Seoul Journal of Korean Studies

It is becoming increasingly apparent to historians and archaeologists alike that the twelfth-century Samguk sagi’s datings for many of its early entries, especially those appearing in its Silla Annals (Silla pon’gi 新羅本紀) and Paekche Annals (Paekche pon’gi 百濟本紀), are problematic. Having devoted a number of years to the study of these two texts, I have come to the conclusion that the vast majority of the early entries in both chronicles are accounts of actual historical events that have been systematically antedated. It is evident that the records upon which the Silla and Paekche chronicles were based were, for the most part, originally dated according to the sexagenary cycle (K. kanji 干支 cycle). Thus when accounts of later events in Silla’s or Paekche’s histories were antedated to fill the chronological void created by the implausibly early foundation dates ascribed to the two kingdoms, in most instances the redating was done in multiples of sixty years.

In this paper I will first demonstrate through a comparison with evidence derived from two much earlier Chinese sources—the third-century Sanguozhi and the fifth-century Hou Hanshu—that the Silla Annals’ date of 173 for the arrival at the Silla court of a diplomatic mission allegedly sent by the Japanese queen Himiko (K. Pimiho) is not only anachronistic, but impossible. I will then argue through a comparison primarily with evidence from the late eighth-century Japanese history, the Shoku Nihongi, that the embassy to Silla purportedly sent by Himiko in the late second century is actually an antedated account of an embassy recorded as having been sent by a female Japanese ruler of the early eighth century.