Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Enhanced functionalities of immune cells separated by a microfluidic lattice: assessment based on holotomography

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

The isolation of white blood cells (WBCs) from whole blood constitutes a pivotal process for immunological studies, diagnosis of hematologic disorders, and the facilitation of immunotherapy. Despite the ubiquity of density gradient centrifugation in WBC isolation, its influence on WBC functionality remains inadequately understood. This research employs holotomography to explore the effects of two distinct WBC separation techniques, namely conventional centrifugation and microfluidic separation, on the functionality of the isolated cells. We utilize three-dimensional refractive index distribution and time-lapse dynamics to analyze individual WBCs in-depth, focusing on their morphology, motility, and phagocytic capabilities. Our observations highlight that centrifugal processes negatively impact WBC motility and phagocytic capacity, whereas microfluidic separation yields a more favorable outcome in preserving WBC functionality. These findings emphasize the potential of microfluidic separation techniques as a viable alternative to traditional centrifugation for WBC isolation, potentially enabling more precise analyses in immunology research and improving the accuracy of hematologic disorder diagnoses.

© 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Modifications in the morphology and function of white blood cell (WBC) subtypes act as diagnostic markers for a wide array of disorders, such as infections, cancer, and autoimmune diseases [1,2]. Hence, the isolation and characterization of WBCs into morphological and functional subtypes have become a focal point of interest across the biological and medical disciplines, including cell phenotyping and immunotherapy [3,4]. Cell analysis techniques such as flow cytometry, which evaluates cell count, activity, and morphology, have been developed and are in extensive use [5]. However, conventional separation methods like density gradient centrifugation present significant limitations. These include laborious procedures, potential alteration in immune cell phenotype, low purity and yield, and undesirable activation [6,7]. In response to these challenges, microfluidic devices, which gently segregate WBCs based on size and morphology, have recently emerged as a viable alternative [810].

Microscopy techniques, crucial for observing and analyzing cells, have conventionally relied on light microscopy, fluorescence microscopy, and electron microscopy [1113]. While these methods have contributed to our understanding of immune cell structure and function, they come with certain constraints. Light microscopy, despite its ubiquitous use, provides limited resolution and often requires staining or labeling that can potentially disrupt the cell's natural state or functions. Fluorescence microscopy, while allowing the visualization of specific cellular components, necessitates fluorescent labels or markers, which might jeopardize cell viability and function. Photobleaching and phototoxicity further limit the observation of live cells over extended periods [14]. More importantly, exogenous labeling prevents the use of cells for therapeutic applications. Electron microscopy, although it offers high-resolution imaging, requires intricate sample preparation and is incompatible with live cell imaging, thus posing significant challenges [15].

Quantitative phase imaging (QPI) has come forth as a robust solution, mitigating many limitations associated with traditional microscopy techniques [1618]. As a label-free, non-invasive technique, QPI enables real-time observations of live cells and provides a quantitative analysis of parameters like cell morphology, concentration, mass, and volume. It utilizes the refractive index (RI) as an intrinsic quantitative imaging contrast [19]. The label-free and quantitative imaging capability of QPI is an uncompromised study of cell imaging, making it the ideal method to authenticate the integrity of cells using microfluidic devices [20,21].

In this research, we delve into the effects of different isolation methods on the functionality of individual live immune cells. We extracted polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNLs) utilizing two distinct enrichment methods: density gradient centrifugation and a microfluidic lattice chip, and compared the resultant morphological and functional modifications. Using holotomography (HT), a 3D QPI technique, we reconstructed the 3D RI maps, or holotomograms, of PMNLs to analyze their cellular morphology and functionality. By identifying the morphological and biophysical characteristics of individual immune cells and conducting time-lapse 3D RI imaging of live cells, we were able to investigate the dynamics of individual PMNLs. Our subsequent analysis of functional alterations illustrated the impacts of mechanical stress on immune cells. Our findings indicate that centrifugal force negatively impacts migration and phagocytosis capacities, whereas the microfluidic separator demonstrates the potential to preserve WBC functionality.

2. Materials and methods

Fabrication and principle of microfluidic lattice

A microfluidic lattice separator was fabricated by standard photolithography and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) molding processes. The fabrication process of photoresist (PR) mold involved the procedures of cleaning a silicon wafer using a buffered oxide etchant, spin-coating of a PR layer to a thickness of 25 µm, baking of the PR mold at 100°C, exposing it to ultraviolet light through a photomask, developing the PR using acetone, and post-development baking at 100°C. The PDMS chip was then created by pouring a PDMS mixture of a base and a curing agent at 1:9 mass ratio and curing it at 100°C for 10 min and 65°C for 24 h. Once cured, the PDMS slab was peeled off from the mold and cut into individual chips. Inlet and outlet reservoir holes were drilled, and each chip was bonded to a glass slide after oxygen plasma treatment.

The PDMS chip integrates the principles of a microfluidic lattice separator and a pneumatic circuit to achieve pumpless WBC separation, as previously described [22,23]. The microfluidic lattice consists of an array of main channels and side channels connecting them, which are designed to separate two blood cell types as WBCs flow along the main channels, and red blood cells (RBCs) exit through the separation channels (Fig. S1) [24]. Simultaneously, the lattice facilitates the washing of WBCs with a co-flowing buffer stream. This enables direct application of the separated WBCs to downstream analysis without the need for additional sample preparation, such as cell washing. To achieve pumpless operation of the separator, we used PDMS degassing. PDMS, being a gas-permeable material, can function as a built-in vacuum source for microfluidics upon degassing. Consequently, spontaneous separation can be achieved by filling the inlet reservoirs with blood and buffer solutions, while blocking the outlet reservoirs with a cover glass.

Blood collection and isolation of PMNLs

This research was conducted following rigorous protocols that received approval from the KAIST Institutional Review Board (IRB project number: IRB-20-021). All procedures adhered to the Helsinki Declaration of 2000, and the research team obtained informed consent from all participants. Peripheral blood was collected from 5 healthy volunteers using ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA) coated tubes.

Subsequently, PMNLs were isolated from human peripheral blood samples employing two separation methods: density gradient centrifugation and microfluidic separation. The density gradient method selectively segregates cells falling within a specific mass density range, whereas the microfluidic device separates large WBCs from smaller red blood cells (RBCs) and blood plasma.

To isolate PMNLs using conventional centrifugation, we prepared a layered mix of density gradient media (Histopaque 1119 and Histopaque 1077, ThermoFisher, USA), over which we delicately layered a solution of whole blood and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, ThermoFisher, USA) diluted with 2% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS, ThermoFisher, USA). Post-centrifugation at 800 g for 30 minutes without brake, granulocytes were identified in the median layer of the gradient media. The retrieved granulocytes were twice rinsed with 10 mL of PBS and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 200 g. We then resuspended the resultant cell pellet in 5 mL of PBS.

The microfluidic devices were utilized to separate WBCs containing PMNLs. The microfluidic devices were primed by infusing PBS with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) post-degassing of the devices. Once the microchannels were completely filled with the washing buffer, we introduced whole blood. The microfluidic lattice successfully separated WBCs from smaller red blood cells and blood plasma. A collection period of 15 min sufficed to gather an adequate number of WBCs for our ensuing experiments.

The sorted cells were subsequently transferred onto a TomoDish (Tomocube Inc., Republic of Korea) using a #1.5 H coverslip (Paul Marienfeld GmbH & Co. KG, Germany) in preparation for acquiring the holotomograms. We obtained 49 and 54 PMNL images using the gradient density method and microfluidic separation, respectively. Additionally, 16 red blood cells from the microfluidic separators were imaged and served as a reference for mobility analysis.

Imaging system

To capture holotomograms of live PMNLs, we employed an HT system (HT-2 H; Tomocube Inc., Republic of Korea). This HT system functions based on Mach-Zehnder interferometry, using a coherent light source with a wavelength of 532 nm. Multiple 2D holograms, captured at different illumination angles modulated by exploiting a digital micromirror device [25,26], are used to reconstruct the holotomograms of a cell, employing the Fourier diffraction theorem and Rytov approximation for gradually varying RI [27]. Precise control over the illumination angle impinging on the sample is achieved through a digital micro-mirror device.

Despite these measures, due to the finite numerical apertures of the condenser and objective lenses with the numerical apertures of 1.2, the reconstructed holotomograms are subject to axial elongation, a phenomenon known as the ‘missing cone problem.’ We employed a regularization method predicated on a non-negativity constraint to address this issue. The theoretical resolution of the HT system is determined to be 156 nm and 360 nm for the lateral and axial directions, respectively [28]. Further details regarding the principle, instrumentation, and reconstruction code of HT are available in the referenced sources [2830].

The HT system additionally offers the capability to capture correlative fluorescent images. For acquiring fluorescent images from labeled cells, the fluorescence channel was utilized to record holotomograms. This process involved employing stacked wide-field acquisition with a step size of 313 nm, followed by 3D deconvolution, with the excitation center wavelengths set to 470 nm. We manually adjusted both the excitation light intensity and exposure time to consistently visualize the target structures at uniform intensity levels.

Phagocytic functionality assay

The functionality of the purified PMNLs was assessed by evaluating their phagocytic capacity under microscopic observation. We employed fluorescently labeled E. coli (Alexa Fluor 594) as a functional probe. The E. coli stock was diluted to a concentration of 200 µg/ml and incubated for an hour at 37°C. We then exposed the purified PMNLs to this diluted mixture.

The cells were then transferred to a plate (TomoDish; Tomocube Inc., Republic of Korea) and incubated for an additional hour at 37°C. Phagocytic PMNLs create a vesicle to bind to the bioparticles. We employed a Hoechst stain to amplify the differentiation capability in the images. After that, phagocytic uptake was examined using a combined fluorescence and HT system over a 30-minute observation period. We acquired 24 and 19 PMNL images using the gradient density method and microfluidic separation, respectively.

3. Results

Holotomographic imaging of PMNLs isolated using different methods

We extracted WBCs from whole blood using two distinct methodologies (Fig. 1(A); Refer to Materials and Methods). In contrast to the centrifugation method, which required over an hour to acquire our target cells, the microfluidic chip accomplished cell separation in under 20 minutes. Following the sample preparation using both methods, we obtained holotomograms of the PMNLs using HT (Fig. 1(B)). HT, the optical analogous to X-ray computed tomography (CT), enabled the precise and high-resolution reconstruction of unlabeled live cells and tissues [17,27,31]. Due to its label-free and quantitative 3D imaging capability, HT has recently been utilized for the study of flow cytometry [20,21], cell biology [3234], immunology [35,36], microbiology [37,38], biomolecular condensates [32,33], drug screening [39,40], and regenerative medicine [41,42].

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Experimental steps to compare proposed white blood cell isolation techniques. (A) White blood cells are extracted from whole blood samples employing two distinct methodologies. (B) Label-free Refractive Index (RI) tomography documents the condition of each isolated PMNL. (C) Reconstruction of the holotomograms using 49 holograms, with the interference pattern depicted in the orange magnified box. (D) Representative images of the reconstructed holotomograms, including maximum contrast projections (MCPs) onto three orthogonal planes. The variable ‘n’ represents the RI (E) Representative MCP images of PMNLs with fluorescent images. Polymorphonuclei are stained with Hoechst, offering complementary information to the holotomgrams.

Download Full Size | PDF

In brief, the hologram of the scattered beam passing through the sample was acquired using 49 distinct holograms, enabling the reconstruction of the holotomograms (Fig. 1(C)). The reconstructed holotomograms exhibited an RI value range from 1.34 to 1.41, aligning with previously reported findings [43]. The representative images display PMNLs composed of multi-lobulated nuclei and multiple intracellular granules, which demonstrated a high RI (Fig. 1(D)). To ensure our study focused solely on PMNLs, we used a fluorescence-based validation, where the characteristic nuclear morphology was inspected to exclude other types of WBCs (Fig. 1(E)).

Comparison of biophysical and morphological characteristics

The two isolation techniques, namely, centrifugation and microfluidics, were compared based on the cellular attributes obtained from HT in terms of biophysical and morphological characteristics. We began segmenting cells utilizing Otsu’s method (Fig. 2(A)) [44]. The segmentation with RI values served to evaluate parameters such as volume, protein density, dry mass, solidity, and eccentricity (Fig. 2(B)–2(F)) from the measured holotomograms of individual cells. There is a linear relationship between RI and dry mass concentration: Δn = α·C, where Δn is the RI difference between cells and surrounding media and C represents the cell’s dry mass concentration, was used to estimate the dry mass of a single cell [45]. The RI increment α was established at 0.185 µm3/pg [46]. The resulting statistics revealed no significant difference in dry mass between the two isolation methods. Solidity, a measure of the convexity or concavity of the cell's shape, and eccentricity, a measure of the cell's elongation, provided insight into the cellular form. Generally, cells with irregular shapes exhibit lower solidity and higher eccentricity (Fig. S2).

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. Statistical Examination of morphological and biophysical features. (A) Maximum contrast projections of PMNLs, shown representatively. Otsu's method-based established algorithm segregates PMNLs from the background (illustrated by the green line). (B–F) Morphological analysis of PMNLs. The statistics reveals distinct behaviors of PMNLs dependent on the isolation technique employed. Distributions were statistically evaluated using the two-sided unpaired t-test and displayed with median values. Significance levels are indicated as follows: **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, while n.s. denotes non-significant differences with p > 0.05.

Download Full Size | PDF

Notably, the phenotypic parameters indicated significant variations in PMNLs contingent upon the isolation techniques. PMNLs separated by centrifugation exhibited lower volume and higher dry mass density compared to those separated by the microfluidic chip (Figs. 2(B), 2(C)). This discrepancy may stem from the distinct operating principles of the two methods; the microfluidic chip primarily separates particles based on size rather than density [47]. Irrespective of the isolation method, the dry mass remained constant (Fig. 2(D)). The solidity and eccentricity parameters suggested that PMNLs obtained through the microfluidic chip exhibited more irregular forms (Figs. 2(E), 2(F)). This finding aligns with previous reports suggesting that centrifugation causes pseudopod retraction [48].

Analysis of cellular motility

The migratory capacity of PMNLs plays a pivotal role in immune defense. To evaluate this capacity, we monitored the movement of individual cells every second using HT(HT) (Fig. 3(A), 3B). Subsequently, these cell trajectories were analyzed using an anomalous diffusion model to quantify the dynamic behavior into discernible values (Fig. 3(C)) [49]. The anomalous diffusion model evaluates cellular viability and mobility, represented by the diffusion exponent (α in Fig. 3(C)) and the diffusion coefficient (K in Fig. 3(C)).

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Analysis of cellular dynamics. (A) Each PMNLs from different isolation methods are continuously tracked and visualized using holotomograms at three-second intervals. The cellular boundary is represented by different colors for each time frame. (B) PMNLs’ Trajectories for nine seconds are displayed together in a coordinate space with origin as initial position. The length of trajectory represents the mobility of PMNLs. (C) A diffusion model is utilized to quantify the mobility of PMNLs. Error bars represent standard deviations. MSD denotes Mean Squared Displacement.

Download Full Size | PDF

The fluctuation in the cellular boundary reflects the active crawling behavior of stress-free PMNLs (Fig. 3(A)). These PMNLs exhibited a heightened level of activity, frequently extending and retracting their pseudopods. This active movement is a characteristic behavior of stress-free PMNLs, as demonstrated in the trajectory map (Fig. 3(B)). We validated our analysis using linear regression with the anomalous diffusion model. Red blood cells were also analyzed as a control group. The data fitting results suggested that centrifugal force diminishes the locomotive capacity of PMNLs (Fig. 3(C)). This observation aligns with our previous morphological analysis regarding solidity and eccentricity, as a retracted pseudopod can influence locomotion capacity [50]. The results suggest that the microfluidic chip facilitates the separation of PMNLs under minimal stress, thereby preserving their active locomotion capacity.

Phagocytosis capacity analysis

We aimed to assess the phagocytic capability of PMNLs isolated using two distinct methods by co-culturing them with fluorescently labeled E. coli bioparticles (Fig. 4(A)). The phagocytic capacity was quantified by measuring the fluorescence intensity. Holotomograms revealed that phagocytosed bioparticles possess a relatively high RI value (Fig. 4(B)). Our data suggested that PMNLs derived via microfluidic chip separation demonstrated greater fluorescence intensities compared to those isolated through the centrifugation method (Fig. 4(C)). Given the assumption that the average fluorescence intensities of E. coli bioparticles are consistent, the higher intensities imply an increased number of phagocytosed bioparticles. To determine the quantity of phagocytosed bioparticles, we utilized fluorescent signal thresholds for segmentation and estimated their dry mass using RI values. Our results indicated a higher dry mass of intracellular E. coli bioparticles in cells separated by the microfluidic chip, compared to those obtained through centrifugation. There was no significant difference in the mean RI of intracellular E. coli bioparticles between the two groups, suggesting that the composition of the phagocytosed bioparticles remained unchanged. The elevated dry mass of intracellular E. coli bioparticles indicates that the microfluidic technique preserves the phagocytic function of PMNLs more effectively than centrifugation.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Phagocytic functionality assay. (A) The phagocytosis assay quantifies the immunological response of PMNLs. (B) Combined holotomograms and fluorescence images enable the counting of only fluorescently-conjugated E. coli within each PMNL. (C) PMNLs isolated using the microfluidic chip demonstrate higher phagocytic capacity compared to those isolated via the conventional centrifugation method. Distributions were statistically compared using a two-sided unpaired t-test. *p < 0.05.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Discussion

Centrifugation is a widely adopted technique in the field of cell separation, enrichment, and washing. However, it often induces subtle but crucial morphological and biophysical changes that tend to be overlooked. These changes play a pivotal role in fields such as clinical diagnostics that rely on precise cell morphology observation.

Conventional imaging methods have limitations in capturing subtle changes in cell morphology and function. In this study, by leveraging the capabilities of holotomography, we unveiled significant alterations in cellular morphology and biophysical properties due to centrifugation. Notably, we observed a decrease in motility and phagocytic capacity in centrifuged cells compared to those isolated using a non-centrifugal method—the microfluidic lattice. This lattice not only enables rapid separation of WBCs from RBCs but also subjects cells to gentler mechanical forces in contrast to centrifugation. Additionally, microfluidic chips closely mimic the architecture of human blood vessels, providing a more accurate depiction of natural cellular dynamics.

One possible explanation for the morphological change is cell dehydration caused by centrifugation. Given that the RI is directly proportional to protein concentration, and there is no significant difference in the dry mass of cells between the two groups, the increased intracellular protein concentration in centrifuged cells suggests a reduction in intracellular volume. As the primary constituent of cells is water, this decline in volume can be largely attributed to dehydration.

Centrifugal force-induced cytoskeletal remodeling could also impact cell morphology and functionality [51]. Most cells possess a filamentous actin (F-actin) cytoskeleton responsible for bearing the majority of mechanical stress and maintaining cell shape. Mechanical forces can induce F-actin reconfiguration, leading to alterations in cellular morphology. The cytoskeleton is involved in leukocyte migration, immunological synapse formation, and phagosome formation, aligning with our statistical analysis results [52]. Further investigation into intracellular cytoskeletal changes might provide more insights into the impact of centrifugal force on cells. Moreover, employing machine-learning-based image inference could be beneficial for virtually generating molecular-specific imaging without the need of introducing exogenous labeling agents [53].

The results shown in this work suggest the development of a label-free biomarker to indicate cellular functionality. Exploiting both static and dynamic holotomograms of individual WBCs has the potential to create a virtual biomarker correlating to cellular functionality. Static holotomograms provide intrinsic biophysical information about cellular structures and morphologies, including their dry mass, protein concentration, and shape features. These parameters can be associated with various cell functions, such as cell type and maturity, signaling pathways, or disease states. On the other hand, dynamic holotomograms can give insights into the temporal behavior of cells, illustrating the changes in intracellular structures and cell morphologies over time. These could be linked to active cellular processes such as migration, proliferation, differentiation, and response to environmental changes. By integrating both static and dynamic information, a comprehensive and rich biomarker could be constructed. This biomarker could be a robust indicator of the WBC's functionality, and it may be applicable to a wide range of studies, from basic biological research to clinical diagnostics and prognostics, thereby opening a new window to understand complex cellular dynamics in a more refined manner.

This study does also have a few limitations. First, this study focused on PMNLs, and the conclusions may not necessarily apply to other WBC types. Each type of WBC has unique biophysical characteristics and functions, and the effects of the isolation method could differ among them. Future studies could focus on expanding the research to other cell types. Second, the current microfluidic device is small and may not be practical for handling large volumes of blood, which might be necessary in clinical settings. Scaling up the microfluidic device without compromising its effectiveness would be a challenge. Third, although the study effectively measures basic cellular functions like migration and phagocytosis, it does not directly address more complex and subtle biological processes, such as signal metabolism, transduction, or gene expression changes. The use of fluorescently labeled E. coli bioparticles to evaluate phagocytic function is an artificial condition that may not fully reflect the cells’ behavior in the human body. These limitations could potentially be addressed in future work. For instance, a more diverse set of WBCs could be tested to generalize the findings. The microfluidic device could be redesigned to handle larger volumes. More sophisticated techniques, potentially involving machine learning or other computational methods, could be developed to analyze more complex biological processes. Additionally, more physiologically relevant assays could be developed to better assess cellular functionality in conditions that mimic the human body more closely.

In conclusion, our methodology enabled the label-free evaluation of cellular morphology and functionality. The microfluidic chip facilitated rapid enrichment of WBCs, substantially reducing sample preparation time. Time-lapse imaging at high temporal resolution allowed for the measurement and differentiation of phagocyte dynamics, distinguishing them from anomalous diffusion and suggesting a novel quantitative parameter for migration capacity. Furthermore, correlative imaging with fluorescent bioparticles allowed for the examination and comparison of phagocytic capacity based on different separation techniques. Our findings showed that centrifugal force negatively impacts both the migration and phagocytosis capacities of phagocytes, and these effects can be counteracted by using a microfluidic chip. We believe that our study introduces a new approach that minimizes cellular deformation for image analysis.

Funding

Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (2021-0-00745, N11230131); National Research Foundation of Korea (2015R1A3A2066550, 2022M3H4A1A02074314, RS-2023-00241278).

Disclosures

MJ Lee, G Kim, and YK Park have financial interests in Tomocube Inc., a company that commercializes HT and is one of the sponsors of the work.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Supplemental document

See Supplement 1 for supporting content.

References

1. F. Borrego, J. Kabat, D.-K. Kim, L. Lieto, K. Maasho, J. Peña, R. Solana, and J. E. Coligan, “Structure and function of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I specific receptors expressed on human natural killer (NK) cells,” Mol. Immunol. 38(9), 637–660 (2002). [CrossRef]  

2. X. Zhu and J. Zhu, “CD4 T helper cell subsets and related human immunological disorders,” Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21(21), 8011 (2020). [CrossRef]  

3. C. A. Klebanoff, L. Gattinoni, and N. P. Restifo, “Sorting through subsets: Which T cell populations mediate highly effective adoptive immunotherapy?” Journal of Immunotherapy 35, 651 (2012).

4. G. A. Challen and M. H. Little, “A side order of stem cells: the SP phenotype,” Stem Cells (Durham, NC, U. S.) 24(1), 3–12 (2006). [CrossRef]  

5. L. A. Herzenberg, D. Parks, B. Sahaf, O. Perez, M. Roederer, and L. A. Herzenberg, “The history and future of the fluorescence activated cell sorter and flow cytometry: a view from Stanford,” Clin. Chem. (Washington, DC, U. S.) 48(10), 1819–1827 (2002). [CrossRef]  

6. E. Segura, M. Touzot, A. Bohineust, A. Cappuccio, G. Chiocchia, A. Hosmalin, M. Dalod, V. Soumelis, and S. Amigorena, “Human inflammatory dendritic cells induce Th17 cell differentiation,” Immunity 38(2), 336–348 (2013). [CrossRef]  

7. A. Bøyum, “[9] Separation of lymphocytes, granulocytes, and monocytes from human blood using iodinated density gradient media,” Methods Enzymol. 108, 88–102 (1984). [CrossRef]  

8. H. W. Hou, R. P. Bhattacharyya, D. T. Hung, and J. Han, “Direct detection and drug-resistance profiling of bacteremias using inertial microfluidics,” Lab Chip 15(10), 2297–2307 (2015). [CrossRef]  

9. D. R. Gossett, W. M. Weaver, A. J. Mach, S. C. Hur, H. T. K. Tse, W. Lee, H. Amini, and D. Di Carlo, “Label-free cell separation and sorting in microfluidic systems,” Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 397(8), 3249–3267 (2010). [CrossRef]  

10. Y. Sun and P. Sethu, “Microfluidic adaptation of density-gradient centrifugation for isolation of particles and cells,” Bioengineering 4(4), 67 (2017). [CrossRef]  

11. J. W. Lichtman and J.-A. Conchello, “Fluorescence microscopy,” Nat. Methods 2(12), 910–919 (2005). [CrossRef]  

12. R. E. Gordon, “Electron microscopy: a brief history and review of current clinical application,” Method Mol. Biol. 1180, 119–135 (2014). [CrossRef]  

13. D. J. Stephens and V. J. Allan, “Light microscopy techniques for live cell imaging,” science 300(5616), 82–86 (2003). [CrossRef]  

14. J. B. Pawley, “Fundamental limits in confocal microscopy,” in Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy (Springer, 2006), pp. 20–42.

15. M. J. Dykstra and L. E. Reuss, Biological Electron Microscopy: Theory, Techniques, and Troubleshooting (Springer Science & Business Media, 2011).

16. K. Lee, K. Kim, J. Jung, J. Heo, S. Cho, S. Lee, G. Chang, Y. Jo, H. Park, and Y. Park, “Quantitative phase imaging techniques for the study of cell pathophysiology: from principles to applications,” Sensors 13(4), 4170–4191 (2013). [CrossRef]  

17. Y. Park, C. Depeursinge, and G. Popescu, “Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine,” Nat. Photonics 12(10), 578–589 (2018). [CrossRef]  

18. T. L. Nguyen, S. Pradeep, R. L. Judson-Torres, J. Reed, M. A. Teitell, and T. A. Zangle, “Quantitative phase imaging: recent advances and expanding potential in biomedicine,” ACS nano 16(8), 11516–11544 (2022). [CrossRef]  

19. Y. Park, G. Popescu, P. Ferraro, and B. Kemper, “Quantitative phase imaging and its applications to biophysics, biology, and medicine,” (Frontiers Media SA, 2020), p. 226.

20. H. S. Park, S. Ceballos, W. J. Eldridge, and A. Wax, “Invited Article: Digital refocusing in quantitative phase imaging for flowing red blood cells,” APL Photonics 3(11), 110802 (2018). [CrossRef]  

21. D. Pirone, J. Lim, F. Merola, L. Miccio, M. Mugnano, V. Bianco, F. Cimmino, F. Visconte, A. Montella, and M. Capasso, “Stain-free identification of cell nuclei using tomographic phase microscopy in flow cytometry,” Nat. Photonics 16(12), 851–859 (2022). [CrossRef]  

22. S. Shin, B. Kim, Y.-J. Kim, and S. Choi, “Integrated microfluidic pneumatic circuit for point-of-care molecular diagnostics,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 133, 169–176 (2019). [CrossRef]  

23. H. S. Shin, J. Park, S. Y. Lee, H. G. Yun, B. Kim, J. Kim, S. Han, D. Cho, J. Doh, and S. Choi, “Integrative Magneto-Microfluidic Separation of Immune Cells Facilitates Clinical Functional Assays,” Small 19, 2302809 (2023). [CrossRef]  

24. M. Yamada, W. Seko, T. Yanai, K. Ninomiya, and M. Seki, “Slanted, asymmetric microfluidic lattices as size-selective sieves for continuous particle/cell sorting,” Lab Chip 17(2), 304–314 (2017). [CrossRef]  

25. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light (Elsevier, 2013).

26. K. Lee, K. Kim, G. Kim, S. Shin, and Y. Park, “Time-multiplexed structured illumination using a DMD for optical diffraction tomography,” Opt. Lett. 42(5), 999–1002 (2017). [CrossRef]  

27. E. Wolf, “Three-dimensional structure determination of semi-transparent objects from holographic data,” Opt. Commun. 1(4), 153–156 (1969). [CrossRef]  

28. C. Park, S. Shin, and Y. Park, “Generalized quantification of three-dimensional resolution in optical diffraction tomography using the projection of maximal spatial bandwidths,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 35(11), 1891–1898 (2018). [CrossRef]  

29. K. Kim, J. Yoon, S. Shin, S. Lee, S.-A. Yang, and Y. Park, “Optical diffraction tomography techniques for the study of cell pathophysiology,” J. Biomed. Photonics Eng. 2, 020201 (2016).

30. S. Shin, K. Kim, T. Kim, J. Yoon, K. Hong, J. Park, and Y. Park, “Optical diffraction tomography using a digital micromirror device for stable measurements of 4D refractive index tomography of cells,” in Quantitative Phase Imaging II (SPIE2016), pp. 156–163.

31. D. Jin, R. Zhou, Z. Yaqoob, and P. T. So, “Tomographic phase microscopy: principles and applications in bioimaging,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 34(5), B64–B77 (2017). [CrossRef]  

32. M. Esposito, C. Fang, K. C. Cook, N. Park, Y. Wei, C. Spadazzi, D. Bracha, R. T. Gunaratna, G. Laevsky, and C. J. DeCoste, “TGF-β-induced DACT1 biomolecular condensates repress Wnt signalling to promote bone metastasis,” Nat. Cell Biol. 23(3), 257–267 (2021). [CrossRef]  

33. S.-A. Lee, L.-C. Chang, W. Jung, J. W. Bowman, D. Kim, W. Chen, S.-S. Foo, Y. J. Choi, U. Y. Choi, and A. Bowling, “OASL phase condensation induces amyloid-like fibrillation of RIPK3 to promote virus-induced necroptosis,” Nat. Cell Biol. 25(1), 92–107 (2023). [CrossRef]  

34. M. Baczewska, K. Eder, S. Ketelhut, B. Kemper, and M. Kujawińska, “Refractive index changes of cells and cellular compartments upon paraformaldehyde fixation acquired by tomographic phase microscopy,” Cytometry, Part A 99(4), 388–398 (2021). [CrossRef]  

35. M. Lee, Y.-H. Lee, J. Song, G. Kim, Y. Jo, H. Min, C. H. Kim, and Y. Park, “Deep-learning-based three-dimensional label-free tracking and analysis of immunological synapses of CAR-T cells,” Elife 9, e49023 (2020). [CrossRef]  

36. Y.-J. Choe, J. Y. Min, H.-S. Lee, S.-Y. Lee, J. Kwon, H.-J. Kim, J. Lee, H. M. Kim, H. S. Park, and M. Y. Cho, “Heterotypic cell-in-cell structures between cancer and NK cells are associated with enhanced anticancer drug resistance,” Iscience 25(9), 105017 (2022). [CrossRef]  

37. G. Kim, D. Ahn, M. Kang, J. Park, D. Ryu, Y. Jo, J. Song, J. S. Ryu, G. Choi, and H. J. Chung, “Rapid species identification of pathogenic bacteria from a minute quantity exploiting three-dimensional quantitative phase imaging and artificial neural network,” Light: Sci. Appl. 11(1), 190 (2022). [CrossRef]  

38. M. Kim, Y. Cheon, D. Shin, J. Choi, J. E. Nielsen, M. S. Jeong, H. Y. Nam, S. H. Kim, R. Lund, and H. Jenssen, “Real-Time Monitoring of Multitarget Antimicrobial Mechanisms of Peptoids Using Label-Free Imaging with Optical Diffraction Tomography,” Adv. Sci. 10, 2302483 (2023). [CrossRef]  

39. E. R. Polanco, T. E. Moustafa, A. Butterfield, S. D. Scherer, E. Cortes-Sanchez, T. Bodily, B. T. Spike, B. E. Welm, P. S. Bernard, and T. A. Zangle, “Multiparametric quantitative phase imaging for real-time, single cell, drug screening in breast cancer,” Commun. Biol. 5(1), 794 (2022). [CrossRef]  

40. D. Park, D. Lee, Y. Kim, Y. Park, Y.-J. Lee, J. E. Lee, M.-K. Yeo, M.-W. Kang, Y. Chong, and S. J. Han, “Cryobiopsy: a breakthrough strategy for clinical utilization of lung cancer organoids,” Cells 12(14), 1854 (2023). [CrossRef]  

41. J. Sivalingam, Y. SuE, Z. R. Lim, A. T. Lam, A. P. Lee, H. L. Lim, H. Y. Chen, H. K. Tan, T. Warrier, and J. W. Hang, “A scalable suspension platform for generating high-density cultures of universal red blood cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells,” Stem Cell Rep. 16(1), 182–197 (2021). [CrossRef]  

42. Y. Kim, T.-K. Kim, Y. Shin, E. Tak, G.-W. Song, Y.-M. Oh, J. K. Kim, and C.-G. Pack, “Characterizing organelles in live stem cells using label-free optical diffraction tomography,” Molecules and cells 44(11), 851 (2021). [CrossRef]  

43. S. Park, J. W. Ahn, Y. Jo, H.-Y. Kang, H. J. Kim, Y. Cheon, J. W. Kim, Y. Park, S. Lee, and K. Park, “Label-free tomographic imaging of lipid droplets in foam cells for machine-learning-assisted therapeutic evaluation of targeted nanodrugs,” ACS nano 14(2), 1856–1865 (2020). [CrossRef]  

44. N. Otsu, “A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. 9(1), 62–66 (1979). [CrossRef]  

45. K. Kim, S. Lee, J. Yoon, J. Heo, C. Choi, and Y. Park, “Three-dimensional label-free imaging and quantification of lipid droplets in live hepatocytes,” Sci. Rep. 6(1), 36815 (2016). [CrossRef]  

46. H. Zhao, P. H. Brown, and P. Schuck, “On the distribution of protein refractive index increments,” Biophys. J. 100(9), 2309–2317 (2011). [CrossRef]  

47. B. Kim, K. H. Kim, Y. Chang, S. Shin, E.-C. Shin, and S. Choi, “One-Step Microfluidic Purification of White Blood Cells from Whole Blood for Immunophenotyping,” Anal. Chem. 91(20), 13230–13236 (2019). [CrossRef]  

48. S. Fukuda and G. W. Schmid-Schönbein, “Centrifugation attenuates the fluid shear response of circulating leukocytes,” J. Leukocyte Biol. 72(1), 133–139 (2002). [CrossRef]  

49. D. S. Banks and C. Fradin, “Anomalous diffusion of proteins due to molecular crowding,” Biophys. J. 89(5), 2960–2971 (2005). [CrossRef]  

50. C. C. Reyes-Aldasoro, Y. Zhao, D. Coca, S. A. Billings, V. Kadirkamanathan, G. M. Tozer, and S. A. Renshaw, “Analysis of immune cell function using in vivo cell shape analysis and tracking,” Paper presented at the 4th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition in Bioinformatics (2009).

51. P. Rougerie, V. Miskolci, and D. Cox, “Generation of membrane structures during phagocytosis and chemotaxis of macrophages: role and regulation of the actin cytoskeleton,” Immunological reviews 256(1), 222–239 (2013). [CrossRef]  

52. S. A. Freeman and S. Grinstein, “Phagocytosis: receptors, signal integration, and the cytoskeleton,” Immunological reviews 262(1), 193–215 (2014). [CrossRef]  

53. Y. Jo, H. Cho, W. S. Park, G. Kim, D. Ryu, Y. S. Kim, M. Lee, S. Park, M. J. Lee, and H. Joo, “Label-free multiplexed microtomography of endogenous subcellular dynamics using generalizable deep learning,” Nat. Cell Biol. 23(12), 1329–1337 (2021). [CrossRef]  

Supplementary Material (1)

NameDescription
Supplement 1       Supplemental Figure

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Experimental steps to compare proposed white blood cell isolation techniques. (A) White blood cells are extracted from whole blood samples employing two distinct methodologies. (B) Label-free Refractive Index (RI) tomography documents the condition of each isolated PMNL. (C) Reconstruction of the holotomograms using 49 holograms, with the interference pattern depicted in the orange magnified box. (D) Representative images of the reconstructed holotomograms, including maximum contrast projections (MCPs) onto three orthogonal planes. The variable ‘n’ represents the RI (E) Representative MCP images of PMNLs with fluorescent images. Polymorphonuclei are stained with Hoechst, offering complementary information to the holotomgrams.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Statistical Examination of morphological and biophysical features. (A) Maximum contrast projections of PMNLs, shown representatively. Otsu's method-based established algorithm segregates PMNLs from the background (illustrated by the green line). (B–F) Morphological analysis of PMNLs. The statistics reveals distinct behaviors of PMNLs dependent on the isolation technique employed. Distributions were statistically evaluated using the two-sided unpaired t-test and displayed with median values. Significance levels are indicated as follows: **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, while n.s. denotes non-significant differences with p > 0.05.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Analysis of cellular dynamics. (A) Each PMNLs from different isolation methods are continuously tracked and visualized using holotomograms at three-second intervals. The cellular boundary is represented by different colors for each time frame. (B) PMNLs’ Trajectories for nine seconds are displayed together in a coordinate space with origin as initial position. The length of trajectory represents the mobility of PMNLs. (C) A diffusion model is utilized to quantify the mobility of PMNLs. Error bars represent standard deviations. MSD denotes Mean Squared Displacement.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Phagocytic functionality assay. (A) The phagocytosis assay quantifies the immunological response of PMNLs. (B) Combined holotomograms and fluorescence images enable the counting of only fluorescently-conjugated E. coli within each PMNL. (C) PMNLs isolated using the microfluidic chip demonstrate higher phagocytic capacity compared to those isolated via the conventional centrifugation method. Distributions were statistically compared using a two-sided unpaired t-test. *p < 0.05.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.