Energy Consumption and Production Pattern in Direct Drilling Wheat in Punjab

The study was conducted on input energy consumption for wheat production in irrigated condition at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. The results revealed that the highest input energy requirement of 15682.9 MJha-1was recorded for conventional tillage (CT) compared 13189.4, 12467.6 and 12467.6 MJha-1 for rotavator (RT), happy seeder (HS) and zero tillage (ZT), respectively. Nitrogen (N) application showed a positive relationship with input energy consumption and highest of 18297.0 MJha-1 was recorded with 150 kg Nha-1 compared 15164.5, 13651.3, 6694.7 MJha-1 for 0, 100 and 125 kg Nha-1, respectively. The main source of input energy use was fertilizer and irrigation. The higher share of direct and non-renewable input energy consumption was recorded in CT and indirect and renewable input energy consumption was higher in HS, ZT and RT. Direct & renewable and indirect & non-renewable input energy showed a negative and positive relationship with N rates. CT wheat with 150 kg Nha-1 produced the highest total output energy. The results showed that the highest 10.48, 0.38 kgMJ-1 and 3.96 MJkg-1 of output: input ratio, energy productivity and energy specific under ZT, ZT and CT, respectively. However, the maximum NPK energy equivalent in biomass was recorded in CT. Input: output ratio, energy productivity and NPK energy equivalent showed negative relationship and energy specific showed a positive relation with N rates. CT showed the higher net gain of energy compared to direct drilling methods as ZT, HS and RT. Article history Received: 8 June 2016 Accepted: 30 September 2017


introduction
From the era of Green Revolution, energy consumption has increased tremendously in agriculture and farming has become very energy intensive.Presently, farmers are using high energy to enhance production due to competition and some mismanagement on using inputs.However, energy consumption in agriculture is directly related to the development of technology in farming and the level of mechanization 3 Several studies have been conducted to know the energy consumption patterns in different crops and cropping systems at different situations all over the world 7,14,17 and all of them show the importance of how energy resources are used.It was evaluated the changes in wheat-maize energy consumption in India 7 and reported that the average values of energy consumption for wheat in low and high hills were 41.68 and 110.8 MJ/ha and for maize were 43.43 and 81.33 MJ/ha, respectively.Conducted the optimization of energy consumption for wheat production in Iran 1 and reported that average energy consumption for wheat production was 58367.69MJ/ha and about 8755.1 MJ/ha of total energy could be saved while holding the constant level of wheat yield.The results of the other study showed that per hectare operational energy use and size of holdings were inversely related to each other.The average use of operational energy was 1028 MJ/ha for rain-fed wheat production.The highest operational energy was required for preparation of field for sowing.The source wise energy use was 3826 MJ/ha.The major source of input energy use was seed and fertilizer.The output-input energy ratio was 5.39.The energy was gap analysis showed that an additional investment of rupee one on energy use in the production of rain-fed wheat gave an additional income of Rs. 1.61 8 .In another study found that wheat crop utilized a total of 38356.39MJ/ha of which utilization of fertilizer energy was 38.45% followed by diesel and machinery energy.Output-input energy ratio and energy productivity were recorded to be 3.13 and 0.16 kg of wheat/MJ, respectively 12 .Most of the studies were conducted on the pattern of energy consumption in irrigated and dry areas particularly the wheat grown with traditional methods but very little information available on the pattern of energy consumption of direct drilling wheat sown in Indo-Gangetic plains of India.However, the alternative techniques of the traditional methods of agriculture like zero tillage, happy seeder and rotavator technology for the planting of wheat and other crops were introduced recently.Several studies have been shown that these technologies have certain benefits like saving on fuel, water, time and labor over the conventional methods and proved to be efficient in energy conservation by saving fuel, irrigation water and labour.Efficient use of energies helps to achieve increased production, productivity and contributes to the economy, profitability and competitiveness of agriculture, sustainability in rural living 15 .Use of conservation techniques helps to improve and make to more efficient for the utilization of natural and energy resources 13 .It was reported that economic, efficient and sustainable use of energy based on the proper energy management 12 .It is seen that the importance has been given in many countries including Iran for the efficiently, sustainability and economical use of energy.The major objective of the present study was to study the energy input and output per hectare to produce of direct drilling wheat in irrigated areas of Punjab.It also identifies the method of planting wheat by which energy savings could be realized by the conventional method in order to reduce the energy consumption for wheat production.The input and output data were converted into energy using the standard conversion coefficients (Table 1).The irrigation data was converted into energy using the standard conversion coefficient (Table 1).

Study Area
Ludhiana representing the Indo-Gangetic alluvial plains is situated at the 30°56' N latitude and 75°52' E longitude at an altitude of 247m above mean sea level.It is characterized by the subtropical semi-arid type of climate with hot and dry summer (mid April to end of June), hot and humid summer monsoon ).The treatments comprised of four methods of planting (Planting with Happy seeder, Rotavator, Zero tillage in the standing stubbles and conventional tillage after removal of paddy straw) and four N rates (Control,100,125 and 150 kg ha -1 ) were laid out in split-plot design with three replications.
In case of zero tillage and happy seeder methods, the direct drilling was done in the field without any preparatory tillage with Pantnagar zero-till drill and happy seeder.In case of happy seeder, the loose straw of combine harvested rice was spread uniformly while planting of wheat.In conventional tillage, the field was prepared after pre-sowing irrigation at field capacity by two harrowing and two cultivations with a tractor drawn cultivator followed by planking.
Once ploughing with rotavator for incorporation of paddy straw followed by seed broadcasting and again ploughing with rotavator for mixing the seed in the soil.

results and Discussion input Energy Consumption
Total input energy use considerably varied with methods of planting and nitrogen rates (Table 3).The highest input energy consumed to produce of wheat under conventional tillage (15682.9MJ ha -1 ) followed by rotavator (13189.4MJ ha -1 ).The same and lowest energy consumed (12467.6MJ ha -1 ) when the crop was sown with direct drilling methods like zero tillage and happy seeder.The fertilizer and irrigation water showed the maximum share of energy consumption in wheat production (Table 2 and 3).The fertilizer and irrigation had 67.9 and 30.7 % share of the total input energy consumption in case of happy seeder and zero tillage but it was 64.2 & 29.0 and 54.0 & 24.4% rotavator and conventional tillage wheat, respectively and rest of the other inputs.The energy consumption increased with the increasing level of nitrogen up to the highest rate of 150 kg ha -1 .The highest energy consumption of 18297 MJ ha -1 was recorded with the application of 150 kg Nha -1 which was 63.4, 25.4, 17.1% higher than 0, 100 and 125 kg Nha -1 .The irrigation share of total energy consumption in control was 57.0% but fertilizer and irrigation share was 50.9 & 28.0, 55.9 & 25.2 and 54.6 & 20.9% in case of 100, 125 and 150 kg Nha -1 , respectively.From Iran 1 reported that average energy consumption for wheat production was 58367.69MJha -1 .The similar results were reported by 13 and indicated that canola crop utilized a total of 30889.098MJha -1 of which utilization of fertilizer energy was 38.93 % followed by electricity (27.62 %) and diesel fuel (20.085 %).
It was reported that wheat production consumed a total 38356.39MJha -1 of energy 12 , which was mostly on fossil fuels.Fertilizer energy was the main energy input (38.45%).In Turkey found the energy requirement of sunflower was 18931.09MJha -1 18 .
In this investigation found that the fertilizer was the maximum energy utilizing input (51.28%) followed by diesel fuel (28.55%).The results revealed that the total input energy consumption in sunflower production in Greece was 10.49 GJha -1 , with fertilizer being the major energy input 5 .

Direct and indirect input Energy
The higher share of direct input energy of 13.83 and 9.90% of the total input energy was recorded in conventional tillage and rotavator compared to 5.46% each for zero tillage and happy seeder planted wheat (Table 2 and 3).The share of direct input energy varies with N rates.N has a negative relationship with direct input energy consumption.The higher direct input energy consumption of 14.99 % of the total input energy was recorded in the 0 kg Nha -1 compared to 7.47, 6.74 and 5.45%, respectively.
The indirect input energy consumption was higher under direct drilling methods which were 59.10, 59.10, 57.49% of the total input energy in happy seeder, zero tillage and rotavator, respectively compared to 50.69% for the conventional tillage (Table 2 and 3).The indirect input energy consumption showed a positive relationship with the use of nitrogen up to 125 kg Nha -1 further increase in N showed a negative relationship.The highest share of 67.99% of the total input energy was recorded with 125 kg Nha -1 compared to 66.35, 64.43 and 27.35% for the 150, 100 and 0 kg Nha -1 , respectively.

renewable and non-renewable input Energy
Renewable input energy had maximum share of direct drilling methods which was 57.24, 57.24 and 54.12% of the total input energy for happy seeder, zero tillage and rotavator compared to 46.57% for conventional tillage (Table 2 and 3).Renewable input energy had the same trend as the direct input energy with the varying rates of N. Renewable input energy of N showed the similar relationship as the indirect input energy.The maximum share of renewable input energy of 65.89% of the total input energy for 125 kg Nha -1 and lowest share was recorded of control (22.55%).
Non-renewable input energy consumption (Table 2 and 3) was highest in rotavator (54.29%) and conventional tillage (53.27%) compared to happy seeder (50.89 %) and zero tillage (50.89%).Nonrenewable input energy had the similar trend as direct input energy and renewable energy with the application of N rates.N had a positive relationship with the non-renewable input energy.The lowest non-renewable input energy was recorded in the 0 kg Nha -1 .

output Energy
Output energy varied significantly with the methods of planting and nitrogen rates.Wheat planted with zero tillage showed higher grain output energy which was significantly more than all the other methods of planting (Table 4).The application of 150 kg Nha -1 produced the significantly higher grain and straw output energy than the lower rates of N. The supply of 150 kg Nha -1 to the crop sown with zero tillage and happy seeder showed the highest grain output energy which was significantly more than the other treatment combinations.In case of straw, the significantly higher output energy showed the conventional tillage wheat as compared to other methods of planting.However, the interaction Planting method-4590 Nitrogen-2070 Planting method x N-4140 effect of method of planting and nitrogen was also significant.Conventional tillage wheat showed the similar straw output energy with the use of 125 and 150 kg Nha -1 and it was significantly more than the other treatment combinations.Total output energy of grain and straw was recorded significantly more from the wheat planted with conventional tillage as compared to other methods of planting.Total output energy was increased significantly with the increase in N from 0 to 150 kg Nha -1 .The interactive effect showed that conventional tillage wheat with the use of 150 kg Nha -1 produced the highest total output energy.

net gain of Energy
The maximum net gain of energy of 115202.15MJha -1 was observed in conventional tillage which was 10.97, 9.30 and 3.91% more than happy seeder (102559.85MJha -1 ), rotavator (104483.18MJha -1 ), and zero tillage (110694.85MJha -1 ), respectively (Table 3).The higher net gain under the conventional tillage was due to the more output energy in straw as compared to grains.Net gain of energy was increased with each increment of N and the maximum of 102559.85MJha -1 was recorded with 150 kg Nha -1 which was 47.65, 17.47 and 9.05 % more than 0 (69562.80MJha -1 ), 100 (109661.23 MJha -1 ) and 125 (120845.50MJha -1 ), kg Nha -1 .In Iran reported that average energy about 8755.1 MJha -1 of total energy could be saved while holding the constant level of wheat yield 1 in Iran.In another study reported that net energy gain in sunflower production was 36.87GJha -1 5 .

Energy use Efficiency
The energy use efficiency varies with the methods of planting and it was obtained 10.48, 9.44, 9.11 and 8.90 from the zero tillage, happy seeder, rotavator and conventional tillage wheat (Table 5).It shows that direct drilling methods are more efficient than the traditional method of planting.The nitrogen use showed negative relation with the energy use efficiency.The maximum was recorded under the control and lowest at 150 Kg Nha -1 .It may be due to the immobilization or leaching losses of a higher rate of nitrogen than a lower rate.The output-input energy ratio varies with the location.It was found to be 3.13 in wheat from Ardabil Province of Iran 12 , 5.39 in rainfed wheat from India 8 .In another reported that energy ratio in sunflower production was 4.5 5 .To compare the work of various workers, it shows the direct drilling methods are more efficient in energy use efficiency compared to conventional method.

Energy Productivity
Energy productivity had the similar trend as nitrogen use efficiency (Table 5).The highest was recorded of 0.35 kgMJ -1 with zero tillage followed by happy seeder (0.31 kgMJ -1 ), rotavator (0.28 kgMJ -1 ) and conventional tillage (0.26 kgMJ -1 ).It showed that the direct drilling methods like zero tillage and happy seeder are more efficient methods for producing more with less energy as compared to rotavator and conventional tillage.Energy productivity was maximum under control (0.37 kgMJ -1 ) and a further increase in nitrogen from 100 to 150 kg Nha -1 decreased the energy productivity from 0.27 and 0.28 kgMJ -1 , respectively.It could be due to the immobilization or leaching losses of a higher rate of nitrogen than a lower rate.Energy productivity of wheat is varied with the location.Energy productivity of wheat was recorded 0.16 KgMJ -1 from Ardabil Province of Iran 12 .Our results are also showed higher energy productivity with the direct drilling methods which are more efficient than the traditional method.

Energy-Specific
In this case, trend was reversed; the lowest energy specific was recorded with zero tillage and highest with conventional tillage (Table 5).It shows that the wheat sown with conventional tillage utilized more energy to produce one kilogram of grain as compared to other methods of planting.However, the application of nitrogen from 100 to 150 kg ha -1 consumed more energy for the production of wheat over the control.It shows that higher production of wheat can be obtained with the use of higher energy in the form of fertilizer.
nPK Energy Equivalent NPK energy equivalent in grain, straw and total equivalent energy in biomass were varied with methods of planting and nitrogen rates (Table 5).Energy equivalent in grain was highest under zero tillage followed by conventional tillage, rotavator and happy seeder.However, in case of straw the higher energy equivalent in zero tillage followed by conventional tillage, happy seeder and rotavator.The similar trend was observed in NPK energy equivalent in biomass as the energy equivalent obtained in grains.The NPK energy equivalent showed a positive relationship with the application of nitrogen.The energy equivalent of NPK in grains, straw and biomass was increased with the increase in nitrogen rate from 0 to 150 kg Nha -1 .The highest NPK energy equivalent was recorded with 150 kg Nha-1 in grains, straw and biomass.

Conclusion
Wheat planted with direct drilling methods like HS, ZT and RT under irrigated conditions consumed a total input energy of 12467.6,12467.6 and 13189.4Mjha -1 compared 15682.9MJha -1 with conventional tillage.N showed a positive relationship with the use of input energy and highest consumed at 150 kg Nha -1 .The major energy use inputs were fertilizer and irrigation in wheat production.These inputs had the share of total energy consumption of 98.6, 98.6 and 93.2 and 78.4% in HS, ZT, RT and CT wheat and 78.9, 81.1 75.5% for 100, 125 and 150 kg Nha -1 .The highest total output energy equivalent was recorded in CT and with 150 kg Nha -1 .However, the supply of 150 kg Nha -1 to the crop sown with zero tillage and happy seeder showed the highest grain output energy which was significantly more than the other treatment combinations.The higher output: input ratio and energy productivity and lower energy specific were recorded under direct drilling methods compared to traditional method.A total NPK energy equivalent was observed in ZT and with 150 kg Nha -1 .However, a higher net gain of energy was found in CT and with 150 kg Nha -1 .The use of conservation agriculture practices like zero tillage and happy seeder with 150 kg Nha -1 for wheat production found to be more efficient and to improve the utilization of natural and energy resources.

table 2 :Amount of inputs and total energy equivalent of different inputs and machinery Parameter unit Quantity Energy equ- total energy per hectare ivalent (mJ) equivalent (mJ)
Field ExperimentAn experiment was carried out at Agronomy Research Farm, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana during Rabi season of 2009-10.The soil was loamy sand with neutral pH of 8.1, low in organic carbon (0.24%) and available nitrogen (186 kg ha -1 ), medium in available phosphorus (13.7 kg ha -1 ) and high in available potassium (246.5 kg ha-1

table 3 :total input, direct, indirect, renewable, non-renewable and net gain energy under different treatments
2 Oha -1 ) was applied at sowing.The remaining half dose of nitrogen was broadcasted with first irrigation.The post-emergence spray of 2, 4-D @ 625g in 500 litres of water per hectare was done at 40 days after sowing for the control of weeds.The first post sowing irrigation was applied on December 11, 2009 and subsequent irrigations were applied on January 1, 2010, February 29, 2010, March 13, 2010 and March 24, 2010.The crop was harvested from the net plot of 7 m x 1.05 m on 14th April, 2010 (zero tillage and happy seeder) and 16th April, 2010 (rotavator and conventional tillage) for the record of per plot grain yield.Grain and straw samples were taken from the net plot for the analysis of nitrogen in grain and straw by The standard macro-Kjeldahl procedure.The soil samples from 0-15 cm depth