-
Five Readings of Euthyphro
- Philosophy and Literature
- Johns Hopkins University Press
- Volume 38, Number 2, October 2014
- pp. 495-509
- 10.1353/phl.2014.0061
- Article
- Additional Information
- Purchase/rental options available:
Euthyphro is frequently dissected for its philosophical dilemmas regarding the relation of the god’s love to holiness, and whether justice is a part of the holy or the converse. But how can we understand the dialogue as a literary whole? This paper exhibits five ways in which it can be so understood: Euthyphro is the subjectivist patsy (both a literalist and divine command theorist) playing against Socrates’s natural law-like moral objectivity; the dialogue is elenchic because the dilemmas are true; the dialogue is elenchic, but the dilemmas are false; the dialogue produces a double irony; the irony is in the existence of the dialogue.