Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contemporary Challenges in Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer: A Collaboration Opportunity for Genetic Counselors and Breast Surgeons

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Drohan B, Roche CA, Cusack JC Jr, Hughes KS. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and other hereditary syndromes: using technology to identify carriers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1732–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. American Board of Genetic Counseling. www.abgc.net. Accessed 14 April 2015.

  3. National Society of Genetic Counselors. Professional status survey: executive summary. 2014. www.nsgc.org.

  4. Hampel H, Frankel WL, Martin E, et al. Screening for the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer). N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(18):1851–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lu KH, Wood ME, Daniels M, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology expert statement: collection and use of a cancer family history for oncology providers. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(8):833–40.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Larsen Haidle J. Important differences between a triage pedigree and risk assessment. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(29):3345–6. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.56.8378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Trepanier A, Ahrens M, McKinnon W, et al.; National Society of Genetic Counselors. Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (Review). J Genet Couns. 2004; 13(2):83–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson BJ, Qureshi N, Santaguida P, et al. Systematic review: family history in risk assessment for common diseases. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:878–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tung N, Battelli C, Allen B, et al. Frequency of mutations in individuals with breast cancer referred for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing using next-generation sequencing with a 25-gene panel. Cancer. 2014;121(1):25–33. doi:10.1002/cncr.29010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Castera L, Krieger S, Rousselin A, et al. Next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture targeting multiple candidate genes. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22(11):1305–13. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pirzadeh-Miller SM, Raymond VM, Knapke S. Genetic and environmental risk assessment and colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:526. doi:10.7326/L15-5072.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Kurian AW, et al. Concerns about cancer risk and experiences with genetic testing in a diverse population of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(14):1584–91. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.58.5885.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

No conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joy Larsen Haidle MS, CGC.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Larsen Haidle, J., Whitworth, P. Contemporary Challenges in Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer: A Collaboration Opportunity for Genetic Counselors and Breast Surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 3203–3207 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4757-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4757-z

Keywords

Navigation