Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic Impact of Inferior Mesenteric Artery Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The aims of this study are to identify the natural course of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) lymph node metastasis, and to evaluate the prognostic impact of IMA lymph node metastasis in the sigmoid colon and rectal cancer.

Patients and Methods

From our prospectively collected database, a total of 625 patients who underwent resection with curative intent for stage III adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon and rectal cancer between June 1995 and June 2007 were selected. Patients were divided into the IMA-positive group (n = 33) and the IMA-negative group (n = 592) according to IMA lymph node metastasis status. Clinicopathological features, recurrence patterns, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were compared between the two groups.

Results

Following curative resection, 5-year disease-free survival rate was 31.9% in the IMA-positive group and 69.4% in the IMA-negative group (p < 0.001). Cox regression analysis revealed that rectal cancer, pathologic stage, and presence of IMA lymph node metastasis were independently associated with disease-free survival. Systemic recurrence rate was significantly higher in the IMA-positive group than in the IMA-negative group (48.5 vs. 20.8%, respectively, p = 0.001). Para-aortic nodal recurrence showed significant association with presence of IMA lymph node metastasis on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 11.8; 95% confidence interval 2.7–52.2, p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Presence of IMA lymph node metastasis should be considered as a predictive factor for high systemic recurrence, and should be treated and followed up with caution for para-aortic nodal recurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Fisher R, Newland RC, Pheils MT, Smyth E, et al. A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological variables in prognosis after resection of large bowel cancer. Br J Surg. 1985;72:698–702.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lindmark G, Gerdin B, Pahlman L, Bergstrom R, Glimelius B. Prognostic predictors in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:1219–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sobin L. (2010) TNM classification of malignant tumours. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Malassagne B, Valleur P, Serra J, Sarnacki S, Galian A, Hoang C, Hautefeuille P. Relationship of apical lymph node involvement to survival in resected colon carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:645–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grinnell RS. Results of ligation of inferior mesenteric artery at the aorta in resections of carcinoma of the descending and sigmoid colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1965;120:1031–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lange MM, Buunen M, Velde CJ, Lange JF. Level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery: low tie preferred over high tie. A review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1139–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim JC, Lee KH, Yu CS, et al. The clinicopathological significance of inferior mesenteric lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30:271–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Titu LV, Tweedle E, Rooney PS. High tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in curative surgery for left colonic and rectal cancers: a systematic review. Dig Surg. 2008;25:148–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanemitsu Y, Hirai T, Komori K, Kato T. Survival benefit of high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in sigmoid colon or rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2006;93:609–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. Part I. Clinical classification. Japanese Research Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Jpn J Surg. 1983;13:557–73.

  11. Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, et al. Indication for using high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in rectal cancer surgery. Examination of nodal metastases by the clearing method. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:984–7; (discussion 7–91).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chin CC, Yeh CY, Tang R, Changchien CR, Huang WS, Wang JY. The oncologic benefit of high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in the surgical treatment of rectal or sigmoid colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:783–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Min BS, Kim JS, Kim NK, Lim JS, Lee KY, Cho CH, Sohn SK. Extended lymph node dissection for rectal cancer with radiologically diagnosed extramesenteric lymph node metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:3271–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pezim ME, Nicholls RJ. Survival after high or low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during curative surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 1984;200:729–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Surtees P, Ritchie JK, Phillips RK. High versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1990;77:618–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Glass RE, Ritchie JK, Thompson HR, Mann CV. The results of surgical treatment of cancer of the rectum by radical resection and extended abdomino-iliac lymphadenectomy. Br J Surg. 1985;72:599–601.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kang Young Lee MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kang, J., Hur, H., Min, B.S. et al. Prognostic Impact of Inferior Mesenteric Artery Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18, 704–710 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1291-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1291-x

Keywords

Navigation