Figures
Abstract
Understanding how pathogenic fungi adapt to host plant cells is of major concern to securing global food production. The hemibiotrophic rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, cause of the most serious disease of cultivated rice, colonizes leaf cells asymptomatically as a biotroph for 4–5 days in susceptible rice cultivars before entering its destructive necrotrophic phase. During the biotrophic growth stage, M. oryzae remains undetected in the plant while acquiring nutrients and growing cell-to-cell. Which fungal processes facilitate in planta growth and development are still being elucidated. Here, we used gene functional analysis to show how components of the NADPH-requiring glutathione and thioredoxin antioxidation systems of M. oryzae contribute to disease. Loss of glutathione reductase, thioredoxin reductase and thioredoxin peroxidase-encoding genes resulted in strains severely attenuated in their ability to grow in rice cells and that failed to produce spreading necrotic lesions on the leaf surface. Glutathione reductase, but not thioredoxin reductase or thioredoxin peroxidase, was shown to be required for neutralizing plant generated reactive oxygen species (ROS). The thioredoxin proteins, but not glutathione reductase, were shown to contribute to cell-wall integrity. Furthermore, glutathione and thioredoxin gene expression, under axenic growth conditions, was dependent on both the presence of glucose and the M. oryzae sugar/ NADPH sensor Tps1, thereby suggesting how glucose availability, NADPH production and antioxidation might be connected. Taken together, this work identifies components of the fungal glutathione and thioredoxin antioxidation systems as determinants of rice blast disease that act to facilitate biotrophic colonization of host cells by M. oryzae.
Citation: Fernandez J, Wilson RA (2014) Characterizing Roles for the Glutathione Reductase, Thioredoxin Reductase and Thioredoxin Peroxidase-Encoding Genes of Magnaporthe oryzae during Rice Blast Disease. PLoS ONE 9(1): e87300. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087300
Editor: Jae-Hyuk Yu, University of Wisconsin – Madison, United States of America
Received: September 7, 2013; Accepted: December 26, 2013; Published: January 24, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Fernandez, Wilson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was funded by the National Science Foundation (IOS-1145347). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Fungal diseases of plants represent a categorical defeat of the host innate immune system by the pathogen. Plants rely on two lines of basal defenses [1]–[4] to contain microbial infections: pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)- triggered immunity (PTI) [1], [2] and a stronger version of PTI called effector-triggered immunity (ETI) [1], [2], [5]. However, pathogens such as the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae [6] can spend at least part of their lifecycle growing undetected in host cells [7], [8]. How M. oryzae interferes with plant defenses to initially achieve colonization is only just becoming apparent [9]–[13]. Less clear is how plant defense suppression is integrated with the metabolic demands of the fungus in order to sustain cell-to-cell biotrophic growth in rice cells [14]. Understanding how this might be achieved would enhance our fundamental knowledge of the processes governing rice blast disease.
Rice blast is the most serious disease of cultivated rice, a threat to global food security, and a problem compounded by climate change and modern agricultural practices [6], [14]–[18]. During infection, M. oryzae elaborates a specialized structure called an appressorium on the surface of the rice leaf [6], [19], [20]. Penetration of the rice cuticle occurs due to an accumulation of hydrostatic turgor pressure inside the appressorium that acts on a septin-dependent penetration peg emerging at the base of the cell [19]. From the penetration peg, the fungus produces a thin, filamentous primary hypha in the apoplastic space that, in compatible interactions, differentiates into bulbous invasive hyphae (IH) [21]. IH grows within the first infected plant cell surrounded by the plant-derived extra-invasive hyphal membrane (EIHM). At 32 – 36 hour post inoculation (hpi) the fungus develops thin, filamentous IH that move to neighboring cells via plasmodesmata [8], [21], where they differentiate into bulbous IH once more. Successive colonization of living rice cells by IH is accompanied by the secretion of apoplastic and cytoplasmic effector proteins [8], [22] until necrotrophy commences. A compatible interaction between M. oryzae and susceptible rice hosts therefore requires overcoming PTI and avoiding ETI to initiate colonization, followed by the prolonged suppression of plant defenses during biotrophic growth.
Plant reactive oxygen species (ROS) production is a feature of PTI and ETI [1], [2], [23] and some M. oryzae genes necessary for the neutralization of plant ROS have been characterized [24]. Huang and colleagues [10] identified a gene, HYR1, which encodes a glutathione peroxidase and is involved in ROS detoxification. Δhyr1 mutants were shown to be unable to tolerate high concentrations of H2O2 under axenic growth conditions, demonstrated a decreased ability to tolerate ROS generated by a susceptible plant, and were impaired in lesion formation. In another study, a serine-rich protein, known as Defense Suppressor 1 (Des1) was identified from a T-DNA insertional mutant library as having a role in pathogenicity. Des1 was shown to be important for neutralizing host-derived ROS during M. oryzae infection and preventing the strong induction of plant defense responses [11]. In contrast to Hyr1 and Des1, the secreted M. oryzae catalase CatB was not shown to be important for neutralizing plant-derived ROS at the site of penetration but rather for strengthening cell walls [25], while a secreted catalase-peroxidase, CpxB, is needed for neutralizing plant-derived ROS during early infection but not for pathogenicity [26]. M. oryzae also produces endogenous ROS bursts during appressorial formation [27], a process requiring NADPH oxidases and integral to appressorial function [20].
The outcome of plant defense suppression is biotrophic growth of M. oryzae in rice cells [14], [18], [21]. An important regulator of M. oryzae pathogenicity is the sugar sensor trehalose-6-phosphate synthase 1 (Tps1). In response to the sensing of its substrate glucose 6-phosphate (G6P), Tps1 controls NADPH levels to mediate genetic responses to changing nutrient and redox conditions [14], [28]–[31]. G6P sensing by Tps1 elevates glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) activity to stimulate NADPH production from G6P in the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). This results, via an NADPH-dependent signaling pathway, in the induced expression of a number of genes, including some encoding NADPH-requiring enzymes [29]. Elevated NADPH levels can displace G6P from the active site of Tps1, presumably preventing Tps1 induction of G6PDH activity and reducing NADPH production. Together, these observations describe a redox homeostatic mechanism whereby on the one hand, NADPH production is balanced with G6P availability by the interactions of these molecules at the Tps1 active site, and on the other hand, the expression of genes encoding NADPH-requiring enzymes is dependent on NADPH availability. Evidence that this NADPH-dependent genetic switch mechanism operates in planta comes from the observations that overexpressing G6PDH or disrupting the downstream transcription factor inhibitors Nmr1-3 in Δtps1 strains at least partially restores their infection capabilities [29]. However, which Tps1-controlled, NADPH-requiring enzymatic activities – if any - are necessary for rice infection is not known.
We wished to address this gap in our knowledge about Tps1 function and sought to determine NADPH-dependent outputs of the Tps1 signaling pathway that impact pathogenicity. Here, we identified the M. oryzae glutathione and thioredoxin antioxidation systems as important NADPH-requiring processes, essential for infection, whose gene expression is controlled by Tps1 in response to glucose. Glutathione is a tripeptide antioxidant formed from cysteine, glutamic acid and glycine by the action of glutamate-cysteine ligase and glutathione synthase [32]. In the reduced state, the thiol group of the glutathione cysteine can act as an electron donor to protect against oxidative stress when cells are exposed to ROS, in the process converting reduced glutathione (GSH) to its oxidized form glutathione disulfide (GSSG). GSSG is recycled to GSH by glutathione reductase (Gtr1), a flavoprotein that uses NADPH as an electron donor [32]. GSH is a co-factor for glutaredoxins (small proteins involved in maintaining the redox status of target proteins [32], [33]) and glutathione peroxidase, involved in reducing lipid hydroperoxides [34] and encoded by HYR1 in M. oryzae [10]. Thioredoxins play a similar role to glutaredoxins and are small, ubiquitous NADPH-requiring proteins involved in ROS scavenging [32], [35]. In yeast, electron flow from NADPH forms a redox-sensitive disulfide in thioredoxin, which can reduce the disulfide linkages within thioredoxin peroxidase (Tpx1) [36]. Reduced thioredoxin is regenerated by the action of thioredoxin reductase (Trr1). Using live-cell imaging of infected rice leaf sheaths, we determined that mutant M. oryzae strains resulting from the targeted deletion of genes encoding glutathione reductase (GTR1), thioredoxin reductase (TRR1) or thioredoxin peroxidase (TPX1) could penetrate rice cuticles but were impaired in cell-to-cell movement and symptom development. This indicates these NADPH-requiring antioxidation systems are essential for biotrophic growth and fungal virulence. Moreover, the glutathione system was shown to act entirely in the plant during infection – likely in order to neutralize host-derived ROS - because glutathione reductase was not required for appressorial formation or function. In contrast, both Δtrr1 and Δtpx1 mutant strains produced aberrant appressoria on leaf surfaces (but formed normal appressoria on artificial hydrophobic surfaces) and were impaired in plant penetration. This work thus gives new insights into the physiological processes underlying rice infection and illustrates how nutrient availability might be integrated with fungal metabolism, via Tps1, in order to facilitate rapid host cell colonization by the blast fungus.
Results
Δtps1 strains are sensitive to oxidative stress compared to WT
The reducing power in cells is determined by NADPH, which serves as an electron donor in reductive biosynthesis, provides the reducing equivalents for neutralizing ROS through the regeneration of cellular antioxidation systems, and is required in the generation of ROS itself [35], [37]. In M. oryzae, Tps1 couples NADPH production to the expression of genes encoding putative NADPH-dependent enzymes [29] such that Δtps1 strains are defective in both the production of NADPH [28] and the expression of genes encoding enzymes that require NADPH, such as nitrate reductase [29]. Genes residing in clusters that might be involved in the reductive biosynthesis of secondary metabolites also require Tps1 for expression [30]. In this study, we asked if NADPH depletion in Δtps1 strains impacts antioxidation and if so, are the NADPH-requiring systems involved relevant to the infection process? Following previously described protocols [10], [11], we grew the ▵tps1 mutant strain used in our previous studies [28], [29], [38] on solid complete media (CM) containing H2O2, the free radical generator menadione, or the glutathione-specific thiol oxidant diamide, and compared its growth to the wild type (WT) isolate Guy11. We found that the ▵tps1 mutant strain was sensitive to all three oxidants compared to WT (Figure 1A-C).
WT and Δtps1 strains were inoculated as 10 mm mycelial plugs onto 55 mm diameter plates of complete media (CM) containing H2O2 (A), menadione (B) or diamide (C) at the concentrations indicated. Growth of additional strains was also tested on diamide (D), including the new sulphonyl urea resistant Δtps1 strain generated in this study (Δtps1::ILV1), and Δtps1 strains expressing Tps1 proteins carrying the point-mutations R22G or Y99V in the G6P binding pocket of the active site (Δtps1::R22G and Δtps1::Y99V, respectively). Together, these results suggest G6P sensing, but not Tps1 catalytic activity, is sufficient to restore resistance to oxidative stresses in Δtps1 strains. Images were taken after 7 (A) and 5 (B-D) days growth. NT = no treatment. Compounds were added at the final concentrations indicated.
To confirm that sensitivity to diamide and other oxidative stresses was solely due to the loss of Tps1 function, we sought to determine if resistance to oxidative stress could be restored by complementing the Δtps1 mutant strain with functional copies of the TPS1 gene, and also if sensitivity to oxidative stresses could be recapitulated in independently generated Δtps1 strains. Previous studies [28], [31] have characterized Δtps1 strains carrying copies of the TPS1 gene encoding amino acid point mutations in the active site of the enzyme. Two changes, R22G and Y99V, generated proteins that allowed the G6P substrate into the active site but were catalytically inactive and unable to produce the trehalose intermediate trehalose-6-phosphate (T6P) [28]. When constructs encoding these Tps1 variants were introduced into Δtps1 strains, the resulting Δtps1::R22G and Δtps1::Y99V strains could not produce trehalose [28] but were restored for pathogenicity and carbon catabolite repression [28], [31]. These results indicated that the signaling function of Tps1 occurs in response to G6P sensing at the active site independently of Tps1 biosynthetic capabilities [28]. Figure 1D shows that the Δtps1::R22G and Δtps1::Y99V strains were restored for resistance to diamide, indicating G6P sensing by Tps1 is necessary and sufficient to restore oxidative stress responses in Δtps1 strains. In addition, the Δtps1 mutant strain used in Figure 1A-C was generated by homologous replacement of TPS1 by Hph conferring hygromycin resistance [39]. To confirm that increased sensitivity to oxidative stress was a general feature of impaired Tps1 function, we generated an independent Δtps1 strain using our split-marker, high throughput gene deletion strategy [29] by replacing the TPS1 coding region with ILV1 conferring resistance to sulphonyl urea. Figure S1A shows that the resulting sulphonyl urea resistant Δtps1 strain, hereby designated Δtps1::ILV1, was unable to utilize nitrate as a sole nitrogen source, a hallmark of the original hygromycin-resistant Δtps1 strain (hereby designated Δtps1) [28], [31]. The Δtps1::ILV1 strain was also, like Δtps1, sensitive to diamide (Figure 1D) and menadione (Figure S1B). Taken together, we conclude that M. oryzae antioxidation defense requires G6P sensing by Tps1.
The M. oryzae glutathione antioxidation system is required in planta
Diamide is a thiol-oxidizing agent that mediates the direct oxidation of reduced glutathione (GSH) to GSSG [40]. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mutants of the glutathione antioxidation system cannot recycle GSSG to GSH and are sensitive to diamide [41]. Sensitivity of M. oryzae Δtps1 strains to diamide might indicate the NADPH-requiring glutathione antioxidation system is under Tps1 control in response to G6P sensing. To determine if glutathione metabolism is an important output of the Tps1 signaling pathway, we next sought to describe the role of glutathione antioxidation in rice blast disease.
A putative glutathione reductase-encoding gene, locus number MGG_08895 (which we have called GTR1) was identified by sequence homology in the M. oryzae genome database [42]. Figure 2A shows, using quantitative real time PCR (qPCR), that GTR1 expression in WT was induced more than two-fold in the presence of H2O2. To investigate the function of GTR1, we used targeted gene replacement to generate ▵gtr1 deletion strains. Compared to WT, Δgtr1 strains were sensitive to H2O2 (Figure S2A), menadione (Figure S2B) and the thiol oxidizing agent diamide (Figure 2B), confirming a role for Gtr1 in antioxidation and survival under oxidative stress conditions. Sensitivity was reversed in Δgtr1 strains by re-introducing a functioning copy of the GTR1 gene (Figure 2B).
(A) Expression of the glutathione reductase-encoding gene GTR1 in WT strains was induced more than two-fold in the presence of 5 mM H2O2 compared to CM alone. NT = no treatment. Results were normalized against the expression of the β-tubulin gene TUB2. (B) Disruption of the GTR1 coding region resulted in sensitivity of Δgtr1 strains to diamide compared to WT strains. Images were taken after 5 days growth. NT = no treatment. (C) ▵gtr1 strains were not affected in conidiation on CM media compared to parental WT strains. (D) Δgtr1 strains were reduced in virulence compared to WT parental strains when applied to leaves of the susceptible rice cultivar CO-39. (E) The rates of appressorium formation by Δgtr1 strains on rice leaf surfaces were not significantly different (Student’s t-test p≤0.05) to those observed for WT. (F) Appressoria of WT and Δgtr1 strains had the same rates of leaf cuticle penetration at 36 hpi. (C, E, F) Values are the mean of at least three independent replicates. Error bars denote SD. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different (Student’s t-test p≤0.05).
Under normal plate growth conditions, Δgtr1 strains could sporulate at wild type rates (Figure 2C; Student’s t-test p = 0.37). However, unlike WT or Δgtr1 GTR1 complementation strains, Δgtr1 strains were greatly reduced for pathogenicity when spores were applied to whole rice leaves (Figure 2D). Reduced virulence was not due to perturbed appressorial function because Δgtr1 strains could form appressoria on rice leaf surfaces at the same rate as WT (Figure 2E; Student’s t-test p = 0.76) and with the same rates of cuticle penetration (Figure 2F; Student’s t-test p = 0.37).
We undertook live-cell imaging using detached rice leaf sheaths to observe how Δgtr1 IH developed within host cells. We found that Δgtr1 strains could elaborate IH from primary hyphae, but the growth of ▵gtr1 strains was delayed in planta compared to WT (Figure 3A). Three time points are shown to illustrate how Δgtr1 strains grew less extensively than WT in host cells. This delay in growth was quantified to show that at 72 hpi, leaves infected with Δgtr1 strains contained 37 ± 5 - fold (n = 3) less fungal DNA than those infected with WT (Figure 3B). Moreover, a significant reduction was observed in the mean movement of Δgtr1 IH into adjacent cells at 48 hpi compared to WT (Student’s t-test p = 0.0014; Figure 3C).
(A) Live-cell imaging demonstrated Δgtr1 strains were reduced for in planta growth on detached rice leaf sheaths compared to WT strains. Arrows indicate appressoria on the surface of the leaf corresponding to the point of penetration. Asterisks indicate spread of hyphae to adjacent cells. Scale bar is 5 µm. (B) At 72 hpi, leaves infected with WT were found to contain 37-fold more fungal DNA than leaves infected with Δgtr1 strains. DNA was isolated from infected rice leaves and fungal DNA abundance was determined using primers specific for MoACT1 and normalized against the rice actin gene. (C) IH growth to adjacent cells was significantly reduced (Student’s t-test p≤0.05) in ▵gtr1 strains compared to WT at 48 hpi. (B and C) Values are the mean of at least three independent replicates. Error bars denote SD. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different (Student’s t-test p≤0.05).
Overall, our data suggests GTR1 contributes significantly to IH growth in rice cells and full symptom development but is not required for appressorial formation or function. Therefore, the role of GTR1 in fungal virulence appears to lie solely in the plant.
The thioredoxin system is required for infection-related development and host colonization
Exploring the Δtps1 phenotype had revealed glutathione antioxidation as a potentially important NADPH-dependent infection process, and subsequent characterization of Δgtr1 strains confirmed this system is required for the in planta colonization of rice. Glutathione acts to reduce glutaredoxins, small redox enzymes that share many of the cellular functions of thioredoxin [43], [44]. We next asked if - and how - the thioredoxin antioxidation system might also contribute to rice infection by M. oryzae. We identified putative thioredoxin reductase (TRR1; MGG_ 01284) and thioredoxin peroxidase (TPX1; MGG_07503) orthologues in the M. oryzae genome database [42] and generated ▵trr1 and ▵tpx1 deletion strains that were significantly (Student’s t-test p≤0.05) more sensitive to 10 mM H2O2 (Figure 4A and Figure S3), but not diamide or menadione (data not shown), than WT. Figure 4B shows that ▵trr1 and ▵tpx1 strains were significantly reduced in conidiation compared to WT strains on CM (Student’s t-test p = 0.0001). When inoculated onto susceptible rice plants, ▵trr1 and ▵tpx1 strains were unable to produce expanded necrotic lesions compared to WT (Figure 4C). ▵trr1 and ▵tpx1 strains were not defective in their rates of appressorium formation on rice leaf surfaces compared to WT (Figure 4D) or on artificial hydrophobic surfaces (not shown). However, although ▵trr1 and ▵tpx1 strains exhibited normal radial growth on CM (Figure S4) and produced normal-looking appressoria on artificial hydrophobic surfaces (Figure S4), both ▵trr1 and ▵txp1 strains produced odd-shaped appressoria on rice leaf surfaces (Figure S4). Moreover, ▵tpx1 strains, but not Δtrr1, produced a distinctive pigment when forming appressoria on rice leaf surfaces but not hydrophobic surfaces (Figure 4E and Figure S4). Both ▵trr1 and ▵tpx1 strains formed appressoria that were significantly defective (Student’s t-test p = 0.0005 and 0.0018, respectively) in penetrating rice cuticles compared to WT (Figure 4F). Following penetration, we also observed severe delays in the rate of rice cell colonization by ▵trr1 and ▵tpx1 strains (Figure 5A). In both cases, IH movement to cells adjacent to the point of infection was significantly attenuated compared to WT (Figure 5B). To quantify the observed reduction in virulence, the relative amount of fungal DNA in rice cells infected with ▵trr1 (Figure 5C) and ▵tpx1 (Figure 5D) strains was determined at 72 hpi and compared to WT. Both Δtrr1 and Δtpx1 strains were significantly reduced for fungal DNA content in host tissues compared to WT at this timepoint.
(A) Δtrr1 and Δtpx1 thioredoxin mutant strains were sensitive to H2O2 compared to WT on CM at the concentrations shown. NT = no treatment. (B) ▵trr1 and Δtpx1 mutant strains were significantly reduced (Student’s t-test p≤0.05) in conidiation on CM media compared to parental WT strains. (C) Δtrr1 and Δtpx1 mutant strains were reduced in virulence compared to WT parental strains when applied to leaves of the susceptible rice cultivar CO-39. (D) Rates of appressorial formation on rice leaf surfaces were not significantly different (Student’s t-test p≤0.05) for Δtrr1 strains or Δtpx1 strains compared to WT. (E) Δtpx1 strains produced a distinctive pigment in the conidium and/ or germ tube when in contact with the leaf surface that was not seen for WT strains. Scale bars: 10 µm. (F) Appressorial penetration rates of leaf cuticles were significantly reduced (Student’s t-test p≤0.05) in ▵trr1 and ▵tpx1 strains compared to WT. (B, D, F) Values are the mean of three independent replicates. Error bars are SD. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different (Student’s t-test p≤0.05).
(A) Live-cell imaging at 30 hpi and 48 hpi shows ▵trr1 and ▵tpx1 strains were considerably impaired in IH growth in susceptible CO-39 rice leaf sheaths compared to WT. Arrows indicate appressoria on the surface of the leaf corresponding to the point of penetration. Asterisks indicate hyphal movement to adjacent rice cells. Scale bar is 5 µm. (B) IH growth to adjacent cells of ▵trr1 and ▵tpx1 strains was significantly (Student’s t-test p≤0.05) impaired compared to WT strains at 48 hpi. Values are the mean of three independent replicates. Error bars denote SD. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different (Student’s t-test p≤0.05). The relative amount of fungal DNA (a proxy for relative fungal mass) from leaves infected with strains of Δtrr1 (C) and Δtpx1 (D) was 45- and 47-fold less, respectively, compared to WT. Values are the mean of three independent replicates. Error bars denote SD. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different (Student’s t-test p≤0.05).
Taken together, genes of the M. oryzae thioredoxin antioxidation system are required for sporulation and appressorial development, penetration, cell-to-cell movement and full symptom development on rice leaves.
The glutathione, but not thioredoxin, antioxidation system suppresses host ROS accumulation
The above results suggest that although genes of both the glutathione and thioredoxin antioxidation systems are required for full growth in planta, they are not equivalent in their roles regarding sporulation or appressorial development and function. Moreover, ▵trr1 and ▵tpx1 deletion strains were more sensitive to the cell-wall assembly inhibitor Congo Red, and osmotic stresses, than WT or Δgtr1 strains (Figure 6). Non-equivalency of function extends to the host interior, where Figure 7 shows that rice cells infected with Δgtr1 strains stained strongly when incubated with 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB) - indicating the accumulation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at infection sites [10], [11] - compared to WT, which was not stained. In contrast to Δgtr1, rice cells infected with Δtrr1 and Δtpx1 strains stained much less strongly with DAB even though IH growth was more severely attenuated in these strains. This suggests GTR1 is involved in ameliorating extracellular plant host oxidative defenses, but the thioredoxin antioxidation system plays less of a role in neutralizing plant ROS during early infection.
Stressors were added to CM at the concentrations shown. Images were taken after 5 days growth.
Detached rice leaf sheaths were inoculated with the indicated strains, stained with DAB at 48 hpi, and observed under the light microscope. Only cells infected with Δgtr1 strains showed significant DAB staining, resulting in orange pigment formation and indicative of H2O2 accumulation at the penetration site. Bar is 5 µm. Arrow indicates the appressorial point of penetration.
Tps1 and glucose availability control glutathione and thioredoxin gene expression in axenic shake cultures
Sensitivity of Δtps1 strains to diamide and other oxidative stresses indicated G6P sensing by Tps1 was required for antioxidation defenses. Subsequent functional characterizations confirmed the importance of the NADPH-dependent glutathione and thioredoxin antioxidation systems to rice infection. We next sought to connect these observations by confirming the NADPH-dependent regulation of glutathione and thioredoxin antioxidation gene expression by Tps1 in response to G6P sensing. In previous reports, we had shown how NADPH-requiring genes were induced under Tps1-dependent, NADPH-replete conditions [29], [31]. In WT, growth on nitrate as a sole nitrogen source induces NADPH production via Tps1 control of G6PDH in response to G6P sensing. NADPH provides the reducing power for nitrate reductase to metabolize nitrate to nitrite, which is further reduced to ammonium by nitrite reductase [28]. Consequently, increased NADPH production is not observed during the growth of WT on ammonium media, nor by Δtps1 strains on nitrate media [28]. Moreover, WT growth on nitrate media induces the expression of other genes encoding NADPH-requiring enzymes in addition to nitrate reductase via the NADPH-dependent genetic switch described in [29]. This induction is abolished in Δtps1 strains. Consistent with the NADPH-dependent switch model [29], qPCR analysis showed GTR1, TRR1 and TPX1 gene expression was induced in WT following growth in nitrate media (ie. NADPH-replete conditions) compared to ammonium media (Figure 8A). In addition, the induction of GTR1, TRR1 and TPX1 gene expression – in addition to the expression of genes encoding glutamate-cysteine ligase, glutathione synthase and thioredoxin itself - was found to be Tps1-dependent on nitrate media (Figure 8B and 8C). Furthermore, GTR1, TRR1 and TPX1 gene expression in WT was abolished in the absence of glucose on nitrate media (Figure 8D). Taken together, Figure 8A-D shows how genes of the glutathione and thioredoxin antioxidation systems are expressed in a glucose- and Tps1-dependent manner under NADPH-replete conditions. Combined with the growth data in Figure 1D, this suggests Tps1 - via G6P sensing and gene regulation - might coordinate glucose availability in the fungal cell with the production of NADPH in order to fuel at least some antioxidation systems during rice infection (Figure 8E).
(A) In WT, GTR1, TRR1 and TPX1 expression was induced on 1% (w/v) glucose minimal media (GMM) with nitrate as a sole nitrogen source (ie. NADPH-replete conditions, closed bars) compared to GMM with ammonium as a sole nitrogen source (open bars). (B) Tps1 controls the expression of glutathione and (C) thioredoxin antioxidation genes during growth on GMM with nitrate. The expression of genes involved in glutathione recycling (GTR1) and glutathione biosynthesis (MGG_07317 and MGG_06454) was downregulated in Δtps1 compared to WT strains following growth on GMM with nitrate. Genes involved in thioredoxin biosynthesis (MGG_04236), recycling (TRR1) and use (TPX1) were also downregulated in Δtps1 compared to WT strains on GMM with nitrate. (D) The antioxidation genes characterized in this report are glucose-responsive. Expression levels for GTR1, TRR1 and TPX1 were determined following the growth of WT on nitrate-containing minimal media with (+G) or without (-G) 1% (w/v) glucose. (A-D) Values are the mean of three independent technical replicates and at least two biological replicates. Error bars are SD. Gene expression results were normalized against the expression of the ß-tubulin gene (TUB2). Results represent fold changes in gene expression when comparing two strains (B, C) or two growth conditions (A, D). (E) Model summarizing the role of Tps1 in antioxidation in response to G6P sensing.
Discussion
The biotrophic stage of M. oryzae rice infection involves a complex molecular interplay between host cell and pathogen [8], [22], but many of the processes involved and, in particular, their regulation, remain to be elucidated. Here, we have revealed how components of the glutathione and thioredoxin antioxidation systems are essential for in planta colonization and symptom development. Moreover, we have shown that glutathione and thioredoxin genes are expressed in a glucose- and Tps1-dependent manner, thus suggesting how NADPH-requiring antioxidation might be regulated and fuelled as the fungus exploits available sources of glucose during infection (Figure 8E).
This study used plate testing as a tool to identify glutathione reductase as a Tps1-dependent, NADPH-requiring antioxidation process important for rice infection. Sensitivity of Δtps1 strains to diamide indicated Tps1 might control the glutathione antioxidation system (Figure 1). To determine the role of glutathione in host infection, Δgtr1 strains were generated using targeted gene deletion of the M. oryzae GTR1 orthologue. Δgtr1 strains demonstrated increased sensitivity to oxidative stresses during axenic growth compared to WT (Figure 2B) and were restricted in their ability to colonize host tissue relative to WT (Figure 3) despite producing functional appressoria on leaf surfaces (Figure 2E). DAB staining of infected leaf sheaths demonstrated a reduced capacity of Δgtr1 strains to suppress plant ROS compared to WT (Figure 7). Because spore production, appressorium formation and appressorium function was not affected in Δgtr1 strains (Figure 2), the significance of these findings lie in suggesting that the NADPH-dependent regeneration of the glutathione antioxidation system is an in planta-specific process essential for host tissue colonization. Such a stage-specific role for glutathione reductase has, to our knowledge, not been described before in pathogenic fungi and extends our knowledge of this important enzyme.
In contrast to the apparent in planta-specific role of glutathione reductase, loss of components of the thioredoxin antioxidation system affected many aspects of the fungal life cycle. Δtrr1 and Δtpx1 thioredoxin mutants were more sensitive to 10 mM H2O2 than WT (Figure 4A and Figure S3). Δtrr1 and Δtpx1 strains produced appressoria with the same frequency as WT on rice leaves (Figure 4D), but they were aberrant in shape (Figure S4) and deficient in function (Figure 4F). Moreover, Δtpx1 strains produced a striking pigment in germ-tubes and appressoria (Figure 4E), but only in the presence of the host leaf. On artificial hydrophobic surfaces, both Δtrr1 and Δtpx1 strains produced appressoria indistinguishable from wild type (Figure S2), suggesting a role for thioredoxin antioxidation (but not glutathione) in mediating the M. oryzae- rice interaction prior to host invasion. Once inside rice cells, the thioredoxin mutants, like Δgtr1 strains, were reduced in cell-to-cell movement (Figure 5). However, unlike Δgtr1 strains, rice cells infected with the thioredoxin mutants did not stain with DAB (Figure 7), suggesting this system does not significantly participate in neutralizing host ROS defenses during the early infection of rice epidermal cells. Rather, the importance of TRR1 and TPX1 might instead lie in maintaining internal redox balance and/ or functioning in other physiological processes such as cell-wall integrity (as suggested by the sensitivity of Δtrr1 and Δtpx1 strains to Congo Red (Figure 6)). In support of this endogenous metabolic role, we note that Δtrr1 and Δtpx1 deletion strains, but not Δgtr1, demonstrated physiological defects, such as reduced sporulation, in the absence of the host plant, suggesting they are required for normal ex planta growth and developmental processes in M. oryzae.
Thioredoxin, thioredoxin reductase and thioredoxin peroxidase work together to mitigate oxidative stress [36]. In addition, thioredoxins can contribute to a number of cellular processes such as ribonucleotide reduction and the Calvin cycle by targeting proteins other than thioredoxin peroxidases [43], [45]. It is interesting, therefore, to note that while Δtrr1 and Δtpx1 strains are both reduced for leaf sheath penetration rates compared to WT (Figure 4F), Δtrr1 strains penetrate rice leaf surfaces with significantly less frequency than Δtpx1 strains (Figure 4F). This could indicate that thioredoxin targets proteins in addition to Tpx1 in order to facilitate appressorial penetration. Determining the identity of those additional targets would likely contribute to our understanding of appressorial function.
The wide range of physiological processes affected in the thioredoxin mutants described here are consistent with findings in plants, where plant thioredoxins are shown to have extensive roles in development, growth and cell-to-cell communication [46]. In contrast, the phenotypes of the M. oryzae glutathione and thioredoxin mutants are distinct from those of the catalase-defective ΔcatB strain [25], which - unlike Δgtr1 Δtrr1 and Δtpx1 strains - was more resistant to oxidative stress.
Taken together, our work indicates that the glutathione and thioredoxin antioxidation systems have mostly non-equivalent roles in fungal physiology but both are pathogenicity determinants necessary for promoting the biotrophic growth of M. oryzae in rice cells, thus making them attractive targets for inhibiting rice blast disease.
The M. oryzae glutathione and thioredoxin antioxidation genes were expressed in a glucose-dependent manner (Figure 8D). This is important because both antioxidation processes are fuelled by the reducing power of NADPH. Although NADPH can be produced at different locations in the cell by several enzymes that do not require glucose as a substrate (such as the NAD kinases [35], [37]), our previous work has suggested that G6P flux through the PPP is the major source of NADPH with relevance to blast disease [28], [29]. Indeed, inducing PPP activity in NADPH-defective Δtps1 strains by overexpressing G6PDH partially restores virulence to this non-pathogenic mutant strain [29]. Furthermore, glucose is shown here to induce antioxidation gene expression through Tps1 (Figure 8B and 8C). Tps1 is required, in response to G6P sensing, for expressing genes encoding NADPH-dependent enzymes and repressing genes required for alternative carbon source utilization [29], [31]. Our results therefore suggest - to our knowledge, for the first time - a genetic connection between G6P and antioxidation that is mediated by Tps1-dependent NADPH production in the PPP (Figure 8E). Moreover, Tps1 control of NADPH-dependent glutathione and thioredoxin antioxidation gene expression in response to G6P provides additional support for the postulated role of Tps1 in maintaining redox homeostasis during pathogenesis [29].
How does the work describe here contribute to a mechanistic understanding of rice blast disease? Recently, we have shown how biotrophic growth is dependent on endogenous sources of purines [47] and methionine [38] despite their abundance in host cells [47], thus experimentally confirming the host environment to be nitrogen-poor during early infection, at least from the perspective of the fungus [18], [47]. We have suggested that this demand for endogenously produced nitrogenous compounds could be a trade-off between the nitrogen requirements of the fungus on the one hand, and the need to maintain the EIHM - a likely barrier to amino acid and purine uptake - on the other [14], [47]. Such a trade-off might persist if M. oryzae biotrophic hyphae, similar to those of Colletotrichum species [48], function primarily as platforms for effector accumulation and delivery [47]. Indeed, the accumulation of secreted apoplastic effectors between the fungal cell wall and the EIHM supports the use of this strategy - and the need for the EIHM - during rice blast disease [12], [22]. In contrast to nitrogen, sources of glucose might readily cross the EIHM for uptake by IH [47] due to the role of G6P sensing by Tps1 - and NADPH production - in driving infection [29]. The work presented here supports and extends this model of M. oryzae biotrophic growth by firstly indicating how Tps1-dependent NADPH production, in response to G6P, might both control and fuel antioxidation in order to permit rapid growth in rice cells (Figure 8E). Secondly, our work, when taken together, suggests M. oryzae biotrophic hyphae might function in both effector delivery and glucose-dependent antioxidation, but not nutrient acquisition per se, during early infection. Finally, our results fit the testable hypothesis that M. oryzae is adapted to thrive in a carbon-rich, nitrogen-poor environment and thus provides a theoretical framework for conceptualizing future discoveries about the response of M. oryzae to the host cell milieu.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the work presented here suggests M. oryzae NADPH-dependent antioxidation is important for neutralizing plant-derived ROS and maintaining redox homeostasis and thus gives fresh insights into the metabolic demands of biotrophy. Committing glucose metabolism to the production of NADPH for antioxidation has been observed in other rapidly proliferating entities such as cancer cells [49] and activated macrophages [50] in order to maintain internal redox balance. Such shared metabolic strategies between cell types and across taxa indicate a fundamental requirement for NADPH-dependent antioxidation during rapid growth and/ or host colonization. Understanding how we can perturb M. oryzae redox balance during rice infection could thus lead to novel plant protection strategies and impact our understanding of those areas of biology where redox balance and antioxidation are critical. Moreover, determining to what extent glucose metabolism and redox balancing is important for other plant pathogen-host interactions, or for interactions between plants and beneficial mycorrhizal fungi, would be a fascinating future endeavor.
Materials and Methods
Fungal isolates, culture conditions and physiological analyses
Guy11 was used as the wild type (WT) isolate for these studies [31] and all mutant strains mentioned in this study were generated from the WT parental strain (Table S1). Standard procedures for the culture and storage of M. oryzae were used, as described in [47]. Strains were maintained on complete medium (CM), as described previously [38]. 85 mm diameter plates (unless otherwise stated) were incubated at 24°C under 12 hrs light/dark cycles. Plate images were taken with a Sony Cyber-shot digital camera, 14.1 mega pixels, after 10 days of growth (unless otherwise stated). For sporulation rates, strains were grown on at least three independent CM plates. After 12 days of growth, the spores were harvested and counted using a hemocytometer (Corning). Appressorial development assays were performed, as described previously [38], on hydrophobic microscope coverslips (Fisherbrand). Average values were determined from 50 spores, performed in triplicate [38].
Fungal transformations and targeted gene deletions
Transformations were performed as described previously [29]. All gene deletion strains were generated using the PCR-based split marker approach (described in [29]) in which the ILV1 gene, conferring resistance to sulphonyl urea, replaced the native TPS1, GTR1, TRR1 or TXP1 gene in the WT genome. The PCR primers used are shown in Table S2, and the thermocycler conditions for the first round were 1 min at 95°C initial denaturation, followed by 34 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec denaturation, 63°C for 30 sec annealing and 68°C for 1 min extension. Thermocycler conditions for the second round were the same except for a 3 min extension time. Strains carrying homologous gene replacement of the gene of interest were identified by PCR as described by Wilson et al. [29] using the F1 and R1 oligonucleotide primers shown in Table S2.
Complementation studies
Full-length copies of each gene were re-introduced into gene deletion strains using the yeast GAP-repair approach described by Zhou et al. [51]. A full-length copy of the each gene, including its native promoter, was amplified using the primers shown in Table S2. Competent cell production and transformation of the XK1-25 strain was performed using the Alkali-cation yeast transformation kit (MP Biomedicals).
Rice blast pathogenicity assays
Rice blast pathogenicity assays were performed as described previously [29], [31] using three to four week old rice seedlings from the susceptible cultivar, CO-39. Spores were applied as suspensions in a 0.2% gelatin (Difco) solution at a rate of 1×105 spores ml−1. Plants were placed in a growth chamber with 12hr light/dark periods. The infected leaves were collected at 5 days and images were taken using an Epson Workforce scanner at a resolution of 300 dpi.
Rice Leaf Sheath Assay
To visualize fungal colonization of rice epidermal cells, rice leaf sheaths from the susceptible cultivar CO-39 were inoculated with fungal spores (1×105 spores ml−1 in 0.20% gelatin) in the hollow interior of the sheaths as described previously [38], [47]. Infected sheaths were observed under a light microscope (Zeiss AxioSkop). Appressorium formation and penetration rates were determined in triplicate as previously described [38], [47]. Mean IH growth rates and movement to adjacent cells, at 48 hpi, was determined from fifty appressoria per treatment, repeated in triplicate, as previously described [38], [47]. Images were taken using a Nikon A1 laser scanning confocal mounted on a Nikon 90i compound microscope at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Microscopy Center.
Oxidative, osmotic and cell wall stress conditions
To examine the effect of growth under oxidative stress conditions, WT and mutant strains were grown on CM plates containing the oxidants hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 30% in water; Fisher), 2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone (menadione; Acros Organics) or diamide [azodicarboxylic acid bis (N,N-dimethylamide) (Sigma)] solutions, at the concentrations shown, following Huang and colleagues [10]. Pictures were taken at 5 days post treatment.
To observe the accumulation of H2O2 at infection sites, infected rice leaf sheaths (48 hpi) were stained with 3, 3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB, Sigma) as described previously by Chi et al. [11]. Rice sheaths were incubated in 1 mg/ml DAB solution in the dark at room temperature for 8 hours and destained with ethanol: acetic acid solution (94:4 v/v) for 1 hr. Samples were excised and observed under a light microscope.
Mutant strains were tested for cell wall and osmotic stress conditions. Cell wall stress condition was performed by adding 100 ug/ml of Congo Red (Sigma) to solid complete media (CM). Osmotic stress conditions were applied using 0.5 M NaCl (Sigma) and 1 M Sorbitol (Sigma) in CM. Pictures were taken at 5 days post inoculation.
Gene transcript analysis and fungal biomass quantification
For gene expression studies, fungal mycelia was grown in liquid CM for 48 hrs at 25 °C with agitation (150 rpm) before treatment with or without 5 mM H2O2 for 1hr (Figure 2A). Strains were also grown in CM for 48 hrs before switching to 1% (w/v) glucose minimal media (GMM) with either 10 mM sodium nitrate (ie. NADPH-replete media) or 10 mM ammonium tartrate as sole nitrogen sources for 16 hrs, following [31] (Figure 8A-C); or the mycelia was switched to nitrate minimal media with or without 1% (w/v) glucose for 16 hrs (Figure 8D). Mycelia was harvested, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and lyophilized for 24 hrs. A total of 100 mg of each mycelial sample was used to perform RNA extractions. RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit from Qiagen and treated with DNase I (Invitrogen) before conversion to cDNA using the qScript reagents from Quantas. The resulting cDNA was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) in an Eppendorf Mastercycler® ep Realplex real-time PCR system. Reactions were performed using the 2X Quantifast® SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (Qiagen) and the oligonucleotide primers listed in Table S2. Thermocycler conditions were: 5 min at 95°C initial denaturation, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec denaturation, 63°C for 30 sec annealing and 72°C for 1min extension.
The expression of each gene was normalized against the M. oryzae β-tubulin gene (TUB2). Results are given as the average of three technical replications and at least two biological replications. Results represent fold changes in gene expression, following normalization, between two strains (WT vs Δtps1) or two growth conditions (CM vs CM + 10 mM H2O2; GMM + nitrate vs GMM + ammonium; or MM + glucose vs MM –glucose) obtained by the 2−ΔΔCT method, as used previously [29], [31], [47]. Reciprocal values (ie Δtps1 vs WT) are also given to emphasize downregulated gene expression changes.
To determine the relative amount of fungal growth in infected leaves, DNA was extracted, in triplicate, from whole infected leaf tissues at 72 hpi using a HP fungal DNA mini Kit (Omega, BioTek). The relative amount of M. oryzae DNA was determined for each strain by qPCR using primers specific for the M. oryzae actin gene and normalized against the relative quantity of the rice actin gene.
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
G6P sensing by Tps1 is required for antioxidation. (A) We used our high-throughput gene disruption strategy [29] to generate an independent Δtps1 strain by replacing the TPS1 coding region with ILV1 conferring sulphonyl urea resistance. The resulting Δtps1::ILV1 strain was able to grow on 1% (w/v) glucose minimal media (GMM) containing ammonium as a sole nitrogen source. However, like the original hygromycin resistant Δtps1 strain [28], [31], the Δtps1::ILV1 strain was not able to utilize nitrate as a sole nitrogen source. The recapitulation of a nitrate non-utilizing phenotype confirms the loss of Tps1 function in the new Δtps1::ILV1 strain. Strains were grown on GMM [28], [31], [38] with the indicated sole nitrogen sources added at 10 mM final concentration. (B) Loss of Tps1 function in Δtps1 or Δtps1::ILV1 strains increases sensitivity to the oxidant menadione compared to WT. WT levels of resistance are restored in two Δtps1 strains expressing Tps1 proteins carrying the point-mutations R22G or Y99V in the G6P binding pocket of the active site. This suggests G6P sensing, but not Tps1 catalytic activity, is sufficient to restore resistance to oxidative stresses in Δtps1 strains. Strains were inoculated as 10 mm mycelial plugs onto 55 mm diameter plates of complete media (CM) containing menadione at the concentrations indicated. Images were taken after 5 days. NT = no treatment.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087300.s001
(TIF)
Figure S2.
Δgtr1 strains are more sensitive to H2O2 and menadione than WT. Disruption of the GTR1 coding region resulted in increased sensitivity of Δgtr1 strains to H2O2 (A) and menadione (B) compared to WT strains on CM media. Compounds were added at the concentrations indicated. NT = no treatment.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087300.s002
(TIF)
Figure S3.
Impaired radial growth of thioredoxin mutant strains on H2O2 compared to WT. WT, Δtrr1 and Δtpx1 strains were grown on CM (left panel) and CM supplemented with 10 mM H2O2 (right panel). Strains were grown for 5 days, and radial diameters were measured. Δtrr1 and Δtpx1 strains were significantly impaired (Student’s t-test p≤0.05) in radial growth compared to WT in the presence, but not absence, of 10 mM H2O2. Results are the average of three independent replicates. Error bars are standard deviation. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different (Student’s t-test p≤0.05). Measurements were taken after 5 days growth.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087300.s003
(TIF)
Figure S4.
Thioredoxin mutant strains Δtrr1 and Δtpx1 form aberrant appressoria on rice cuticles but not artificial hydrophobic surfaces. Axenic growth on CM was not impaired in ▵trr1 and ▵tpx1 strains compared to WT after 10 days (left panel). Spores of both ▵trr1 and ▵tpx1 strains, like those of WT, produced normal appressoria on artificial hydrophobic surface (plastic coverslips; middle panel). In contrast, on the leaf surface (right panel), ▵trr1 and ▵tpx1 strains developed aberrant appressoria (indicated by black arrows) and ▵tpx1 additionally produced unusual pigments in the conidia (indicated by white arrow). Scale bars: 10 µm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087300.s004
(TIF)
Table S1.
Magnaporthe oryzae strains used in this study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087300.s005
(DOCX)
Table S2.
Oligonucleotide primers used in this study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087300.s006
(DOC)
Acknowledgments
We thank Christian Elowsky from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Microscopy Center for technical support. We thank the Wilson lab members Janet D. Wright, Jonathan Hinz, Cheyney E. Greer, Kathryn Cornwell, Brianna Rooney and Nahir S. Negron-Fernandez for technical assistance.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: JF RAW. Performed the experiments: JF. Analyzed the data: JF RAW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JF RAW. Wrote the paper: JF RAW.
References
- 1. Chisholm ST, Coaker G, Day B, Staskawicz BJ (2006) Host-microbe interactions: shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell 124: 803–814.
- 2. Jones JDG, Dangl JL (2006) The plant immune system. Nature 444: 323–329.
- 3. Dodds PN, Rathjen JP (2010) Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant-pathogen interactions. Nat Rev Genet 11: 539–548.
- 4. Gassmann W, Bhattacharjee S (2012) Effector-Triggered Immunity signaling: from gene-for-gene pathways to protein-protein interaction networks. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 25: 862–868.
- 5.
van der Hoorn RA, Kamoun S (2008) From Guard to Decoy: a new model for perception of plant pathogen effectors. Plant Cell 20: : 2009 – 2017.
- 6.
Wilson RA, Talbot NJ (2009) Under pressure: investigating the biology of plant infection by Magnaporthe oryzae. Nat Rev Microbiol 7: : 185 – 195.
- 7.
Koeck M, Hardham AR, Dodds PN (2011) The role of effectors of biotrophic and hemibiotrophic fungi in infection. Cell Microbiol 13: : 1849 – 1857.
- 8. Yi M, Valent B (2013) Communication between filamentous pathogens and plants at the biotrophic Interface. Annu Rev Phytopathol 51: 27.1–27.25.
- 9.
Valent B, Khang CH (2010) Recent advances in rice blast effector research. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13: : 434 – 441.
- 10. Huang K, Czymmek KJ, Caplan JL, Sweigard JA, Donofrio NM (2011) HYR1-mediated detoxification of reactive oxygen species is required for full virulence in the rice blast fungus. PLoS Pathogen 7: e1001335.
- 11. Chi MH, Park SY, Kim S, Lee YH (2009) A novel pathogenicity gene is required in the rice blast fungus to suppress the basal defenses of the host. PLoS Pathogen 5: e1000401.
- 12.
Mentlak TA, Kombrink A, Shinya T, Ryder LS, Otomo I, et al.. (2012) Effector-mediated suppression of chitin-triggered immunity by Magnaporthe oryzae is necessary for rice blast disease. Plant Cell 24: : 322 – 335.
- 13.
Park C-H, Chen S, Shirsekar G, Zhou B, Khang CH, et al.. (2012) The Magnaporthe oryzae effector AvrPiz-t targets the RING E3 Ubiquitin Ligase APIP6 to suppress pathogen-associated molecular pattern–triggered immunity in rice. Plant Cell 24: : 4748 – 4762.
- 14. Fernandez J, Wilson RA (2012) Why no feeding frenzy? Mechanisms of nutrient acquisition and utilization during infection by the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 25: 1286–1293.
- 15. Pennisi E (2010) Armed and dangerous. Science 327: 804–805.
- 16. Fisher MC, Henk DA, Briggs CJ, Brownstein JS, Madoff LC, et al. (2012) Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health. Nature 484: 186–194.
- 17. Kupferschmidt K (2012) Attack of the clones. Science 337: 636–638.
- 18.
Fernandez J, Wilson RA (2013) Cells in cells: morphogenetic and metabolic strategies conditioning rice infection by the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Protoplasma DOI: 10.1007/s00709-013-0541-8
- 19. Dagdas YF, Yoshino K, Dagdas G, Ryder LS, Bielska E, et al. (2012) Septin-mediated plant cell invasion by the rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae. Science 336: 1590–1595.
- 20. Ryder LS, Dagdas YF, Mentlak TA, Kershaw MJ, Thornton CR, et al. (2013) NADPH oxidases regulate septin-mediated cytoskeletal remodeling during plant infection by the rice blast fungus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 3179–3184.
- 21. Kankanala P, Czymmek K, Valent B (2007) Roles for rice membrane dynamics and plasmodesmata during biotrophic invasion by the blast fungus. Plant Cell 19: 706–724.
- 22. Giraldo MC, Dagdas YF, Gupta YK, Mentlak TA, Yi M, et al. (2013) Two distinct secretion systems facilitate tissue invasion by the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Nat Commun 4: 1996.
- 23. Torres MA, Jones JDG, Dangl JL (2005) Pathogen-induced, NADPH oxidase-derived reactive oxygen intermediates suppress spread of cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Genet 37: 1130–1134.
- 24.
Donofrio NM, Wilson RA (2014) Redox and rice blast: new tools for dissecting molecular fungal–plant interactions. New Phytol 201: : 367 – 369.
- 25. Skamnioti P, Henderson C, Zhang Z, Robinson Z, Gurr SJ (2007) A novel role for catalase B in the maintenance of fungal cell-wall integrity during host invasion in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 20: 568–580.
- 26.
Tanabe S, Ishii-Minami N, Saitoh K, Otake Y, Kaku H, et al.. (2011) The role of catalase-peroxidase secreted by Magnaporthe oryzae during early infection of rice cells. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 24: : 163 – 171.
- 27. Egan MJ, Wang ZY, Jones MA, Smirnoff N, Talbot NJ (2007) Generation of reactive oxygen species by fungal NADPH oxidases is required for rice blast disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 11772–11777.
- 28. Wilson RA, Jenkinson JM, Gibson RP, Littlechild JA, Wang ZY, et al. (2007) Tps1 regulates the pentose phosphate pathway, nitrogen metabolism and fungal virulence. EMBO J 26: 3673–3685.
- 29. Wilson RA, Gibson RP, Quispe CF, Littlechild JA, Talbot NJ (2010) An NADPH-dependent genetic switch regulates plant infection by the rice blast fungus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 21902–21907.
- 30. Fernandez J, Wilson RA (2011) The sugar sensor, trehalose-6-phosphate synthase (Tps1), regulates primary and secondary metabolism during infection by the rice blast fungus: will Magnaporthe oryzae's “sweet tooth” become its “Achilles' heel”? Mycology 2: 46–53.
- 31. Fernandez J, Wright JD, Hartline D, Quispe CF, Madayiputhiya N, et al. (2012) Principles of carbon catabolite repression in the rice blast fungus: Tps1, Nmr1-3, and a MATE–Family Pump regulate glucose metabolism during Infection. PLoS Genet 8: e1002673.
- 32. Carmel-Harel O, Storz G (2000) Roles of the glutathione- and thioredoxin- dependent reduction systems in the Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae to oxidative stress. Annu Rev Microbiol 54: 439–461.
- 33.
Rodríguez-Manzaneque MT, Ros J, Cabiscol E, Sorribas A, Herrero E (1999) Grx5 glutaredoxin plays a central role in protection against protein oxidative damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 19: : 8180– 81890.
- 34. Avery AM, Avery SV (2001) Saccharomyces cerevisiae expresses three phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidases. J Biol Chem 276: 33730–33735.
- 35. Ying W (2008) NAD+/NADH and NADP+/NADPH in cellular functions and cell death: regulation and biological consequences. Antioxid Redox Signal 10: 179–206.
- 36. Ross SJ, Findlay VJ, Malakasi P, Morgan BA (2000) Thioredoxin peroxidase is required for the transcriptional response to oxidative stress in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 11: 2631–2642.
- 37. Pollak N, Dölle C, Ziegler M (2007) The power to reduce: pyridine nucleotides – small molecules with a multitude of functions. Biochem J 402: 205–218.
- 38. Wilson RA, Fernandez J, Quispe CF, Gradnigo J, Seng A, et al. (2012) Towards defining nutrient conditions encountered by the rice blast fungus during host infection. PLoS ONE 7: e47392.
- 39. Foster AJ, Jenkinson JM, Talbot NJ (2003) Trehalose synthesis and metabolism are required at different stages of plant infection by Magnaporthe grisea. EMBO J 22: 225–235.
- 40. Kosower NS, Kosower EM, Wertheim B, Correa WS (1969) Diamide, a new reagent for the intracellular oxidation of glutathione to the disulfide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 37: 593–596.
- 41. Muller EG (1996) A glutathione reductase mutant of yeast accumulates high levels of oxidized glutathione and requires thioredoxin for growth. Mol Biol Cell 7: 1805–1813.
- 42. Dean RA, Talbot NJ, Ebbole DJ, Farman ML, Mitchell TK, et al. (2005) The genome sequence of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Nature 434: 980–986.
- 43. Holmgren A (1989) Thioredoxin and glutaredoxin systems. J Biol Chem 264: 13963–13966.
- 44.
Lu J, Holmgren A (2013) The thioredoxin antioxidant system. Free Radic Biol Med pii: S0891-5849(13)00380-8. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.07.036
- 45. Kumar JK, Tabor S, Richardson CC (2004) Proteomic analysis of thioredoxin-targeted proteins in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 3759–3764.
- 46. Meng L, Wong JH, Feldman LJ, Lemaux PG, Buchanan BB (2010) A membrane-associated thioredoxin required for plant growth moves from cell to cell, suggestive of a role in intercellular communication. . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107: 3900–3905.
- 47. Fernandez J, Yang KT, Cornwell KM, Wright JD, Wilson RA (2013) Growth in rice cells requires de novo purine biosynthesis by the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Sci Rep 3: 2398.
- 48. O'Connell RJ, Thon MR, Hacquard S, Amyotte SG, Kleemann J, et al. (2012) Lifestyle transitions in plant pathogenic Colletotrichum fungi deciphered by genome and transcriptome analyses. Nat Genet 44: 1060–1065.
- 49. Schulze A, Harris AL (2012) How cancer metabolism is tuned for proliferation and vulnerable to disruption. Nature 491 364–373.
- 50. O'Neill LAJ Hardie DG (2013) Metabolism of inflammation limited by AMPK and pseudo-starvation. Nature 493: 346–355.
- 51. Zhou X, Li G, Xu JR (2011) Efficient approaches for generating GFP fusion and epitope-tagging constructs in filamentous fungi. . Fungal Genomics. Xu, J.R. and Bluhm, B.H., Humana Press. 722: 199–212.