Enhanced plasmonic resonant excitation in a grating gated field-effect transistor with supplemental gates

An alternative-grating gated AlGaN/GaN field-effect transistor (FET) is proposed by considering the slit regions to be covered by a highly doped semiconductor acting as supplemental gates. The plasmonic resonant absorption spectra are studied at THz frequencies using the FDTD method. The 2DEGs, under supplemental gates, modulated by a positive voltage, can make the excitation of the higher order plasmon modes under metallic fingers more efficient in comparison to ungated regions in common slitgrating gate transistors. Moreover, the supplemental gates can confine the electric field of dipole oscillation between metallic gate fingers under THz radiation. The competition of the near-field enhancement and screening effect of the supplemental gate fingers results in the intensity of the higher order plasmon resonances being maximized at increased doping concentration. Our results demonstrate the possibility of significant improvement in the excitation of plasmon resonances in FETs for THz detection. ©2013 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: (040.0040) Detectors; (040.2235) Far infrared or terahertz; (050.2770) Gratings; (250.5403) Plasmonics. References and links 1. M. S. Vitiello, D. Coquillat, L. Viti, D. Ercolani, F. Teppe, A. Pitanti, F. Beltram, L. Sorba, W. Knap, and A. Tredicucci, “Room-Temperature Terahertz Detectors Based on Semiconductor Nanowire Field-Effect Transistors,” Nano Lett. 12(1), 96–101 (2012). 2. L. Vicarelli, M. S. Vitiello, D. Coquillat, A. Lombardo, A. C. Ferrari, W. Knap, M. Polini, V. Pellegrini, and A. Tredicucci, “Graphene field-effect transistors as room-temperature terahertz detectors,” Nat. Mater. 11(10), 865– 871 (2012). 3. M. S. Vitiello, L. Viti, L. Romeo, D. Ercolani, G. Scalari, J. Faist, F. Beltram, L. Sorba, and A. Tredicucci, “Semiconductor nanowires for highly sensitive, room-temperature detection of terahertz quantum cascade laser emission,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 100(24), 241101 (2012). 4. A. Pitanti, D. Coquillat, D. Ercolani, L. Sorba, F. Teppe, W. Knap, G. De Simoni, F. Beltram, A. Tredicucci, and M. S. Vitiello, “Terahetz detection by heterostructed InAs/InSb nanowire based field effect transistors,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 101(14), 141103 (2012). 5. A. R. Davoyan, V. V. Popov, and S. A. Nikitov, “Tailoring Terahertz Near-Field Enhancement via TwoDimensional Plasmons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108(12), 127401 (2012). 6. V. V. Popov, D. V. Fateev, T. Otsuji, Y. M. Meziani, D. Coquillat, and W. Knap, “Plasmonic terahertz detection by a double-grating-gate field-effect transistor structure with an asymmetric unit cell,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 99(24), 243504 (2011). 7. A. V. Muravjov, D. B. Veksler, V. V. Popov, O. V. Polischuk, N. Pala, X. Hu, R. Gaska, H. Saxena, R. E. Peale, and M. S. Shur, “Temperature dependence of plasmonic terahertz absorption in grating-gate gallium-nitride transistor structures,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(4), 042105 (2010). 8. D. V. Fateev, V. V. Popov, and M. S. Shur, “Transformation of the Plasmon Spectrum in a Grating-Gate Transistor Structure with Spatially Modulated Two-Dimensional Electron Channel,” Semiconductors 44(11), 1406–1413 (2010). #178846 $15.00 USD Received 1 Nov 2012; revised 20 Dec 2012; accepted 7 Jan 2013; published 15 Jan 2013 (C) 2013 OSA 28 January 2013 / Vol. 21, No. 2 / OPTICS EXPRESS 1606 9. T. Nishimura, N. Magome, and T. Otsuji, “An Intensity Modulator for Terahertz Electromagnetic Waves Utilizing Two-Dimensional Plasmon Resonance in a Dual-Grating-Gate High-Electron-Mobility Transistor,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 49(5), 054301 (2010). 10. V. V. Popov, D. V. Fateev, O. V. Polischuk, and M. S. Shur, “Enhanced electromagnetic coupling between terahertz radiation and plasmons in a grating-gate transistor structure on membrane substrate,” Opt. Express 18(16), 16771–16776 (2010). 11. D. Coquillat, S. Nadar, F. Teppe, N. Dyakonova, S. Boubanga-Tombet, W. Knap, T. Nishimura, T. Otsuji, Y. M. Meziani, G. M. Tsymbalov, and V. V. Popov, “Room temperature detection of sub-terahertz radiation in doublegrating-gate transistors,” Opt. Express 18(6), 6024–6032 (2010). 12. L. Wang, X. S. Chen, W. D. Hu, J. Wang, J. Wang, X. D. Wang, and W. Lu, “The plasmonic resonant absorption in GaN double-channel high electron mobility transistors,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 99(6), 063502 (2011). 13. L. Wang, W. D. Hu, J. Wang, X. D. Wang, S. W. Wang, X. S. Chen, and W. Lu, “Plasmon resonant excitation in grating-gated AlN barrier transistors at terahertz frequency,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 100(12), 123501 (2012). 14. T. Otsuji, M. Hanabe, T. Nishimura, and E. Sano, “A grating-bicoupled plasma-wave photomixer with resonantcavity enhanced structure,” Opt. Express 14(11), 4815–4825 (2006). 15. E. A. Shaner, M. Lee, M. C. Wanke, A. D. Grine, J. L. Reno, and S. J. Allen, “Single-quantum-well gratinggated terahertz plasmon detectors,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87(19), 193507 (2005). 16. X. G. Peralta, S. J. Allen, M. C. Wanke, N. E. Harff, J. A. Simmons, M. P. Lilly, J. L. Reno, P. J. Burke, and J. P. Eisenstein, “Terahertz photoconductivity and plasmon modes in double-quantum-well field-effect transistors,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 81(9), 1627–1629 (2002). 17. V. V. Popov, “Plasmon Excitation and Plasmonic Detection of Terahertz Radiation in the Grating-Gate FieldEffect-Transistor Structures,” J. Infrared Milli. Terahz. Waves 32(10), 1178–1191 (2011). 18. A. E. I. Fatimy, F. Teppe, N. Dyakonova, W. Knap, D. Seliuta, G. Valušis, A. Shchepetov, Y. Roelens, S. Bollaert, A. Cappy, and S. Rumyantsev, “Resonant and voltage-tunable terahertz detection in InGaAs/InP nanometer transistors,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89(13), 131926 (2006). 19. M. Dyakonov and M. S. Shur, “Plasma wave electronics: novel terahertz devices using two dimensional electron fluid,” IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 43(10), 1640–1645 (1996). 20. V. V. Popov, G. M. Tsymbalov, T. V. Teperik, D. V. Fateev, and M. S. Shur, “Terahertz Excitation of the Higher-Order Plasmon Modes in Field-Effect Transistor Arrays with Common and Separate Two-Dimensional Electron Channels,” Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci., Physics 71(1), 89–92 (2007). 21. V. V. Popov, A. N. Koudymov, M. Shur, and O. V. Polischuk, “Tuning of ungated plasmons by a gate in the field-effect transistor with two-dimensional electron channel,” J. Appl. Phys. 104(2), 024508 (2008). 22. V. V. Popov, M. S. Shur, G. M. Tsymbalov, and D. V. Fateev, “Higher-order plasmon resonances in GaN-based field-effect transistor arrays,” Int. J. High Speed Electron. Syst. 17(3), 557–566 (2007). 23. V. V. Popov, G. M. Tsymbalov, D. V. Fateev, and M. S. Shur, “Cooperative absorption of terahertz radiation by plasmon modes in an array of field-effect transistors with two-dimensional electron channel,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89(12), 123504 (2006). 24. Y. Zeng, Y. Fu, M. Bengtsson, X. S. Chen, W. Lu, and H. Ågren, “Finite-difference time-domain simulations of exciton-polariton resonances in quantum-dot arrays,” Opt. Express 16(7), 4507–4519 (2008). 25. V. V. Popov, O. V. Polischuk, T. V. Teperik, X. G. Peralta, S. J. Allen, N. J. M. Horing, and M. C. Wanke, “Absorption of terahertz radiation by plasmon modes in a grid-gated double-quantum-well field-effect transistor,” J. Appl. Phys. 94(5), 3556–3562 (2003). 26. S. J. Allen, Jr., D. C. Tsui, and F. DeRosa, “Frequency Dependence of the Electron Conductivity in the Silicon Inversion Layer in the Metallic and Localized Regimes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 35(20), 1359–1362 (1975). 27. K. S. Yee, “Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell’s equations in isotropic media,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. AP-14, 302–307 (1966). 28. R. J. Luebbers, F. Hunsberger, and K. S. Kunz, “A frequency-dependent finite-difference time-domain formulation for transient propagation in plasma,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. 39(1), 29–34 (1991). 29. J. Wang, X. S. Chen, Z. F. Li, and W. Lu, “Study of grating performance for quantum well photodetectors,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27(11), 2428–2432 (2010). 30. J. A. Dionne, L. A. Sweatlock, H. A. Atwater, and A. Polman, “Plasmon slot waveguides: Towards chip-scale propagation with subwavelength-scale localization,” Phys. Rev. B 73(3), 035407 (2006).


Introduction
Recently, the terahertz (THz) response of field-effect transistors (FETs) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] with a periodic metal grating gate [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] has been widely investigated.The metal grating gate placed in close proximity to the two dimensional (2D) electron channel is an efficient coupler between plasmons and THz radiation [17].The frequency of gated plasma oscillations can be tuned efficiently by applying DC voltage to the grating-gate fingers.Thus, the gated controllable plasmon becomes one of the most attractive modes for THz radiation detection [18][19][20].However, gated plasmons are still weakly coupled to THz radiation due to the strong screening effect of the gate electrode [20,21].A method to more efficiently excite the gated plasmon modes, especially the higher order resonances, has attracted extensive attention.Popov et al. have demonstrated that the ungated regions of the common 2D electron channel play an important role of electric vibrators in efficiently exciting gated plasmons [20].Further, the absorption spectrum of field-effect hetero-transistors (FEHTs) is calculated with separated 2D electron channels in which the ungated regions are replaced by lateral metal contacts [20,22,23].In their work, higher order plasmon resonances up to a frequency of 15 THz are obtained and the absorption strength approaches the maximum of 0.25.This effect is the result of the electron liquid in the lateral metal contacts being more "rigid" than that in the 2DEGs.Therefore, the side metal contacts are more efficient electric vibrators exciting the gated plasmons.Based on such an idea, we design an alternative-grating gated AlGaN/GaN field-effect transistor by considering the slit regions of the structure to be covered by a highly doped semiconductor acting as supplemental gates.Thus, the supplemental gates can be used to make the "ungated" 2DEGs more "rigid" than the 2DEGs under vacuum slits by applying positive voltages.

Device description and analysis model
Figure 1 shows the schematic of a AlGaN/GaN FET with alternative-grating gates (AGG).
Compared with the common slit-grating gates (SGG), our slit regions are occupied by a highly doped semiconductor acting as supplemental gates.The metallic (yellow, 1 μm wide) and supplemental (green, 0.1 μm wide) gated fingers are arranged alternatively to fully cover the barrier, but not fully screen the channel due to the semi-screened characteristic of doped semiconductor material.Here, the doped semiconductor material, as the supplemental gate, is highly doped GaN and the doping concentration is at the level of 10 18 cm −3 .According to our calculations, a higher concentration, i.e. 10 19 cm −3 , can cause serious screening of the supplemental gate so that the gated plasmons in the channel can be hardly excited.The voltage applied to the metallic gate can be transferred to the supplemental gate due to the Ohmic contact boundary between the metallic and supplemental finger.With this type of grating gate, the density of all the channel electrons can be modulated uniformly.Other parameters of AlGaN/GaN FETs are used in calculations as follows: areal density of 2DEGs at zero gate voltage N 0 = 1.87 × 10 13 cm −2 , electron relaxation time τ = 2.27 × 10 −13 s [20], electron effective mass m* = 0.2m 0 , barrier thickness d = 10 nm and barrier permittivity ε b = 9 [20].The plasmonic resonant absorption spectra of the transistor at THz frequencies are investigated by using a finite difference time domain (FDTD) method [13,24].The Drude model [13,25,26] is used to describe the behaviors of 2DEGs and the supplemental gates.The gold fingers with electric conductivity 4.1 × 10 7 S•m −1 are considered as the perfectly conductive strips.Our further calculation shows that this assumption has a negligible effect on our results.The electromagnetic wave (EMW) solver "EMLAB" from "Sentaurus" was used for the calculation of the 2D FDTD method.According to the standard Yee algorithm [27], Maxwell's equations are differentiated in the time-space dimension [9,14].The frequencydependent conductivity based on the Drude model is embedded into the EMW solver [9,13].In the simulation, recursive convolution (RC) methods are used to handle dispersive media [28].Additionally, periodic boundary conditions are imposed in the x direction for the grating gates, while perfect matched layers are imposed in the y direction [29].
For a thin barrier layer, the dispersion of gated plasmons in FETs with SGG has the following form [8,17,22] where k = 2πn/L (n = 1, 2, 3•••) when w << L. w and L are the slit width and the period of SGG, respectively.In this paper, w is narrow enough compared to L (see Fig. 1) such that the wave vector of gated plasmon basically satisfies the formula mentioned above.Under the gradual channel approximation, the areal density in the gated region can be expressed in a simple parallel-plate capacitor model as 0 , where U g is the gate voltage and U th is the channel depletion threshold voltage.Then the dispersion Eq. (1) becomes * ( ) .

Results and discussions
Figure 2 shows the THz absorption spectra of AlGaN/GaN FETs for AGG (solid lines) at zero gate voltage.The doping concentration of the supplemental gate changes from 3.5 × 10 18 cm −3 to 1.5 × 10 18 cm −3 at a step of 0.5 × 10 18 cm −3 .For convenience of comparison, the absorption spectrum for common SGG (dashed line) is also calculated, as shown in Fig. 2.
The resonant frequencies for the structure with SGG are in good agreement with that of Eq.
(1).The equidistant characteristic of THz absorption peaks is also shown in the results of the AGG as evidence of the excitation of the gated plasmon modes, although the peaks have a small redshift in spectra.The small shift may result from the dielectric change of the supplemental gates induced by different doping concentrations.Figure 3 shows the plasmoninduced electric field distributions of the AGG device with a doping concentration 2.0 × 10 18 cm −3 .Figures 3(a), 3(b), 3(c) and 3(d) correspond to the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th order resonant modes, respectively.It has been indicated that the electric field of channel plasmons can extend to the barrier and buffer layers without the metallic gates [30].However, with the metallic gates, the induced imaging charge in the gates confines the field of channel plasmons to the barrier layer even without applied gate voltages.Furthermore, the spatial waveform of the plasmon mode occupies the entire period of the structure [8].The maximum field intensity tends to be confined more closely to the edges of the metallic gate fingers as the order of plasmon modes increases.It also can be seen from Fig. 2 that the absorption strengths of S1 to S3 for the common SGG are higher than that for AGG.Moreover, with increasing the doping density, the absorption strengths of S1 to S5 monotonically decrease.This effect may be due to the carrier screening effect of supplemental gates resulting in the weakening of gated plasmons coupling to the THz radiation.However, an abnormal change is obtained that the absorption peak of S6 for AGG exhibits a maximum at increased doping concentration (see the inset of Fig. 2).Here, the screening effect of the supplemental gates reduces the absorption of channel plasmons with increasing doping concentration.Therefore, the absorption peak is expected to decrease.However, for the higher order plasmon modes, the high resonant frequencies make the electric dipole oscillations very strong.When increasing the doping concentration, the electric fields of dipole oscillations near the channel become stronger.The maximum peak is the consequence of the competition between the screening effect and the near-field enhancement caused by the supplemental gates.This phenomenon will be explained below in detail.As mentioned above, the absorption peaks of the lower orders exhibit little reduction with an increase in the doping concentration due to the carrier screening effect of supplemental gates.However, the absorption peaks of the higher orders are excited with increasing doping concentration and have higher strength.This is due to the fact that the resonant frequencies are not very high for the lower order plasmon modes, and the electric fields of the dipole oscillations between the metallic gates are weak.Thus, the carrier screening effect is dominant and reduces the absorbance.For the higher order plasmon modes, the high resonant frequencies make the electric fields of the dipole oscillations very strong.The supplemental gates between two adjoining metallic fingers provide a good conductive path in which the electric fields of dipole oscillation are well confined.The gates make the fields near the 2D channel stronger than that for SGG.In addition, the higher doping concentration the supplemental gates have, the more strongly the electric fields are confined.Thus, for the higher order plasmon modes, although the carrier screening effect still exists, the near-field enhancement effect is dominant and the higher order resonances are more efficiently excited.The left inset (black line) presents the electric field for the AGG structure with a doping concentration of 1.5 × 10 18 cm −3 at the 5th resonant frequency 11.86 THz.right inset (red line) shows the electric field for the AGG structure with a doping concentration of 3.5 × 10 18 cm −3 at the 5th resonant frequency 11.08 THz.It is seen that the electric field with low doping concentration is much lower and more spread than that with high doping concentration.Moreover, the abnormal peaks appear at S6 for zero gate voltage, S5 for 3V and S4 for 5V (seeing the insets of Fig. 2 and Fig. 4).It is well known that a higher positive gate voltage can cause the higher 2DEGs density.In that case, the near-field enhancement can also be strengthened due to the increasing net dipole moment in the channel.Thus, at a certain gate voltage, the competition of the screening and near-field enhancement of supplemental gates results in the creation of the maximum peak at increased doping concentration.When increasing the gate voltage, the channel under the metallic gate can further intensify the effect of near-field enhancement.Finally, the combining localized strengthening of the electric fields causes the relevant peak of abnormal change to shift the excitation of lower orders.In addition, for SGG transistor, it is also found that the plasmon resonances can be excited up to 7th order at zero gate voltage (not shown in Fig. 2), 5th order at 3V and 4th order at 5V.Higher ratio of N gated /N ungated , where N gated and N ungated are the 2DEGs densities under the gated and ungated regions, respectively, can reduce the number of excited plasmon modes.For the AGG transistor, the supplemental gates can be used to modulate the 2D electron channel uniformly under a positive gate voltage resulting in higher orders of plasmon modes which can be excited.Therefore, according to the applications, the high performance THz response of field-effect transistors can be achieved by appropriately choosing the grating gate.screening effect of the supplemental gate fingers results in the intensity of the higher order plasmon resonances being maximized at increased doping concentration.Our results demonstrate the possibility of significant improvement in the excitation of plasmon resonances in FETs for THz detection.

Fig. 1 .
Fig. 1.The schematic of an alternative-grating gated AlGaN/GaN FET.The THz wave is incident from the top side with the polarization of electric field along the grating-gate periodicity. ,

Fig. 2 .
Fig.2.THz absorption spectra for AGG (solid lines) and SGG (dashed line) at zero gate voltage.The arrow marks the change of doping concentration from 3.5 × 10 18 cm −3 to 1.5 × 10 18 cm −3 at a step of 0.5 × 10 18 cm −3 ."S1" to "S6" are used to label the resonant peaks.Each symbol presents a series of peaks at the same resonant order.Absorption strength as a function of doping concentration at S6 is shown in the inset.

Fig. 4 .
Fig. 4. THz absorption spectra for AGG (solid lines) and SGG (dashed line) under 3V (a) and 5V (b) gate voltages.The arrow marks the change of doping concentration from 3.5 × 10 18 cm −3 to 1.5 × 10 18 cm −3 at a step of 0.5 × 10 18 cm −3 ."S1" to "S6" are used to label the resonant peaks.Each symbol presents a series of peaks at the same order.The insets in (a) and (b) show the absorption strength as a function of doping concentration for S5 and S4, respectively.
For clarity we only calculate the field distribution of dipole oscillation of the AGG structures #178846 -$15.00USD Received 1 Nov 2012; revised 20 Dec 2012; accepted 7 Jan 2013; published 15 Jan 2013 (C) 2013 OSA 28 January 2013 / Vol.21, No. 2 / OPTICS EXPRESS 1612 for different doping concentrations without considering the 2DEG channel in order to indicate the near-field enhancement.The results are shown in Fig. 5 with AGG at a 5V gate voltage.

Fig. 5 .
Fig. 5.The electric filed distribution of dipole oscillation along the white dashed line (see the insets) at 5V gate voltage.The white dashed line is the perpendicular bisector of the supplemental gate.The values of the X-coordinate correspond to that of Y-axis of the inset.