Keywords
DDIT4, mTOR, REDD1, thapsigargin
This article is included in the Antibody Validations gateway.
DDIT4, mTOR, REDD1, thapsigargin
Mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) is a central signaling node in the cellular response to nutrient availability and growth factor signaling, initiating and regulating processes such as protein synthesis, ribosome biogenesis and de novo lipogenesis when active (reviewed by Laplante and Sabatini1). However, in times of amino acid deprivation or energy deficit, the cell must switch from these anabolic processes to maintain energy homeostasis. The switch is controlled by changes in mTORC1 activity that occur in response to variations in the availability of nutrients and energy requirements of the cell (see recent review by Albert and Hall2).
REDD1 (protein regulated in development and DNA damage response 1) also known as DDIT4 (DNA damage-inducible transcript 4 protein) or RTP801, is a 232 amino-acid upstream repressor of mTORC1 activity3–5 that is transcriptionally upregulated by growth factor signaling and in response to amino acid deprivation, among other stimuli. The mechanism by which REDD1 acts to repress mTORC1 signaling has been under investigation for almost a decade6. These studies are focused on REDD1’s suppression of mTORC1 via its stimulation of the tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2); however, the method by which REDD1 activates TSC2 remained elusive6.
Recent data have revealed a model where REDD1 promotes the association of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) with serine/threonine-protein kinase Akt, leading to the dephosphorylation of the kinase on Thr3086. This dephosphorylation of Thr308 (but not the Ser473 residue) subsequently leads to a reduction in the Akt-mediated phosphorylation of TSC2, followed by TSC2-mediated stimulation of Rheb GTPase activity. This results in accumulation of Rheb in the GDP bound form, and thus the inhibition of mTORC1 activity.
Despite its ubiquitous distribution, expression of REDD1 is typically negligible in developed tissues until cells encounter conditions of nutrient and energy deprivation7,8 or – particularly in the case of skeletal muscle tissue – during endurance exercise9 when energy is prioritized for movement. It is also transcriptionally activated by p5310 hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1)11 and ATF412 transcription factors, in accordance with initial findings that REDD1 levels increase in response to a variety of cellular stresses, including hypoxia3, ER stress12 and by agents that cause DNA damage such as UV radiation13. Several pharmacological agents can also be used to induce REDD1 expression in experimental models where REDD1 follows endogenous patterns of expression. Agents such as the glucocorticoid dexamethasone14 and the non-competitive inhibitor of the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) pump thapsigargin12 have been shown to upregulate expression of REDD1.
We examined Proteintech’s anti-REDD1 antibody (catalog number 10638-1-AP) in scenarios where REDD1 levels were either reduced or absent. The antibody, which is raised against a whole-fusion protein immunogen consisting of amino acid residues 1-232, is cited in over 90% of publications utilizing REDD1 antibodies (CiteAb: http://www.citeab.com/search?q=REDD1), and a total of 110 publications (at the time of writing, http://www.ptglab.com/Products/REDD1-Antibody-10638-1-AP.htm?publication=1). REDD1 reduction was achieved using RNA interference (RNAi). Antibody specificity was further supported by Western blotting experiments performed using samples from a REDD1-/- knockout mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cell line, and controlled in the presence of thapsigargin.
The anti-REDD1 antibody used in this study (Cat#: 10638-1-AP, RRID: AB_2245711) is a rabbit polyclonal antibody made exclusively by Proteintech Group. It was raised against a fusion protein corresponding to the full-length human REDD1-protein sequence (amino acids 1-232). Full sequence: MPSLWDRFSSSSTSSSPSSLPRTPTPDRPPRSAWGSATREEGFDRSTSLESSDCESLDSSNSGFGPEEDTAYLDGVSLPDFELLSDPEDEHLCANLMQLLQESLAQARLGSRRPARLLMPSQLVSQVGKELLRLAYSEPCGLRGALLDVCVEQGKSCHSVGQLALDPSLVPTFQLTLVLRLDSRLWPKIQGLFSSANSPFLPGFSQSLTLSTGFRVIKKKLYSSEQLLIEEC.
All validations in this study were undertaken using lot# 00019207.
A protein BLAST search demonstrates that the full-length sequence of human REDD1 shares over 90% homology with mouse Redd1.
Goat anti-Rabbit polyclonal secondary antibody, conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was obtained from Jackson ImmunoResearch (Cat# 111-035-003, RRID: AB_2313567). This antibody is specific for both the heavy and light chains of Rabbit IgG, and was affinity purified to reduce cross-reactivity to other species.
The anti-α-tubulin antibody used in this study (sc-32293, RRID: AB_628412) is a mouse monoclonal antibody purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. The antibodies used in this study are summarised in Table 1.
HEK-293 cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC CRL-1573) and used in shRNA knock down validation studies of the 10638-1-AP anti-REDD1 antibody.
The REDD1-/- knockout MEF cell line and permission for its use was obtained from Dr. Leif Ellisen. Construction of the REDD1-/- allele and generation of this cell line was previously described by Sofer et al.1.
DMEM high-glucose medium was purchased from Gibco/Life Technologies (11965-092) and Fetal Bovine Serum Premium Select was purchased from Atlanta Biologicals (51150).
The target site for REDD1 knock down was determined by available literature and online shRNA design tools (Broad Institute: http://www.broadinstitute.org/rnai/public/seq/search, siDirect version 2.0: http://sidirect2.rnai.jp/). We designed two single-stranded 21mer stem DNA oligonucleotides, encoding the target siRNA (sense strand), in addition to their single-stranded complementary strand counterparts (antisense strand). The two sequences (sense and antisense) were linked together by a short linker sequence TTCAAGACG that forms a hairpin loop structure upon sequence expression. At the end of the shRNA template we added a 6 nucleotide poly (T) tail, recognized as a termination signal. The 5’ ends of the two oligonucleotides are non-complementary and form the BamHI and HindIII restriction site overhangs which facilitated directional cloning into the pGenesil-1 vector. pGenesil-1 is a plasmid vector modified by addition of the hU6 promoter to the pEGFP-C1 plasmid. The sense strand sequences of both shRNA constructs designed for this study are shown in Table 2.
HEK-293 cells (2×105) were seeded in fresh, full media in duplicate per experimental condition in 12-well CellBind plates (Corning). Cells were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C in a humidified incubator (5% CO2) prior to REDD1 knock down. Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Sciences, #11668027), a cationic lipid based transfection reagent, was mixed with pGenesil-1 vector containing REDD1 shRNA or control shRNA construct at a ratio of 1:1 in reduced serum medium and incubated for 15 minutes at 37°C to allow formation of lipid-DNA complexes. Cell culture media in 12-well plates were replaced with fresh pre-warmed media lacking serum before addition of lipid-DNA complex to HEK-293 cells. Cells were incubated with lipid-DNA complex for 48 hours at 37°C (5% CO2), before removal of media and washing in PBS. Cells were then harvested and lysed by application of 1X Laemmli sample buffer and scraping. REDD1 levels were detected by Western blot experiment.
REDD1-/- and wild type cells were seeded at 2.5×105 in 12 well dishes in DMEM high glucose media containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Life Technologies #15070-063). Cells were incubated for at least 24 hours at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 prior to treatment. The medium was removed and replaced with medium containing either 100 nM thapsigargin (Sigma #T9033) or vehicle (ethanol), and the cells were returned to the incubator for 4 hours. The medium was then removed, cells were washed once with cold PBS, and harvesting and lysis by application of 1X Laemmli sample buffer and scraping.
Cell lysates were heated at 100°C for 5 minutes, before 40 µl lysate (per sample) was loaded onto a 4–20% Criterion SDS-polyacrylamide gel (BioRad). Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE (200V for 1 hour). Separated proteins were transferred to PVDF membrane in a Criterion Blotter (BioRad) at 50V for 90 min. Membrane was blocked in 5% milk in TBS-Tween (TBS-T) for one hour before addition of primary antibody (1:800 dilution) in 1% milk TBS-T. Primary antibody incubation was carried out overnight before membrane washing in TBS-T and addition of secondary antibody (1:7,500 dilution) in 5% milk TBS-T for a further hour. Excess secondary antibody was removed by washing in TBS-T, before Protein bands were visualised by incubation with Clarity Western ECL Blotting Substrate (BioRad) and imaging on a FluorChem M imaging system (ProteinSimple). All steps were carried out at room temperature and are listed Table 3. Western blot signals were also further analysed by densitometry analysis using Alphaview (ProteinSimple).
We reduced endogenous levels of REDD1 using a homemade shRNA construct designed to target REDD1 mRNA (as detailed in the methods section). An initial RNAi experiment was carried out using 1.6 µg REDD1 shRNA plasmid or control shRNA plasmid to transfect HEK-293 cells. Cells were incubated with shRNA plasmid for 48 hours before cell lysis. REDD1 levels were then immediately visualized by Western blot experiment using the Proteintech anti-REDD1 antibody (10638-1-AP).
We found that REDD1 expression was reduced by up to 58% in cells incubated with REDD1-targeting shRNA (this percentage was obtained using data from REDD1-2 shRNA samples, n=2) compared to cells transfected with the control plasmid as shown in Figure 1a (assessed by densitometry measurements normalised to alpha-tubulin levels, as shown in Figure 1b). To further observe whether a higher percentage of reduction could be achieved by increasing the amount of shRNA, a second experiment using 3.2 µg REDD1 shRNA plasmid was performed. However, a further reduction of REDD1 levels was not observed (results not shown).
A second experiment was set up to further probe the specificity of Proteintech’s REDD1 antibody. REDD1-/- knockout and REDD1+/+ MEF cells were incubated with thapsigargin or carrier control before protein lysate preparation and subsequent Western blotting.
In accordance with Proteintech’s REDD1 antibody being highly specific for REDD1, the Western blot results show that REDD1 signal is present only in REDD1+/+ MEF cells and increase in response to thapsigargin. No such response was seen in the REDD1-/- knockout MEFs regardless of thapsigargin treatment. This observation was seen in three independent experiments (n=3); the data shown in Figure 2 are representative and were obtained following a 20 minute exposure of the Western blot membrane.
Through testing Proteintech’s anti-REDD1 antibody (10638-1-AP) in a REDD1-/- knockout (KO) MEF cell line, and to a certain extent, by using it in combination with REDD1 shRNA plasmids in HEK-293 cells, we have demonstrated a loss or reduction of REDD1 protein signal on Western blot membranes, respectively – indicative of antibody target specificity. Antibody signal also responds accordingly to the presence of thapsigargin-treated MEF cell lines. This paper validates the specificity of this commercially available antibody for the REDD1 protein in Western blots, supporting a significant prior body of work that has utilised this immunological reagent.
There are several observations we must address in this conclusion; the first being REDD1’s observed molecular weight (MW) on Western blot membranes. Despite having a predicted MW of 25 kDa, REDD1 often migrates around 35 kDa during SDS-PAGE due to the presence of multiple lysines in its amino acid sequence, as documented by other sources10,16,17. The MW seen for REDD1 in our investigations are in concordance with the reported MW shift. Second, the faint bands present in Figure 2 could perhaps warrant further investigation, but as the blot shown represents a prolonged membrane exposure (20 minutes), these artefacts are unlikely to cause misinterpretation of results in experiments, given the signal intensity in the stimulated wild type control (WT+).
The level of REDD1 knock down in the RNAi experiment was lower than desired (calculated to be around a 58% reduction of REDD1 levels). However, given the loss of REDD1 signal in the Western blots featuring REDD1-/- knockout (KO) MEF cells – a cell line well-characterised by previous studies6,15,18–20 – using the same antibody lot as in the knock down experiment, we feel there is enough evidence to confirm REDD1 specificity.
At the time of paper submission, the #00019207 lot was the only lot available from the vendor. Lot-to-lot testing is carried out by the vendor, but not yet in the context of REDD1 absence or knock down (though data of an initial RNAi experiment appear on the online datasheet, they represent the same lot #00019207); therefore it would be interesting to follow up this study in future by testing further lots of the 10638-1-AP REDD1 antibody in such settings where REDD1 levels are absent or compromised.
F1000Research: Dataset 1. Raw data for ‘Validation of a commercially available anti-REDD1 antibody using RNA interference and REDD1-/- mouse embryonic fibroblasts’, 10.5256/f1000research.7691.d11499121
LK preformed the studies involving thapsigargin treatment of wild type and knockout REDD1 MEFs and SLR performed the studies using shRNA to knock down REDD1 expression in HEK293 cells. SRK and DLG conceived the study. DLG prepared a first draft of the manuscript. SRK and DLG were responsible for revision of the draft manuscript and all authors have agreed to the final content.
At the time this manuscript was initiated DLG was employed by Proteintech. No other known competing interests were present.
SRK is funded by NIH grants DK15658 and DK094141.
I confirm that the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
We thank Professor Leif W. Ellisen (Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA) for the provision of and permission to use the REDD1+/+ MEF cell line.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 01 Mar 16 |
read | read |
Click here to access the data.
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)