Literature and Medicine

Abstract:

This article examines how sufferers experienced, understood, and expressed themselves as bilious, focusing on the late Georgian era when the disease became one of the most fashionable and oft diagnosed amongst the elites. We show that responses to bile were more complex, varied, and less credulous than contemporary diatribes and subsequent historiography imply. Nonetheless, we foreground the socioculturally negotiated elements of the malady rather than its "reality." Applying Rosenberg's framing diseases model reveals biliousness as one of the most problematic conditions to frame, but one of the most malleable to self-fashion. We demonstrate how Georgian Britons found functionality in their bile and "performed" being bilious. Articulate, literate sufferers deployed a range of strategies to vent or master their bile, or to render it social and serviceable, deriving various compensatory "secondary gains." We illuminate their variable success in reifying and sublimating bile, and differentiating the boundaries of biliousness vis-à-vis other complaints.