메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터

주제분류

정기구독(개인)

소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.

회원혜택

로그인 회원이 가져갈 수 있는 혜택들을 확인하고 이용하세요.

아카루트

학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.

영문교정

영문 논문 작성에 도움을 드리기 위해, 영문 교정 서비스를
지원하고 있어요.

고객센터 제휴문의

...

저널정보

저자정보

표지
이용수
내서재
0
내서재에 추가
되었습니다.
내서재에서
삭제되었습니다.

내서재에 추가
되었습니다.
내서재에서
삭제되었습니다.

초록·키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: Architectural structures in modern society ate evolving repeatedly while accommodation the various conditions and demands of society along with the concentration of urban population and rapidly changing economic growth. Architectural design, which along with such economic development, demonstrates the need for al prior safety impact assessment on various risk factors for efficient underground space planning in building planning in accordance with various laws and regulations required by society under the condition of a limited site. Among the safety evaluations for each purpose in accordance with the underground space development, the similarity between the evaluation papers in the ground-related fields of the building safety impact assessment and the underground safety impact assessment is to be studied to study a reasonable improvement plan. Method: Building safety impact assessment and underground safety impact assessment are institutionalized of that the results of the evaluation implementation perpared through the review of the ground safety impact assessment in accordance with the Building Act before and after building permits are reflected in the design documents during licensing and various deliberation. Therefore, each evaluation manual was compared and analyzed to suggest effective linkage of evaluation items, adjustment and sharing of evaluation contents. Result: Through this study, both systems have their respective purposes and differences of impact assessment, and at the same time, it is reviewed that the evaluation and analysis methods included in the target project are very similar of overlapping. A method of exempting evaluations similar to or overlapping with additional adjustments through sharing of related departments was proposed. In addition, additional legal and institutional research is needed to secure the execution power of the two systems in the future.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. 서론
2. 지반 정보·평가 시스템 및 법적 추진 방향
3. 건축물 안전영향평가와 지하안전영향평가의 제도 비교 및 분석
4. 결론
Reference

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-610-001135759