Skip to main content
Log in

The Value of Peritoneal Cytology as a Preoperative Predictor in Patients With Gastric Carcinoma Undergoing a Curative Resection

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although positive peritoneal cytology is associated with poor prognosis, it has not been found to be independently predictive of outcome when evaluated in context of post-resection pathologic T and N stage. This study was undertaken to evaluate the predictive value of positive cytology in context of other prognostic factors available prior to surgery in patients undergoing R0 resection for gastric cancer, to assess its role in selecting patients for appropriate treatment prior to surgical resection.

Methods

Clinical variables for all patients undergoing R0 resection for gastric adenocarcinoma at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1993–2002 were reviewed from a prospective database. Patients underwent preoperative assessment of T and N stage with CT scan, laparoscopy, and endoscopic and/or laparoscopic ultrasound. Peritoneal cytology was obtained in all patients.

Results

Patients with gastric cancer (n = 371) underwent R0 resection and staging laparoscopy with peritoneal washings; 24 patients (6.5%) had positive peritoneal cytology. Positive cytology was associated with advanced T stage (P = 0.02) but not with nodal positivity (P = 0.11). Median survival of patients with positive cytology was 14.8 months vs. 98.5 months for patients with negative cytology (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified preoperative T stage, preoperative N stage, site, and cytology as significant predictors of outcome. Positive cytology was the preoperative factor most predictive of death from gastric cancer (RR 2.7, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Positive cytology is information potentially available preoperatively that identifies a patient population at very high risk for early recurrence and death after curative resection of gastric cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A Jemal T Murray A Samuels A Ghafoor E Ward MJ Thun (2003) ArticleTitleCancer statistics, 2003 CA Cancer J Clin 53 5–26 Occurrence Handle12568441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. MF Brennan (1995) ArticleTitleBenefit of aggressive multimodality treatment for gastric cancer Ann Surg Oncol 2 286–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD3M3kt1M%3D Occurrence Handle7552615

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. RC Martin SuffixII DP Jaques MF Brennan M Karpeh (2002) ArticleTitleAchieving R0 resection for locally advanced gastric cancer: is it worth the risk of multiorgan resection? J Am Coll Surg 194 568–77 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01116-X Occurrence Handle12025834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. SN Hochwald S Kim DS Klimstra MF Brennan MS Karpeh (2000) ArticleTitleAnalysis of 154 actual five-year survivors of gastric cancer J Gastrointest Surg 4 520–5 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1091-255X(00)80095-5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fjslekug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11077328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. JS Macdonald SR Smalley J Benedetti et al. (2001) ArticleTitleChemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction N Engl J Med 345 725–30 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa010187 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvps1Cqug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11547741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. AM Lowy PF Mansfield SD Leach J Ajani (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic staging for gastric cancer Surgery 119 611–4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB2cfhslY%3D Occurrence Handle8650600

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. T Yoshikawa A Tsuburaya O Kobayashi M Sairenji H Motohashi Y Noguchi (2003) ArticleTitlePeritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer exposed to the serosa—a proposed new classification based on the local and distant cytology Hepatogastroenterology 50 1183–6 Occurrence Handle12846010

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. JJ Bonenkamp I Songun J Hermans CJ van de Velde (1996) ArticleTitlePrognostic value of positive cytology findings from abdominal washings in patients with gastric cancer Br J Surg 83 672–4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB1MnisFU%3D Occurrence Handle8689216

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. EC Burke MS Karpeh SuffixJr KC Conlon MF Brennan (1998) ArticleTitlePeritoneal lavage cytology in gastric cancer: an independent predictor of outcome Ann Surg Oncol 5 411–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czot1aqtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9718170

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. U Ribeiro SuffixJr JJ Gama-Rodrigues AV Safatle-Ribeiro et al. (1998) ArticleTitlePrognostic significance of intraperitoneal free cancer cells obtained by laparoscopic peritoneal lavage in patients with gastric cancer J Gastrointest Surg 2 244–9 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1091-255X(98)80019-X Occurrence Handle9841981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. S Abe H Yoshimura H Tabara et al. (1995) ArticleTitleCurative resection of gastric cancer: limitation of peritoneal lavage cytology in predicting the outcome J Surg Oncol 59 226–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA2MnlsVY%3D Occurrence Handle7630168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. MF Brennan (1999) ArticleTitleLymph-node dissection for gastric cancer N Engl J Med 340 956–8 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199903253401210 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7ntleqtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10089191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. MW Kattan MS Karpeh M Mazumdar MF Brennan (2003) ArticleTitlePostoperative nomogram for disease-specific survival after an R0 resection for gastric carcinoma J Clin Oncol 21 3647–50 Occurrence Handle10.1200/JCO.2003.01.240 Occurrence Handle14512396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. MS Karpeh L Leon D Klimstra MF Brennan (2000) ArticleTitleLymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than number? An analysis of 1,038 patients Ann Surg 232 362–71 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200009000-00008 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvktFKlsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10973386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. FH Miller ML Kochman MS Talamonti GG Ghahremani RM Gore (1997) ArticleTitleGastric cancer. Radiologic staging Radiol Clin North Am 35 331–49 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB2c3hs1A%3D Occurrence Handle9087207

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. JW Smith MF Brennan JF Botet H Gerdes CJ Lightdale (1993) ArticleTitlePreoperative endoscopic ultrasound can predict the risk of recurrence after operation for gastric carcinoma J Clin Oncol 11 2380–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuD28ros10%3D Occurrence Handle8246026

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. E Bando Y Yonemura Y Takeshita et al. (1999) ArticleTitleIntraoperative lavage for cytological examination in 1,297 patients with gastric carcinoma Am J Surg 178 256–62 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00162-2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvlsVGktg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10527450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. U Ribeiro SuffixJr JJ Gama-Rodrigues B Bitelman et al. (1998) ArticleTitleValue of peritoneal lavage cytology during laparoscopic staging of patients with gastric carcinoma Surg Laparosc Endosc 8 132–5 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00019509-199804000-00011 Occurrence Handle9566568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. T Fujimura T Ohta H Kitagawa et al. (1998) ArticleTitleTrypsinogen expression and early detection for peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer J Surg Oncol 69 71–5 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199810)69:2<71::AID-JSO5>3.0.CO;2-R Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FitlKqtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9808508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nekarda H, Schenk U, Ludwig C, et al. Prognostic impact of diagnostic lavage in completely resected gastric cancer (abstract). Gastric Cancer Congress Abstr Proc 1995;99

  21. M Benevolo M Mottolese M Cosimelli et al. (1998) ArticleTitleDiagnostic and prognostic value of peritoneal immunocytology in gastric cancer J Clin Oncol 16 3406–11 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvltFSjsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9779720

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. A Schott I Vogel U Krueger et al. (1998) ArticleTitleIsolated tumor cells are frequently detectable in the peritoneal cavity of gastric and colorectal cancer patients and serve as a new prognostic marker Ann Surg 227 372–9 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199803000-00009 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7os1aruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9527060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. S Fujii J Kitayama S Kaisaki et al. (2002) ArticleTitleCarcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in abdominal cavity as a useful predictor of peritoneal recurrence of gastric cancer with serosal exposure J Exp Clin Cancer Res 21 547–53 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXitVCmtLs%3D Occurrence Handle12636101

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Y Kodera H Nakanishi S Ito et al. (2002) ArticleTitleQuantitative detection of disseminated free cancer cells in peritoneal washes with real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction: a sensitive predictor of outcome for patients with gastric carcinoma Ann Surg 235 499–506 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200204000-00007 Occurrence Handle11923605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. H Ueno K Yoshida T Hirai F Kono M Kambe T Toge (2003) ArticleTitleQuantitative detection of carcinoembryonic antigen messenger RNA in the peritoneal cavity of gastric cancer patients by real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction Anticancer Res 23 1701–8 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXltlKisro%3D Occurrence Handle12820444

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. K Oyama M Terashima A Takagane C Maesawa (2004) ArticleTitlePrognostic significance of peritoneal minimal residual disease in gastric cancer detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction Br J Surg 91 435–43 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4455 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7lsVWgtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle15048743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. T Suzuki T Ochiai H Hayashi S Hori H Shimada K Isono (1999) ArticleTitlePeritoneal lavage cytology findings as prognostic factor for gastric cancer Semin Surg Oncol 17 103–7 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(199909)17:2<103::AID-SSU4>3.0.CO;2-Q Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzotVKnsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10449681

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. T Marutsuka S Shimada K Shiomori et al. (2003) ArticleTitleMechanisms of peritoneal metastasis after operation for non-serosa-invasive gastric carcinoma: an ultrarapid detection system for intraperitoneal free cancer cells and a prophylactic strategy for peritoneal metastasis Clin Cancer Res 9 678–85 Occurrence Handle12576435

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Marianne Beninati for her help with data collection. Supported by a grant from the Gelb Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Coit MD.

Additional information

Published by Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. © 2005 The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bentrem, D., Wilton, A., Mazumdar, M. et al. The Value of Peritoneal Cytology as a Preoperative Predictor in Patients With Gastric Carcinoma Undergoing a Curative Resection. Ann Surg Oncol 12, 347–353 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.03.065

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.03.065

Keywords

Navigation