Skip to main content
Log in

Does the Presence of Circulating Tumor Cells in the Venous Drainage of Curative Colorectal Cancer Resections Determine Prognosis? A Meta-Analysis

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Hepatic metastasis can occur following curative colorectal cancer surgery despite favorable prognostic indicators, raising the question of whether detecting circulating tumor cells in the venous drainage of colorectal cancers at resection using reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction would help determine prognosis. This study compares lymph node positivity, hepatic metastasis rates, and disease-free survival in circulating tumor positive versus negative patients.

Methods

A Medline, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane database search was conducted on all studies between 1999 and 2006 reporting the outcomes of interest. Meta-analysis was performed in line with recommendations from the Cochrane Collaboration and the Quality of Reporting of Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Results

Nine studies reporting on 646 subjects published between 1998 and 2006 matched the selection criteria and were suitable for inclusion in this meta-analysis. There was a significantly higher incidence of circulating tumor cells (50%) in lymph node positive compared with negative groups (21%) [odds ratio (OR) = 3.83, confidence interval (CI) = 2.46–5.94], and a significantly increased hepatic metastases rate (21%) in circulating tumor cells positive compared with in negative patients (8%, OR = 6.38; CI = 2.67–15.25. Disease-free survival was significantly higher in the circulating tumor cell negative versus positive groups at 1 year [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.04, CI = 0–0.46], 2 years (HR = 0.05, CI = 0.01–0.31), and 3 years (HR = 0.08, CI = 0.02–0.34) post resection.

Conclusion

This study highlights the potential importance of free cancer cell detection in the venous drainage of colorectal cancers as a prognostic indicator and a mode of staging colorectal cancers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Astler VB, Coller AF. The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg 1954;139:846–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dukes CE. The classification of cancer of the rectum. J Pathol Bacteriol 1932; 35:323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shah SA, Haddad R, Al-Sukhni W et al. Surgical resection of hepatic and pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202:468–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Safi F, Beyer HG. The value of follow-up after curative surgery of colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Detect Prev 1993;17 :417–24

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T. Cancer Statistics, 1993. CA Cancer J Clin 1993; 43:7–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher ER, Turnbull RB. The cytologic demonstration and significance of tumor cells in the mesenteric venous blood in patients with colorectal carcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1955; 100:102–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Griffiths JD, McKinna JA, Rowbotham H et al. Carcinoma of the colon and rectum: circulating malignant cells and five-year survival. Cancer 1973;31:226–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leather AJ, Gallegos NC, Kocjan G et al. Detection and enumeration of circulating tumour cells in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 1993; 80 :777–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindemann F, Schlimok G, Dirschedl P et al. Prognostic significance of micrometastatic tumour cells in bone marrow of colorectal cancer patients. Lancet 1992; 340:685–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamaguchi K, Takagi Y, Aoki S et al. Significant detection of circulating cancer cells in the blood by RT-PCR during colorectal cancer resection. Ann Surg 2000; 232:58–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wyld DK, Selby P, Perren TJ et al. Detection of colorectal cancer cells in peripheral blood by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for cytokeratin 20. Int J Cancer 1998; 79:288–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanellos I, Zacharakis E, Kanellos D et al. Prognostic significance of CEA levels and detection of CEA mRNA in draining venous blood in patients with colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2006; 94:3–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Iinuma H, Okinaga K, Egami H et al. Usefulness and clinical significance of quantitative real-time RT-PCR to detect isolated tumor cells in the peripheral blood and tumor drainage blood of patients with colorectal cancer. Int J Oncol 2006; 28:297–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ueda T, Furui J, Komuta K et al. Detection of carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in the mesenteric vein of patients with resectable colorectal cancer. Surg Today 1998; 28:701–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sadahiro S, Suzuki T, Ishikawa K et al. Detection of carcinoembryonic antigen messenger RNA-expressing cells in portal and peripheral blood during surgery does not influence relapse in colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2005; 12:988–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Akashi A, Komuta K, Haraguchi M et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in the mesenteric vein is not a predictor of hepatic metastasis in patients with resectable colorectal cancer: a long-term study. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46:1653–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guller U, Zajac P, Schnider A et al. Disseminated single tumor cells as detected by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction represent a prognostic factor in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 2002; 236:768–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Taniguchi T, Makino M, Suzuki K et al. Prognostic significance of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction measurement of carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA levels in tumor drainage blood and peripheral blood of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 89:970–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fujita S, Kudo N, Akasu T et al. Detection of cytokeratin 19 and 20 mRNA in peripheral and mesenteric blood from colorectal cancer patients and their prognosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2001; 16:141–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Luo C, Li S. The detection and its clinical significance of cancer cells in portal vein blood of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 1999; 37:214–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang XW, Yang HY, Fan P et al. Detection of micrometastasis in peripheral blood by multi-sampling in patients with colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11:436–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sadahiro S, Suzuki T, Tokunaga N et al. Detection of tumor cells in the portal and peripheral blood of patients with colorectal carcinoma using competitive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Cancer 2001; 92:1251–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Allen-Merch TG, McCullough TK, Patel H et al. Role of circulating tumour cells in predicting recurrence after excision of primary colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 2007; 94:96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang JY, Wu CH, Lu CY et al. Molecular detection of circulating tumour cells in the peripheral blood of patients with colorectal cancer using RT-PCR: significance of the prediction of postoperative metastasis. World J Surg 2006; 30:1007–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook 4.1.3, Clarke M, Oxman AD (eds). The Cochrane Library, Update Software: Oxford, 2001

  26. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Onkologie 2000; 23:597–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J et al. Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1985; 27:335–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959; 22:719–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Parmer MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med 1998; 17:2815–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315:629–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Egger M, Smith GD. Misleading meta-analysis. BMJ 1995; 310:753–4

    Google Scholar 

  32. Waisberg J, Contim-Neto L, Oliveira Mda S et al. Determination of carcinoembryonic antigen levels in peripheral and draining venous blood in patients with colorectal carcinoma. Arq Gastroenterol 2004; 41:88–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tabuchi Y, Deguchi H, Imanishi K et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels of peripheral and portal blood and tumor histopathology in colorectal cancer. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1986; 87:1540–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tabuchi Y, Deguchi H, Imanishi K et al. Comparison of carcinoembryonic antigen levels between portal and peripheral blood in patients with colorectal cancer. Correlation with histopathologic variables. Cancer 1987; 59:1283–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tabuchi Y, Deguchi H, Imanishi K et al. Colorectal cancer patients with high risk of hematogenous metastasis: correlation with CEA levels in peripheral and draining venous blood during the period of operation. J Surg Oncol 1991; 47:87–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tabuchi Y, Deguchi H, Imanishi K et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen levels of peripheral and draining venous blood in patients with colorectal cancer. Correlation with survival. Cancer 1992; 69:2411–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Griffiths JD, McKinna JA, Rowbotham HD et al. Carcinoma of the colon and rectum: circulating malignant cells and five-year survival. Cancer 1973; 31:226–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Deguchi H, Tabuchi Y, Saitoh Y. CEA levels of draining venous blood and draining-peripheral CEA gradient in colorectal cancer patients: correlation with postoperative survival. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1990; 91:575–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Tien YW, Lee PH, Wang SM et al. Simultaneous detection of colonic epithelial cells in portal venous and peripheral blood during colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45:23–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Leather AJ, Gallegos NC, Kocjan G et al. Detection and enumeration of circulating tumour cells in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 1993; 80:777–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Smith B, Selby P, Southgate J et al. Detection of melanoma cells in peripheral blood by means of reverse transcriptase and polymerase chain reaction. Lancet 1991; 338:1227–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Guadagni F, Kantor J Aloe S et al. Detection of blood-borne cells in colorectal cancer patients by nested reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for carcinoembryonic antigen messenger RNA: longitudinal analyses and demonstration of its potential importance as an adjunct to multiple serum markers. Cancer Res 2001; 61:2523–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Xu D, Li XF, Zheng S et al. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR detection for CEA, CK20 and CK19 mRNA in peripheral blood of colorectal cancer patients. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2006; 7:445–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Pantel K, Cote RJ, Fodstad O. Detection and clinical importance of micrometastatic disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91:1113–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ding L, Sunamura M, Kodama T et al. In vivo evaluation of the early events associated with liver metastasis of circulating cancer cells. Br J Cancer 2001; 85:431–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Aznavoorian S, Murphy AN, Stetler-Stevenson WG et al. Molecular aspects of tumor cell invasion and metastasis. Cancer 1993; 71:1368–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kim YS, Liotta LA, Kohn EC. Cancer invasion and metastasis. Hosp Pract 1993; 28:92–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Folkman J, Shing Y. Angiogenesis. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:10931–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Mamounas E, Wieand S, Wolmark N et al. Comparative efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Dukes’ B versus Dukes’ C colon cancer: results from four National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project adjuvant studies (C-01, C-02, C-03, and C-04). J Clin Oncol 1999; 17:1349–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Gill S, Loprinzi CL, Sargent DJ et al. Pooled analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer: who benefits and by how much? J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:1797–806

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. International Multicentre Pooled Analysis of B2 Colon Cancer Trials (IMPACT B2) Investigators. Efficacy of adjuvant fluorouracil and folinic acid in B2 colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17:1356–63

    Google Scholar 

  52. Carrithers SL, Parkinson SJ, Goldstein S et al. Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin receptors. A novel marker for colorectal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39:171–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Tien YW, Lee PH, Wang SM et al. Simultaneous detection of colonic epithelial cells in portal venous and peripheral blood during colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45:23–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Nakamura H, Hinoda Y, Nakagawa N et al. Detection of circulating anti-MUC1 mucin core protein antibodies in patients with colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol 1998; 33:354–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Burchill SA, Bradbury MF, Pittman K et al. Detection of epithelial cancer cells in peripheral blood by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Br J Cancer 1995; 71:278–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanouil Zacharakis MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katsuno, H., Zacharakis, E., Aziz, O. et al. Does the Presence of Circulating Tumor Cells in the Venous Drainage of Curative Colorectal Cancer Resections Determine Prognosis? A Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 15, 3083–3091 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0131-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0131-8

Keywords

Navigation