Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Changes in Surgical Management of the Axilla Over 11 Years – Report on More Than 1500 Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on the Prospective I-SPY2 Trial

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Axillary surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is becoming less extensive. We evaluated the evolution of axillary surgery after NAC on the multi-institutional I-SPY2 prospective trial.

Methods

We examined annual rates of sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery with resection of clipped node, if present), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and SLN and ALND in patients enrolled in I-SPY2 from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2021 by clinical N status at diagnosis and pathologic N status at surgery. Cochran-Armitage trend tests were calculated to evaluate patterns over time.

Results

Of 1578 patients, 973 patients (61.7%) had SLN-only, 136 (8.6%) had SLN and ALND, and 469 (29.7%) had ALND-only. In the cN0 group, ALND-only decreased from 20% in 2011 to 6.25% in 2021 (p = 0.0078) and SLN-only increased from 70.0% to 87.5% (p = 0.0020). This was even more striking in patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) disease at diagnosis, where ALND-only decreased from 70.7% to 29.4% (p < 0.0001) and SLN-only significantly increased from 14.6% to 56.5% (p < 0.0001). This change was significant across subtypes (HR−/HER2−, HR+/HER2−, and HER2+). Among pathologically node-positive (pN+) patients after NAC (n = 525) ALND-only decreased from 69.0% to 39.2% (p < 0.0001) and SLN-only increased from 6.9% to 39.2% (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Use of ALND after NAC has significantly decreased over the past decade. This is most pronounced in cN+ disease at diagnosis with an increase in the use of SLN surgery after NAC. Additionally, in pN+ disease after NAC, there has been a decrease in use of completion ALND, a practice pattern change that precedes results from clinical trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giuliano AE, Dale PS, Turner RR, Morton DL, Evans SW, Krasne DL. Improved axillary staging of breast cancer with sentinel lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg. 1995;222:394–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Giuliano AE, Jones RC, Brennan M, Statman R. Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2345–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 1994;220:391–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, et al. The sentinel node in breast cancer–a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:941–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:927–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hunt KK, Yi M, Mittendorf EA, et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate and reduces the need for axillary dissection in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250:558–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gimbergues P, Abrial C, Durando X, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate in breast cancer patients with a clinically negative axillary nodal status at presentation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1316–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mamounas EP, Brown A, Anderson S, et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: results from national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2694–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Xing Y, Foy M, Cox DD, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK, Cormier JN. Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:539–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelly AM, Dwamena B, Cronin P, Carlos RC. Breast cancer sentinel node identification and classification after neoadjuvant chemotherapy-systematic review and meta analysis. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:551–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310:1455–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuehn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:609–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boileau JF, Poirier B, Basik M, et al. Sentinel node biopsy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in biopsy proven node positive breast cancer: the SN FNAC study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Classe J-M, Loaec C, Gimbergues P, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy without axillary lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate and safe for selected patients: the GANEA 2 study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;173:343–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Piltin M, Boughey J. Axillary management: how has neoadjuvant chemotherapy changed our surgical approach? Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2022;14:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-022-00442-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boughey JC, Alvarado MD, Lancaster RB, et al. Surgical standards for management of the axilla in breast cancer clinical trials with pathological complete response endpoint. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2018;4:26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Khan TM, Rossi AJ, Suman V, Haffty B, Hernandez JM, Boughey JC. Is axillary radiation not inferior to axillary dissection for sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29:1526–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clinicaltrials.gov. I-SPY TRIAL: Neoadjuvant and personalized adaptive novel agents to treat breast cancer (I-SPY). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01042379. Accessed 20 March 2023.

  19. Barker AD, Sigman CC, Kelloff GJ, Hylton NM, Berry DA, Esserman LJ. I-SPY 2: an adaptive breast cancer trial design in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;86:97–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Park JW, Liu MC, Yee D, et al. Adaptive randomization of neratinib in early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:11–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Rugo HS, Olopade OI, DeMichele A, et al. Adaptive randomization of veliparib-carboplatin treatment in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:23–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van’t Veer LJ, et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1999–2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. DeMichele A, Berry DA, Zujewski J, et al. Developing safety criteria for introducing new agents into neoadjuvant trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:2817–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yee D, DeMichele AM, et al. Association of event-free and distant recurrence-free survival with individual-level pathologic complete response in neoadjuvant treatment of stages 2 and 3 breast cancer: three-year follow-up analysis for the I-SPY2 adaptively randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:1355–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Piltin MA, Hoskin TL, Day CN, Davis J, Boughey JC. Oncologic outcomes of sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:4795–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nguyen TT, Hoskin TL, Day CN, et al. Decreasing use of axillary dissection in node-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:2596–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mamtani A, Barrio AV, King TA, et al. How often does neoadjuvant chemotherapy avoid axillary dissection in patients with histologically confirmed nodal metastases? results of a prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3467–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Srour MK, Tseng J, Luu M, Alban RF, Giuliano AE, Chung A. Patterns in the use of axillary operations for patients with node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a national cancer database (NCDB) analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:3305–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Naffouje SA, Barker V, Lee MC, Hoover SJ, Laronga C. Surgical management of axilla of triple-negative breast cancer in the Z1071 era: a propensity score-matched analysis of the national cancer database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29:2985–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Naffouje SA, Sabesan A, Hoover SJ, Lee MC, Laronga C. Surgical management of the axilla of HER2+ breast cancer in the Z1071 era: a propensity-score-matched analysis of the NCDB. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:8777–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

National Institutes of Health’s National Cancer Institute (P01 CA210961) and Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judy C. Boughey MD, FACS.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Esserman is an uncompensated board member of the Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, which sponsors the I-SPY TRIAL. She also reports that she is on the Blue Cross Medical Advisory Panel, is paid for travel, and is given an honorarium for her time; she leads an investigator-initiated vaccine trial for high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ, which is funded by Merck through the University of California San Francisco. There are no conflicts related to this manuscript. Dr. Singh reports funding to the institution for the trial through trial sponsors, specifically Foundation for the National Institutes of Health and ACRI. Dr. Tchou is a consultant for BD.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boughey, J.C., Yu, H., Dugan, C.L. et al. Changes in Surgical Management of the Axilla Over 11 Years – Report on More Than 1500 Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on the Prospective I-SPY2 Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 30, 6401–6410 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13759-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13759-y

Keywords

Navigation