Skip to main content
Log in

A Predictive Score for Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer (SeC-Score): A Single-Centre, Controlled Study for Preoperative Patient Selection

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The standard treatments of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) remains poorly defined. Chemotherapy (CT) and secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) represent both valid options, even if several studies demonstrated a greater survival benefit, with survival rates up to 62 months, for platinum-sensitive patients undergoing complete SCS. The purpose of the present study was to develop a predictive model, named SeC-Score (SeC-s), to assess the risk of optimal SCS, including, for the first time in literature, HE4.

Methods

All patients affected by suspicious ROC at radiologic imaging, referred to the Department of Gynecology of Campus Bio-medico of Rome, were prospectively included in the study. The preoperative variables considered in our predictive model were: age, residual tumour (RT) at primary cytoreduction (0 vs. >0 cm), preoperative CA125 and HE4, and ascites at recurrence. After exploratory laparotomy, patients were submitted to secondary SCS (Group A) or addressed to CT (Group B).

Results

A total of 135 patients with ROC were considered for the analysis. Preoperative CA125, HE4, ascites, and RT at first surgery were found statistically significant and included into a multivariate logistic regression model to determine the risk to not optimal SCS. In the overall cohort of patients, SeC-s reported sensitivity and specificity of 82 and 83 %, respectively (PPV = 0.79, NPV = 0.81).

Conclusions

Our data support the use of SeC-s to preoperative triage patients suitable of optimal SCS, even if external validation is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ledermann JA, Raja FA. Clinical trials and decision-making strategies for optimal treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:S104–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van de Laar, et al. Cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer (SOCceR trial): a multicenter randomised controlled study. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:22.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Al Rawahi T, Lopes AD, Bristow RE. Surgical cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;28:2.

  4. Plotti F, Scaletta G, Aloisi A, Luvero D, Capriglione S, Miranda A, Montera R, De Cicco Nardone C, Terranova C, Angioli R. Quality of life in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: chemotherapy versus surgery plus chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan 13.

  5. Heintz AP, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, et al. Carcinoma of the ovary. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;83:(1 Suppl):135–66.

  6. Harter P, du Bois A, Hahmann M, Hasenburg A, Burges A, Loibl S, et al. Surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer: The Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO)DESKTOP OVAR Trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(12):1702-10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Harter P, Bois AD, Hahmann M, et al. Surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer: The Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) DESKTOP OVAR trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1702–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tian WJ, Chi DS, Sehouli J, Trope CG, Jiang R, Ayhan A, et al. A risk model for second- ary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer: an evidence-based proposal for patient selection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:597–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Plotti F, Capriglione S, Terranova C, Montera R, Aloisi A, Damiani P, Muzii L, Scaletta G, Benedetti-Panici P, Angioli R. Does HE4 have a role as biomarker in the recurrence of ovarian cancer? Tumour Biol. 2012;33(6):2117-23. doi:10.1007/s13277-012-0471-7. Epub 2012 Aug 9. PubMed PMID: 22875782.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Angioli R, Capriglione S, Aloisi A, Guzzo F, Luvero D, Miranda A, Damiani P, Montera R, Terranova C, Plotti F. Can HE4 predict platinum response during first-line chemotherapy in ovarian cancer? Tumour Biol. 2014;35(7):7009-15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Angioli R, Plotti F, Capriglione S, Aloisi A, Montera R, Luvero D, Miranda A, Cafà EV, Damiani P, Benedetti-Panici P. Can the preoperative HE4 level predict optimal cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma? Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Dec 7.

  12. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228-47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Angioli R, Plotti F, Capriglione S, Montera R, Damiani P, Ricciardi R, Aloisi A, Luvero D, Cafà EV, Dugo N, Angelucci M, Benedetti-Panici P. The role of novel biomarker HE4 in endometrial cancer: a case control prospective study. Tumour Biol. 2012 Nov 20.

  14. Angioli R, Miranda A, Aloisi A, Montera R, Capriglione S, De Cicco Nardone C, Terranova C, Plotti F. A critical review on HE4 performance in endometrial cancer: where are we now? Tumour Biol. 2013 Sep 26.

  15. Angioli R, Capriglione S, Aloisi A, Luvero D, Cafà EV, Dugo N, Montera R, De Cicco Nardone C, Terranova C, Plotti F. REM (risk of endometrial malignancy): a proposal for a new scoring system to evaluate risk of endometrial malignancy. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(20):5733-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Muzii L, Bellati F, Manci N, Zullo MA, Angioli R, Panici PB. Ringer’s lactate solution remains in the peritoneal cavity after laparoscopy longer than expected. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(1):148–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:1373–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee CK. Impact of secondary cytoreductive surgery on survival in patients with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: analysis of the CAPLYPSO trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;136(1):18–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chan JK, Sherman AE, et al. Influence of gynecologic oncologists on the survival of patients with endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:832–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Plotti F, Capriglione S, Miranda A, Scaletta G, Aloisi A, Luvero D, Ricciardi R, Terranova C, De Cicco Nardone C, Angioli R. The impact of gynecologic oncology training in the management of cancer patients: is it really necessary? A prospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;184:19–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fanfani F, Monterossi G, Fagotti A, Gallotta V, Costantini B, Vizzielli G, Petrillo M, Carbone MV, Scambia G. Positron emission tomography-laparoscopy based method in the prediction of complete cytoreduction in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Scaletta MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Angioli, R., Capriglione, S., Aloisi, A. et al. A Predictive Score for Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer (SeC-Score): A Single-Centre, Controlled Study for Preoperative Patient Selection. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 4217–4223 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4534-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4534-z

Keywords

Navigation