Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of cooling rate on eutectic cell count, grain size, microstructure, and ultimate tensile strength of hypoeutectic cast iron

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes a series of microstructural and strength studies performed on hypoeutectic cast iron, which was sand cast using a variety of end chills (metallic, nonmetallic, water-cooled, and subzero, respectively). The effects of cooling rate on the eutectic cell count (ECC), grain size, and the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) were evaluated. Attempts were also made to explain these effects and to correlate the UTS with ECC. It was found that subzero chilled and water-cool, chilled cast iron exhibit severe undercooling compared to normal sand cast iron. It was concluded from this investigation that nucleation conditions are completely altered but growth conditions prevail as usual. Therefore, undercooling during solidification is considered to be responsible for variation in ECC, grain size, microstructure, and tensile strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Hemanth et al., Wear, Vol 192, 1996, p 134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Hemanth et al., J. Mater. Des., Vol 16, 1995, p 175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. AFS Cast Metals Handbook, 4th ed., 1957, p 82

  4. R.T. Wimber, Trans. AFS, Vol 88, 1980, p 717

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D.O. Morton, Foundry Pract., Vol 200, 1979, p 87

    Google Scholar 

  6. D.M. Stefunescu and C.R. Loper, Giesserei, Vol 5, 1981, p 73

    Google Scholar 

  7. T.J. Baker, Materials in Engineering Application, Vol 1, 1978, p 13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Suzuki and N. Kayama, Trans. AFS, Vol 90, 1982, p 423

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. R.T. De Hoff and F.N. Rhines, Quantitative Microscopy, Wiley & Co., UK, 1980, p 282

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Fedriksson and M. Hillert, Br. Foundryman, Vol 34, 1971, p 54

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Glover et al., Trans. AFS, Vol 90, 1982, p 745

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. R.W. Heine and C.R. Loper, Trans. AFS, Vol 77, 1969, p 185

    Google Scholar 

  13. G.F. Ruff and J.F. Wallace, Trans. AFS, Vol 85, 1977, p 179

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J.V. Dawson and W. Oldfield, BCIRA J., Vol 8, 1960, p 221

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Le Rolland and E. Plenard, Foundrie, Vol 131, 1956, p 477

    Google Scholar 

  16. A.G. Fuller et al., BCIRA J., Vol 11, 1956, p 358

    Google Scholar 

  17. G.N.T. Gilbert, Br. Foundryman, Vol 43, 1968, p 264

    Google Scholar 

  18. H.K. Bishop et al., Trans. AFS, Vol 59, 1951, p 435

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.T. Berry, Trans. AFS, Vol 78, 1970, p 421

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. Glover and C.E. Bates, Trans. AFS, Vol 91, 1983, p 235

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Hemanth et al., J. Mater. Sci., Vol 33, 1998, p 23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G.F. Ruff and J.F. Wallace, J. Mater. Sci., Vol 81, 1977, p 179

    Google Scholar 

  23. G.X. Sun and C.R. Loper, J. Mater. Sci., Vol 87, 1983, p 841

    Google Scholar 

  24. J.F. Wallace, J. Mater. Sci., Vol 79, 1975, p 363

    Google Scholar 

  25. N. Church et al., J. Mater. Sci., Vol 68, 1966, p 113

    Google Scholar 

  26. B.E. Read Hill, Physical Metallurgy Principles, East West Press, New Delhi, India, 1974, p 665

    Google Scholar 

  27. G.F. Ruff and J.F. Wallace, J. Mater. Sci., Vol 80, 1976, p 705

    Google Scholar 

  28. A.B. Michael and M.B. Bever, Trans. AIME, Vol 188, 1950, p 47

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hemanth, J., Rao, K.V.S. Effect of cooling rate on eutectic cell count, grain size, microstructure, and ultimate tensile strength of hypoeutectic cast iron. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 8, 417–423 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1361/105994999770346701

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1361/105994999770346701

Keywords

Navigation