Arbitrary-to-linear or linear-to-arbitrary polarization controller based on Faraday and Pockels effects in a single BGO crystal

We propose an arbitrary-to-linear or linear-to-arbitrary polarization controller based on the mutual action of Faraday and Pockels effects in a single Bi4Ge3O12 (BGO) crystal after the wave coupling theory describing these two effects. It is demonstrated that, the expected conversion of arbitrary-to-linear or linear-to-arbitrary polarization state of light can be realized by adjusting the applied electric and magnetic fields. ©2007 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: (260.5430) Polarization; (190.4360) Nonlinear optics, devices; (230.2090) Electro-optical devices; (160.3820) Magneto-optical materials. References and links 1. R. Alferness, “Electrooptic guided-wave device for general polarization transformations,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 17, 965-969 (1981). 2. N. G. Walker and G. R. Walker, “Polarization control for coherent communications,” J. Lightwave Technol. 8, 438-458 (1990). 3. A. V. Krishnamoorthy, F. Xu, J. E. Ford, and Y. Fainman, “Polarization-controlled multistage switch based on polarization-selective computer-generated holograms,” Appl. Opt. 36, 997-1010 (1997). 4. C. D. Poole, “Measurement of polarization-mode dispersion in single-mode fibers with random mode coupling,” Opt. Lett. 14, 523-525 (1989). 5. T. Ono, S. Yamazaki, H. Shimizu, and K. Emura, “Polarization control method for suppressing polarization mode dispersion influence in optical transmission systems,” J. Lightwave Technol. 12, 891-898 (1994). 6. R. Khosravani, S. A. Havstad, Y. W. Song, P. Ebrahimi, and A. E. Willner, “Polarization-mode dispersion compensation in WDM systems,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 13, 1370-1372 (2001). 7. R. Noe, D. Sandel, M. Yoshida-Dierolf, S. Hinz, V. Mirvoda, A. Schopflin, C. Gungener, E. Gottwald, C. Scheerer, G. Fischer, T. Weyrauch, and W. Haase, “Polarization mode dispersion compensation at 10, 20, and 40 Gb/s with various optical equalizers,” J. Lightwave Technol. 17, 1602-1616 (1999). 8. G. G. Paulus, F. Grasbon, A. Dreischuh, H. Walther, R. Kopold, and W. Becker, “Above-threshold ionization by an elliptically polarized field: interplay between electronic quantum trajectories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3791-3794 (2000). 9. B. Borca, M. V. Frolov, N. L. Manakov, and A. F. Starace, “Threshold effects on angular distributions for multiphoton detachment by intense elliptically polarized light,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 133001 (2001). 10. M. E. J. Friese, T. A. Nieminen, N. R. Heckenberg, and H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, “Optical torque controlled by elliptical polarization,” Opt. Lett. 23, 1-3 (1998). 11. J. J. Larsen, K. Hald, N. Bjerre, H. Stapelfeldt, and T. Seideman, “Three dimensional alignment of molecules using elliptically polarized laser fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2470-2473 (2000). 12. T. Lai, L. Liu, Q. Shou, L. Lei, and W. Lin, “Elliptically polarized pump-probe spectroscopy and its application to observation of electron-spin relaxation in GaAs quantum wells,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 40404042 (2004). 13. W. A. Bonner and B. D. Bean, “Asymmetric photolysis with elliptically polarized light,” Orig. Life Evol. Biosphere 30, 513-517 (2000). 14. W. H. J. Aarts and G. -D. Khoe, “New endless polarization control method using three fiber squeezers,” J. Lightwave Technol. 7, 1033-1043 (1989). 15. F. Heismann, “Analysis of a reset-free polarization controller for fast automatic polarization stabilization in fiber-optic transmission systems,” J. Lightwave Technol. 12, 690-699 (1994). 16. H. Shimizu and K. Kaede, “Endless polarization controller using electro-optic waveplates,” Electron. Lett. 24, 412-413 (1988). #88058 $15.00 USD Received 11 Oct 2007; revised 25 Oct 2007; accepted 25 Oct 2007; published 9 Nov 2007 (C) 2007 OSA 12 November 2007 / Vol. 15, No. 23 / OPTICS EXPRESS 15589 17. J. Prat, J. Comellas, and G. Junyent, “Experimental demonstration of an all-fiber endless polarization controller based on Faraday rotation,” Photon. Technol. Lett. 7, 1430-1432 (1995). 18. D. Goldring, Z. Zalevsky, G. Shabtay, D. Abraham, and D. Mendlovic, “Magneto-optic-based devices for polarization control,” J. Opt. A 6, 98-105 (2004). 19. X. S. Yao, L. Yan, and Y. Shi, “Highly repeatable all-solid-state polarization-state generator,” Opt. Lett. 30, 1324-1326 (2005). 20. Y. Zhang, C. Yang, S. Li, H. Yan, J Yin, C. Gu, and G. Jin, “Complete polarization controller based on magneto-optic crystals and fixed quarter wave plates,” Opt. Express 14, 3484-3490 (2006). 21. T. Saitoh and S. Kinugawa, “Magnetic field rotating-type Faraday polarization controller,” Photon. Technol. Lett. 15, 1404-1406 (2003). 22. S. H. Rumbaugh, M. D. Jones, and L. W. Casperson, “Polarization control for coherent fiber-optic systems using nematic liquid crystals,” J. Lightwave Technol. 8, 459-465 (1990). 23. Z. Zhuang, S. -W. Suh, and J. S. Patel, “Polarization controller using nematic liquid crystals,” Opt. Lett. 24, 694-696 (1999). 24. X. Chen, L. Yan, and X. S. Yao, "Waveplate analyzer using binary magneto-optic rotators," Opt. Express 15, 12989-12994 (2007) 25. L. Chen, G. Zheng, and W. She, “Electrically and magnetically controlled optical spanner based on the transfer of spin angular momentum of light in an optically active medium,” Phys. Rev. A. 75, 061403(R) (2007). 26. P. A. Williams, A. H. Rose, K. S. Lee, D. C. Conrad, G. W. Day, and P. D. Hale, “Optical, thermo-optic, electro-optic, and photoelastic properties of bismuth germanate (Bi4Ge3O12),” Appl. Opt. 35, 3562-3569 (1996). 27. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Electrodynamics of continuous media (Pergamon Press, 1984). 28. W. She and W. Lee, “Wave coupling theory of linear electroopitc effect,” Opt. Commun.195, 303-311 (2001). 29. H. Wang, W. Jia, and J. Shen, “Magneto-optical Faraday rotation in Bi4Ge3O12 crystal,” Acta Phys. Sin. 34, 126-128 (1985). 30. R. Nitsche, “Crystal growth and electro-optic effect of bismuth germanate, Bi4 (GeO4)3,” J. Appl. Phys. 36, 2358-2360 (1965). 31. D. P. Bortfeld and H. Meier, “Refractive indices and electro-optic coefficients of the eulitities Bi4Ge3O12 and Bi4Si3O12,” J. Appl. Phys. 43, 5110-5111 (1972). 32. Z. Y. Guo, “Standard magnetic field source of automatic adjustment,” Metrology & Measurement Technique 30, 20-21 (2003). 33. T. Matsuzaki, K. Nagamine, K. Ishida, N. Kawamura, S. N. Nakamura, Y. Matsuda, M. Tanase, M. Kato, K. Kurosawa, H. Sugai, K. Kudo, N. Takeda, and G. H. Eaton, “First observation of radiative photons associated with the − μ transfer process from − μ t to He 3 through an intermediate ) He ( 3 − μ t mesomolecule,” Phys. Lett. B 527, 43–49 (2002). 34. J. P. Gordon and H. Kogelnik, “PMD fundamentals: Polarization mode dispersion in optical fibers,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 97, 4541-4550 (2000).


Introduction
The state of polarization (SOP), as a fundamental property of a light wave, has drawn a great deal of attention due to its interesting properties and potential applications.In polarization sensitive systems such as waveguides [1], coherent detections [2] and polarization-based switches [3], SOP effect plays an important role.And in wave-length-division-multiplexing (WDM) systems, polarization-mode dispersion (PMD), polarization-dependent loss (PDL) and unpredicted SOP drift (due to thermal, mechanical or pressure perturbations) can accumulate and become considerable obstacles to the long-haul telecommunications [4][5][6][7].Also, the use of elliptically polarized fields has added a new dimension to the study of multiphoton processes, such as the asymmetry of angular distributions in above-threshold ionization (ATI), in which the laser ellipticity is an important parameter [8,9].In micromanipulation it was demonstrated that the polarization of laser beam (optical spanner) can smoothly control the rotation of small particles or orientation of molecules [10][11].The elliptically polarized pump-probe technology has revealed that the electron-spin relaxation in semiconductor quantum well depends evidently on the incident ellipticity of laser beam [12].Besides, recent interest is also attracted to explore the potential of elliptically polarized light in promoting the asymmetric photolysis of racemic organic substrates and producing measurable enantiomeric excesses [13].
For the control of the SOP of light, a number of useful polarization controllers, such as the squeezed fiber [14], rotating wave-plates [15], electro-optic wave-plates [16], Faraday rotators [17][18][19][20], and rotating magnetic field type [21] have been reported.Other kinds are based on nematic liquid crystals, which possess a superiority of low operating voltage [22,23].Very Recently, a simple waveplate analyzer using magneto-optic (MO) polarization rotators is also proposed [24].In this paper, we propose another kind of polarization controller, i.e., arbitrary-to-linear or linear-to-arbitrary polarization controller, which consists of only one crystal without mechanically moving parts, completely driven by magnetic and electric fields, so operating fast, accurately and stably.

Theory
Here, we would like to use the wave coupling theory of the mutual action of Faraday and Pockels effects to discuss the principle of our polarization controller.Recently, we proposed an electrically and magnetically controlled optical spanner based on the wave coupling theory of Faraday and Pockels effects in an optically active medium [25].We find from the theory that, if a suitable medium with Faraday and Pockels effects but without natural optical activity (e.g., Bi 4 Ge 3 O 12 (BGO) crystal [26]) is used to construct the SOP controller, the conversion of arbitrary-to-linear or linear-to-arbitrary polarization of light can be easily achieved by adjusting the applied magnetic and electric fields.Now we begin to discuss its principle.When a light propagates in a medium, which exhibits Faraday and Pockels effects but without natural optical activity and is simultaneously subject to external magnetic field ) 0 B( and electric field ) 0 E( , the second-order polarizations induced by the two fields should be . where denote two cross or independent components of light in the crystal; and subscripts MO and EO denote Faraday rotation [27] and Pockels effect [28], respectively.Similarly to Refs.[25,28], starting from Maxwell's equations, considering only the secondorder nonlinearity described by Eq. ( 1), we can derive, under slow varying amplitude approximation and no-walk-off approximation, the wave-coupling equations describing the mutual action of Faraday and Pockels effects in the medium, as follows: where are the same as those in Ref. [28], while , where a, b, c, and m are four unit vectors parallel to 1 E , 2 E , E(0) and B(0), respectively (as shown in Fig. 1).Therefore , and 2 / 0 63 B (in Tesla) and 0 E (in kV/cm) denote the amplitudes of magnetic and electric fields, respectively.

Arbitrary-to-linear polarization controller
Firstly, we discuss the conversion of arbitrary-to-linear SOP.In this case, the initial conditions of light field are α , where α and δ are two parameters, which can be measured and determined by an Agilent 8509C polarization analyzer [19].Subsequently, the solutions of Eq. ( 3) are 2 ( ) sin cos( )exp( ) cos sin( )exp( ) to the vertical one (V).The corresponding mapping algorithm on Poincare sphere for the arbitrary-to-linear SOP conversion is shown in Fig. 2, marked by the blue lines.And, the required magnetic and electric fields can be easily calculated by using the following expressions: For example, with the input SOP is far smaller than the breakdown field of the material considered [31].The required magnetic field can be supplied by an adjustable electromagnet [32], or for some special uses, by superconducting Helmholtz coil [33].Fig. 2. Arbitrary-to-linear or linear-to-arbitrary SOP mapping algorithms on the Poincare sphere: V, vertical linear; H, horizontal linear; M, +45 o linear; N, -45 o linear; L, left-handed circular; R, right-handed circular; P 1, an arbitrary input SOP; P 3 , an arbitrary output SOP; Q 3 , projection of P 3 in S 2 OS 3 plane.Conversion of arbitrary-to-linear polarization (blue lines): , where s is an odd (even) integer.Conversion of linear to arbitrary polarization (red lines):

Linear-to-arbitrary polarization controller
Secondly, we discuss the conversion of linear-to-arbitrary polarization.With the initial condition of horizontally linear polarization, i.e., , the solution of Eq. ( 3) can be easily gotten.It is ) cos( ) 2 sin( Equations ( 6) and (7) indicate that the retardation and Stokes vector are the functions of the two applied fields since are the functions of two static fields.And Eqs. (7) have the same forms as those of unit-sphere coordinates with azimuth angle ) 2 ( and ) ( θ π + are tuned in the range from 0 to π 2 , which means that the conversion of linear-to-arbitrary polarization can be realized since the Poincare sphere corresponds to all of SOP.The mapping algorithm on the Poincare sphere for linear-to-arbitrary SOP conversion is also shown in Fig. 2, by red lines.To reach point ) , , (

S S S
on the Poincare sphere, the applied fields should be set as  , representing azimuth angle and ellipticity of polarization ellipse, respectively; and the positive and negative for e correspond to right-and left-handed elliptical polarizations, respectively.Therefore in practice, for given ψ and e , we can calculate immediately that the required magnetic and electric fields according to Eqs. ( 8 , respectively.Fig. 3 shows the general correspondence between applied fields and designated output SOP.The color bars in Fig. 3 illustrates that, the maximum amplitudes of two external fields needed are also about 1.25T and 8.6kV/cm, respectively.Similarly, for the case of vertically linear polarization input, i.e., 0 ) 0 (

Summary
In summary, we have theoretically demonstrated both arbitrary-to-linear and linear-toarbitrary polarization controllers based on the mutual action of Faraday rotation and Pockels effect in a single BGO crystal.And, one can find that with such two controllers combined together, the arbitrary-to-arbitrary SOP conversion could also be realized.

.
It should be pointed out that in derivation of Eqs.(2), the relation

Fig. 1 .
Fig. 1.The configuration of the BGO crystal and the directions of the two external fields.We now choose one 4cm 5mm 5mm × × BGO crystal as the working medium, which is so designed: two (110) faces are coated with electrodes while two ) 10 1 ( faces are well polished;

.
The output light filed can be equivalently described by the following Stokes vector[34] $15.00 USD Received 11 Oct 2007; revised 25 Oct 2007; accepted 25 Oct 2007; published 9 Nov 2007 (C) 2007 OSAOn the other hand, a Stokes vector can be represented by two parameters of the polarization ellipse, ψ and e , i.e.,

Fig. 3 .
Fig. 3. Correspondence between applied fields and designated output SOP for horizontally linear polarization input: (a) Magnetic field (in Tesla) vs. designated output SOP; (b) Electric field (in kV/cm) vs. designated output SOP.