We, however, demonstrate that notch1a/b expression is unaffected by loss of RA in zebrafish. We further demonstrate that RA is required for HSC formation prior to the formation of dorsal aorta hemogenic endothelium. Our combined results therefore suggest that, unlike in mice, zebrafish RA does not regulate Notch1-signaling. We therefore propose a model whereby RA signaling acts outside of the pre-hemogenic endothelium, in a Notch1-independent fashion to regulate zebrafish HSC formation.

RA may indirectly regulate Wnt16-Notch signaling

Recently, Clements et al., (2011) demonstrated a requirement for Wnt16 in zebrafish hematopoiesis. RA-deficient and wnt16-morphant embryos display common hematopoietic phenotypes; both demonstrate proper vascular gene expression and produce a functional dorsal aorta, but exhibit a severe reduction in HSC and common lymphoid progenitor gene expression [18]. These data suggest that both RA and Wnt16 are required for HSC formation. Our data, and previous results also suggest that both RA and Wnt16 function outside of dorsal aorta pre-hemogenic endothelium to regulate zebrafish HSC formation prior to 19 hpf [18]. Furthermore, both aldh1a2 and wnt16 are expressed in the paraxial mesoderm at this time [18]. In addition to hematopoietic defects, Wnt16-depleted embryos exhibit reduced somitic expression of the Notch ligands dlc and dld [18]. HSC gene expression is lost in dlc-mutants injected with dld morpholino, and dlc/dld overexpression rescues HSC gene expression in wnt16-morphants [18]. Notch3 is required by Wnt16-induced Dlc/Dld to regulate HSC formation [21]. We demonstrate that the expression of notch3, and its transcriptional target her9 are not downregulated in RA-deficient embryos at 17 hpf. Our data therefore indicate that, despite their similar localization, and their common temporal requirement in definitive hematopoiesis, RA does not positively regulate wnt16, its downstream targets dlc, and dld, or notch3.

Dlc/Dld-mediated Notch signal transduction within pre-hematopoietic endothelial cells relies on the junctional adhesion molecules Jam1a/Jam2a [26]. We demonstrate that the anterior-most jam1a-expressing posterior lateral-plate mesoderm cells of RA-depleted embryos are improperly situated, and do not contact the somites. Furthermore, RA-depleted embryos exhibit upregulated, laterally expanded somitic jam2a expression. The expression domains of jam1a/2a, and the Notch transcriptional target her9 do not significantly overlap at 17 hpf. Consequently, despite observing mildly upregulated her9 expression in somitogenesis stage RA-depleted embryos, it remains possible that their jam1a-positive cell populations experience reduced Notch signaling. It is therefore currently unclear if the modifications to jam1a/2a expression that we observe in RA-depleted embryos are sufficient to disrupt Notch signaling within migrating pre-hematopoietic endothelial cells, or serve to reduce their definitive hematopoietic potential.

RA differentially regulates the expression of early and late Cxcl12b signaling pathway components

Studies of Cxcl12b-signaling in zebrafish have revealed an essential role for this chemokine in definitive hematopoiesis. Targeted ablation of somitic cxcl12b-expressing endothelial cell precursors is sufficient to disrupt HSC formation in zebrafish, as is pharmacological or genetic inhibition of Cxcl12b signaling during somitogenesis stages [25]. We find that cxcl12b expression is subtly increased in the posterior somites of RA-depleted embryos, suggesting that RA may negatively regulate its expression.

meox1-null (cho) zebrafish mutants exhibit an increase in somitic cxcl12b expression, and a corresponding increase in HSC number [25]. Meox1-mediated chromatin immunoprecipitation of the zebrafish cxcl12b locus suggests that Meox1 is probably a direct inhibitor of cxcl12b [25]. We demonstrate that RA-depleted zebrafish embryos exhibit a subtle decrease in the posterior somitic expression of meox1. This decrease likely accounts for the increased cxcl12b expression that we observe in RA-depleted embryos. As these modifications to meox1/cxcl12b gene would be expected to generate increased HSC numbers [25], they do not explain the loss of HSCs that we observe in RA-depleted embryos.

Cxcl12b signaling occurs preferentially through the Cxcr4a receptor [79]. During zebrafish somitogenesis, cxcr4a is expressed within the anterior half of each somite (Fig 7A). We demonstrate that this expression is nearly abolished in RA-depleted embryos. Our data therefore implicates RA as a transcriptional regulator of cxcr4a within the somites. Given the requirement for Cxcl12b signaling in zebrafish definitive hematopoiesis, it is possible that the HSC gene expression defects that we observe in RA-depleted embryos may be partially attributable to reduced levels of cxcr4a. In support of this idea, we find that the RA-synthesis inhibitor DEAB and the Cxcr4-receptor antagonist AMD3100 act in concert to impair zebrafish embryonic HSC formation.

Lineage tracing experiments have shown that a proportion of cxcl12b and cxcr4a-expressing cells from the mediolateral portion of each somite colonize the dorsal aorta and dorsal-aorta supportive cells, but do not contribute to HSC populations directly [25]. This has led to the idea that Cxcl12b-signaling within the dorsal aorta may render endothelial cells competent to make HSCs [25]. Surprisingly, the early reduction of cxcr4a expression that we observe in RA-depleted embryos is not maintained; RA-depleted embryos exhibit strongly increased cxcr4a, cxcl12b, and meox1 expression within the dorsal aorta and surrounding tissues at 28 hpf, just prior to HSC emergence (Fig 8A–8C’; S9 Table). Despite this increase, RA-depleted embryos do not produce HSCs. It is therefore possible that Cxcl12b/Cxcr4a signaling may regulate HSC formation earlier in development than previously thought (i.e. during somitogenesis). Alternatively, RA could act downstream of the Cxcl12b signaling pathway at 28 hpf, and cxcl12b/cxcr4a upregulation at this time may reflect the existence of some sort of negative-feedback loop. More stringent temporal analyses of Cxcl12b/Cxcr4a function in definitive hematopoiesis will be required to distinguish between these two possibilities.

Previous research has shown that cxcr4a expression is negatively regulated by hemodynamic force [65, 80], and that dorsal aorta cxcr4a expression is upregulated in embryos with reduced blood flow [80]. We observe mild circulatory and dorsal aorta morphology defects in a proportion of 2.5 μM DEAB-treated embryos at 28 hpf. It is therefore possible that the increased cxcr4a expression that we observe in these embryos results from decreased vascular perfusion. There are currently no published accounts linking hemodynamic force to changes in cxcl12b expression. It is not therefore clear if the upregulated cxcl12b expression that we observe in 28 hpf RA-depleted embryos might also be a consequence of impaired circulation.

The majority of aldh1a2-morphant and 2.5 μM DEAB-treated embryos exhibit normal posterior dorsal aorta and intersegmental vessel formation. Furthermore, although some aldh1a2-morphants exhibit delayed circulation, most possess visible circulating erythrocytes by 28 hpf. Our results further suggest that vascular and arterial gene expression is not altered in RA-depleted embryos. Nevertheless, RA-depleted embryos exhibit HSC gene expression defects. Our temporal analyses indicate that RA is required prior to the onset of dorsal aorta formation. Consequently, although previous studies have linked blood flow to HSC formation [52], our combined data suggest that the definitive hematopoietic phenotypes of RA-depleted embryos are not simply the consequence of reduced circulation or improper patterning of the dorsal aorta.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Quantification of cmyb gene expression phenotypes in 32 hpf wild type (WT) controls and RA-deficient embryos.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166040.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Quantification of thymic gene expression phenotypes in wild type (WT) and aldh1a2-morphant embryos.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166040.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Quantification of circulatory phenotypes in wild type (WT) and aldh1a2-morphant embryos.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166040.s003

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Quantification of Tg(kdrl:GFP) dorsal aorta morphology phenotypes in 28 hpf wild type (WT) controls and RA-deficient embryos.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166040.s004

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Quantification of dorsal aorta gene expression phenotypes in wild type (WT) controls and RA-deficient embryos.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166040.s005

(DOCX)

S6 Table. Quantification of dorsal aorta notch gene expression phenotypes in 26 hpf wild type (WT) controls and RA-deficient embryos.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166040.s006

(DOCX)

S7 Table. Quantification of cmyb gene expression defects in 32 hpf wild type (WT) controls and aldh1a2-morphant embryos treated with 1 nM RA at indicated time points.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166040.s007

(DOCX)

S8 Table. Quantification of Wnt16-Notch3 pathway component gene expression phenotypes in 17 hpf wild type (WT) controls and RA-deficient embryos.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166040.s008

(DOCX)

S9 Table. Quantification of Chemokine pathway component gene expression phenotypes in 17 hpf wild type (WT) controls and RA-deficient embryos.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166040.s009

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Aleah McCorry, and Sophia Koch for fish care. We are grateful to members of the Waskiewicz Laboratory for providing technical assistance and constructive comments.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: LMP AJW.
  2. Data curation: LMP KJM SAW AJW.
  3. Formal analysis: LMP KJM SAW.
  4. Funding acquisition: AJW.
  5. Investigation: LMP KJM SAW.
  6. Methodology: LMP KJM SAW AJW.
  7. Project administration: LMP AJW.
  8. Resources: LMP KJM SAW AJW.
  9. Supervision: AJW.
  10. Validation: LMP KJM SAW.
  11. Visualization: LMP.
  12. Writing – original draft: LMP AJW.
  13. Writing – review & editing: LMP KJM SAW AJW.

References

  1. 1. Davidson AJ, Zon LI. The 'definitive' (and 'primitive') guide to zebrafish hematopoiesis. Oncogene. 2004;23(43):7233–46. 1207943[pii]. pmid:15378083.
  2. 2. Palis J, Yoder MC. Yolk-sac hematopoiesis: the first blood cells of mouse and man. Exp Hematol. 2001;29(8):927–36. pmid:11495698.
  3. 3. Dzierzak E. The emergence of definitive hematopoietic stem cells in the mammal. Curr Opin Hematol. 2005;12(3):197–202. pmid:15867575.
  4. 4. Cumano A, Godin I. Ontogeny of the hematopoietic system. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:745–85. pmid:17201678.
  5. 5. Moore MA, Metcalf D. Ontogeny of the haemopoietic system: yolk sac origin of in vivo and in vitro colony forming cells in the developing mouse embryo. Br J Haematol. 1970;18(3):279–96. pmid:5491581.
  6. 6. Begemann G, Meyer A. Hindbrain patterning revisited: timing and effects of retinoic acid signalling. Bioessays. 2001;23(11):981–6. pmid:11746213.
  7. 7. Niederreither K, Subbarayan V, Dolle P, Chambon P. Embryonic retinoic acid synthesis is essential for early mouse post-implantation development. Nat Genet. 1999;21(4):444–8. pmid:10192400.
  8. 8. Niederreither K, Vermot J, Schuhbaur B, Chambon P, Dolle P. Retinoic acid synthesis and hindbrain patterning in the mouse embryo. Development. 2000;127(1):75–85. pmid:10654602.
  9. 9. Belandia B, Parker MG. Nuclear receptors: a rendezvous for chromatin remodeling factors. Cell. 2003;114(3):277–80. pmid:12914692.
  10. 10. Glass CK, Rosenfeld MG. The coregulator exchange in transcriptional functions of nuclear receptors. Genes Dev. 2000;14(2):121–41. pmid:10652267.
  11. 11. Xu L, Glass CK, Rosenfeld MG. Coactivator and corepressor complexes in nuclear receptor function. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1999;9(2):140–7. pmid:10322133.
  12. 12. Purton LE, Bernstein ID, Collins SJ. All-trans retinoic acid delays the differentiation of primitive hematopoietic precursors (lin-c-kit+Sca-1(+)) while enhancing the terminal maturation of committed granulocyte/monocyte progenitors. Blood. 1999;94(2):483–95. pmid:10397716.
  13. 13. Purton LE, Bernstein ID, Collins SJ. All-trans retinoic acid enhances the long-term repopulating activity of cultured hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 2000;95(2):470–7. pmid:10627451.
  14. 14. Goldie LC, Lucitti JL, Dickinson ME, Hirschi KK. Cell signaling directing the formation and function of hemogenic endothelium during murine embryogenesis. Blood. 2008;112(8):3194–204. blood-2008-02-139055 [pii] pmid:18684862.
  15. 15. Lai L, Bohnsack BL, Niederreither K, Hirschi KK. Retinoic acid regulates endothelial cell proliferation during vasculogenesis. Development. 2003;130(26):6465–74. pmid:14627725.
  16. 16. Chanda B, Ditadi A, Iscove NN, Keller G. Retinoic acid signaling is essential for embryonic hematopoietic stem cell development. Cell. 2013;155(1):215–27. pmid:24074870.
  17. 17. Alexa K, Choe SK, Hirsch N, Etheridge L, Laver E, Sagerstrom CG. Maternal and zygotic aldh1a2 activity is required for pancreas development in zebrafish. PloS one. 2009;4(12):e8261. pmid:20011517; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2788244.
  18. 18. Clements WK, Kim AD, Ong KG, Moore JC, Lawson ND, Traver D. A somitic Wnt16/Notch pathway specifies haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2011;474(7350):220–4. pmid:21654806; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3304471.
  19. 19. Gering M, Patient R. Notch signalling and haematopoietic stem cell formation during embryogenesis. Journal of cellular physiology. 2010;222(1):11–6. pmid:19725072.
  20. 20. Hadland BK, Huppert SS, Kanungo J, Xue Y, Jiang R, Gridley T, et al. A requirement for Notch1 distinguishes 2 phases of definitive hematopoiesis during development. Blood. 2004;104(10):3097–105. pmid:15251982.
  21. 21. Kim AD, Melick CH, Clements WK, Stachura DL, Distel M, Panakova D, et al. Discrete Notch signaling requirements in the specification of hematopoietic stem cells. EMBO J. 2014;33(20):2363–73. pmid:25230933.
  22. 22. Kumano K, Chiba S, Kunisato A, Sata M, Saito T, Nakagami-Yamaguchi E, et al. Notch1 but not Notch2 is essential for generating hematopoietic stem cells from endothelial cells. Immunity. 2003;18(5):699–711. S1074761303001171 [pii]. pmid:12753746.
  23. 23. Robert-Moreno A, Espinosa L, de la Pompa JL, Bigas A. RBPjkappa-dependent Notch function regulates Gata2 and is essential for the formation of intra-embryonic hematopoietic cells. Development. 2005;132(5):1117–26. dev.01660 [pii] pmid:15689374.
  24. 24. Robert-Moreno A, Guiu J, Ruiz-Herguido C, Lopez ME, Ingles-Esteve J, Riera L, et al. Impaired embryonic haematopoiesis yet normal arterial development in the absence of the Notch ligand Jagged1. EMBO J. 2008;27(13):1886–95. pmid:18528438; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2486417.
  25. 25. Nguyen PD, Hollway GE, Sonntag C, Miles LB, Hall TE, Berger S, et al. Haematopoietic stem cell induction by somite-derived endothelial cells controlled by meox1. Nature. 2014;512(7514):314–8. pmid:25119043.
  26. 26. Kobayashi I, Kobayashi-Sun J, Kim AD, Pouget C, Fujita N, Suda T, et al. Jam1a-Jam2a interactions regulate haematopoietic stem cell fate through Notch signalling. Nature. 2014;512(7514):319–23. pmid:25119047.
  27. 27. Westerfield M. The zebrafish book. A guide for the library use of zebrafish (Danio rerio). 4th Edition ed: University of Oregon Press, Eugene.; 2000.
    • 28. Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 1995;203(3):253–310. pmid:8589427.
    • 29. Traver D, Paw BH, Poss KD, Penberthy WT, Lin S, Zon LI. Transplantation and in vivo imaging of multilineage engraftment in zebrafish bloodless mutants. Nature immunology. 2003;4(12):1238–46. pmid:14608381.
    • 30. Choi J, Dong L, Ahn J, Dao D, Hammerschmidt M, Chen JN. FoxH1 negatively modulates flk1 gene expression and vascular formation in zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2007;304(2):735–44. pmid:17306248; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1876740.
    • 31. Maves L, Kimmel CB. Dynamic and sequential patterning of the zebrafish posterior hindbrain by retinoic acid. Dev Biol. 2005;285(2):593–605. pmid:16102743.
    • 32. Perz-Edwards A, Hardison NL, Linney E. Retinoic acid-mediated gene expression in transgenic reporter zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2001;229(1):89–101. S0012-1606(00)99979-2[pii]. pmid:11133156.
    • 33. Gongal PA, March LD, Holly VL, Pillay LM, Berry-Wynne KM, Kagechika H, et al. Hmx4 regulates Sonic hedgehog signaling through control of retinoic acid synthesis during forebrain patterning. Dev Biol. 2011;355(1):55–64. pmid:21539831.
    • 34. Pillay LM, Forrester AM, Erickson T, Berman JN, Waskiewicz AJ. The Hox cofactors Meis1 and Pbx act upstream of gata1 to regulate primitive hematopoiesis. Dev Biol. 2010;340(2):306–17. S0012-1606(10)00062-X [pii] pmid:20123093.
    • 35. Gongal PA, Waskiewicz AJ. Zebrafish model of holoprosencephaly demonstrates a key role for TGIF in regulating retinoic acid metabolism. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17(4):525–38. ddm328 [pii] pmid:17998248.
    • 36. French CR, Erickson T, French DV, Pilgrim DB, Waskiewicz AJ. Gdf6a is required for the initiation of dorsal-ventral retinal patterning and lens development. Dev Biol. 2009;333(1):37–47. S0012-1606(09)00985-3 [pii] pmid:19545559.
    • 37. Prince VE, Price AL, Ho RK. Hox gene expression reveals regionalization along the anteroposterior axis of the zebrafish notochord. Dev Genes Evol. 1998;208(9):517–22. pmid:9799433.
    • 38. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. S1046-2023(01)91262-9[pii]. pmid:11846609.
    • 39. Stuckemann T, Wegleiter T, Stefan E, Nagele O, Tarbashevich K, Bock G, et al. Zebrafish Cxcr4a determines the proliferative response to Hedgehog signalling. Development. 2012;139(15):2711–20. pmid:22782722.
    • 40. Drummond DL, Cheng CS, Selland LG, Hocking JC, Prichard LB, Waskiewicz AJ. The role of Zic transcription factors in regulating hindbrain retinoic acid signaling. BMC Dev Biol. 2013;13:31. pmid:23937294; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3751700.
    • 41. Begemann G, Schilling TF, Rauch GJ, Geisler R, Ingham PW. The zebrafish neckless mutation reveals a requirement for raldh2 in mesodermal signals that pattern the hindbrain. Development. 2001;128(16):3081–94. pmid:11688558.
    • 42. Grandel H, Lun K, Rauch GJ, Rhinn M, Piotrowski T, Houart C, et al. Retinoic acid signalling in the zebrafish embryo is necessary during pre-segmentation stages to pattern the anterior-posterior axis of the CNS and to induce a pectoral fin bud. Development. 2002;129(12):2851–65. pmid:12050134.
    • 43. Lieschke GJ, Oates AC, Crowhurst MO, Ward AC, Layton JE. Morphologic and functional characterization of granulocytes and macrophages in embryonic and adult zebrafish. Blood. 2001;98(10):3087–96. pmid:11698295.
    • 44. Burns CE, DeBlasio T, Zhou Y, Zhang J, Zon L, Nimer SD. Isolation and characterization of runxa and runxb, zebrafish members of the runt family of transcriptional regulators. Exp Hematol. 2002;30(12):1381–9. pmid:12482499.
    • 45. Kalev-Zylinska ML, Horsfield JA, Flores MV, Postlethwait JH, Vitas MR, Baas AM, et al. Runx1 is required for zebrafish blood and vessel development and expression of a human RUNX1-CBF2T1 transgene advances a model for studies of leukemogenesis. Development. 2002;129(8):2015–30. pmid:11934867.
    • 46. Thompson MA, Ransom DG, Pratt SJ, MacLennan H, Kieran MW, Detrich HW 3rd, et al. The cloche and spadetail genes differentially affect hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis. Dev Biol. 1998;197(2):248–69. pmid:9630750.
    • 47. Zhang Y, Jin H, Li L, Qin FX, Wen Z. cMyb regulates hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell mobilization during zebrafish hematopoiesis. Blood. 2011;118(15):4093–101. pmid:21856868.
    • 48. Jin H, Xu J, Wen Z. Migratory path of definitive hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells during zebrafish development. Blood. 2007;109(12):5208–14. pmid:17327398.
    • 49. Murayama E, Kissa K, Zapata A, Mordelet E, Briolat V, Lin HF, et al. Tracing hematopoietic precursor migration to successive hematopoietic organs during zebrafish development. Immunity. 2006;25(6):963–75. S1074-7613(06)00513-9 [pii] pmid:17157041.
    • 50. Ma D, Wei Y, Liu F. Regulatory mechanisms of thymus and T cell development. Developmental and comparative immunology. 2013;39(1–2):91–102. pmid:22227346.
    • 51. Kopinke D, Sasine J, Swift J, Stephens WZ, Piotrowski T. Retinoic acid is required for endodermal pouch morphogenesis and not for pharyngeal endoderm specification. Dev Dyn. 2006;235(10):2695–709. pmid:16871626.
    • 52. North TE, Goessling W, Peeters M, Li P, Ceol C, Lord AM, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell development is dependent on blood flow. Cell. 2009;137(4):736–48. pmid:19450519; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2722870.
    • 53. Bertrand JY, Cisson JL, Stachura DL, Traver D. Notch signaling distinguishes 2 waves of definitive hematopoiesis in the zebrafish embryo. Blood. 2010;115(14):2777–83. pmid:20107232; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2854425.
    • 54. Burns CE, Traver D, Mayhall E, Shepard JL, Zon LI. Hematopoietic stem cell fate is established by the Notch-Runx pathway. Genes Dev. 2005;19(19):2331–42. gad.1337005 [pii] pmid:16166372.
    • 55. Weinstein BM, Lawson ND. Arteries, veins, Notch, and VEGF. Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology. 2002;67:155–62. pmid:12858536.
    • 56. Kopan R, Ilagan MX. The canonical Notch signaling pathway: unfolding the activation mechanism. Cell. 2009;137(2):216–33. pmid:19379690; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2827930.
    • 57. Lai EC. Notch cleavage: Nicastrin helps Presenilin make the final cut. Current biology: CB. 2002;12(6):R200–2. pmid:11909545.
    • 58. Iso T, Kedes L, Hamamori Y. HES and HERP families: multiple effectors of the Notch signaling pathway. Journal of cellular physiology. 2003;194(3):237–55. pmid:12548545.
    • 59. Marcelo KL, Sills TM, Coskun S, Vasavada H, Sanglikar S, Goldie LC, et al. Hemogenic endothelial cell specification requires c-Kit, Notch signaling, and p27-mediated cell-cycle control. Dev Cell. 2013;27(5):504–15. pmid:24331925; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3994666.
    • 60. Ma M, Jiang YJ. Jagged2a-notch signaling mediates cell fate choice in the zebrafish pronephric duct. PLoS Genet. 2007;3(1):e18. pmid:17257056; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1781496.
    • 61. Ellertsdottir E, Lenard A, Blum Y, Krudewig A, Herwig L, Affolter M, et al. Vascular morphogenesis in the zebrafish embryo. Dev Biol. 2010;341(1):56–65. pmid:19895803.
    • 62. Gates MA, Kim L, Egan ES, Cardozo T, Sirotkin HI, Dougan ST, et al. A genetic linkage map for zebrafish: comparative analysis and localization of genes and expressed sequences. Genome research. 1999;9(4):334–47. pmid:10207156.
    • 63. Jouve C, Palmeirim I, Henrique D, Beckers J, Gossler A, Ish-Horowicz D, et al. Notch signalling is required for cyclic expression of the hairy-like gene HES1 in the presomitic mesoderm. Development. 2000;127(7):1421–9. pmid:10704388.
    • 64. Liu Y, Pathak N, Kramer-Zucker A, Drummond IA. Notch signaling controls the differentiation of transporting epithelia and multiciliated cells in the zebrafish pronephros. Development. 2007;134(6):1111–22. pmid:17287248.
    • 65. Bussmann J, Wolfe SA, Siekmann AF. Arterial-venous network formation during brain vascularization involves hemodynamic regulation of chemokine signaling. Development. 2011;138(9):1717–26. pmid:21429983; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3074448.
    • 66. Harrison MR, Bussmann J, Huang Y, Zhao L, Osorio A, Burns CG, et al. Chemokine-guided angiogenesis directs coronary vasculature formation in zebrafish. Dev Cell. 2015;33(4):442–54. pmid:26017769; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4448080.
    • 67. Tachibana K, Hirota S, Iizasa H, Yoshida H, Kawabata K, Kataoka Y, et al. The chemokine receptor CXCR4 is essential for vascularization of the gastrointestinal tract. Nature. 1998;393(6685):591–4. pmid:9634237.
    • 68. Ara T, Tokoyoda K, Okamoto R, Koni PA, Nagasawa T. The role of CXCL12 in the organ-specific process of artery formation. Blood. 2005;105(8):3155–61. pmid:15626744.
    • 69. Takabatake Y, Sugiyama T, Kohara H, Matsusaka T, Kurihara H, Koni PA, et al. The CXCL12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 axis is essential for the development of renal vasculature. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(8):1714–23. pmid:19443644; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2723985.
    • 70. Xu Q, Wang Z, Chen X, Duan W, Lei J, Zong L, et al. Stromal-derived factor-1alpha/CXCL12-CXCR4 chemotactic pathway promotes perineural invasion in pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6(7):4717–32. pmid:25605248; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4467110.
    • 71. Siekmann AF, Standley C, Fogarty KE, Wolfe SA, Lawson ND. Chemokine signaling guides regional patterning of the first embryonic artery. Genes Dev. 2009;23(19):2272–7. pmid:19797767; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2758748.
    • 72. Aiuti A, Webb IJ, Bleul C, Springer T, Gutierrez-Ramos JC. The chemokine SDF-1 is a chemoattractant for human CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells and provides a new mechanism to explain the mobilization of CD34+ progenitors to peripheral blood. J Exp Med. 1997;185(1):111–20. pmid:8996247; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2196104.
    • 73. Zou YR, Kottmann AH, Kuroda M, Taniuchi I, Littman DR. Function of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in haematopoiesis and in cerebellar development. Nature. 1998;393(6685):595–9. pmid:9634238.
    • 74. Peled A, Petit I, Kollet O, Magid M, Ponomaryov T, Byk T, et al. Dependence of human stem cell engraftment and repopulation of NOD/SCID mice on CXCR4. Science. 1999;283(5403):845–8. pmid:9933168.
    • 75. Walters KB, Green JM, Surfus JC, Yoo SK, Huttenlocher A. Live imaging of neutrophil motility in a zebrafish model of WHIM syndrome. Blood. 2010;116(15):2803–11. pmid:20592249; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2974588.
    • 76. Ding L, Morrison SJ. Haematopoietic stem cells and early lymphoid progenitors occupy distinct bone marrow niches. Nature. 2013;495(7440):231–5. pmid:23434755; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3600153.
    • 77. Greenbaum A, Hsu YM, Day RB, Schuettpelz LG, Christopher MJ, Borgerding JN, et al. CXCL12 in early mesenchymal progenitors is required for haematopoietic stem-cell maintenance. Nature. 2013;495(7440):227–30. pmid:23434756; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3600148.
    • 78. Yu C, Liu Y, Miao Z, Yin M, Lu W, Lv Y, et al. Retinoic acid enhances the generation of hematopoietic progenitors from human embryonic stem cell-derived hemato-vascular precursors. Blood. 2010;116(23):4786–94. pmid:20427702.
    • 79. Boldajipour B, Doitsidou M, Tarbashevich K, Laguri C, Yu SR, Ries J, et al. Cxcl12 evolution—subfunctionalization of a ligand through altered interaction with the chemokine receptor. Development. 2011;138(14):2909–14. pmid:21693511.
    • 80. Packham IM, Gray C, Heath PR, Hellewell PG, Ingham PW, Crossman DC, et al. Microarray profiling reveals CXCR4a is downregulated by blood flow in vivo and mediates collateral formation in zebrafish embryos. Physiol Genomics. 2009;38(3):319–27. pmid:19509081.