Open transversus abdominis plane block and analgesic requirements in patients following right hemicolectomy

INTRODUCTION Reducing exogenously administered opioids in the post-operative period is associated with early return of bowel function and decreased post-operative complication rates. We evaluated the effectiveness of a surgeon-delivered open transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block as a method to reduce post-operative opioid requirements, sedation and inpatient stay. METHODS The patient cohort was identified from those who had undergone a right hemicolectomy for colonic cancer. Patients received either an open TAP block and post-operative patient controlled anaesthesia (PCA) (n=20) or were part of a control group who received subcutaneous local anaesthetic infiltration and PCA (n=16). RESULTS PCA morphine use was reduced within the first 24 hours post-operatively in the TAP block group compared with controls (42.1mg vs 72.3mg, p=0.002). Sedation was also reduced significantly in the early post-operative period (p<0.04). There was a non-significant trend towards reduced length of stay in the intervention group (8.2 vs 8.73 days). There were no recorded complications attributable to the open TAP block. CONCLUSIONS Open TAP blocks are safe and reduce post-operative opioid requirements and sedation after right hemicolectomies. They should be considered as part of a multimodal enhanced recovery approach to patients undergoing abdominal surgery via a transverse incision.

oPeN traNsversus aBDomiNis PlaNe BlocK aND aNalgesic requiremeNts iN PatieNts folloWiNg right hemicolectomy bRADY vENTHAM RObERTS gRAHAM DANIEL involves the operating surgeon indentifying the anatomical layers under direct vision when closing the abdomen and placing the local anaesthetic accordingly. This has the advantage of avoiding inadvertent injection into the incorrect layer or damaging deeper structures.
Our study evaluated the effi cacy of open surgically placed TAP blocks. Open or surgically placed TAP blocks have been described as adjuncts in plastic, 16 gynaecological 15 and also colorectal surgery through a midline incision. 17 Owen et al described a technique of performing an open surgical TAP block in women undergoing Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. 15 They found a signifi cantly lower morphine requirement in those with a surgically placed TAP compared with no TAP block. Bharti et al performed a small randomised controlled trial by injecting either 40ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine or saline from inside the abdominal wall into the TAP plane for colorectal resections. 17 The aim of our study was to detect whether a surgeon administered open TAP block was an effective adjunct in providing post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing colorectal resection. Specifi cally, we focused on the impact of TAP blocks on reducing post-operative patient controlled anaesthesia (PCA) morphine requirements as a surrogate marker of post-operative pain. Additionally, we investigated whether TAP blocks lead to a reduction in sedation levels and a shorter hospital stay.

methods
The patient cohort was identifi ed from a prospectively gathered cancer database for all colonic cancer patients who underwent an open right hemicolectomy between 2006 and 2011 at Queen Margaret Hospital, NHS Fife. Strict inclusion criteria were designed to ensure that a homogenous cohort was obtained. Patients were excluded from analysis if they had not had their operation under one specifi c experienced colorectal surgeon (who was the primary operator in all cases), had any incision other than a right upper transverse incision, had their operation performed as a non-elective (ie emergency) procedure or had missing data/details or non-recoverable inpatient notes. Patients were also excluded if they had an alternative post-operative analgesia plan (epidural analgesia, ultrasonography guided TAP placement, local anaesthetic wound catheters and nonmorphine PCA).
Patient demographic details (sex, age), operative details (primary operator, incision, indication, urgency, timing and dose of TAP block placement) and post-operative details were recorded. The total PCA morphine intake in the fi rst 24 hours post-operatively and in the second 24 hours (24-48 hours) was recorded. In addition, excessive sedation in the immediate 48-hour post-operative period was determined as the number of times that the sedation score was >2 in a 24-hour period (Ramsay sedation scale; best eye opening response of the patient: 1 = spontaneously, 2 = to speech, 3 = to stimulation, 4 = no response; recorded on an hourly basis). The total inpatient post-operative stay was calculated from the inpatient's notes.

operative methodology
All patients underwent an elective open right hemicolectomy performed by one experienced colorectal surgeon. All operations were carried out through an upper right transverse incision. In the TAP group, 20ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine was infi ltrated into the right TAP under direct vision at the time of wound closure. In the control group, 20ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine was infi ltrated into the subcuticular space prior to skin closure. Both groups had post-operative PCA morphine. Analgesia in both groups was supplemented by intravenous paracetamol 1g four times a day for the fi rst 48 hours. Additional morphine boluses of 5mg could be administered by attending medical staff if pain was not controlled suffi ciently with the standard patient administered 1mg bolus and 5-minute lock-out.
Data were recorded on a proforma prior to being transferred to an Excel ® worksheet (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, US). Comparisons between groups were made using either a two-sample t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate using Minitab ® 15 (Minitab, Coventry, UK). The threshold for statistical signifi cance was p<0.05.

results
A total of 74 patients were identifi ed as suitable for the patient cohort. Of these, 38 were excluded (21 epidural anaesthesia, 1 fentanyl PCA, 1 ultrasonography placed TAP block, 3 wound catheters and 12 patients with missing data), leaving 36 patients for analysis. Of these, 16 (44%) were managed with PCA morphine and local anaesthetic skin infi ltration, and 20 (56%) with PCA and a surgically placed open TAP block. There was no evidence of difference between the groups in terms of sex (50% vs 55% men respectively, p=0.77) or age (mean: 68. The amount of PCA morphine required by patients on post-operative days 1 and 2 is shown in Figure 1a. Comparing both groups, there was a signifi cant difference in morphine consumption on day 1 (PCA + skin infi ltra-  The number of episodes of excessive sedation is recorded in Figure 1b. There was a significant reduction on day 2 in the number of episodes of excessive sedation experienced by patients in the TAP block intervention group (difference: 1.95, 95% CI: 0.1-3.8, p=0.041). However, the difference in episodes of excessive sedation on day 1 between the two groups failed to reach statistical significance (difference: -0.1, 95% CI: -1.9-1.6, p=0.886). There was a marginal trend towards a shorter inpatient stay in the TAP intervention group versus the control group (mean: 8.2 vs 8.7 days).

Discussion
In this study we found that a surgically administered TAP block significantly reduces the post-operative opioid requirements in the first 24 hours following an open right hemicolectomy. The morphine requirement in the TAP group was half of that in the control group during the second 24 hours but this failed to reach statistical significance. In addition, lower levels of excessive sedation were found in the second 24 hours in those patients who had received a surgically placed TAP block.
PCA provides analgesia that improves patient satisfaction. 3,18 However, exogenously administered opioids reduce propulsive peristaltic contractions and increase the non-propulsive contractions, leading to side effects such as post-operative nausea and vomiting, and gastrointestinal paralysis. 19.20 Consequently, reducing post-operative opioid administration could potentially reduce the occurrence of post-operative ileus and reduces morbidity, facilitating earlier discharge. 20 TAP blocks have been recognised as playing an important role in effective multimodality post-operative analgesia. 21 They have been shown to reduce opioid requirements in a Cochrane meta-analysis published in 2010 22 although this was with eight relatively small heterogeneous studies. Anaesthesiologist-delivered TAP blocks have been found to reduce the morphine requirement and pain scores in Caesarean sections 7 and open abdominal surgery 23 in the context of randomised controlled trials albeit with relatively small patient numbers. In the context of laparoscopic colorectal resections, TAP blocks have been shown to reduce opioid requirements, 24 the time to normal diet and time until hospital discharge when compared with opioid PCA in non-randomised trials. 25 Our results echoed a randomised study comparing landmark technique TAP block and PCA versus standard PCA in patients undergoing a bowel resection through a midline laparotomy scar. 23 Patients receiving a TAP block used 21.9mg of morphine compared with 80.44mg in those with-out a TAP block in the first 24 hours. This is comparable with the 42.05mg in those with a TAP block compared with 72.25mg without in our study. A possible explanation for the higher morphine requirement in our study was the unilateral administration of TAP block compared with the bilateral blocks used by McDonnell et al. 23 The importance of this study lies in demonstrating the efficacy of open surgically placed TAP blocks, a developing technique. Currently, no studies have shown an open TAP block to be effective in reducing the morphine requirement in those undergoing a colonic resection via an upper abdominal transverse incision. However, these results should be interpreted with some caution due to the retrospective design of the study and the relatively small patient numbers. Nevertheless, the information presented here will allow future studies to be sufficiently powered to detect differences that are clinically relevant.
Some authors have suggested that TAP blocks as administered though the triangle of Petit may not be effective for upper abdominal procedures as there may not be an adequate sensory block of the lower six thoracic nerves. 26 In a paper in which ultrasonography guided TAP blocks were used in laparoscopic colorectal resections, with specimen extraction and colonic anastomosis through a right upper quadrant incision, no significant statistical difference in morphine requirements in those with and without ultrasonography guided TAP block was demonstrated. 24 Subcostal TAP blocks have also been described as a method of analgesia for upper abdominal operations, not extending below the T10 dermatome or more lateral than the anterior axillary line. 8,9 Surgically placed TAP blocks negate these limitations as the block is placed locally rather than for an 'upper' (subcostal infiltration) or 'lower' (triangle of Petit infiltration) abdominal incision.
We experienced no complications with surgically administered TAP blocks. There have been several reports of inadvertent liver injury related to both traditional landmark and ultrasonography guided TAP blocks. 11,12 In patients undergoing a right upper quadrant incision for an open hemicolectomy, surgeon administered open TAP blocks may avoid this complication. Similarly, intraperitoneal infiltration may occur in obese patients and in those with reduced muscle tone, even with ultrasonography guidance. 27 One of the major strengths of surgically administered TAP blocks in open surgery is the ability to infiltrate the correct anatomical layer under direct vision, avoiding potential complications of transabdominal peritoneal puncture.
conclusions Surgically administered TAP blocks significantly reduce opioid analgesic requirements in the immediate postoperative period following open right hemicolectomy. Patients who received a surgically placed TAP block had significantly fewer episodes of excessive sedation in the post-operative period. We conclude that surgically administered TAP blocks are safe and should be considered as part of the multimodal management of patients undergoing open colorectal surgery.