Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2014, 15 (2): 33-47 | DOI: 10.13060/12130028.2014.15.2.129

The second wave of anti-feminism? Post-crisis maternalist policies and the attack on the concept of gender in Poland

Dorota Szelewa

This article argues that, despite Poland's better situation during the economic crisis, the long-lasting rationalisation of permanent austerity overshadows and hinders any alternative solutions in the field of social policies. In this sense, the crisis that hurt the economies of many other countries represented a reference frame for adhering to the path of austerity policies in Poland. The neoliberal track in social and economic policies was accompanied by the strengthening of their conservative pillar: any slight improvements in family policies took a maternalist direction, with a well-paid maternity leave prolonged to one year without the same individual rights being granted to fathers. Finally, the crisis served as a background for the Catholic Church's attack on the category of "gender", an example of moral panic. The policy changes as well as the stronger anti-feminism in public discourse were in line with the institutional and ideological legacies of the period of transition, while the crisis served as a direct and indirect reference point for the actors behind these developments.
This research was supported by the National Research Centre in Poland, grant no 2012/04/S/HS5/00440.

Klíčová slova: gender, crisis, austerity, Poland, childcare, Catholic Church, moral panic

Zveřejněno: 1. červen 2014  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Szelewa, Dorota. 2014. "The second wave of anti-feminism? Post-crisis maternalist policies and the attack on the concept of gender in Poland." Gender, Equal Opportunities, Research 15(2):33-47.
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. Adamik, M. 1993. "Feminism and Hungary." Pp. 207-212 in Funk, N., Mueller, M. (eds.) Gender Politics and Post-Communism. Reflections from Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union New York, London: Routledge. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  2. Baizan, P. 2009. "Regional child care availability and fertility decisions in Spain." Demographic Research, Vol. 21, No. 7: 803-842. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  3. Balcerowicz, L. 1995. Socialism, capitalism, transformation. Budapest,New York: Central European University Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  4. Balcerzak-Paradowska, B. 2004. Rodzina i polityka rodzinna. Warsaw: IPiSS.
  5. Balcerzak-Paradowska, B., Chłoń-Domińczak, A., Kotowska, I. et. al. 2003. "The Gender Dimensions Of Social Security Reform in Poland." Pp. 187-247 in Fultz, E., Ruck, M., Steinhilber, S. (eds.). The Gender Dimensions of Social Security Reform in Central and Eastern Europe: Case Studies of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. Budapest: International Labour Organization.
  6. Blyth, M. 2002. Great transformations: economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. New York: Cambridge University Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  7. Bohle, D., Greskovits, B. 2012. Capitalist diversity on Europe's periphery. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  8. Bruszt, L., Stark, D. 2001. "One Way or Multiple Paths: For a Comparative Sociology of East European Capitalism." American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 106, No. 4: 1129-1137. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  9. CBOS. 2012. Zmiany w zakresie wiary i religijno¶ci Polaków po ¶mierci Jana Pawła II. Report no BS/49/2012. Warsaw: Public Opinion Research Center.
  10. CBOS. 2013a. Postawy prokreacyjne Polek. Report no BS/ 29/2013. Warsaw: Public Opinion Research Center.
  11. CBOS. 2013b. Równouprawnienie płci? Report no BS/31/ 2013. Warsaw: Public Opinion Research Center.
  12. Chimonas, S. 2005. Inequality and Child Care Policy: A Postmodern Theory of Moral Panics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Marriott Hotel, Loews Philadelphia Hotel, Philadelphia.
  13. Cohen, S. 2002. Folk Devils and Moral Panics. London: Rouledge.
  14. Critcher, C. 2008. "Moral Panic Analysis: Past, Present and Future." Sociology Compass, Vol. 2, No. 4: 1127-1144. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  15. Ćwiek, J. 2013. "Żłobki zbyt drogie i niedostępne." Rzeczpospolita, daily issue 18/07/2013.
  16. Dziewiecka-Bokun, L. 2000. "Rola Państwa w Realizacji Polityki Spolecznej w Okresie Transformacji Ustrojowej w Polsce." Problemy Polityki Spolecznej. Studia i Dyskusje, Vol 2/2012.
  17. Elson, D. 2010. "Gender and the global economic crisis in developing countries: a framework for analysis." Gender & Development, Vol. 18, No. 2: 201-212. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  18. Escobedo, A., Meil, G., Lapuerta, I. 2014. "Spain country note." Pp. 277-290 in Moss P. (ed.) International Review of Leave Policies and Research 2014. London: International Network on Leave Policies and Research.
  19. Ferge, Z. 1992. "Social Policy Regimes and Social Structure. Hypothesis about the Prospects of Social Policy in Central-Eastern Europe." In Ferge, Z., Kolberg I. E. Social Policy in a Changing Europe, Colorado, Campus and Westview: Boulder.
  20. Fleckenstein, T., Seeleib-Kaiser, M. 2011. "Business, skills and the welfare state: the political economy of employment-oriented family policy in Britain and Germany." Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 21, No. 2: 136-149. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  21. Fodor, E., Glass C., Kawachi J., Popescu L. 2002. "Family policies and gender in Hungary, Poland and Romania." Communist and Post-Communism Studies, Vol. 35: 475-490. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  22. Fultz, E., Ruck, M., Steinhilber, S. (eds.). 2003. The Gender Dimensions of Social Security Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe: case studies of teh Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. Budapest: International Labour Office.
  23. Gal, S., Kligman, G. 2000. Reproducing gender: politics, publics, and everyday life after socialism. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  24. Glass, C., Fodor, E. 2007. "From Public to Private Maternalism? Gender and Welfare in Poland and Hungary after 1989." Social Politics, Vol. 14, No. 3: 323-350. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  25. Good, E., Ben-Yehuda, N., 2009. Moral Panics: The Social Construction of Deviance. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  26. Gornick, J. C., Meyers, M.K. 2003. Families that Work. Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment: Russel Sage Foundation.
  27. Gornick, J. C., Meyers, M.K. 2008. "Creating Gender Egalitarian Societies: An Agenda for Reform." Politics & Society, Vol. 36, No. 3: 313-349. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  28. GUS. 2014. Żłobki i kluby dziecięce w 2013 r. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office.
  29. Haney, L. 2002. Inventing the Needy: Gender and the Politics of Welfare in Hungary. Berkley: University of California Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  30. Haney, L. 2003. "Welfare Reform with a Familial Face." In Haney, L., Pollard L. (eds.) Families of a New World. Gender, Politics, and State Development in a Global Context. New York and London: Routledge.
  31. Hobson, B. (ed.). 2014. Worklife Balance. The agency and Capabilities Gap. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  32. Hobson, B., Fahlén, S., Takács, J. 2011. "Agency and Capabilities to Achieve a Work-Life Balance: A Comparison of Sweden and Hungary." Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, Vol. 18, No. 2: 168-198. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  33. Heinen, J. 2000. "The Impact of Privatization on the Female Workforce in Poland." Pp. 118-131 in Iatridis, D. S. Social Justice and the Welfare State in the Central and Eastern Europe. The Impact of Privatization, Praeger.
  34. Heinen, J., Wator, M. 2006. "Child Care in Poland before, during, and after the Transition: Still a Women's Business." Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, Vol. 13, No. 2: 189-216. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  35. Javornik, J. 2014. "Measuring state de-familialism: Contesting post-socialist exceptionalism." Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 24, No. 3: 240-257. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  36. Karamessini, M., Rubery J. (eds.), 2014. Women and austerity: the economic crisis and the future for gender equality: Routledge.
  37. Kocourkova, J. 2002. "Leave arrangements and childcare services in Central Europe: policies and practices before and after the transition." Community, Work & Family, Vol. 5, No. 8: 302-318. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  38. Ko¶miński, P. 2013. "Terlikowski: Feministki winne pedofilii. ¦roda: Jezus wyznawał gender." Gazeta Wyborcza, daily issue 18/10/2013.
  39. Krinsky, C. 2013. "Introduction: The Moral Panic Concept." Pp. 1-14 in Krinsky, C. (ed.). The Ashgate Research Companion to Moral Panics. Ashgate Publishing. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  40. Leitner, S. 2010. "Germany outpaces Austria in childcare policy: the historical contingencies of 'conservative' childcare policy." Journal of European Social Policy. Vol. 20, No. 5: 456-467. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  41. Lelkes, O. 2000. "A great leap towards liberalism? The Hungarian welfare state." International Journal of Social Welfare, Vol. 9, No. 2: 92-102. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  42. Luzia, K. 2008. "Day Care as Battleground: using moral panic to locate the front lines." Australian Geographer, Vol. 39, No. 3: 315-326. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  43. Łapniewska, Z. 2010. "Analiza wpływu kryzysu gospodarczego na sytuację kobiet w Polsce." Pp. 19-59 in Czer wińska, A., Łapniewska, Z., Piotrowska J. (eds.) Kobiety na "zielonej wyspie". Kryzys w Polsce z perspektywy gender, Warsaw: Fundacja Feminoteka, Heinrich Böll Foundation.
  44. Mackay, F., Kenny, M., Chappell L. 2010. "New Institutionalism Through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism?" International Political Science Review, Vol. 31, No. 5: 573-588. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  45. Mahon, R., Williams, F. 2007. "Gender and State in Post-communist Societies: Introduction." Social Politics, Vol. 14, No. 3: 281-283. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  46. Mahoney, J., Thelen, K.A. 2010. Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  47. Makkai, T. 1994. "Social Policy and Gender in Eastern Europe." Pp. 188-205 in Sainsbury, D. (ed.). Gendering Welfare States. London, Thousand Oaks, New Dehli: SAGE. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  48. MB. 2014. Diagnoza wpływu Ustawy o opiece nad dziećmi w wieku do lat 3 na rozwój wczesnodziecięcych usług opiekuńczo-edukacyjnych w gminach. Warsaw: Milward Brown and Komeński Foundation on Development of Children.
  49. Morgan, K. J. 2008. "The Political Path to a Dual Earner/ Dual Carer Society: Pitfalls and Possibilities." Politics & Society, Vol. 36, No. 3: 403-420. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  50. McCauley, J. 2007. The Strength of the Nation: Why the U.S. is Panicked about Gay Marriage. Conference Papers: American Sociological Association.
  51. MPiPS. 2011. Resortowy program rozwoju instytucji opieki nad dziećmi w wieku do lat 3 realizowany w latach 2011 - 2013 "MALUCH". Warsaw: Ministerstwo Pracy i Polityki Społecznej.
  52. Nelson, J. 1997. "Social Costs, Social Sector Reforms, and Politics in Post-Communist Transformations." Pp. 247-271 in Nelson, J., Tilly, C., Walker, L. Transforming Post-Communist Political Economies, Washington DC: National Academy Press.
  53. Olah, L. S., Fr±tczak, E. 2004. "Becoming a Mother in Hungary and Poland during State Socialism". Demographic Research. 2004: Max Planck Institute. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  54. OECD. 2011. Doing Better for Families. Paris: Oganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  55. Orloff, A. S. 2009. "Gendering the Comparative Analysis of Welfare States: An Unfinished Agenda." Sociological Theory, Vol. 27, No. 3: 317-343. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  56. Panayotova, E., Brayfield A. 1997. "National Context and Gender Ideology. Attitudes toward Women's Employment in Hungary and the United States". Gender and Society, Vol. 11, No. 5: 627-655. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  57. Pascall, G., Lewis, J. 2004. "Emerging Gender Regimes and Policies for Gender Equality in a Wider Europe." Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 33, No. 3: 373-394. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  58. Ray, R., Gornick J. C., Schmitt J. 2010. "Who cares? assessing generosity and gender equality in parental leave policy designs in 21 countries." Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 20, No. 3: 196-216. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  59. Rubery, J. 2014. "From 'women and recession' to 'women and austerity': a framework for analysis." Pp. 17-36 in Karamessini M., Rubery, J. (eds.), Women and austerity: the economic crisis and the future for gender equality. London and New York: Routledge.
  60. Russinova, Z. 2000. "Changes in the Social Status of Bulgarian Women and their Organisations during the Transition to a Market Economy." Pp. 91-99 in Iatridis, D. S. Social Justice and the Welfare State in the Central and Eastern Europe. The Impact of Privatization, Praeger.
  61. Saxonberg, S. 2000. "Polish Women in the mid-1990s. Christian Democrats in a Country without a Christian Democratic Party." Czech Sociological Review, Vol. 8., No. 2: 233-253. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  62. Saxonberg, S. 2013. "From Defamilialization to Degenderization: Toward a New Welfare Typology." Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 47, No. 1: 26-49. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  63. Saxonberg, S., Sirovatka, T. 2006. "Failing Family Policies in Eastern Europe." Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, Vol. 8, No. 2: 185-202. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  64. Saxonberg, S., Szelewa, D. 2007. "The Continuing Legacy of the Communist Legacy? The development of family policies in Poland and the Czech Republic". Social Politics, Vol. 14, No. 3: 351-379. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  65. Scharpf, F. W., Schmidt, V. A. 2000. Welfare and work in the open economy. Volume II, Diverse responses to common challenges in twelve countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  66. Schmidt, Viven A., and Mark Tchatcher, eds. 2014. Resilient Liberalism in Europe's Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  67. Streeck, W., Thelen, K. A. 2005. Beyond continuity: institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
  68. Szacki, J. 1995. Liberalism after communism. Budapest, New York: Central Europen University Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  69. Szelewa, B. 2014. Mobilization against "gender ideology" in Poland. A presentation during the Friedrich Ebert Foundation international meeting on the 18th of February 2014. Budapest, Hungary.
  70. Szelewa, D., Polakowski, M. 2014. "Austerity Meets Conservatism: The Opportunities and Constraints of Social Investment Policies in Poland." A paper presented at the conference Assessing the social investment strategy. University of Lausanne, IDHEAP, Lausanne, Switzerland, 10-11 April 2014.
  71. Szelewa, D., Polakowski, M. 2008. "Who cares? Changing patterns of childcare in Central and Eastern Europe." Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 18, No. 2: 115-131. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  72. Szikra, D., Szelewa, D. 2010. "Do CEE countries fit the "Western" welfare picture? The example of family policy in Hungary and Poland." Pp. 81-114 in Klenner, C., Leiber, S. (eds.) Welfare States and Gender in Central-Eastern Europe. Brussels: ETUI.
  73. Titkow, A. 1995. "Kobiety pod presj±? Proces kształtowania sie tożsamo¶ci." In Titkow, A., Domanski, H. (eds.) Co to znaczy byc kobieta w Polsce?. Warszawa: IFiS PAN.
  74. Villa, P., Smith, M. 2014. "Policy in the time of crisis: employment and gender equality in Europe." Pp. 273-294 in Karamessini M., Rubery, J. (eds.) Women and austerity: the economic crisis and the future for gender equality. London and New York: Routledge.
  75. Walby, S. 2009. "Gender and the Financial Crisis." Paper for UNESCO Project on Gender and the Financial Crisis. UNESCO.
  76. Watson, P. 1993. "The Rise of Masculinism in Eastern Europe". New Left Review, Vol. 1, No. 198: 71-82.

Tento článek je publikován v reľimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), která umoľňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.