Persistent luminescence mechanisms: human imagination at work

The present status and future progress of the mechanisms of persistent luminescence are critically treated with the present knowledge. The advantages to be achieved by a further need as well as the pitfalls of the excessive use of imagination are shown. As usual, in the beginning of the present era of persistent luminescence since the mid 1990s, the imagination played a more important role than the sparse solid experimental data and the chemical common sense and knowledge was largely ignored. Since some five years, the mechanistic studies seem to have reached the maturity and – perhaps deceivingly – it seems that there are only details to be solved. However, the development of red emitting nanocrystalline materials poses a challenge also to the more fundamental studies and interpretation. The questions still luring in the darkness include the problems how the increased surface area affects the defect structure and how the “persistent energy transfer” really works. There is still some light to be thrown onto these matters starting with agreeing on the terminology: the term phosphorescence should be abandoned altogether. The long lifetime of persistent luminescence is due to trapping of excitation energy, not to the forbidden nature of the luminescent transition. However, the technically well-suited term “afterglow” should be retained for harmful, short persistent luminescence. © 2012 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: (160.2540) Fluorescent and luminescent materials; (160.2900) Optical storage materials; (160.5690) Rare-earth-doped materials; (160.2220) Defect-center materials; (300.6280) Spectroscopy, fluorescence and luminescence. References and links 1. E. N. Harvey, A History of luminescence: From the Earliest Times Until 1900 (Amer. Phil. Soc., Philadelphia, USA, 1957), Chapter VIII. 2. T. Aitasalo, J. Hölsä, H. Jungner, M. Lastusaari, and J. Niittykoski, “Thermoluminescence study of persistent luminescence materials: Euand R-doped calcium aluminates, CaAl2O4:Eu ,R,” J. Phys. Chem. B 110(10), 4589–4598 (2006). 3. P. Dorenbos, “Mechanism of persistent luminescence in Sr2MgSi2O7: Eu ; Dy,” Phys. Status Solidi B 242(1), R7–R9 (2005). 4. T. Aitasalo, J. Hölsä, H. Jungner, M. Lastusaari, J. Niittykoski, M. Parkkinen, and R. Valtonen, “Eu doped calcium aluminates prepared by alternative low temperature routes,” Opt. Mater. 26(2), 113–116 (2004). 5. H. F. Brito, J. Hassinen, J. Hölsä, H. Jungner, T. Laamanen, M. Lastusaari, M. Malkamäki, J. Niittykoski, P. Novák, and L. C. V. Rodrigues, “Optical energy storage properties of Sr2MgSi2O7:Eu ,R persistent luminescence materials,” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 105(2), 657–662 (2011). 6. R. Hahn, S. Berger, and P. Schmuki, “Bright visible luminescence of self-organized ZrO2 nanotubes,” J. Solid State Electrochem. 14(2), 285–288 (2010). 7. J. M. Carvalho, L. C. V. Rodrigues, M. C. F. C. Felinto, L. A. O. Nunes, J. Hölsä, and H. F. Brito, “The role of titanium in the structurally and thermally tuneable luminescence of zirconia sol-gel nanomaterials,” J. Mater. Chem. (submitted). #161450 $15.00 USD Received 13 Jan 2012; revised 25 Feb 2012; accepted 26 Feb 2012; published 2 Mar 2012 (C) 2012 OSA 1 April 2012 / Vol. 2, No. 4 / OPTICAL MATERIALS EXPRESS 371 8. K. Van den Eeckhout, P. F. Smet, and D. Poelman, “Persistent luminescence in Eu-doped compounds: a review,” Materials 3(4), 2536–2566 (2010). 9. R. Chen and S. W. S. McKeever, Theory of Thermoluminescence and Related Phenomena (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997). 10. G. Blasse and B. C. Grabmaier, Luminescent Materials (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1994). 11. D. Jia and W. M. Yen, “Trapping mechanism associated with electron delocalization and tunneling of CaAl2O4:Ce , a persistent phosphor,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 150(3), H61–H65 (2003). 12. X. Wang and D. Jia, “Long persistent phosphors,” in Phosphor Handbook, 2nd ed., S. Shionoya, W. M. Yen, and H. Yamamoto, eds. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007), pp. 793–818. 13. International workshop on Persistent Phosphors (Phosphoros 2011) Sept 19 and 20, 2011, Universiteit Ghent, Ghent, Belgium, http://www.lumilab.ugent.be/?q=phosphoros (accessed on Dec. 30, 2011). 14. M. R. Thompson, “Psychophysical evaluations of modulated color rendering for energy performance of LEDbased architectural lighting,” PhD thesis (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2007). 15. H. Rupp, Die Leuchtmassen und ihre Verwendung eine Einführung in Fluoreszenz und Phosphoreszenz der festen Körper (Gebr. Bornträger, Berlin, Germany, 1937). 16. Fortunius Licetus, Litheosphorus Sive de Lapide Bononiensi (Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy, 1640). 17. M. Lastusaari, T. Laamanen, M. Malkamäki, K. O. Eskola, A. Kotlov, S. Carlson, E. Welter, H. F. Brito, M. Bettinelli, H. Jungner, and J. Hölsä, “The Bologna Stone: history’s first persistent luminescence material,” Eur. J. Mineral. (to be published). 18. V. Klatt and P. Lenard, “Über die Phosphoreszenzen des Kupfers Wismuths und Mangans in den Erdalkalisulfiden,” Wied. Ann. (Ann. Phys. Chem. Neue Folge) 38, 90–107 (1889). 19. H. Yamamoto and T. Matsuzawa, “Mechanism of long phosphorescence of SrAl2O4:Eu ,Dy and CaAl2O4:Eu ,Nd,” J. Lumin. 72-74, 287–289 (1997). 20. T. Matsuzawa, Y. Aoki, N. Takeuchi, and Y. Murayama, “A new long phosphorescent phosphor with high brightness, SrAl2O4:Eu Dy,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 143(8), 2670–2673 (1996). 21. T. Lin, Z. Tang, Z. Zhang, X. Wang, and J. Zhang, “Preparation of a new long afterglow blue-emitting Sr2MgSi2O7-based photoluminescent phosphor,” J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 20(16), 1505–1506 (2001). 22. Y. Lin, Z. Tang, Z. Zhang, and C. W. Nan, “Anomalous luminescence in Sr4Al14O25:Eu,Dy phosphors,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 81(6), 996–998 (2002). 23. J. Hölsä (Department of Chemistry, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland) and A. J. J. Bos, P. Dorenbos, M. Lastusaari, T. Laamanen, and M. Malkamäki are preparing a manuscript to be called “Thermoluminescence and persistent luminescence excitation properties of Sr2MgSi2O7:Eu ,Dy.” 24. J. Hölsä, “Persistent luminescence beats the afterglow: 400 years of persistent luminescence,” Electrochem. Soc. Interface 18(4), 42–45 (2009). 25. A. J. J. Bos, R. M. van Duijvenvoorde, E. van der Kolk, W. Drozdowski, and P. Dorenbos, “Thermoluminescence excitation spectroscopy: a versatile technique to study persistent luminescence phosphors,” J. Lumin. 131(7), 1465–1471 (2011). 26. Q. le Masne de Chermont, C. Chanéac, J. Seguin, F. Pellé, S. Maîtrejean, J.-P. Jolivet, D. Gourier, M. Bessodes, and D. Scherman, “Nanoprobes with near-infrared persistent luminescence for in vivo imaging,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104(22), 9266–9271 (2007). 27. W. Jia, H. Yuan, L. Lu, H. Liu, and W. M. Yen, “Phosphorescent dynamics in SrAl2O4: Eu ,Dy single crystal fibers,” J. Lumin. 76-77, 424–428 (1998). 28. B. Zhang, C. Zhao, and D. Chen, “Synthesis of the long-persistence phosphor CaAl2O4:Eu , Dy, Nd by combustion method and its luminescent properties,” Luminescence 25(1), 25–29 (2010). 29. P. Dorenbos, “Mechanism of persistent luminescence in Eu and Dy codoped aluminate and silicate compounds,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 152(7), H107–H110 (2005). 30. S. Carlson, J. Hölsä, T. Laamanen, M. Lastusaari, M. Malkamäki, J. Niittykoski, and R. Valtonen, “X-ray absorption study of rare earth ions in Sr2MgSi2O7:Eu ,R persistent luminescence materials,” Opt. Mater. 31(12), 1877–1879 (2009). 31. K. Korthout, K. Van den Eeckhout, J. Botterman, S. Nikitenko, D. Poelman, and P. Smet, “Luminescence and Xray absorption measurements of persistent SrAl2O4:Eu,Dy powders: evidence for valence state changes,” Phys. Rev. B 84(8), 085140 (2011). 32. Z. Qi, C. Shi, M. Liu, D. Zhou, X. Luo, J. Zhang, and Y. Xie, “The valence of rare earth ions in R2MgSi2O7:Eu, Dy (R = Ca, Sr) long-afterglow phosphors,” Phys. Status Solidi A 201(14), 3109–3112 (2004). 33. L. C. V. Rodrigues, H. F. Brito, J. Hölsä, R. Stefani, M. C. F. C. Felinto, M. Lastusaari, M. Malkamäki, and L. A. O. Nunes, “Persistent luminescence mechanism of the CdSiO3:Tb 3+ phosphors,” in Proc. 16th Int. Conf. Lumin. (ICL’11), Ann Arbor, MI, USA, June 26 – July 1, 2011, pp. 69–70 (2011). 34. A. Nag and T. R. N. Kutty, “The mechanism of long phosphorescence of SrAl2−xBxO4 (0<x<0.2) and Sr4Al14−xBxO25 (0.1<x<0.4) co-doped with Eu 2+ and Dy,” Mater. Res. Bull. 39(3), 331–342 (2004). 35. F. Clabau, X. Rocquefelte, S. Jobic, P. Deniard, M.-H. Whangbo, A. Garcia, and T. Le Mercier, “Mechanism of phosphorescence appropriate for the long-lasting phosphors Eu-doped SrAl2O4 with codopants Dy 3+ and B,” Chem. Mater. 17(15), 3904–3912 (2005). 36. P. Dorenbos, “Locating lanthanide impurity levels in the forbidden band of host crystals,” J. Lumin. 108(1-4), 301–305 (2004). #161450 $15.00 USD Received 13 Jan 2012; revised 25 Feb 2012; accepted 26 Feb 2012; published 2 Mar 2012 (C) 2012 OSA 1 April 2012 / Vol. 2, No. 4 / OPTICAL MATERIALS EXPRESS 372 37. L. C. V. Rodrigues, H. F. Brito, J. Hölsä, and M. Lastusaari, “Persistent luminescence behavior of materials doped with Eu and Tb,” Opt. Mater. Express (to be published). 38. D. Jia, X. J. Wang, and W. M. Yen, “Electron traps in Tb-doped CaAl2O4,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 363(3-4), 241– 244 (2002). 39. T. Aitasalo, J. Hassinen, J. Hölsä, T. Laamanen, M. Lastusaari, M. Malkamäki, J. Niittykoski, and P. Novák, “Synchrotron radiation investigations of the Sr2MgSi2O7:Eu ,R persistent luminescence materials,” J. Rare Earths 27(4), 529–538 (2009). 40. J. Trojan-Piegza, E. Zych, J. Hölsä, and J. Niittykoski, “Spectroscopic properties of persistent luminescence phosphors: Lu2O3:Tb ,M (M = Ca, Sr, Ba),” J. Phys. Chem. C 113(47), 20493–20498 (2009). 41. L. C. V. Rodrigues, H. F. Brito, J. Hölsä, R. Stefani, M. C. F. C. Felinto, M. Lastusaari, M. Malkamäki, and L. A. O. Nunes, “Discovery of the persistent luminescence mechanism of CdSiO3:Tb ,” J. Phys. Chem. C (to be published). 42. T. Laamanen, “Defects in persistent luminescence materials,” P


Introduction
Persistent luminescence can be defined as emission obtained after the removal of an excitation source [1] which can be visible light, UV radiation, electron beam, plasma beam, X-rays, or even γ-rays.This much is agreed upon at present.Generally, though not universally, it has also been accepted that the excitation (irradiation) energy is stored in intrinsic traps or in those intentionally introduced or in both [2].The nature and origin of the traps are contested [3], they may be assumed to result from the preparation methods [4] -usually reducing ones -or from the aliovalent co-doping of the material [5] or from unidentified lattice defects and distortions [6].Too often, the more detailed description and effect of the defects are just omitted although it is evident that the defects play an important role both as an emitting center and the defect generator, as is the case with the persistent luminescence of "non-doped" zirconia -in fact a small titanium impurity partly in the trivalent form is the origin [7].
The general disagreement extends -or, it should be said: starts -from the very name of the phenomenon.In the literature (e.g.[8]), there is practically an endless number of permutations of the adjectives as long, persistent, long-duration and long-lasting as well as nouns as afterglow, fluorescence, phosphorescence and luminescence -in pairs of two or in bigger clusters -the record being perhaps "Long-Persistent Phosphorescence".It is not clear if this name was given intently but it is doubted when knowing more closely the father of this name, prof.William (Bill) Yen.In practice, the name is afterglow -and this it should still be in the future if the duration of the persistent luminescence is short, up to a limit when it is still a nuisance but not yet long enough to be exploited to something useful.Scientifically, persistent luminescence is a special case of thermally stimulated luminescence (TSL) at a given temperature.Because of this additional restriction, this name should be avoided, though, since it may easily be confused with thermoluminescence [9] which is a broader phenomenon.
Persistent luminescence is definitely not phosphorescence since the relatively long life time of phosphorescence is due to the forbidden transitions within the luminescence center [10].However, in persistent luminescence materials, the excitation energy is stored in defects -the nature of which is usually totally different from the luminescence center.As an example, rather intense persistent luminescence -though not good enough for practical applicationscan be obtained from Ce 3+ doped aluminates [11].The origin of the luminescence is the 5d 1 ( 2 D) → 4f 1 ( 2 F J ; J: 5/2 and 7/2) transitions which are both parity and spin allowed (∆S = 0) and cannot be named as phosphorescence as the short (order of some tens of ns) conventional lifetime of Ce 3+ implies.The long lifetime is not as such a reason to name persistent luminescence as phosphorescence.This is, however, only one consequence whereto the ignorance about the real mechanisms of persistent luminescence can lead.Finally, the classification of some authors are trying to introduce -based once again -on the lifetime of persistent luminescence -leads to nothing since the limits are not clear and change when a new top score in the duration is achieved.The reader might wonder the utility of e.g. the following classification: very short persistent, short persistent, persistent, long persistent, and super long persistent phosphorescence [12].
It has been already a few generations ago when -at least some kind of -agreement was achieved to use luminescence instead of -usually theoretically inaccurate -fluorescence and phosphorescence [10].Maybe it is the time to make the same with persistent luminescence?At least the some 50+ participants of the first meeting on persistent luminescence were overwhelmingly for the use of a single term [13].Maybe the common sense finally gains over the temptation of using too much imagination.
The imagination of the authors has thus achieved the maximum value when the intensity of persistent luminescence is concerned.Nevertheless, there exist clear rules concerning the intensity (and its evolution vs. time): the luminous intensity (luminance) should exceed the value of 0.32 mcdm −2 when measured at a defined (one steradian (sr), i.e. 65.54 degrees) viewer angle.The threshold value corresponds to approx.100 times the lower limit of the perception of the human eye in the scotopic (dark adapted) vision range [14].This valuecombined with the requirement that the persistent luminescence should last at least a few hours to be of any practical use -limits significantly the number of potential phosphors.However, only very infrequently this rule is remembered and even less frequently the measurements have been carried out to validate it with the phosphor studied.
The history of persistent luminescence extends to some 1000 years ago making persistent luminescence probably the first kind of documented luminescence [15].Unfortunately, the materials used in the Chinese painting presented to the Japanese emperor are not known.In the beginning of the 17th century, the persistent luminescence certainly became the best documented kind of luminescence because of the discovery -or better manufacture -of the famous Bologna Stone [16].This was apparently BaS made by the reduction of the mineral Barite containing a selection of impurities to give a good persistent luminescence materialthough not yet good enough for practical applications.The Bologna Stone aroused the interest of the great Galileo though he never published anything about it -maybe better for him since, at that time, he was already in house arrest proclaimed by the Roman Catholic pope.He definitely needed no extra trouble by using too much imagination since the Bologna Stone was suggested to have some celestial properties and to be closely related to alchemy.The final explanation of the origin of persistent luminescence from the Bologna Stone had to wait until the present day, however [17].It was revealed that the Bologna Stone is indeed BaS and not, as incorrectly though frequently believed, BaSO 4 (barite).The persistent luminescence originates from the monovalent copper impurity.The mechanism suggested [17] is -againsimilar to the one for Eu 2+ to be discussed in detail below.
The first commercial applications (self-lit watch dials etc.) came with ZnS:Cu about 100 years ago.Similar sulphide materials -CaS:Eu 2+ , (Ca,Sr)S:Bi 3+ etc. appeared later -the famous Lenard's phosphors [18] -but their utility is hampered by their extreme sensitivity to moisture.The final boom in the research and applications came in mid 1990s with the introduction of the efficient Eu 2+ ,R 3+ co-doped aluminates -CaAl 2 O 4 :Eu 2+ ,Nd 3+ [19] and SrAl 2 O 4 :Eu 2+ ,Dy 3+ [20] emitting in the blue and green, respectively.The disilicate, Sr 2 MgSi 2 O 7 :Eu 2+ ,Dy 3+ [21] and another aluminate (Sr 4 Al 14 O 25 :Eu 2+ ,Dy 3+ ) [22] with improved moisture stability followed in the early 2000s.All these phosphors extend the persistent luminescence beyond the limit of 24+ hours enabling the use of natural excitation by sun light -if this is at all possible, however, since the soft UVA-blue light excitation characteristics of the phosphors may vary significantly [23].However, only a few phosphors -in addition to those mentioned previous only Y 2 O 2 S:Eu 3+ ,Mg 2+ ,Ti -have gained commercial success -and the red emitting oxysulfide only because of the lack of really good persistent phosphors emitting in red [23].Fig. 1.A three-color persistent luminescence panel based on the Sr2MgSi2O7:Eu 2+ ,Dy 3+ (blue), SrAl2O4:Eu 2+ ,Dy 3+ (green) and Y2O2S:Eu 3+ ,Mg 2+ ,Ti (red) phosphors (modified from [24]).
The use of the persistent luminescence phosphor finally determines the properties, the following three being the most important: excitation, colour, and duration.The first one is usually widely ignored though very recently the excitation spectroscopy of persistent luminescence phosphors has proved invaluable to fill this gap [25].In principle, at present it is possible to have persistent luminescence phosphors to cover the entire visible spectral range (Fig. 1) though the weakness of luminescence and the relative insensitivity of the human eye in red is still a problem.This is discussed in some detail in the end of this paper.
The future trends involved in the persistent luminescence research are not difficult to predict -in the short term, of course.First, in order to design new phosphor materials -or at least to tailor the present ones -the exact knowledge of the mechanisms behind the phenomenon is required.The present development is based on the trial and error methods and on the use of experimental techniques which are either very difficult or nearly impossible to carry out or require sophisticated apparatus with enormous costs involved as the synchrotron radiation sources.Secondly, the development of new phosphors covering the entire visible spectrum -especially in the red and NIR ranges -are acutely needed e.g. for biomedical applications [26].Thirdly, the new methods of manufacture of these phosphors need to be studied carefully since there are indications that e.g. the nanophophors may have different defect structure from the powders and single crystals.This paper tries to address to the two former trends -both stating the status quo and the possible future trends -not forgetting the milestones of the human imagination in the past.

Earlier persistent luminescence mechanisms
Not much was known about the mechanisms of persistent luminescence prior to the introduction of the aluminate materials in the mid 1990s [19,20].This is no wonder despite the ZnS:Cu materials had been already at that time commercially available for nearly a hundred years.In fact, the mechanism of the conventional luminescence from copper is still contested [10].The luminescence center as well as the co-dopant in the Eu 2+ ,R 3+ co-doped aluminates (mainly SrAl 2 O 4 :Eu 2+ ,Dy 3+ ) offered a seemingly -or deceivingly -simple system: the electron from the valence band is trapped to Eu 2+ converting it to Eu + (?) whilst Dy 3+ traps the hole becoming Dy 4+ .It is implied that both the electrons and holes act as charge carriers.The schematic mechanism follows this reasoning (Fig. 2  Old habits die hard since the latest paper suggesting the presence of Eu + was published in 2010 [28].It was thus not really too fast, unfortunately, when it has been realized that the Eu + species is very improbable and would require huge amounts of energy to be formed.This energy is just not available in ambient conditions.More rational researchers soon suggested a reverse process, i.e. the oxidation of Eu 2+ and reduction of Dy 3+ [29].The charge carriers are again the same.Although being much more realistic, in general, the problem with the "redox" mechanisms is that several materials -including both Sr 2 MgSi 2 O 7 :Eu 2+ ,Dy 3+ (blue) and SrAl 2 O 4 :Eu 2+ ,Dy 3+ (green emission) -show rather intense persistent luminescence without the co-dopant, albeit weaker and shorter than with the co-doping.Moreover, except for the Eu 2+ → Eu 3+ oxidation [30,31], no change in the co-dopants' valence has been observed experimentally by EPR, XPS, or XANES [30][31][32] techniques.The first lesson is that maybe the existence of a luminescence center -co-dopant redox couple is not at all necessary.Sometimes the luminescence center and co-dopant are the same, as with CdSiO 3 :Tb 3+ [33].The role of the co-dopant may thus be completely different.From this idea there was only a short way to recognize that the charge carriers may be trapped to defects created by the codopants.The existence of defects is more or less obvious as a result of charge compensation since, in most cases, the co-dopant has the valence incompatible with the host cation.Instead, it should be observed that the luminescence center has usually the same valence as the host cation it replaces.This is evident since the luminescence center must 1) yield efficient luminescence by its very nature (as Eu 2+ , Ce 3+ , Pr 3+ , Eu 3+ , and Tb 3+ show) and 2) this luminescence should not be quenched by uncontrolled lattice defects (as color centers).
It is interesting to note, in retrospective of course, that all the efficient luminescence centers involved in different persistent luminescence materials form chemically (and physically, too) meaningful redox couples: Eu 2+ , Ce 3+ , Pr 3+ , Eu 3+ , Tb 3+ , Mn 2+ , Ti 3+ , Cr 3+ , Bi 3+ , Pb 2+ , and Cu + with Eu 3+ , Ce IV , Pr IV , Eu 2+ , Tb IV , Mn 3+ , Ti IV , Cr 2+ /Cr IV , Bi V , Pb IV , and Cu 2+ , respectively.The second lesson to be learnt is that efficient persistent luminescence seems to involve mainly the oxidation of the luminescence center, much less frequently -but not completely excluded -the reduction.This means that the charge carriers are electrons and the process should include the conduction band where the mobility of the electrons is far higher than that of holes in the valence band.Thus the electron finding a trap below the conduction band is more probable.The third lesson is that the oxidation/reduction of the luminescence center and the co-dopant is perhaps only a virtual one; instead of the actual oxidized and reduced species, maybe R n+ -h + and R n+ -e -pairs are formed, respectively.The actual oxidized species have been observed only for the Eu 2+ -Eu 3+ pair [30,31].The pair formation may be a conceivable possibility since in a M 2+ lattice the small and highly charged R 3+ ion with high charge density attracts easily electrons.As a conclusion concerning the early mechanisms proposed for persistent luminescence, it is evident that at least a basic knowledge of the general chemical behavior of the species in the materials studied could have helped to reject the most improbable mechanisms.Restricting the imagination -so useful in some cases -could have done the same, as well.As an extreme case of the use of imagination and to those who long for exact numbers, the following mechanism was suggested [34] for the Eu 2+ and Dy 3+ doped SrAl 2−x B x O 4 and Sr 4 Al 14−x B x O 25 (Fig. 3).However, the mechanism -apart from the participation of the borate -resembles the presently accepted mechanisms.If the authors had known -as shown in the next section -the correct position of the 4f 7 ( 8 S 7/2 ) ground level of Eu 2+ in the host band gap and omitted the complications…

Advanced persistent luminescence mechanisms
The early persistent luminescence mechanisms proposed were usually nothing but qualitative sketches on what could be if there were some experimental data available to support them.The quantitative understanding of the said materials and processes therein and the design of new, even better materials could hardly be done with these mechanisms.However, it must be said that all the elements of the present more advanced mechanisms were there but not in the same one or two mechanisms and there were also things which were evidently not correct at all.For example, the mechanism of persistent luminescence in Eu 2+ and R 3+ doped SrAl 2 O 4 [35] considered [8] as one of the fundamental ones is purely qualitative and contains highly suspicious processes as charge transfer emission of Eu 3+ at 445 nm.In addition, the authors have considered only direct electron transfer between traps and the 5d levels of Eu 2+ .The electron transfer via the conduction band was excluded based on inconsistent photoconductivity measurements.Taken these deficiencies, this work cannot be considered as a model.Much of the progress in understanding the persistent luminescence mechanisms owes to the work on combining the energy level systems of the host, the luminescence centers and the co-dopants [36].Basically only now it was made possible to predict at least the following: 1) the nature -an electron or hole transfer -of the charging process of persistent luminescence, 2) identification of the most probable centers (dopants) for persistent luminescence, 3) the role of (rare earth) co-dopants, 4) to predict the energy sufficient to charge persistent luminescence (i.e.persistent luminescence excitation).Despite the model probably failed to explain the role of the co-dopants, i.e. the capture of an electron in the conduction band by an R 3+ ion to form R 2+ , the energy level schemes were a major breakthrough.It allows, among other things, to design an efficient persistent luminescence phosphor by a careful choice of the band gap energy and the luminescence center, i.e. extending the persistent luminescence from predominantly Eu 2+ doped materials to e.g.Tb 3+ doped ones [37,38].The delicate interplay between several energy level systems can now be controlled though some experimental difficulties still exist e.g. in the exact determination of the band gap energy in VUV by synchrotron radiation sources (e.g.[39]).
The ground energy level positions (Fig. 4) for the R 2+ and R 3+ ions in Sr 2 MgSi 2 O 7 -as in most wide band gap materials -indicate that the best candidates for the persistent luminescence centers are (in this order) Eu 2+ , Ce 3+ , Tb 3+ and Pr 3+ .First of all, all these ions are known to be strong emitters with weak tendency to lose the excitation energy in crossrelaxation or multiphonon de-excitation processes.As for persistent luminescence, most present day applications prefer the excitation (daylight or artificial lighting) with blue light or, if not possible, with UV radiation having energy as low as possible.The Eu 2+ , Ce 3+ , Tb 3+ and Pr 3+ have the lowest 5d energies known (Fig. 4) in the rare earth series ensuring the low excitation energies.Further, the overlap between the excited 5d levels and the host's CB is required and achieved by these ions for efficient electron transfer through CB to traps.Fig. 4. The experimental R 2+ and R 3+ (R: La-Lu) 4f n and 4f n-1 5d 1 ground level energy positions in Sr2MgSi2O7 showing the possible electron (A) and hole (B) trapping mechanisms [42].
The proximity of the host's conduction band (for electron trapping materials, of course) becomes then important as will be discussed in detail with the Eu 2+ persistent luminescence mechanism.Though the excitation of the trivalent ions (Ce 3+ , Tb 3+ and Pr 3+ ) usually requires the use of UV radiation, Eu 2+ can be excited in many hosts by the blue light, as well.The lowering of the band gap energy to e.g.5-6 eV, i.e. changing the host to e.g.Lu 2 O 3 or CdSiO 3 , would enable the persistent luminescence of Tb 3+ as was observed experimentally [40] and [41], respectively.The persistent luminescence of the "typical" R 3+ ions (e.g.Er 3+ , Ho 3+ , Nd 3+ ) can still be observed only in very specific cases.
As a conclusion concerning the advanced mechanisms for persistent luminescence, the experimental techniques and the construction of the host independent evolution of the energy levels for both the R 2+ and R 3+ ions in any host has enabled the prediction of the doping schemes for efficient persistent luminescence.A minimum amount of experimental work is still required to establish at least one energy level value relating at least one R 2+ or R 3+ ion to the host band structure.In addition to the energetics in the system, the kinetics may play an important role to achieve efficient persistent luminescence.This knowledge is, however, easily available -at least for Eu 2+ , Ce 3+ , and Pr 3+ though excluding Tb 3+ : the lifetimes for the 4f n-1 5d 1 levels are ca. 1 µs, 50 ns and 1 µs, respectively, and for Tb 3+ a value of 1 µs can be used (the exact value is not known, however).The short lifetime of Ce 3+ means severe competition between emission and the transfer of electrons to the host's conduction band (and to subsequent trapping).Despite the very favourable energetics, the number of potential persistent luminescence materials amongst the Ce 3+ doped compounds is serendipitously low.The improvements to the present models require the better description of both the nature and the energy level structure of the defects.Thermoluminescence measurements are now a commonplace practice but the theoretical calculations using the DFT methods have given encouraging results [42], as well.
As a result of the sometimes tedious progress, the mechanism of persistent luminescence of the Eu 2+ doped materials can now be considered to have reached the maturity -perhaps except for the exact nature of the defects whereto the excitation energy is stored.As an example of the "model" mechanism for persistent luminescence, that for Sr 3 SiO 5 :Eu 2+ ,Nd 3+ is described here (Fig. 5).This model has been used to construct the corresponding mechanisms for the materials based on the persistent luminescence of Tb 3+ [40] and even Ti 3+ [43], Cr 3+ [44] and Cu + [17], the latter three revealing the utility of the model far beyond the rare earths.The Eu 2+ ion is thus the basic choice, though versatile and unsurpassed in efficiency, as a persistent luminescence center.The band gap value (for Sr 3 SiO 5 :Eu 2+ : 6.0 eV) is easily found from the synchrotron (or other VUV) excitation spectrum of Eu 2+ , as well as is the charge (electron) transfer (e -[O(2p)] + Eu 3+ → Eu 2+ ) transition energy (3.2.eV) from the excitation spectrum of Eu 3+ , used to estimate the Eu 2+ 8 S 7/2 ground state position.The excitation and emission energies can be obtained from the elementary photoluminescence studies.Finally, the trap energies are acquired from the straightforward deconvolution of the TL glow curves.
The resulting mechanism involves, as the charging phase, the excitation of an electron from the 4f 7 ( 8 S 7/2 ) ground state to the excited 4f 6 5d 1 ( 2 D) states of Eu 2+ .Due to the proximity of the host's conduction band (the 4f 6 5d 1 levels definitely overlap, though only partially, with CB), some electrons can easily escape from the excited 4f 6 5d 1 levels, directly or aided by thermal energy (kT), to the conduction band of Sr 3 SiO 5 .The relatively long lifetime of the 4f 6 5d 1 ( 2 D) → 4f 7 ( 8 S 7/2 ) emission of Eu 2+ (ca. 1 µs) facilitates this charge transfer.The electrons then move further quite freely in the conduction band until they meet a defect and are trapped.The reverse, decharging, process is initiated by the absorption of thermal energy allowing the trapped electrons to escape back to the conduction band and populate the 4f 6 5d 1 ( 2 D) levels of Eu 2+ (partially overlapping the CB of Sr 3 SiO 5 ).The non-radiative (within the 4f 6 5d 1 states) and finally the radiative relaxation of Eu 2+ (from the lowest 4f 6 5d 1 state) takes care of producing the persistent luminescence.Alternatively, retrapping of the electrons can occur in every step of the decharging process still lengthening the persistent luminescence.Although the mechanism is convincing, it is not entirely quantitative since the energies of the processes are only estimates because the values are based on data consisting of broad band emission, excitation and absorption.The estimated accuracy is thus only of the order of 0.5 eV.

Red emitting persistent luminescence materials
The difficulties to obtain good persistent luminescence materials emitting in red is due to both the lack of stable red emitting phosphors and the insensitivity of the human visual perception (Fig. 6).The red emission should be very useful especially for biomedical applications [26,46], as well.It is evident that -especially in the dark and just after entering into the low level illumination conditions [48] -the perception of red requires a very strong source.Unfortunately, the choices are very few.The standard solution would be to use Eu 2+ doped materials but the extension of the Eu 2+ luminescence to red requires an extremely strong crystal field or a shift of the whole 4f 6 5d 1 electron configuration to exceptionally low energies.From the electrostatic point of view, the former seems more or less impossible whilst the latter can be achieved in such sulphide lattices as CaS and SrS.The disadvantage of these hosts is their extremely hygroscopic nature.The excitation can, however, be at relatively low energy, even in the visible, so these should be preferred if the hygroscopy is not a problem.
The other possibilities include the doping with Eu 3+ and, indeed, the strong luminescence of the conventional Eu 3+ doped phosphors as rare earth oxides and oxysulfides can be used at ca. 610 -625 nm.The problems arise from the high energy required to reach good excitation (to the charge transfer band at 200 -350 nm) and the difficulty of creating necessary defects by co-doping.When the energy level scheme of Eu 3+ (Fig. 4) is considered, the ground 7 F 0 level is well in the valence band (or even lower) and thus the conventional persistent luminescence mechanism is not operational.In addition, the chemistry of the Eu 3+ /Eu 2+ system does not allow for the Eu IV species.It has recently been suggested [49] that the persistent luminescence of Y 2 O 2 S:Eu 3+ ,Ti,Mg 2+ is based on the hole trapping in charge compensation defects close to the top of the valence band.The efficient co-doping seems to include a combination of Mg 2+ and Ti IV which both could induce hole traps, e.g. the single negative substitutional defects ( ' Y g M ) and triply negative yttrium vacancies ( ''' Y V ) though the probability of the latter should be low mainly due to the stable YO + complex cation sublattice in Y 2 O 2 S. Nevertheless, persistent luminescence times of 5+ h have been obtained [50].
Still other possibilities to obtain red persistent luminescence include the use of the "persistent energy transfer" between Eu 2+ (absorbing and storing) and Mn 2+ (emission), as in CaMgSi 2 O 6 :Eu 2+ ,Mn 2+ ,Pr 3+ [46].The exact mechanisms seem to be largely unknown since, in addition to the sensitizer and luminescence, a third trap forming ion is usually needed.The same holds with the Cr 3+ doped materials [44] though their efficiency seems to be even less than that of the Mn 2+ doped systems.

Conclusions
The modelling of the processes occurring in persistent luminescence has achieved a stage where the main features are well known but the details concerning the traps and their depths are still somewhat an open question.As a small but interesting and intriguing detail probably worth of a study is the evidently unbroken Sr host cation and Dy 3+ co-dopant combination yielding the best performance irrespective of the host lattice, i.e. in SrAl 2 O 4 , Sr 2 MgSi 2 O 7 , Sr 4 Al 14 O 25 , and even Sr 3 SiO 5 .The commercial market seems to be saturated with only a few persistent luminescence materials.There is, however, an ever-growing demand for red emitting materials -especially in nanocrystalline form for biomedical applications.The Eu 2+ ,Mn 2+ ,R 3+ co-doped materials still offer a challenge to explain in a satisfactory manner the "persistent energy transfer" between Eu 2+ and Mn 2+ .The effect of the R 3+ co-doping is of interest, too, since it may affect the properties of the assumed storage (Eu 2+ ) and/or the emission (Mn 2+ ).