Microfiber-microcavity system for efficient single photon collection

Single photon sources are key components for various quantum information processing. For practical quantum applications, bright single photon sources with efficient fiber-optical interfaces are highly required. Here, bright fiber-coupled single photon sources based on InAs quantum dots are demonstrated through the k-vector matching between a microfiber mode and a normal mode of the linear photonic crystal cavity. One of the modes of the linear photonic crystal cavity whose k-vector is similar to that of the microfiber mode is employed. From independent transmission measurement, the coupling efficiency directly into the fiber of 58% is obtained. When the quantum dot and cavity system is non-resonantly pumped with 80 MHz pulse train, a raw count rate of 1.81 MHz is obtained with g(0) = 0.46. Resonant pump is expected to improve the rather high g(0) value. Time-resolved photoluminescence is also measured to confirm the three-fold Purcell enhancement. This system provides a promising route for efficient direct fiber collections of single photons for quantum information processing. © 2016 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: (230.5590) Quantum-well, -wire and -dot devices; (230.5298) Photonic crystals; (270.0270) Quantum optics. References and links 1. N. Gisin, G. G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, “Quantum cryptography,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 74(1), 145–195 (2002). 2. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, “A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics,” Nature 409(6816), 46–52 (2001). 3. S. Buckley, K. Rivoire, and J. Vučković, “Engineered quantum dot single-photon sources,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 75(12), 126503 (2012). 4. M. Pelton, C. Santori, J. Vucković, B. Zhang, G. S. Solomon, J. Plant, and Y. Yamamoto, “Efficient source of single photons: a single quantum dot in a micropost microcavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89(23), 233602 (2002). 5. C. Santori, D. Fattal, J. Vučković, G. S. Solomon, and Y. Yamamoto, “Single-photon generation with InAs quantum dots,” New J. Phys. 6, 89 (2004). 6. W.-H. Chang, W.-Y. Chen, H.-S. Chang, T.-P. Hsieh, J.-I. Chyi, and T.-M. Hsu, “Efficient Single-Photon Sources Based on Low-Density Quantum Dots in Photonic-Crystal Nanocavities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(11), 117401 (2006). 7. S. Strauf, N. G. Stoltz, M. T. Rakher, L. A. Coldren, P. M. Petroff, and D. Bouwmeester, “High-frequency single-photon source with polarization control,” Nat. Photonics 1(12), 704–708 (2007). 8. J. Claudon, J. Bleuse, N. S. Malik, M. Bazin, P. Jaffrennou, N. Gregersen, C. Sauvan, P. Lalanne, and J.-M. Gérard, “A highly efficient single-photon source based on a quantum dot in a photonic nanowire,” Nat. Photonics 4, 174–177 (2010). 9. A. Laucht, S. Pütz, T. Günthner, N. Hauke, R. Saive, S. Frédérick, M. Bichler, M. C. Amann, A. Holleitner, M. Kaniber, and J. Finley, “A Waveguide-Coupled On-Chip Single-Photon Source,” Phys. Rev. X 2(1), 011014 (2012). 10. O. Gazzano, S. Michaelis de Vasconcellos, C. Arnold, A. Nowak, E. Galopin, I. Sagnes, L. Lanco, A. Lemaître, Vol. 24, No. 20 | 3 Oct 2016 | OPTICS EXPRESS 23471


Introduction
Triggered single photon sources (SPSs) have been actively pursued over the past two decades, motivated by quantum information processing such as quantum key distribution [1] and quantum computing [2].The triggered SPSs are required to have brightness, low error rate, and fast emission rate, which are of different importance depending on target applications [3].Brightness, defined as a mean single photon number per pulse, is a crucial parameter for a deterministic SPS.The triggered SPSs are typically realized based on spontaneous emission of quantum emitters.Semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) have drawn considerable interest as solid-state quantum emitters owing to their high quantum efficiency and optical stability.However, it's challenging to funnel the photons out of the semiconductor material due to total internal reflection.Various kinds of nanostructures have been engineered around a QD to efficiently collect single photons and/or increase the source speed via Purcell effect [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].Nanowires and micropillars have been commonly applied, and over 70% brightness was obtained from a few of those structures [8,10,16,17].
Major applications of the SPSs employ the single photons as 'qubits', carrying information on its quantum state [18].The single photons should be eventually coupled to an optical fiber for long haul transmission.Conversely, the most efficient SPSs fire single photons into the free space and the subsequent fiber coupling engenders additional losses which effectively degrade the source brightness.Fiber-coupled SPSs are intriguing detours of the problem and several coupling schemes have been reported [19][20][21][22][23][24].In pursuit of brightness, a few fiber-coupled SPSs based on microcavities achieved around 20% of (fibercoupled) brightness [22][23][24], while other fiber-coupled SPSs with broadband coupling scheme remained around 10% of brightness [19][20][21].A few recent brightest QD SPSs generated single photons around 70% of pump pulses collected by microscope objectives [8,10,16,17].Their typical coupling efficiency to the subsequent single-mode fiber was ~70% [17], which implies that the effective brightness into fiber could be about 50%.Therefore, the brighter fiber-coupled SPS is dearly sought after.
Here we present bright fiber-coupled SPSs based on a QD embedded in a microfibermicrocavity system.The phase-matched coupling between a linear photonic crystal (PhC) cavity mode and a microfiber mode elevates the fiber coupling efficiency.Single photons from the QD are collected through the microfiber via the phase-matched cavity mode.High single photon count rate and brightness are achieved based on the efficient phase-matched fiber coupling.Significant Purcell enhancement is also confirmed from lifetime measurement.A series of data with different fibers and different QD-cavity systems supported consistency of the scheme.

Microfiber-microcavity system
The brightness of a fiber-coupled SPS is defined as the mean number of single photons per pulse and expressed as B = qβη, where q is internal quantum efficiency of the QD state, β is single mode coupling efficiency, and η is fiber coupling efficiency of the cavity mode.The internal quantum efficiency q typically ranges between 60 and 90% for InAs QDs [25,26].The spontaneous emission factor β is expressed as The β factors of PhC cavity modes or waveguide modes are usually high [6,24,27] owing to the Purcell effect and the suppressed other γ by the bandgap [28].On the other hand, the fiber coupling efficiency η was less than 50% and it was a main limiting factor of brightness in our previous fiber-coupled SPSs [23,24].Therefore, we concentrated on finding a structure to maximize the η and consequently elevate the brightness B. The fiber coupling efficiency η is closely related to the loss channels of the structure.In this system, the total quality factor Q is decomposed into three terms as . Accordingly the fiber coupling efficiency η is expressed as Here, Q i is a quality factor associated with each loss channel (i = fiber, air, slab).To maximize the η, the coupling into the fiber (1 fiber Q ; fiber coupling rate) should be enhanced and the loss to the air and the slab (1 1 1 ) should be reduced.A fiber-coupled PhC cavity structure is employed for the bright SPS (Fig. 1).The PhC cavity is designed to be a stick-shape linear cavity which is 13a long (a: lattice constant of the PhC), namely L13 cavity.The bottom schematic of the Fig. 1 describes a phasematched coupling between the cavity and the microfiber, which is a key concept of this SPS.
Resonant modes of the fiber-coupled L13 cavity were investigated by finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations (Fig. 2).The resonant modes were located along a dispersion curve of a PhC waveguide [29] and labeled as M1-M8 from the lowest frequency (Fig. 2(a)).For each mode, quality factors into each loss channel (Q fiber , Q slab , Q air ) and fiber coupling efficiencies were calculated and are shown in Fig. 2(b,c).The fiber coupling rate (1/Q fiber ) is high when the k-vector of a cavity mode is close to the phase-matching region (blue shaded circle in Fig. 2(a)).Q air is smaller than Q slab by 1-2 orders of magnitude, which means that radiation to the air is the dominant loss channel.The loss to the air (1/Q air ) keep increasing as the k-vector approaches the radiation zone.As a result, the fiber coupling efficiencies of the M3 and M4 modes in the vicinity of the phase-matching region are high (> 80%) (Fig. 2(c)).The fiber coupling efficiencies of the M1 and M2 modes could also be large if the Q loss remains high enough after fabrication.Our experimental Q loss stays order of 10 4 owing to imperfect fabrication (shown in Fig. 4(a)).

Sample fabrication and measurement setup
The InAs/GaAs QD wafer was grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE).Density of the InAs QDs was about 1 × 10 8 cm −2 .Our PhC cavities were fabricated by e-beam lithography using positive e-beam resist (ZEP-520A, ZEON chemicals).After development, chlorine-assisted argon beam etching drilled the PhC holes in the wafer.Selective wet etching with hydrofluoric acid undercut the Al x Ga 1-x As sacrificial layer to make the structure freestanding.Lattice constant, hole radius, and slab thickness were a = 253 nm, 0.33 a, and 125 nm, respectively.
A conventional single-mode optical fiber was tapered with flame-brush techniques to fabricate the microfibers.Compared to our previous microfibers [24], we reduced the pulling speed to approach the adiabatic condition [30] and decreased the flame oscillation speed to suppress the flame fluctuations.We achieved a high transmission of 93% with a short taper length of 16 mm.After the tapering, the microfiber was delicately curved and shaped with translational stages.The curved microfiber was fixed at an aluminum unit, and the unit was loaded inside the cryostat.Diameter of the taper waist was 0.8 μm, and the radius of curvature was 100 μm.The measurement setup is shown in Fig. 3.A 780-nm femtosecond laser with repetition rate of 80 MHz was used as a pump source.The pump laser was incident by an objective lens, and the signal was collected through the microfiber.A halogen lamp was incident to one arm of the fiber as a broad-band light source for the transmission measurement.The PhC sample and the microfiber were loaded inside a closed cycle cryostat.Collected signals were spectrally filtered with 0.1-nm window by a monochromator and measured by a charge coupled device (CCD) or a Hanbury Brown and Twiss (HBT) setup.Single-photon avalanche diodes (SPADs) which have detection efficiencies of 12.3% and 13.1% and response time of 400 ps were used to measure single photon count rates as well as second-order autocorrelations.Another SPAD which has faster response time of 40 ps and a lower detection efficiency was used to measure time-resolved PLs of the QDs inside cavities.Total transmission of the setup is calibrated with a tunable laser tuned near the QD emission wavelength.Transmission of the curved microfiber, FC-type fiber connector, and the monochromator (denoted as (1), ( 2), (3) in Fig. 3) are 0.93, 0.95, 0.36, respectively.Transmission from the microfiber to one end of fiber is 0.93 because collected photons pass through lossy tapered region only once.Consequently, the transmission from the microfiber to the two SPADs is 0.93 0.95 0.36 0.33 × × = , which will be used to estimate the brightness later.

Bright fiber-coupled single photon sources
We measured resonant transmission spectra to characterize the fiber-coupled PhC cavities.The fiber coupling of the cavity modes induces transmission dips, which are fitted and analyzed by the coupled mode theory [31][32][33].The fiber coupling efficiencies and the quality factors are obtained from the fitting.The PhC L13 cavity of interest (cavity 1) had several resonant modes in its transmission spectrum (Fig. 4(a)).The spectral separation between adjacent modes decreases as it approaches the bandedge (~909 nm), which is a characteristic behavior of waveguide-like PhC cavities [29,34].As one can observe in Fig. 4(a) and 4(b), the M3 cavity mode at 906.9 nm showed a strong photoluminescence (PL) peak which is from a spectral overlap with a QD.So the M3 mode was investigated in detail and it showed fiber coupling efficiency η of 58% and quality factor of 2,400.We utilized the M3 mode instead of M4 mode because we couldn't find a QD that was spectrally and spatially coupled to the M4 mode due to the low QD density.The transmission dip of M4 mode was deeper, which means its η is larger as 67%.Since the M4 and M3 are two deepest cavity modes, the phase matching point to a microfiber mode is expected to lie between M4 and M3 modes.We confirmed that the highest η from the fabricated samples was 76% (cavity 0, Fig. 4(c)), which is comparable to the calculated η of 89%.However, since it is difficult to locate the cavity mode satisfying the ideal phase-matching conditions, the highest η for each cavity typically varied in the range of 60-76%.Besides, finding the high-η cavity mode which was spatially and spectrally coupled to a QD perfectly was hindered by the low QD density.PL spectra were measured to confirm the QD-cavity coupling (Fig. 4(b)).We found a QD peak at 907 nm (QD 1) which was spectrally coupled to the M3 mode.Other resonant modes also appeared due to the cavity feeding effect from the QD [35,36].The QD peak dominated the cavity peak nearly by one order of magnitude, which indicated good spatial overlap of the QD with the M3 mode.For the following measurements, the QD peak was spectrally filtered by a monochromator with 0.1-nm window (orange bar in Fig. 4(b)) and directed to the HBT setup with SPADs.Second-order autocorrelation histogram of the QD 1 peak manifests single photon nature with g (2) (0) of 0.28 (Fig. 4(d)).The nonzero g (2) (0) value mainly stems from the recapture process [5,37] and cavity-enhanced QD continuum states [35,36].It can be significantly suppressed by (quasi-) resonant pumping scheme [5].Fig. 5. Pump power dependence of the single photon count rate and g (2) (0).Red and green dots represent detected photon count rates at the pump power.Here, the subscript L (R) indicates the detected count rate from the left (right) arm of the fiber, and A (B) denotes the count rate measured at the detector A (B). g (2) (0) is marked with black diamond.Dashed arrow indicate the maximum pump power of 11 μW in the limit of g (2) (0) < 0.5.
Next, the pump power dependence of single photon count rates and g (2) (0) were studied (Fig. 5).Here the single photons from both left and right arms of the fiber were detected.The single photon count rates showed saturation behaviors, which is a typical characteristic of a two-level system.When the pump power was 11 μW, the detected single photon count rates were I L_A = 480 kHz, I L_B = 492 kHz, I R_A = 413 kHz, I R_B = 424 kHz, with the g (2) (0) value of 0.46.Here, the subscript L (R) indicates the detected count rate from the left (right) arm of the fiber, and A (B) denotes the count rate measured at the detector A (B).The overall raw count rate was I L_A + I L_B + I R_A + I R_B = 1.81 MHz.After excluding the unwanted background signal [4] by multiplying 1− g (2) 0 ( ) , the total estimated single photon count rate was 1.33 MHz.Taking into account the setup transmission of 0.33 and the detection efficiencies of 12.3% and 13.1% for the respective detectors in the HBT setup, the collected single photon count rate was estimated to be 32 MHz, and the corresponding brightness B = 40%.We underline that the microfiber has high transmission of 93% by optimizing the fiber tapering processes.The corresponding transmission from the taper waist to the one end of the fiber is 96%.The relatively high g (2) (0) value is attributed to cavity-enhanced background signal [35,36] and carrier recapture process [37].The g (2) (0) value should be suppressed further for most of practical quantum processing.We claim that it can be significantly reduced by employing (quasi-) resonant pump [5].Time-resolved PLs of the QD signal was also measured to confirm the Purcell effect (Fig. 6(a)).The Purcell effect is known to be advantageous for fast SPSs [38] and high β factors [6].The spectrally filtered QD signal was measured with a fast SPAD which was triggered by pump pulses (red line in Fig. 6(a)).The histogram shows a bi-exponential decay and the fast (slow) component is associated with the radiative decay (background emission or spin-flip transition).The fast radiative component was 390 ps.Compared to the lifetime of QD ensemble in unpatterned GaAs of 1.23 ns [24], the enhanced spontaneous emission was manifested with the Purcell factor of 3. We also measured the lifetime of another QD (QD 2) spectrally far from the cavity mode and located inside the bandgap (Fig. 6(b,c)), which was τ off = 5.3 ns (black line in Fig. 6(a)).The long lifetime of 5.3 ns is attributed to the diminished density of states by the PhC bandgap [28].To check the robustness of the structure and consistency of the brightness model, a set of data was measured using different cavities and microfibers (Table 1).For the previous cavity 1, we changed the fiber (fiber 1) with another fiber (fiber 2) which was slightly distorted and hence the η was degraded to 40%.In this case, the brightness B was limited up to 26%.Multiplication of q and β can be obtained as a ratio of B to η.The q•β values were similar for both fiber 1 and fiber 2 as 0.69 and 0.65, respectively, which means that the brightness of 26% was mainly limited by the fiber coupling efficiency of 40%.We also performed similar measurements with a different cavity (cavity 2) and fiber (fiber 3).On resonance, we obtained brightness of 37% based on the fiber coupling efficiency of 59%, which are comparable values with those of the cavity 1 with the fiber 1.When we detuned the cavity resonance to deposition techniques [39], B was reduced to 22% with similar η of 56%.In this case, the β factor is expected to decrease due to the large detuning.As a result, we could collect consistent results and analyses for the different QD-cavity systems and microfibers.

Conclusion
Although we succeeded to transform 40% of the pump pulses into fiber-coupled single photons, there is still considerable room for improvement.First, the η of the SPS can be raised.There was some discrepancy between the highest η of the fabricated cavities (cavity 0) and the η of the bright SPS (cavity 1) due to the fluctuation of the η and the randomness of the QD-cavity coupling.For example, if we introduce strain tuning of the QD [40][41][42] for better spectral matching or site-controlled QDs [43] for deterministic spatial matching, the efficiency of QD-cavity coupling can be made higher and a QD can be coupled to a cavity with higher η.Second, the quasi-resonant excitation can selectively pump a p-shell of a single QD, which significantly decreases the off-resonant cavity feeding [5].Accordingly, higherdensity QD wafers can be utilized to increase the probability of a cavity having a bright QD inside.It will also greatly decrease the multiphoton probability due to suppression of unwanted excess carriers originating from above-band pump.Besides, if we adopt the deterministic positioning of photonic crystal cavity to a QD [44], we could obtain higher Purcell factor.
the spontaneous emission rate into the cavity mode of interest (the other modes).

Fig. 1 .
Fig. 1.A schematic diagram of fiber-coupled linear photonic crystal cavity.The bottom schematic explains the phase-matched coupling between microfiber and cavity.A quantum dot is embedded inside the cavity.

Fig. 2 .
Fig. 2. (a) k-space distribution of the resonant modes of L13 cavity (red circles) and dispersion relations of a microfiber (dashed line) and a photonic crystal waveguide (green solid line).kvector of each mode is located having equal spacing with adjacent modes.Resonant modes are marked M1-M8 from the lowest frequency.The black (gray) shaded area represents radiation modes to the air (transverse-magnetic modes leaking through the slab).(b) Q fiber (red dots), Q air (blue diamonds), and Q slab (green squares) of each mode.(c) Fiber coupling efficiency η of each mode.The M3 mode has the high η of 89%.

Fig. 4 .
Fig. 4. (a) Transmission spectrum of the cavity 1. Inset: The M3 mode is fitted to obtain the fiber coupling efficiency of 58%.(b) Photoluminescence spectrum of the cavity 1.The QD signal at 907 nm (QD 1) is spectrally filtered.The orange bar indicates the spectral window of 0.1 nm.(c) Transmission spectrum of cavity 0. Inset: The cavity mode near 917 nm is fitted to obtain the fiber coupling efficiency of 76%.(d) Second-order autocorrelation histogram of the QD 1 peak in (b) measured with the HBT setup.Pump power was 0.7 μW and integration time was 100 s.It shows clear antibunching with g (2) (0) = 0.28.

Fig. 6 .
Fig. 6.(a) Time-resolved PL measurement of the on-resonance QD (QD 1) and the offresonance QD (QD 2).The histogram of the QD 1 is fitted using a bi-exponential decay function (red line), and the fast (slow) component is 390 ps (1.77 ns).The histogram of the QD 2 is fitted using a mono-exponential decay function (black line), and the lifetime is 5.3 ns.The exponential fits of the decay curves are marked with dashed lines.(b) Transmission spectrum of the cavity containing the QD 2. Spectral positions of the resonant modes are denoted as the transmission dips.(c) Photoluminescence spectrum of the QD-cavity system.A quantum dot signal located at 895.9 nm (QD 2, indicated by a black arrow) is spectrally far from any cavity mode.

cav
Δλ is linewidth of the cavity mode) by gas