Effects of Shear Rate and Inhibitors on Wax Deposition of Malaysian Crude Oil

Wax deposition can cause a serious problem in crude oil flow assurance, especially in deep water operation due to the long chain of n-paraffin. This paper examines the effects of two factors on the deposition process, which are shear rate and different types of inhibitors. 10 mL of four different types of wax inhibitors (cocamide diethanolamine (C-DEA), diethanolamine (DEA), poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) (EVA) and poly (maleic anhydride-alt-1-octadecene) (MEA) were injected into a crude oil vessel where the temperature of cold finger and water bath were set at 5°C and 50°C, respectively. The rotation speed was operated at different ranges between 0 and 600 rpm. From the result, it was found that the amount of total wax deposit decreased when shear rate increased. EVA showed a strong effect to inhibit wax formation with 33.33% reduction of wax deposit at 400 rpm as compared to other inhibitors.


INTRODUCTION
The deposition of wax from crude oil in subsea can occur along the pipeline that is connected from the offshore, as well as to the onshore [1][2][3][4] .Waxes are linear hydrocarbons with more than 16 carbon atoms 5 .n-paraffin chains will crystalize and adhere to each other inside the pipeline to form wax 6 .The deposition phenomenon occurs when the operating temperature of the pipeline is below the wax appearance temperature dollars yearly to the petroleum industry 1 .In an oil and gas reservoir, any n-paraffin will be in solution form at high temperature and pressure.The normal surrounding temperature in the seabed can achieve around 4°C, therefore it is easy to cause wax deposition 9 .
To minimize wax deposition, many techniques have been introduced through removal and prevention, such as chemical, mechanical and thermal methods.In this study, chemical method was chosen to reduce the rate of solid deposition.The effectiveness of a particular paraffin inhibitor is different for different well.Therefore, the best inhibitor needs to be determined for each well individually 10 .Four different types of inhibitors were used in this study, which are cocamide diethanolamine (C-DEA), diethanolamine (DEA), poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) (EVA) and poly(maleic anhydride-alt-1-octadecene) (MEA).C-DEA and DEA comprise of hydroxyl groups, whereas EVA and MA consist of acetate and ester group, respectively.It is believed that the addition of an inhibitor in a crude sample can weaken solid deposit through van der Waals bonding, which results in an easy removal of the deposit by shear forces flow streams 11 .
A polymer inhibitor contains wax-like portions that allow the molecules to incorporate into the wax deposit structure.This type of in inhibitor also has other structural features that can alter and disrupt crystallization and network growth of crystal wax.However, for hydroxyl group, it can act as a surfactant, which is a good oil-in-water emulsifier that can prevent gelling problem in crude oil and also can act as an inhibitor.Different types of inhibitors have been widely studied for wax deposition problem.It has been found that different inhibitors will give different effect on wax deposition rate [12][13][14] .Aside from the type of inhibitor, shear rate in the flow line also gives significant influence on deposition rate.Previous works found that if shear rate increased, the amount of total deposition decreased 8,15 .Therefore, the objective of the present work is to gain a better understanding on how wax inhibitor and shear rate affect the rate of wax deposition in Malaysian crude oil.

Preparation of polymer solvent
EVA and MEA solutions (400 ppm) were prepared by dissolving an appropriate amount of solid EVA and MEA in cyclohexane under continuous stirring at 60°C for 1 h.DEA and C-DEA inhibitors, supplied by Sigma-Aldrich, were used at pure liquid concentration.

Physical property analysis
Table 1 shows the summary of the equipment used for the physical analysis study.

Cold finger experimental set up and analysis
Fig. 1 shows the cold finger apparatus that was fabricated to evaluate the rate of wax deposition of crude oil.This device is suitable to correlate wax deposition data to the temperature differences between the bulk oil and wall 4,10,15 .

Methods of analysis
First, the cold finger was placed within the center of a stainless steel jar filled with 300 mL of crude oil.The crude samples need to be conditioned above the WAT for thermal treatment in an oven for 1 h to solubilize any precipitated wax.An impeller was also attached at the middle of the cold finger to make the field flow influences both the shear stress field and the rate of heat transfer at the cold finger surface.
The cold finger and jar were then placed inside a heating water bath to control the crude oil temperature.The heating bath temperature was initially fixed with a predefined temperature of 50°C.The connection of the cold finger in the cooling bath circulation system was set up while the crude oil was heated up.The cold fluid valve was opened to condition the cold finger after it has reached the thermal equilibrium of the bath and jar.Crude oil with and without wax inhibitor were tested in the cold finger experiment.The stirring rate can be adjusted depending on research purpose.The experiment was carried out for 2 h to presume the aging effect upon the wax deposited onto the cold finger.Visual observations were made for the physical characteristics of the deposits.The deposit was then scrapped from the cold finger, weighed and saved for further analysis 4,15 .

Paraffin inhibition efficiency
Paraffin inhibition efficiency (PIE) was calculated using Eq.1: Where W f is the reference amount of wax deposit without chemical treatment in gram (g) and W t is the amount of paraffin deposit with chemical treatment in gram (g) 12 .Four different shear rates were studied.

Characteristics of crude oil sample
The details of the crude oil sample characteristics used in this study such as viscosity, density, specific gravity, WAT, pour point temperature and wax content are shown in Table 2 below.Fig. 2 presents the results of cold finger testing for Malaysian crude oil with four different chemical inhibitors.The chemical inhibitor performance is given as a function of four difference shear rates ranged from 0-600 rpm.The test was conducted at constant temperature, experimental duration and amount of inhibitor of 5°C, 2 h and 10 mL, respectively.Wax deposit was found to decrease significantly when the shear rate increased at the shear condition from 0-400 rpm.This trend is suggested due to the decrease of crude oil viscosity surrounding the cold finger 13,16 .Minimum wax was observed at 400 rpm for all chemical inhibitors.The cold finger temperature was set below its wax appearance temperature.Therefore, it is This activity changed the internal energy of both systems involved, which is from non-Newtonian to Newtonian region.Nevertheless, changing the temperature around the cold finger also changed the rheology of the wax deposit.However, when the samples were stirred rapidly at the shear rate of 600 rpm, the amount of deposit increased slightly.This happens due to the shear thickening fluid behaviour resultant from a very viscous liquid.The non-Newtonian behavior increased the tendency of the wax to precipitate out from the crude oil to form waxes through crystallization process.Once the crystals have formed, the tendency of the crystal to aggregate is higher.
Above the pour point temperature, the crude oil behaves as a Newtonian character.At this condition, the crude oil is in the liquid form.Below pour point temperature, the crude oil region changed from Newtonian to non-Newtonian fluid region due to the presence of solid particles 17 .The viscosity of the crude oil is influenced by two factors; crude oil temperature and shear rate 16 .The presence of chemical inhibitor at low temperature would help the wax to alter crystal growth and surface characteristic by incorporation into the wax structure.The capability of the wax to stick to each other would be lower due to van der Waals interaction.Therefore, the solubility of chemical inhibitor in crude oil will play a major role in viscosity reduction 18 .
Table 3 shows the performance inhibitor efficiency (%PIE) of each chemical inhibitor.EVA inhibitor shows the best performance to reduce and inhibit wax formation.The PIE data were calculated using Eq. 1.The order of inhibitor performance is: EVA has a polar group along the polymeric chain, which contributes to better performance of the polymer additives as a wax crystallization modifier 19,20 .The strong van der Waals interaction between EVA and wax (C 28 H 58 ) influences the inhibitor performance.Although MEA also has a polar group, but the interaction of the molecules of MEA with wax molecules is weaker than EVA.This interaction is based on the radial distribution function (rdf) analysis 11 .
For the results of DEA and C-DEA wax deposit, it can be suggested that DEA and C-DEA could not give strong van de Waals interaction because these inhibitors possess a hydroxyl group (OH) that could not incorporate into the wax molecules.A molecular dynamic simulation on the interaction of DEA and C-DEA with n-paraffin should be conducted for better understanding.Fig. 3 represents the wax deposit formed on the cold finger by varying the stirring rate.As shown in the figures, the deposit had approximately 1 mm thickness for 0 rpm.The deposit layer seems smooth and soft gel wax was observed as shown in Fig. 3 (a).It can be easily scratched off from the cold finger u-tube.As shown in Fig. 3 (b) to (c), once the shear rate was introduced at the range of 200 rpm to 400 rpm, the thickness and wax deposit amount were reduced and it became easier to scratch off compared to the wax obtained at 0 rpm.
As shown in Table 3, 400 rpm gave the best performance with 33.33% of PIE value based on the weight and surface area basis when EVA was used as the inhibitor.However, the performance at 600 rpm was suddenly outperformed where the amount of deposit obtained increased more than the control sample.The control sample is the crude oil without the addition of any inhibitor.4 presents pour point temperature using four different inhibitors in the crude oil.Pour point is the lowest temperature at which the crude oil flows freely under its own weight because of the crystallization of waxes or paraffin 13,21 .From the table, EVA inhibitor shows the lowest pour point value compared to other inhibitors.However, when DEA and C-DEA were used as inhibitors, the pour point obtained changed from 10°C to 19°C and 20°C, respectively.This value confirmed that different types of inhibitors can affect and increase the pour point of crude oil.The higher value of pour point temperature suggests higher probability of solid crystallization process, whereby it can increase the viscosity of crude oil and cause flow problems.Therefore, different rates of crystal growth are affected by different types of chemical inhibitors 16 .
Strong van der Waals interaction between wax and the functional group in EVA is suggested as a reason in the decrease of WAT and increase of wax solubility as discussed in our previous work 11 .

CONCLUSIONS
EVA inhibitor shows the best performance to reduce wax formation based on paraffin inhibitor efficiency value.This study found that as the stirring rate increased, the amount of wax deposit was observed to be decreased with the present of inhibitors.This activity changed the internal energy of both systems involved, which is from non Newtonian to Newtonian region.The minimum shear rate was found at 400 rpm for every experiment.Once exceeded the minimum point, wax content would start to increase due to the shear thickening fluid behavior resultant from a very viscous liquid.

Fig. 1 : 2 :
Fig. 1: Cold finger apparatus set up Fig. 2: Effect of rotational speed on wax deposit using different types of inhibitors

Fig 3 :
Fig 3: Example of changes of deposit thickness with increasing shear rate using EVA inhibitor at (a) 0 rpm, (b) 200 rpm, (c) 400 rpm and (d) 600 rpm