Open Access, Peer-reviewed, Quarterly
pISSN 1225-1682
eISSN 2287-9293
    J Korean Fract Soc. 2007 Jul;20(3):239-245. Korean.
    Published online Jun 14, 2016.
    https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2007.20.3.239
    Copyright © The Korean Fracture Society. All rights reserved
    Original Article

    The Surgical Outcomes for Isolated Greater Tuberosity Fracture of Proximal Humerus

    Eun-Sun Moon, M.D., Myung-Sun Kim, M.D., and Young-Jin Kim, M.D.
      • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
    • Address reprint requests to: Myung-Sun Kim, M.D. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonnam National University College of Medicine, 8, Hak-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju 501-757, Korea. Tel: 82-62-220-6336, Fax: 82-62-225-7794, Email: rhamses@chol.com

    Abstract

    Purpose

    To evaluate the adequate surgical methods and postoperative rehabilitation by analyzing the outcome of surgical treatment for isolated greater tuberosity fracture of proximal humerus.

    Materials and Methods

    Ten patients who allowed at least 1 year follow up after the surgical treatment of isolated greater tuberosity fractures were evaluated. Their mean age was 52.3 years (range, 28~67) and mean follow up duration was 23.8 months (range, 12~36). We choosed the different approaches and fixation methods according to size, location and presence of comminution of the fragment, and combined injury. The rehabilitation programs were indivisualized and we evaluated the clinical outcomes using UCLA and Constant scoring system.

    Results

    According to the UCLA scoring system, 5 cases were excellent, 3 cases were satisfactory, and 2 cases were unsatisfactory. By the Constant scoring system, 8 cases were excellent and 2 cases were good. The average bony union time was 7.6 weeks (range, 6~8) except the 2 cases of revision surgery. Two cases were operated using cannulated screws alone, 3 cases using only nonabsorbable sutures and 5 cases using cannulated screws and nonabsorbable sutures. One out of two revision cases was developed from the negligence of preoperative shoulder anterior dislocation with rupture of subscapularis, and the other was caused by improper immobilization of the fracture site postoperatively.

    Conclusion

    Not only the adequate surgical approaches and the fixation methods according to the size and comminution of fragment, but also the identification of combined injuries were very important in the surgical treatment for the isolated greater tuberosity fracture. And we considered that the adequate postoperative rehabilitation and proper protection based on the intraoperative fixation stability play an important role for the better clinical and radiological outcomes.

    Keywords
    Greater tuberosity fracture; Surgical treatment; Fixation method; Rehabilitation

    Figures

    Fig. 1
    (A) 46-year-old male and his initial anteroposterior and external rotational radiographs show isolated greater tuberosity fracture.
    (B) Immediate postoperative radiograph shows fracture fixation using one cannulated screw through the deltopectoral approach.

    (C) But, anterior shoulder dislocation was developed at postoperative 1 day.

    (D) The initial anterposterior radiograph obtained from the local hospital shows the previous existence of anterior shoulder dislocation.

    (E) MRI showed the complete subscapularis tear.

    (F) At 2 years 8 months after fracture fixation using tension band suturing with nonabsorbable sutures and subscapularis repair with suture anchors, the radiograph shows good fracture healing.

    Fig. 2
    (A) 43-year-old female and her initial anteroposterior radiograph show isolated greater tuberosity fracture with anterior shoulder dislocation.
    (B) After closed reduction, anteroposterior radiograph and CT scan were checked.

    (C) Immediate postoperative radiograph shows the fracture fixation using two cannulated screws through the deltoid splitting approach.

    (D) At postoperative 2 weeks, subarachnoid hemorrhage was developed and neurosurgery was performed. The follow up radiograph after neurosurgery shows fixation loss of fracture fragment.

    (E) She underwent the revision surgery for greater tuberosity fracture using tension band suturing with nonabsorbable suture through the same approach and the radiograph at 3 year after operation shows good fracture healing.

    Tables

    Table 1
    Patients demographics

    References

      1. Bigliani LU, Flatow EL. Acromioclavicular fractures of the proximal humerus. In: Rockwood CA, Matsen FA III, editors. The shoulder. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1998. pp. 337-389.
      1. Carrera EF, Matsumoto MH, Netto NA, Faloppa F. Fixation of greater tuberosity fractures. Arthroscopy 2004;20:e109–e111.
      1. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;214:160–164.
      1. DePalma AF, Cautilli RA. Fractures of the upper end of the humerus. Clin Orthop 1961;20:73–93.
      1. Ellman H, Hanker G, Bayer M. Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68:1136–1144.
      1. Flatow EL, Cuomo F, Maday MG, Miller SR, McIlveen SJ, Bigliani LU. Open reduction and internal fixation of two-part displaced fractures of the greater tuberosity of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:1213–1218.
      1. Green A, Izzi J. Isolated fractures of the greater tuberosity of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003;12:641–649.
      1. Kang HJ, Lee DH, Yoon HK, Hahn SB. Cannulated screw fixation for 4 part fractures of the neck of humerus. J Korean Fract Soc 2005;18:432–436.
      1. Kim E, Shin HK, Kim CH. Characteristics of an isolated greater tuberosity fracture of the humerus. J Orthop Sci 2005;10:441–444.
      1. Kim SH, Ha KI. Arthroscopic treatment of symptomatic shoulders with minimally displaced greater tuberosity fracture. Arthroscopy 2000;16:695–700.
      1. Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970;52:1077–1089.
      1. Park TS, Choi IY, Kim YH, Park MR, Shon JH, Kim SI. A new suggestion for the treatment of minimally displaced fractures of the greater tuberosity of the proximal humerus. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 1997;56:171–176.
      1. Platzer P, Kutscha-Lissberg F, Lehr S, Vecsei V, Gaebler C. The influence of displacement on shoulder function in patients with minimally displaced fractures of the greater tuberosity. Injury 2005;36:1185–1189.
      1. Rockwood CA, Green DP. In: Fractures in adults. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2001. pp. 1012-1017.
      1. Schai PA, Hintermann B, Koris MJ. Preoperative arthroscopic assessment of fractures about the shoulder. Arthroscopy 1999;15:827–835.
      1. Shin DJ, Chang SA, Byun YS, Hwang DH, Lee SR, Kim SH. T-plate fixation for two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Korean Fract Soc 2005;18:426–431.
      1. Taverna E, Sansone V, Battistella F. Arthroscopic treatment for greater tuberosity fractures: rationale and surgical technique. Arthroscopy 2004;20:e53–e57.
    Cited by
    Crossref 2
    Google Scholar 
    MeSH Terms
    Dislocations
    Follow-Up Studies
    Humans
    Humerus*
    Immobilization
    Malpractice
    Rehabilitation
    Rupture
    Shoulder
    Sutures
    Metrics
    Share
    Figures
    slide
    slide

    1 / 2

    Tables
    slide

    1 / 1

    PERMALINK