Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Molecular Basis for Antioxidant Enzymes in Mediating Copper Detoxification in the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

Abstract

Antioxidant enzymes play a major role in defending against oxidative damage by copper. However, few studies have been performed to determine which antioxidant enzymes respond to and are necessary for copper detoxification. In this study, we examined both the activities and mRNA levels of SOD, CAT, and GPX under excessive copper stress in Caenorhabditis elegans, which is a powerful model for toxicity studies. Then, taking advantage of the genetics of this model, we assessed the lethal concentration (LC50) values of copper for related mutant strains. The results showed that the SOD, CAT, and GPX activities were significantly greater in treated groups than in controls. The mRNA levels of sod-3, sod-5, ctl-1, ctl-2, and almost all gpx genes were also significantly greater in treated groups than in controls. Among tested mutants, the sod-5, ctl-1, gpx-3, gpx-4, and gpx-6 variants exhibited hypersensitivity to copper. The strains with SOD or CAT over expression were reduced sensitive to copper. Mutations in daf-2 and age-1, which are involved in the insulin/insulin-like growth factor-1 signaling pathway, result in reduced sensitivity to stress. Here, we showed that LC50 values for copper in daf-2 and age-1 mutants were significantly greater than in N2 worms. However, the LC50 values in daf-16;daf-2 and daf-16;age-1 mutants were significantly reduced than in daf-2 and age-1 mutants, implying that reduced copper sensitivity is influenced by DAF-16-related functioning. SOD, CAT, and GPX activities and the mRNA levels of the associated copper responsive genes were significantly increased in daf-2 and age-1 mutants compared to N2. Additionally, the activities of SOD, CAT, and GPX were greater in these mutants than in N2 when treated with copper. Our results not only support the theory that antioxidant enzymes play an important role in copper detoxification but also identify the response and the genes involved in these processes.

Introduction

Copper is an essential metal but is toxic at high doses. Elevated copper contamination levels resulting from human activities have been widely documented [1], [2]. Currently, the field of toxicology is moving away from the measurement of single endpoints (such as growth or mortality) and toward measurements of how organisms respond to toxic exposures at the cellular level [3][6]. Similarly, copper toxicology is moving from studying conditions of acute toxicity (such as growth, behavior or mortality) and toward investigating how organisms respond to copper toxicity [3], [5], [7], [8]. Copper toxicity results from the accumulation of oxidative damage generated by reactive oxygen species via Fenton-like reaction processes [9][12]. Therefore, the induction of antioxidant enzymes is an important protective mechanism that minimizes organisms' oxidative damage from copper [13]. The malondialdehyde (MDA), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide (O2’−) contents are sharply increased, which subsequently enhances the antioxidant enzyme activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), catalase (CAT), and glutathione S-transferase (GST) [14], [15]. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying copper detoxification are still poorly understood in nematodes, despite the fact that copper is a dominant contaminant in the environment.

Caenorhabditis elegans, an excellent experimental model organism, is well -suited to the investigation of toxicological processes (due to its short life cycle, low cost, sequenced genome, and ease with which mass cultures can be generated) [16][19]. Other advantages, including the conservation of stress response pathways, availability of mutant and transgenic strains, and wealth of biological information, have led to the increased use of C.elegans in toxicological studies [20][22]. The effects of copper toxicity (such as mortality, growth, behavior, and brood size) have been commonly reported in C. elegans [23][25]. These features make the nematode a user-friendly animal for the study of toxicity. Although we previously reported that elevated copper levels produce oxidative damage in the worms [26], [27], detailed information concerning the activation of the antioxidant system in the detoxification of copper is limited, and few analyses have been conducted to determine the antioxidant genes are necessary for such detoxification.

Particularly, Genes associated with the insulin/IGF signaling pathway constitutively enhance the activities of stress-defense-related enzymes, such as SOD and CAT, causing hyposensitivity to heat, UV, oxidants and heavy metals [28][30]. In this insulin-like signaling pathway, age-1 encodes phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase and transmits signals from daf-2, the insulin receptor-like protein, into the cell [31]. This hyposensitivity may be mediated by daf-16, a forkhead transcription factor [29]. At the same time, the expression of sod-1, sod-3, sod-5, ctl-1, and ctl-2 is regulated directly or indirectly by this signaling pathway [29], [32]. Hyposensitivity to copper does not appear to be correlated with the expression of metallothioneins [28]. However, little evidence has directly indicated that antioxidant enzymes are necessary in the copper detoxification process.

The aims of this work are the following: (I) to identify which antioxidant enzymes and associated genes play a key role in copper detoxification and (II) to determine the antioxidant enzymes that mediate copper response capacities in daf-2, age-1 and daf-16 mutants. Our study will contribute to the understanding of the molecular detoxification mechanisms of antioxidant enzymes induced by copper.

Materials and Methods

C. elegans strains: culture and maintenance

Worm culture, maintenance and synchronization were performed as previously described [33]. The strains used in this study were N2, sod-1(tm776), sod-2(gk257), sod-3(tm760), sod-4(gk101), sod-5(tm1146), ctl-1(ok1242), ctl-2(ok1137), ctl-3(ok2042), wuIs151(ctl-1+ctl-2+ctl-3+myo-2::GFP), wuIs152(sod-1 gDNA), wuIs156(sod-2 gDNA), huIs33(sod-3 gDNA), daf-16(m26), age-1(hx546), daf-2(e1368), daf-16(m26);age-1(m333), and daf-16(m26);daf-2(e1370), which were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC), as well as gpx-1(tm2100), gpx-2(tm2895), gpx-3(tm2139), gpx-4(tm2111), gpx-5(tm2042), gpx-6(tm2535), gpx-7(tm2166), and gpx-8(tm2108), which were provided by the National Bioresource Project (NBRP).

Chemicals and reagents

CuSO4·5H2O was used as an analytical reagent and was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA and Shanghai Zhizhen Chemical Co., Ltd., purity ≥99%. All other chemicals and reagents used in this study were of molecular biology grade and were purchased from Sigma Chemicals (St. Louis, Mo, USA), Qiagen (Valencia, CA, USA) or Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Copper exposure for enzyme assays

CuSO4·5H2O was dissolved in ultra-pure distilled water. A uracil-deficient strain of E.coli, OP50, was cultured in L-Broth (3 g yeast extract, 10 g tryptone and 10 g NaCl in 1 L of ddH2O) as a food source. One liter of saturated OP50 was centrifuged and resuspended in 100 mL K -medium (32 mmol/L KCl and 52 mmol/L NaCl). This wash procedure was repeated three times. The 3-day-old worms (young adults) were transferred to fresh K -medium [34], which was supplemented with different concentrations of CuSO4 (0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 0.8 mM). A volume of OP50 equal to 1/10 of the test solution was added. No experimental conditions, including CuSO4 concentrations, induced mortality in C. elegans. The assays were performed in disposable borosilicate tubes with constant shaking at 20°C. The tubes were tilted on a supported surface with constant shaking for 24±1 h at 20°C.

To confirm the results, we also conducted exposure experiments as follows: the L4 populations were transferred into K medium containing 0.8 mM CuSO4 with bacteria. The assays were performed in 300 mL flasks for 24 h with 50 µmol FUDR (5-Fluoro-2-deoxyuridine, Sigma) at 150 rpm and 20°C. The worms were then collected by centrifugation and washed. Live worms were separated by sucrose flotation [35].

Antioxidant enzyme activities

After exposure to 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 0.8 mmol/L CuSO4 for 24 h, worms were repeatedly collected and cleaned at 825×g for 1 min. The worms were suspended in cold homogenized buffer (0.01 mol/L Tris-HCl, 0.0001 mol/L EDTA-2Na, 0.01 mol/L sucrose, 0.8% NaCl, according to the protocol of the Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute) and homogenized using a homogenizer for 6 min on ice. The mixture was centrifuged at 367×g for 10 min at 4°C. The upper aqueous layer containing the enzyme was transferred to a new 1.5 mL EP tube for an enzymatic assay. Protein contents were determined using standard methods (bicinchoninic acid), as described previously [36].

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in worms was measured using a commercial chemical assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) by the xanthine oxidase method [37]. SOD is a specific inhibitor of the superoxide anion radical. There are only two SODs, – Cu/Zn-SOD and Mn-SOD–, which make up the total SOD (T-SOD) in nematodes. Mn-SOD activity is lost when treated with regents; however, Cu/Zn-SOD activity is invariant.

Catalase (CAT) activity was measured using ammonium molybdate methods [38] with the assay kit of Nanjing Jiancheng, China. The enzyme extract was incubated with H2O2 for 1 min at 37°C. The reaction was quickly stopped by the addition of ammonium molybdate. A CAT unit is defined as the decomposition of 1 µmol H2O2 per second.

Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity in worms was evaluated according to the DTNB (5,5'-Dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid)) method [39] using a colorimetric GSH-Px detection kit (Nanjing Jiancheng, China). Briefly, the homogenate was incubated with H2O2 and GSH for 5 min at 37°C before 2-thio two nitrobenzoic acid was added to stop the reaction.

GST activity was quantified by the CDNB (2,4-Dinitrochlorobenzene, Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology, China) method. Fifty microliters of supernatant was used in a total reaction volume of 250 µL. The substrates for GST, CDNB (1 mM) and GSH (5 mM), were added to the reaction wells. The change in absorbance of CDNB conjugate for the first minute was measured at 340 nm and 28°C at 12 -s intervals (ε340 = 9.6 mM−1 cm−1). Nonenzymatic reaction activities were subtracted from the enzymatic activity.

The SOD, CAT, GPX, and GST activities were then measured at an absorbances of 550, 405, 412, or 340 nm, respectively, using a microplate reader and the SOFTmax software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA).

Isolation of RNA and cDNA synthesis

Total RNAs were isolated from C. elegans by freeze -cracking (in which RNA isolation suspension is completely frozen in liquid nitrogen and then transfered to a 37°C heating block (ThermoQ, China) to thaw completely; this process is repeated 5 times) [40] and extracted using the conventional RNAiso Plus reagent (TaKaRa, China), according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA was quantified with a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo, USA). Reverse transcription was carried out using the Go Taq 2-Step RT-qPCR System (TaKaRa, China). The cDNA product was stored at −80°C until use.

Real-time PCR

All of the PCR primers (Table S1) were designed using Primer Premier 5.0. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed using the SYBR Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa, China), according to the manufacturer's instructions, on a Biosystems 7300 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster, CA, USA) using cDNA at a 1∶20 dilution. A dissociation curve was established for each sample. The cycling conditions were as follows: 3 min at 95°C, 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 31 s. Fluorescence data were obtained at the 60°C step. For each primer set, target quantities were derived from standard curves, which were generated using the Ct value for each dilution plotted against the log of its concentration. Relative expression values were calculated by dividing the quantities of the target sequence of interest with the quantity obtained for cdc-42 (RHO GTPase) and Y45F10D.4 (an iron -binding protein involved in Fe-S cluster formation) as internal reference genes [41].

Lethality tests

Experimental design and test procedures were conducted as previously described [42] with minor modifications. All nematode strains were exposed to their assigned concentrations at the L4 stage (control and seven increasing CuSO4 concentrations) in 24-well tissue culture plates (Corning Incorporated, USA) with food source equal to 1/10 of the test solution for 24 h (±1). Each exposure well contained approximately 30 worms in 0.8 mL test solution, and each treatment consisted of 3 exposure wells for a total of 90 worms per CuSO4 concentration. After the 24 h exposure period, the worms were scored under a dissection microscope as alive if moving or dead if unresponsive to gentle probing. Aqueous lethality tests were replicated three times for LC50 analysis.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as means±SE. Graphs were generated using SigmaPlot 10.0 software (Systat Software, Inc., USA). The CuSO4 LC50 was determined with SPSS 11.5 (SPSS Manager Inc., USA). The data were log transformed and subjected to a χ2 test for normality and to Bartlett's test for homogeneity. Probit analysis was used to calculate the LC50 and confidence interval (CI). Significant variations were determined using Student's t-tests, except for Duncan's multiple comparison test as required. Probability levels of 0.05 or less were considered statistically significant. Four replicates for each treatment and control were conducted for enzyme and mRNA assays and three replicates were used for the lethality test.

Ethics Statement

The work described here has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis) and, is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Its publication is approved by all authors and by the responsible authorities (the full name of the group leader is Enbo, Ma) where the work was carried out, and, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, including electronically, without the written consent of the copyright-holder.

Results and Discussion

To investigate the role of antioxidant enzymes in the copper detoxification, we first investigated the effects of copper on the antioxidant enzymes' activities and gene expression levels. The status of copper pollution in China is between 0.4 mM to 26 mM [1], [43]. The young adult nematode, which is more resistant to copper than any other development stage, dies at exposure to concentrations higher than 0.8 mM. If only live at high concentrations in nematodes were examined, resistant selection would confound the results. Accordingly, the exposure concentrations of CuSO4 were determined according to the minimum lethality doses of 0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, and 100%. Four enzymes (SOD, CAT, GPX, and GST) were measured after cultivation of the 3-day-old worms (young adults) in the nominal value presence of 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 mM CuSO4 for 24 h. No mortality was observed in either the control or CuSO4-exposed groups. A detailed description of the genes and mutants studied in these studies can be found in table 1.

SOD activity and mRNA expression levels

Total SOD activity (T-SOD) was significantly increased at all concentrations (from 0.1 to 0.8 mM CuSO4) of treatment compared to the untreated group (fig 1A); the results were approximately 1.7-fold greater than those of the controls. We also examined the induction of Cu/Zn-SOD and Mn-SOD. Interestingly, the induction of Cu/Zn-SOD activities was apparent at treatment concentrations of 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 mmol/L CuSO4, which induced activity increases of approximately 1.5-fold, compared to the control group (fig 1A). The induction of Mn-SOD activities was significant based on treatment concentrations of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mmol/L CuSO4, at which Mn-SOD activities were increased by 2.4-, 3.4-, 2.7, and 2.3-fold, respectively (fig 1A). These data indicate that even as low as 0.05 mmol/L CuSO4 may initiate an individual stress response. These increases in SOD activities were also reported with copper treatment [9]. Copper, as a SOD co-factor, may have the ability to increase SOD activities [10].

thumbnail
Figure 1. SODs activities or mRNA expression induced by copper in C. elegans.

(A) SOD activity assessed in nematode N2 at different concentrations of copper exposure. All values are given as the means ±SE (n = 3) in U mg−1 Pr. The gene expressions of sod-1(B), sod-2 (C), sod-3 (D), sod-4 (E), and sod-5 (F) were quantified in N2 at different concentrations of copper exposure and normalized with cdc-42. * P<0.05, ** P<0.01 versus respective controls analyzed by t-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107685.g001

In C. elegans, there are two cytosolic Cu/Zn-SODs encoded by sod-1 and sod-5, one extracellular Cu/Zn-SOD encoded by sod-4, and two mitochondrial Mn-SODs encoded by sod-2 and sod-3. The Mn-SOD likely contributes only a minor fraction of total SOD activity (fig 1A). sod-2 and sod-1 are highly expressed, whereas sod-3 and sod-5 are minor isoforms, the expressions of which are increased in response to stressful situations [44]. In the present study, we quantified the expression levels of each of the SOD genes by qPCR. The results showed that mRNA levels of sod-3 and sod-5 were significantly induced (13 and 3-fold greater than the control, respectively) by 0.1 mmol/L CuSO4 in the expression of five SOD genes (fig 1C and E). However, neither sod-3 nor sod-5 mRNA levels were significantly up-regulated under any other CuSO4 treatment concentrations in this study. Other genes were slightly elevated (with no significant difference), which might have contributed to the elevated enzyme activity (fig 1). The increased specificity of the -mRNA levels of sod has been observed in other aquatic organisms [14], [45].

CAT activity and mRNA expression levels

Although SODs play a role in preventing oxidative damage [46], the detoxification process is completed by CAT because H2O2 is a by-product of oxygen metabolism and a substrate of CAT [46]. With respect to CAT activity, treatment with 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 mM concentrations of CuSO4 induced a significant increase of 1.3- to 1.6- fold (fig 2A). Such increases in the activities of CAT have been reported with copper treatments [9], [14], [45], and the extent of the increase varied among the treated concentrations and different species [47]. The response of CAT to copper can be thought of as a defensive mechanism that acts with SODs to limit the toxic impact of copper at physiological levels.

thumbnail
Figure 2. CATs activities or mRNA expression induced by copper in C. elegans.

(A) The CAT activity and H2O2 content were changed during the copper stress. Values are presented as the means ±SE (n = 3) in U g−1 Pr. and mmol mg−1 Pr. The gene expressions of ctl-1(B), ctl-2 (C), and ctl-3 (C) were quantified in nematode N2 under the stress of different concentration of copper and normalized with cdc-42. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus respective controls analyzed by t-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107685.g002

In C.elegans, three CAT genes have been characterized: ctl-1, ctl-2, and ctl-3 [48]. ctl-1 encodes an unusual cytosolic catalase, the mRNA level of which was increased by approximately 1.7-fold and 3.1-fold in the 0.4 and 0.8 mmol/L CuSO4 treatment groups, respectively (fig 2B). ctl-2 encodes a peroxisomal catalase, the mRNA level of which was increased by approximately 3.2-fold and 2.2-fold in the 0.4 and 0.8 mmol/L CuSO4 treatment groups, respectively (fig 2C). ctl-3 encodes a tissue specific catalase; as expected, the mRNA levels of ctl-3 were not significantly up-regulated in any of the CuSO4 treatment groups. These results indicate that ctl-1 and ctl-2 are induced by copper stress. A similar induction was also observed during lead exposure in nematodes [49].

GPX activity and mRNA expression levels

Limited evidence for the role of GPX in organismal copper detoxification has been documented [5], [50]. The results in fig 3A show that GPX activity increased in a dose-dependent manner in C. elegans. Significant increases were observed in all CuSO4 treatments, after which GPX levels were approximately 1.3-, 2.3-, 5.2-, 9.7-, and 13.3-fold greater than those of controls. Additionally, increased GPX activity plays a central role in protecting against the deleterious effects of copper in the blue mussel [50]. Our results indicate that concentrations as low as 0.05 mmol/L CuSO4 might initiate physiological damage.

thumbnail
Figure 3. GPX activities or mRNA expression induced by copper in C. elegans.

(A) The GPX activity was elevated when exposed to copper. Values are presented as the means ±SE (n = 3) in U mg−1 Pr. (B) gpx-1, (C) gpx-2, (D) gpx-3, (E) gpx-4, (F) gpx-5, (G) gpx-6, (F) gpx-7, and (G) gpx-8 expression ratios were each quantified in nematode N2 at different concentrations of copper and normalized with cdc-42. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus respective controls analyzed by t-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107685.g003

In worms, eight homologs of human GPX genes have been identified. qPCR results showed that mRNA levels of almost all GPX genes, excluding gpx-5, could be increased by copper exposure in C. elegans (fig 3). The induction of gpx-1 was increased by 2.2-, 2.3-, 3.6-, 3.6-, and 2.4-fold, respectively, in the 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8 mmol/L CuSO4 treatment groups. The patterns of gpx-2, gpx-3, gpx-4, gpx-6, and gpx-7 expressions were similar, with maximum induction appearing in the 0.4 and 0.8 mmol/L treatment groups (fig 3 C, D, E, G, and H). The induction of gpx-8 was dose-dependent and significantly increased in all treatment groups (fig 3I). gpx-5 expression levels did not change compared to those in controls (fig 3F). These results suggest that GPX genes may play an important role in the regulation of copper detoxification. These elevations were also observed in HepG2 cells under conditions of copper stress [5].

Although the activation of the antioxidant system consisting of SOD, CAT, and GPX can be rather complex, the desired effects of neutralizing free radicals and their toxic effects occur in a multi-step process [10]. However, a dose-dependent decrease in GST was also observed in the worms. The maximum decreases occurred at the treatment levels of 0.4 and 0.8 mM (88% and 79%, respectively) (fig S1). The decrease in GST may be due to the toxic effects of copper, despite the ready availability of other cellular defenses. Additionally, such a decrease may have occurred before the copper-dependent induction of degenerative processes [47]. These results indicate that copper stress induces SOD, CAT, and GPX activities in C. elegans. Moreover, myo-inositol (MI), a nutrient antioxidant, mediates increases in SOD, CAT, and GPX (not including GST) that contribute to lipid and protein copper oxidant repair [51]. For this reason, our attention was mainly directed toward these three major enzymes, which act jointly in the destruction of ROS in the worm.

LC50 values of genetic strains in response to CuSO4

To determine whether the genes induced by copper are necessary for copper detoxification processes, we detected the LC50 of CuSO4 in genetic loss-of-function mutants and some strains with representative over-expressed mRNA at L4 stages. Because the bags-of-worms phenotype would be induced by the exposure of 3-days-old worms (young adult) to copper for a 24 h period, and Live/dead scoring would be impaired by the fact that the eggs would hatched inside the mother. Our results showed that the loss-of-function mutants sod-5, ctl-1, gpx-3, gpx-4, and gpx-6 were significantly more sensitive to CuSO4 compared to controls (table 2). Among the six mutants, ctl-1 and gpx-3 were the most sensitive. Interestingly, the transcription of all of six genes was induced during copper stress conditions. A lack of hypersensitivity in other copper -responsive gene mutant strains (such as: sod-3 (tm760), and ctl-2 (ok1137)) suggests that compensatory or other factors may be involved in the response to copper. The lack of severe oxidative stress hypersensitivity when sod-2, and sod-3 are deleted was attributed to the compensatory effects of increase in function. Protein and lipid damage has also not detected in the sod-1 mutant [46]. The identity of compensatory factors remains to be determined. In addition, the over-expression of sod-1, sod-2, sod-3, and ctl-1+ctl-2+ctl-3 resulted in 1.4- to 2.5-fold increases in the LC50 of CuSO4 over that of the wild type (table 2). The overexpression of sod-1 increased the worm's life span, and total SOD activity was increased by approximately two- fold by wuIs152 [46]. Thus, the over-expression of antioxidant enzyme may suppress copper toxicity.

thumbnail
Table 2. The LC50 values of each strain for CuSO4 (concentration in mmol/L).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107685.t002

The LC50 value of N2 in this study was not exactly the same as that reported in Tatara's study [42]; this discrepancy may have occurred because the L4 larvae stage was used in the present study, whereas young adults were used in the previous study [42]. The wuIs152 –driven (overexpression of SOD-1) further decreased sensitivity in copper did not occur in the same manner as similar increases in paraquat sensitivity [46]. sod-1 deletion mutant also increased sensitivity to paraquat [46], but not to copper. This result may be due to the slower transition of copper-generated O2− into H2O2 in copper than paraquat, as toxic processes are different between the two compounds. The observation that CAT over-expression causes copper hyposensitivity is supported by experiments of CAT over-expression in Drosophila [52]. The strain gpx-1 (tm2100) showed no significant change in the LC50 to CuSO4, which is supported by the fact that the mitochondrial ROS load was not affected in these strains [53]. It was concluded that sod-5, ctl-1, gpx-3, gpx-4, and gpx-6 might be necessary for the copper detoxification process, although other genes for encoding antioxidant enzymes might also participate in the process.

The daf-2 and age-1 mutants reduced copper sensitivity

A recent study implicated insulin/IGF-1 mutants are associated with stress response in nematodes as negative regulators of antioxidant enzymes [28], [30]. Consistent with the model that mutations in daf-2 and age-1 cause reduced sensitivity to heat, oxidants, UV, and heavy metals [28], [30], both daf-2 and age-1 mutants reduced sensitive to copper stress, as reflected by their increased survival LC50 values (table 2). However, the increased resistance of age-1 and daf-2 to copper is reduced by constructing double mutants with daf-16. Both daf-16;daf-2 and daf-16;age-1 exhibited increased copper sensitivity compared with daf-2 and age-1 single mutants (table 2). These results indicate that the reduced copper sensitivity in daf-2 and age-1 mutants is mediated by daf-16. Interestingly, the LC50 value more substantially reduced the sensitivity of daf-2 mutant than that of age-1 (table 2). These effects may be caused by reduced insulin/IGF-1 signaling or they may be mediated by a distinct pathway emanating from DAF-2 that does not involve PI-3-kinase [54]. Consistent with previous findings, the sensitivity of daf-16 mutant to copper is similar to that of wild-type nematodes [28]. Double mutants with unc-75 have a 3-fold increased sensitivity to copper [55]. These results suggested the presence of another stress protection pathway, possibly unc-75 [55].

SOD, CAT, and GPX activities in daf-2 and age-1 mutants

Elevated activities of antioxidant enzymes in worms were present in the daf-2 and age-1 mutants relative to wild-type worms (fig 4). SOD and CAT activities were approximately twice as great as those measured in wild-type worms (fig 4A and B). GPX activity was also elevated in both mutant strains (daf-2 and age-1) (fig 4C), and this elevation was counteracted in double mutants with daf-16(m26). The activation of SOD, CAT, and GPX was decreased in the daf-16 single mutant. The elevated SOD and CAT levels observed here are consistent with previous studies [30], [56], and this is the first observation of elevated GPX in these mutants. The up-regulation of SOD, CAT, and GPX may be frequently associated with increased copper resistance (table 2 and fig 4). This hypothesis is also supported by the role of daf-2 and age-1 gene products as negative regulators of SOD and CAT activities [57].

thumbnail
Figure 4. Antioxidant enzymes in daf-2, and age-1 mutants.

(A) SOD activity in wild-type and daf-2, age-1, daf-16;daf-2, daf-16;age-1, daf-16 mutants. (B) CAT activity in these six strains. (C) GPX activity in these six strains. Values are presented as the means ±SE (n = 3) in U g−1 Pr. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus respective controls analyzed by t-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107685.g004

mRNA expression levels of sod, ctl, and gpx in daf-2 and age-1 mutants

Fig 5 shows the mRNA expression of sod, ctl, and gpx in daf-2, age-1, daf-2;daf-16, and age-1;daf-16 mutants compared with controls during K-medium cultivation. In daf-2 and age-1 mutants, there was a significant increase in sod-3 (nearly 18- and 17-fold, respectively), sod-5 (approximately 4-and 7-fold, respectively), ctl-1 (approximately 12- and 12-fold, respectively), ctl-2 (approximately 2- and 3-fold, respectively), gpx-1 (approximately 2- and 3-fold, respectively), gpx-3 (approximately 3- and 2-fold, respectively), gpx-4 (approximately 5- and 4-fold, respectively), gpx-5 (approximately 3- and 7-fold, respectively), gpx-6 (approximately 7- and 6-fold, respectively), and gpx-8 (nearly 2- and 4-fold, respectively) expression. These elevations were partially attenuated when these mutations were constructed as double mutants with daf-16. The expressions of sod-1, sod-2, sod-4, ctl-3, gpx-2, and gpx-7 did not change in these mutants. Only the expressions of sod-3 and gpx-4 in all tested genes were significantly different in daf-16 mutant compared with wild type. The results of the sod and ctl were consistent with previous reports [29], [58].

thumbnail
Figure 5. mRNA expression levels of antioxidant enzymes in daf-2, age-1, daf-2;daf-16, age-1;daf-16 and daf-16 mutants.

Heat map analysis of the RNA expression patterns of daf-2 and age-1 versus N2. Both sod-3 and sod-5 expression levels were increased in daf-2 and age-1 mutants. Both ctl-1 and ctl-2 were increased in daf-2 and age-1 mutants. gpx-3,4,5,6,7,8 were increased in daf-2 and age-1 mutants. There were no significant difference between N2 and daf-16 mutant except for sod-3 and gpx-4. The red is high; the blue is low.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107685.g005

Responsive capacities of antioxidant enzymes to copper in the daf-2 mutant

SOD, CAT, and GPX activities increased steadily with copper-treated wild-type animals. Such increases were also observed in the insulin/IGF receptor mutant daf-2 and transcription factor daf-16 (fig 6). Whereas SOD activity increased by 1.1- and 1.6-fold at 0.4 and 0.8 mM CuSO4, respectively, in wild-type worms, it increased by 1.7- and 1.5-fold in the daf-2 mutant, 2.9- and 5.1-fold in the daf-16;daf-2 mutant and 1.1- and 1.6- fold in daf-16 mutant. Whereas CAT activity increased by 1.2-fold and 1.3- fold at 0.4 and 0.8 mM CuSO4, respectively, in wild-type worms, it increased by 1.4 and 1.1- fold in daf-2 mutants, 1.4- and 2.3- fold in the daf-16;daf-2 mutant and 1.5- and 2.5- fold in daf-16 mutants. Whereas the GPX activities increased by 7.7-fold and 8.4-fold at 0.4 and 0.8 mM CuSO4, respectively, in wild-type worms, it increased by 10.3-fold and 14.5-fold in the daf-2 mutant, 15.4-fold and 21.8-fold in the daf-16;daf-2 mutant, and 6.7- and 20.6-fold in the daf-16 mutant compared to wild-type worms.

thumbnail
Figure 6. Antioxidant enzymes were induced by copper in daf-2, daf-16, and daf-16;daf-2 mutants.

The activities of SOD (A), CAT (B), and GPX (C) were quantified in nematode N2, daf-2, daf-16, and daf-16;daf-2 treated with different concentrations of copper. All values are given as the means ±SE (n = 3) in U g−1 Pr. *P <0.05, **P<0.01 versus respective controls analyzed by t-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107685.g006

Moreover, these results demonstrated the greater potential for simultaneous up-regulation of SOD, CAT and GPX activities in daf-2, daf-16;daf-2, and daf-16 mutants than in wild-type worms exposed to CuSO4 (fig 6). The underlying mechanism was likely that reduced insulin/IGF-1 signaling relieved inhibitory actions against the antioxidant enzymes, eliciting the coordinated expression of an elaborate detoxification program. The present results not only support the free radical theory, which states that copper induces oxidative enzymes to protect organisms against ROS damage through a Fenton-like reaction [12], but also indicate that increased oxidative enzyme activities may be among the causes of increased hyposensitivity to copper in both daf-2 and age-1 mutants. daf-2 displayed the greatest increases in GPX activity when exposed to copper compared to the three wild-type enzyme activities. This result indicates that additional signaling pathways may contribute to these processes. It was reported that AP-1, JNK/SAPK, NF-kappaB signaling, nrf and hepatocyte nuclear factor 4-alpha might participate in controlling copper-responsive transcription in human cells [3], [7], [8], [59].

Induction of sod, ctl, and gpx mRNAs expression by copper in daf-2, age-1, and daf-16 mutants

Initially the strains were exposed to a toxic concentration of LC50 CuSO4 (nominal value). After treatment with CuSO4, the mRNA expression levels of ctl-1, and sod-5 increased in all strains tested. The highest increases of mRNA expression levels (>4-fold; P<0.01) were occurred in gpx-2, gpx-4, gpx-6, and gpx-7 in wild-type worms and in sod-5 in daf-16 mutants. Smaller but still significant increases (>3-fold; P<0.01) were observed in sod-3, ctl-2, and gpx-8 in wild-type worms and gpx-8 in daf-16 mutants (fig 7). We only extracted mRNA from live animals. At 0.8 mM Cu 50% of the wild-type and daf-16 nematodes were dead, but only ∼20–30% of daf-2 and age-1 mutants were dead. Consequently, selection for the more resistant wild-type and daf-16 worms might be taking place in these experiments. And This process might be one reason why the highest increases in mRNA expression levels were not found in daf-2 and age-1 mutants.

thumbnail
Figure 7. mRNA expression levels of antioxidant enzymes response capacities to copper in daf-2, age-1, daf-16 mutants.

The mRNA expression levels of sod, ctl, and gpx were quantified in nematode N2, daf-2, age-1, and daf-16 treated with 0.8 mM CuSO4. All values are given as the means ±SE (n = 4). Lower case represents significantly difference, P<0.05, analyzed by Duncan's multiple comparison test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107685.g007

The tested gene expression level profiles of daf-16 mutants were similar to those of wild-type worms under basal conditions. And the increased mRNA expression level of sod-3, ctl-1, ctl-2, gpx-1, gpx-2, gpx-3, gpx-4, gpx-6, gpx-7, which were copper -response genes, were not occured in daf-16 mutant when treated with copper. It indicate that these genes might be the target of daf-16-mediated transcription. The mRNA levels of sod-3 and sod-5 in copper -exposed age-1 mutants were intermediate between those of wild-type worms and daf-2 mutants (fig 7). This factor might be the underlying reason why daf-2 mutant are more resistant than age-1 to copper. But it is still uncertain to what extent oxidative stress contributes to their resistant to copper.

Conclusions

Overall, copper induces a complex regulation of antioxidant enzymes. In the present study, we identified copper-responsive antioxidant enzymes and genes. Of these, sod-5, ctl-1, gpx-3, gpx-4, gpx-6 were necessary for copper detoxification. Other genes also played a role in copper detoxification. daf-2 and age-1 mutants were more resistant to copper compared to wild-type worms and also revealed the up-regulatory capacity of antioxidant enzyme activity and expression during copper treatment. The present study provides evidence of the beneficial effects of antioxidant enzymes during copper detoxification in model organisms as well as a better understanding of the utility of C. elegans as a model for the study of metal detoxification mechanisms in humans.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

GST activities were decreased by copper in C. elegans. GST activity in nematodes N2 at different concentrations of copper exposure. All values are given as the means ±SE (n = 3) in U mg−1 Pr.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107685.s001

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

Some strains were provided by the CGC, which is funded by National Institutes of Health Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). The authors give special thanks to Prof. Chonglin Yang, Institute of Gnetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, for his help with this study. We also thanks for Research associate Qing Wei, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, for his help in the manuscript writing.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SS XZ JZ. Performed the experiments: SS YH. Analyzed the data: SS XZ HW EM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SS YH HW EM YG. Wrote the paper: SS XZ HW JZ EM.

References

  1. 1. Xiaochun P, Bing Y, Jiahua D, Zhiliang C, Yanyu W (2012) Vegetation composition and Plant Cu Content in Copper Ore District along Middle-lower-Yangtze River. Hubei Agricultural Sciences 51: 250–254.
  2. 2. Wu F, Liu Y, Xia Y, Shen Z, Chen Y (2011) Copper contamination of soils and vegetables in the vicinity of Jiuhuashan copper mine, China. Environmental Earth Sciences 64: 761–769.
  3. 3. Song MO, Mattie MD, Lee C-H, Freedman JH (2014) The role of Nrf1 and Nrf2 in the regulation of copper-responsive transcription. Experimental Cell Research 322: 39–50.
  4. 4. Sturzenbaum S, Aschner M, Freedman JH (2012) Toxicogenomics in non-mammalian species-Editorial. Front Genet 3: 216.
  5. 5. Song MO, Li J, Freedman JH (2009) Physiological and toxicological transcriptome changes in HepG2 cells exposed to copper. Physiol Genomics 38: 386–401.
  6. 6. Jin YH, Dunlap PE, McBride SJ, Al-Refai H, Bushel PR, et al. (2008) Global transcriptome and deletome profiles of yeast exposed to transition metals. PLoS Genet 4: e1000053.
  7. 7. Song MO, Freedman JH (2011) Role of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha in controlling copper-responsive transcription. Biochim Biophys Acta 1813: 102–108.
  8. 8. Mattie MD, McElwee MK, Freedman JH (2008) Mechanism of copper-activated transcription: activation of AP-1, and the JNK/SAPK and p38 signal transduction pathways. J Mol Biol 383: 1008–1018.
  9. 9. Li M, Hu C, Zhu Q, Chen L, Kong Z, et al. (2006) Copper and zinc induction of lipid peroxidation and effects on antioxidant enzyme activities in the microalga Pavlova viridis (Prymnesiophyceae). Chemosphere 62: 565–572.
  10. 10. Jomova K, Valko M (2011) Advances in metal-induced oxidative stress and human disease. Toxicology 283: 65–87.
  11. 11. Boveris A, Musacco-Sebio R, Ferrarotti N, Saporito-Magriñá C, Torti H, et al. (2012) The acute toxicity of iron and copper: Biomolecule oxidation and oxidative damage in rat liver. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 116: 63–69.
  12. 12. Pham AN, Xing G, Miller CJ, Waite TD (2013) Fenton-like copper redox chemistry revisited: Hydrogen peroxide and superoxide mediation of copper-catalyzed oxidant production. Journal of Catalysis 301: 54–64.
  13. 13. Jiang W-D, Wu P, Kuang S-Y, Liu Y, Jiang J, et al. (2011) Myo-inositol prevents copper-induced oxidative damage and changes in antioxidant capacity in various organs and the enterocytes of juvenile Jian carp (Cyprinus carpio var. Jian). Aquatic Toxicology 105: 543–551.
  14. 14. Srivastava S, Mishra S, Tripathi RD, Dwivedi S, Gupta DK (2006) Copper-induced oxidative stress and responses of antioxidants and phytochelatins in Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle. Aquatic Toxicology 80: 405–415.
  15. 15. Mostofa M, Fujita M (2013) Salicylic acid alleviates copper toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings by up-regulating antioxidative and glyoxalase systems. Ecotoxicology 22: 959–973.
  16. 16. Rice JR, Boyd WA, Chandra D, Smith MV, Den Besten PK, et al. (2014) Comparison of the toxicity of fluoridation compounds in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Toxicol Chem 33: 82–88.
  17. 17. Hall J, Haas KL, Freedman JH (2012) Role of MTL-1, MTL-2, and CDR-1 in mediating cadmium sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Toxicol Sci 128: 418–426.
  18. 18. McElwee MK, Freedman JH (2011) Comparative toxicology of mercurials in Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Toxicol Chem 30: 2135–2141.
  19. 19. Boyd WA, Smith MV, Kissling GE, Rice JR, Snyder DW, et al. (2009) Application of a mathematical model to describe the effects of chlorpyrifos on Caenorhabditis elegans development. PLoS ONE 4: e7024.
  20. 20. Boyd WA, Smith MV, Freedman JH (2012) Caenorhabditis elegans as a model in developmental toxicology. Methods Mol Biol 889: 15–24.
  21. 21. McElwee MK, Ho LA, Chou JW, Smith MV, Freedman JH (2013) Comparative toxicogenomic responses of mercuric and methyl-mercury. BMC Genomics 14: 698.
  22. 22. Tvermoes BE, Boyd WA, Freedman JH (2010) Molecular characterization of numr-1 and numr-2: genes that increase both resistance to metal-induced stress and lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Sci 123: 2124–2134.
  23. 23. Yu Z, Zhang J, Yin D (2012) Toxic and recovery effects of copper on Caenorhabditis elegans by various food-borne and water-borne pathways. Chemosphere 87: 1361–1367.
  24. 24. Hedges KA (2010) Copper exposure damages neurons and induces paralysis in the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans, far below lethal concentrations. M. A. Thesis, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA.
  25. 25. Jonker MJ, Piskiewicz AM, Castellà NII, Kammenga JE (2004) Toxicity of binary mixtures of cadmium-copper and carbendazim-copper to the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 23: 1529–1537.
  26. 26. Yang H, Han Y, Song S, Yang M, Ma E, et al. (2012) Research on toxic effects of copper to Caenorhabditis elegans. Sichuan Journal of Zoology 31: 236–239.
  27. 27. Song S, Guo Y, Yin K, Wu H, Zhang X, et al. (2008) Copper on Long-term role of Nematode physiological Characteristics. Sichuan Journal of Zoology 27: 832–834.
  28. 28. Barsyte D, Lovejoy DA, Lithgow GJ (2001) Longevity and heavy metal resistance in daf-2 and age-1 long-lived mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans. The FASEB Journal 15: 627–634.
  29. 29. Yanase S, Yasuda K, Ishii N (2002) Adaptive responses to oxidative damage in three mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans (age-1, mev-1 and daf-16) that affect life span. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 123: 1579–1587.
  30. 30. Houthoofd K, Fidalgo MA, Hoogewijs D, Braeckman BP, Lenaerts I, et al. (2005) Metabolism, physiology and stress defense in three aging Ins/IGF-1 mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell 4: 87–95.
  31. 31. Vanfleteren JR, De Vreese A (1995) The gerontogenes age-1 and daf-2 determine metabolic rate potential in aging Caenorhabditis elegans. The FASEB Journal 9: 1355–1361.
  32. 32. Panowski SH, Wolff S, Aguilaniu H, Durieux J, Dillin A (2007) PHA-4/Foxa mediates diet-restriction-induced longevity of C. elegans. Nature 447: 550–555.
  33. 33. Brenner S (1974) The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77: 71–94.
  34. 34. Williams PL, Dusenbery DB (1990) Aquatic toxicity testing using the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 9: 1285–1290.
  35. 35. Portman DS (2006) Profiling C. elegans gene expression with DNA microarrays. In: Community TCeR, editor. WormBook: WormBook. pp. 1551–8507.
  36. 36. Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner FH, et al. (1985) Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Analytical Biochemistry 150: 76–85.
  37. 37. Misra HP, Fridovich I (1972) The role of superoxide anion in the autoxidation of epinephrine and a simple assay for superoxide dismutase. J Biol Chem 247: 3170–3175.
  38. 38. Goth L (1991) A simple method for determination of serum catalase activity and revision of reference range. Clin Chim Acta 196: 143–151.
  39. 39. Paglia DE, Valentine WN (1967) Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. J Lab Clin Med 70: 158–169.
  40. 40. Reinke V, Smith HE, Nance J, Wang J, Van Doren C, et al. (2000) A Global Profile of Germline Gene Expression in C. elegans. Molecular Cell 6: 605–616.
  41. 41. Hoogewijs D, Houthoofd K, Matthijssens F, Vandesompele J, Vanfleteren J (2008) Selection and validation of a set of reliable reference genes for quantitative sod gene expression analysis in C. elegans. BMC Molecular Biology 9: 1–8.
  42. 42. Tatara CP, Newman Mc, McCloskey JT, Williams PL (1998) Use of ion characteristics to predict relative toxicity of mono-, di- and trivalent metal ions: Caenorhabditis elegans LC50. Aquatic Toxicology 42: 255–269.
  43. 43. Li YJ, Yang SL, Hou LJ, Zhou JZ, Liu YW (2012) Spatial distribution and contamination evaluation of heavy metals in the intertidal surface sediments of Eastern Chongming. Huan Jing Ke Xue 33: 2368–2375.
  44. 44. Gems D, Doonan R (2009) Antioxidant defense and aging in C. elegans: Is the oxidative damage theory of aging wrong? Cell Cycle 8: 1681–1687.
  45. 45. Lushchak VI (2011) Environmentally induced oxidative stress in aquatic animals. Aquatic Toxicology 101: 13–30.
  46. 46. Doonan R, McElwee JJ, Matthijssens F, Walker GA, Houthoofd K, et al. (2008) Against the oxidative damage theory of aging: superoxide dismutases protect against oxidative stress but have little or no effect on life span in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes & Development 22: 3236–3241.
  47. 47. Mosleh YY, Paris-Palacios S, Biagianti-Risbourg S (2006) Metallothioneins induction and antioxidative response in aquatic worms Tubifex tubifex (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae) exposed to copper. Chemosphere 64: 121–128.
  48. 48. Petriv OI, Rachubinski RA (2004) Lack of Peroxisomal Catalase Causes a Progeric Phenotype in Caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279: 19996–20001.
  49. 49. Vigneshkumar B, Pandian SK, Balamurugan K (2013) Catalase activity and innate immune response of Caenorhabditis elegans against the heavy metal toxin lead. Environmental Toxicology 28: 313–321.
  50. 50. Trevisan R, Ferraz Mello D, Fisher AS, Schuwerack P-M, Dafre AL, et al. (2011) Selenium in water enhances antioxidant defenses and protects against copper-induced DNA damage in the blue mussel Mytilus edulis. Aquatic Toxicology 101: 64–71.
  51. 51. Maria VL, Gomes T, Barreira L, Bebianno MJ (2013) Impact of benzo(a)pyrene, Cu and their mixture on the proteomic response of Mytilus galloprovincialis. Aquatic Toxicology 144–145: 284–295.
  52. 52. Orr WC, Sohal RS (1992) The effects of catalase gene overexpression on life span and resistance to oxidative stress in transgenic Drosophila melanogaster. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 297: 35–41.
  53. 53. Benner J, Daniel H, Spanier B (2011) A Glutathione Peroxdase, Intracellular Peptidases and the TOR Complexes Regulate Peptide Transporter PEPT-1 in C.elegans. PLoS ONE 6: e25624.
  54. 54. Hertweck M, Göbel C, Baumeister R (2004) C. elegans SGK-1 Is the Critical Component in the Akt/PKB Kinase Complex to Control Stress Response and Life Span. Developmental Cell 6: 577–588.
  55. 55. Chu KW, Chan SKW, Chow KL (2005) Improvement of heavy metal stress and toxicity assays by coupling a transgenic reporter in a mutant nematode strain. Aquatic Toxicology 74: 320–332.
  56. 56. Heidler T, Hartwig K, Daniel H, Wenzel U (2010) Caenorhabditis elegans lifespan extension caused by treatment with an orally active ROS-generator is dependent on DAF-16 and SIR-2.1. Biogerontology 11: 183–195.
  57. 57. Finkel T, Holbrook NJ (2000) Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature 408: 239–247.
  58. 58. McElwee J, Bubb K, Thomas JH (2003) Transcriptional outputs of the Caenorhabditis elegans forkhead protein DAF-16. Aging Cell 2: 111–121.
  59. 59. McElwee MK, Song MO, Freedman JH (2009) Copper activation of NF-kappaB signaling in HepG2 cells. J Mol Biol 393: 1013–1021.