545
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Policy Perspectives is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journals, and the authors don’t pay an author processing charge (APC’s).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pakistan-India Equation: Determinants, Dynamics and the Outlook

      Published
      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Though it has been a longtime since 1947, both Pakistan and India couldn't steer the trajectory of their relations in the right direction. Even in the twenty first Century, this relationship is, by and large, determined through the prism of history. The nuclearization of South Asia, triggered by India and the strategic arms race alongside perpetual state of conflict, have aggravated the threat of war that may no more remain limited or restricted to convectional arsenal; but has strong indicators of escalation of any future conflict to nuclear plane, leading to Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD.) The assumption that economic interdependence can lead to normalization of relations, has failed in this particular case. The determinants and dynamics of bilateral relations, holdout that normalization of relations is a complex phenomenon intricately embedded in the resolution of the core disputes. Be it the domain of military and strategic relationship, or either political or economic dimension, there has been no substantial improvement. The resolution of the core disputes including Kashmir is the key to the betterment of relations, which remains as an unfulfilled agenda in the United Nations. Bilateralism has failed so far, and there is a dire need for a sustainable conflict resolution mechanism assisted by third party mediation in order to restraint the region from arm race and the threat of nuclear war, and to ensure a prosperous and peaceful future for South Asia.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.13169
            polipers
            Policy Perspectives: The Journal of the Institute of Policy Studies
            Pluto Journals
            18121829
            18127347
            2017
            : 14
            : 1
            : 23-57
            Affiliations
            Ms. Waqar-un-Nisa is a research team member at the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS), Islamabad
            Article
            polipers.14.1.0023
            10.13169/polipers.14.1.0023
            dfbd174c-ce3b-4ab9-9db2-5fb868b5bec8
            © 2017, Institute of Policy Studies

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History

            Education,Religious studies & Theology,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,Economics

            Bibliography

            1. A Conversation with Gen. Khalid Kidwai by at Carnegie International Nuclear Policy Conference 2015, held on March 23, 2015. Accessed, March 28, 2016, http://carnegieendowment.org/files/03230315carnegieKIDWAI.pdf

            2. . “Pakistan: Vision and Reality, Past and Future.” The Muslim World 96, no. 2 (2006).

            3. Track-Two Dialogue in the India-Pakistan Context, ISAS Brief no. 408, February 23, (2016). Accessed, April 4, 2016, http://www.isas.nus.edu.sg/ISAS%20Reports/ISAS%20Brief%20No.%20408.%20TrackTwo%20Dialogue%20in%20the%20India-Pakistan%20Context.pdf

            4. . Pakistan and World Affairs . Lahore: Jahangir Publishers, 2014.

            5. . The Emergence of Pakistan . New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1967.

            6. Pakistan's Foreign Policy: A Reappraisal , New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

            7. Amnesty International, “‘DENIED’ Failures in accountability for human rights violations by security force personnel in Jammu and Kashmir.” Report 2015. Available at, https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/ASA2018742015ENGLISH.PDF

            8. & . “Indo-Pakistan Trade Cooperation and SAARC,” Peace and Democracy in South Asia 2 no. 1 & 2 (2006). http://himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/journals/pdsa/pdf/pdsa_02_01_04.pdf (Accessed, April 6, 2016.)

            9. “Track Two Diplomacy in India and Pakistan Initiatives, Impact, Challenges, and Ways Forward” Praid Policy Journal , Volume 1, Issue 2, July 2013. http://www.priad.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/PRIAD_POLICYJOURNAL_Goldberg2.pdf (Accessed February 9, 2017.

            10. . “Pakistan-India Relations — the Peace Process.” Strategic Studies XXXI, No. 3, (2011).

            11. Human Rights Watch. “Everyone Lives in Fear, Patterns of Impunity in Jammu and Kashmir.” Volume 18, No. 11(C). 2006, available at, https://www.hrw.org/reports/2006/india0906/

            12. Human Rights Watch. “The Human Rights Crisis In Kashmir.”, June 1993, available at https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/INDIA937.PDF

            13. Joint Press Statement of the Commerce Ministers of India and Pakistan, 18-January-2014, Government of India, Ministry of Commerce & Industry. http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=102587 (Accessed, March 25, 2016.)

            14. , “The Dynamics of Violence along the Kashmir Divide, 2003–2015,” Stimson Centre , 2015. https://www.stimson.org/sites/default/files/dynamics-violence-kashmir-divide.pdf (Accessed, March 27, 2017.)

            15. . “The Indus Water Treaty: Negotiation, Implementation, Challenges and Future Prospects,” Pakistan Horizon 67, no. 1 (2014).

            16. . India Pakistan Relations: Courting Peace from the Corridors of War , ed. . New Delhi: VPM's Centre for International Studies, 2005.

            17. Neither a Hawk, Nor a Dove . New York: oxford University Press, 2015.

            18. “Friendly Exchanges and People-to-People Contact between Pakistan and India: Imperatives and Impediments” Strategic Studies 34, no. 2&3 (2014).

            19. “The changing Contours of minimum deterrence in South Asia,” Policy Perspectives 13, no. 1 (2016).

            20. & (Eds.). Pakistan-India Trade: What Needs to be Done, What Does it Matter , Washington DC: Wilson Centre, 2013.

            21. “Why the India-Pakistan War Over Water Is So Dangerous” Foreign Policy, September 30, 2016. http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/09/30/why-the-india-pakistan-war-over-water-is-so-dangerous-indus-waters-treaty/ (Accessed February 13, 2017.)

            22. A Cold Start for Hot Wars? The Indian Army's New Limited War Doctrine, International Security 32, no. 3 (Winter 2007–08).

            23. “Plebiscite in Kashmir — Stillborn or Killed?” Criterion Quarterly 11, no. 4, December 2016. http://www.criterion-quarterly.com/plebiscite-kashmir-stillborn-killed/ (Accessed March 07, 2017.)

            24. PILDAT. “A Comparative Analysis of Election Manifestoes of Major Political Parties.” April 2013. http://www.pildat.org/publications/publication/elections/Election2013_ManifestoesComparison.pdf (Accessed, Feb 20, 2017.)

            25. Pakistan Business Council. Pakistan-India Trade Normalization: A Word of Caution , report published by Pakistan Business Council , (2015).

            26. & , “Coming Together over Trade? A Study of the Resumed Dialogue between India and Pakistan,” Asian Security, 10 no. 3, (2014)

            27. Record of the Press Briefing by Spokesperson on 25 February 2016, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Pakistan. http://www.mofa.gov.pk/pr-details.php?mm=MzQ5NQ (Accessed March 18, 2016.)

            28. RESOLUTION 1172 (1998), Adopted by the Security Council at its 3890th meeting on 6 June 1998. Available at, http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/naruhodo/data/pdf/data6-1.pdf

            29. Reuters. “TEXT - India, Pakistan prime ministers' joint statement.” Jul 16, 2009. http://in.reuters.com/article/idINIndia-41092220090716 (Accessed, March 18, 2016.)

            30. . 13 December, a Reader: The Strange Case of the Attack on the Indian Parliament . Penguin Books India, 2006.

            31. . Field Notes on Democracy: Listening to Grosshoopers. Chicago: Haymarket Books, 2009.

            32. . “A New Round of Water Talks Between Pakistan — India.” ISSI Issue Brief, March 28, 2017. Accessed, April 21, 2017, http://issi.org.pk/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Final_IB_Ahmad_Salik_dated_28-03-2017.pdf

            33. . Pakistan's Foreign Policy 1947–2012 . New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.

            34. SIPRI Year Book, 2016- Summary, “Armaments, Disarmament and International Security,” 2016, https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/YB16-Summary-ENG.pdf (accessed, March 14, 2017.)

            35. United Nations Development Program. Human Development Report 2015 , 2015, p. 48–49 http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2015_human_development_report.pdf (Accessed, March 15, 2017.)

            36. United Nations. “Resolutions and Decisions of the Security Council 1948.” http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/51(1948) (Accessed March 22, 2017.)

            37. . Ed. India's 2014 Elections: A Modi-led BJP Sweep . New Delhi: SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd, 2015

            38. and , Terrorism in India: Method in Madness? Policy Perspectives , 7, no. 2 (2010).

            Comments

            Comment on this article