Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does Hospital Operative Volume Influence the Outcomes of Patients After Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis?

  • Peritoneal Surface Malignancy
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

For some cancer operations, center volume is associated with improved patient outcomes. Whether this association is true for cytoreductive surgery/heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is unclear. Given the rapidly expanding use of CRS/HIPEC, the aim of this analysis was to determine whether a volume-outcome relationship exists for this strategy.

Methods

The Vizient Clinical Database® was queried for CRS/HIPEC cases from January 2020 through December 2022. Low-, medium-, and high-volume designations were made by sorting hospitals by case volume and creating equal tertiles based on total number of cases. Analysis was performed via one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey test, as indicated.

Results

In the 36-month study period, 5165 cases were identified across 149 hospitals. Low- (n = 113), medium- (n = 25), and high-volume (n = 11) centers performed a median of 4, 21, and 47 cases per annum, respectively. Most cases were performed for appendiceal (39.3%) followed by gynecologic neoplasms (20.4%). Groups were similar with respect to age, gender, race, comorbidities, and histology. Low-volume centers were more likely to utilize the ICU post-operatively (59.6% vs. 40.5% vs. 36.3%; p = 0.02). No differences were observed in morbidity (9.4% vs. 7.1% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.71), mortality (0.9% vs. 0.6% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.93), length of stay (9.3 vs. 9.4 vs. 10 days, p = 0.83), 30-day readmissions (5.6% vs. 5.6% vs. 5.6%, p = 1.0), or total cost among groups.

Conclusions

No association was found between CRS/HIPEC hospital volume and post-operative outcomes. These data suggest that in academic medical centers with HIPEC programs, outcomes for commonly treated cancers are not associated with hospital volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McQuellon RP, Loggie BW, Lehman AB, et al. Long-term survivorship and quality of life after cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10(2):155–62. https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2003.03.067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chicago Consensus Working G. The Chicago consensus on peritoneal surface malignancies: management of appendiceal neoplasms. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(6):1753–60. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08316-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chicago Consensus Working G. The Chicago consensus on peritoneal surface malignancies: management of ovarian neoplasms. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(6):1780–7. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08322-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. van Driel WJ, Koole SN, Sonke GS. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(14):1363–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chicago Consensus Working G. The Chicago consensus on peritoneal surface malignancies: management of peritoneal mesothelioma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(6):1774–9. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08324-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Helm JH, Miura JT, Glenn JA, et al. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(5):1686–93. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3978-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chicago Consensus Working G. The Chicago consensus on peritoneal surface malignancies: management of colorectal metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(6):1761–7. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08315-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chicago Consensus Working G. The Chicago consensus on peritoneal surface malignancies: management of gastric metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(6):1768–73. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08320-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kusamura S, Moran BJ, Sugarbaker PH, et al. Multicentre study of the learning curve and surgical performance of cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pseudomyxoma peritonei. Br J Surg. 2014;101(13):1758–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gani F, Conca-Cheng AM, Nettles B, Ahuja N, Johnston FM. Trends in outcomes after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Surg Res. 2019;234:240–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ho V, Heslin MJ, Yun H, Howard L. Trends in hospital and surgeon volume and operative mortality for cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(6):851–8. https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.07.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ho V, Heslin MJ. Effect of hospital volume and experience on in-hospital mortality for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2003;237(4):509–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bommareddi SR, Simianu VV, Mann LV, Mann GN. High-quality results of cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy perfusion for carcinomatosis at a low volume institution. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(2):219–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Rajeev R, Klooster B, Turaga KK. Impact of surgical volume of centers on post-operative outcomes from cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemoperfusion. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016;7(1):122–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280(20):1747–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Harmon JW, Tang DG, Gordon TA, et al. Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. Ann Surg. 1999;230(3):404–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Andreasson H, Lorant T, Pahlman L, Graf W, Mahteme H. Cytoreductive surgery plus perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in pseudomyxoma peritonei: aspects of the learning curve. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40(8):930–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Polanco PM, Ding Y, Knox JM, et al. Institutional learning curve of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion for peritoneal malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(5):1673–9. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4111-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chowdhury MM, Dagash H, Pierro A. A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome. Br J Surg. 2007;94(2):145–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Squires MH 3rd, Staley CA, Knechtle W, et al. Association between hospital finances, payer mix, and complications after hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: deficiencies in the current healthcare reimbursement system and future implications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(5):1739–45. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4025-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sugarbaker PH, Ronnett BM, Archer A, et al. Pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome. Adv Surg. 1996;30:233–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwartz PB, Stahl CC, Vande Walle KA, et al. What drives high costs of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC: patient, provider or tumor? Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(13):4920–8. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08583-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have no relevant financial disclosures or financial/material support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Henry A. Pitt MD or Henry Richard Alexander MD.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chatani, P.D., Manzella, A., Gribkova, Y.Y. et al. Does Hospital Operative Volume Influence the Outcomes of Patients After Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis?. Ann Surg Oncol 31, 1049–1057 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14450-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14450-y

Keywords

Navigation