Abstract
Background
The importance of pancreatic cancer staging is uncertain. The aim of this report was to evaluate the accuracy of combined standard imaging techniques in predicting the pathologic stage and to evaluate the prognostic effect of clinical staging to identify patient groups in which laparoscopy and laparotomy could be beneficial.
Methods
Fifty-four patients were included in this analysis. The techniques used for clinical staging were endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, abdominal computed tomographic scan, and ultrasonography. All patients underwent both clinical and surgical/pathologic staging. A comparison was performed between presurgical stage and surgical/pathologic stage. The prognostic effect of different factors on survival was evaluated with both univariate (log-rank) and multivariate (Cox) analysis.
Results
Sensitivity and specificity for vascular involvement were 73.9% and 96.3%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for nodal involvement were 63.6% and 95.4%, respectively. A total of 33.3% of patients showed a higher than expected pathologic stage, and 3.7% showed a lower than expected pathologic stage, by comparing clinical and pathologic evaluation. A highly significant correlation was observed between clinical T stage (P = .0067) and tumor diameter (P = .0037) and patient survival. Maximal prognostic differentiation was observed by dividing patients into two groups based on imaging results: group A (favorable prognosis) and group B (unfavorable prognosis). The median survival was 25.1 and 8.0 months for group A and B, respectively. Five-year survival was 20.1% and 0%, respectively (multivariate analysis: P = .0007).
Conclusions
Integrated standard imaging studies achieved reasonable diagnostic accuracy in our analysis. A single classification based on clinical stage and tumor diameter evaluated by imaging predicts prognosis in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
RE Jimenez AL Warshaw DW Rattner CG Willett D McGrath C Fernandez-del Castillo (2000) ArticleTitleImpact of laparoscopic staging in the treatment of pancreatic cancer Arch Surg 135 409–14 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ivFWqsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10768705
PF Saldinger M Reilly K Reynolds et al. (2000) ArticleTitleIs CT angiography sufficient for prediction of resectability of periampullary neoplasms? J Gastrointest Surg 4 233–7 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1091-255X(00)80071-2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czosFyjsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10769085
FR Spitz JL Abruzzese JE Lee et al. (1997) ArticleTitlePreoperative and postoperative chemoradiation strategies in patients treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas J Clin Oncol 15 928–37 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s3htlynsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9060530
HJ Wanebo AS Glicksmann MP Vezeridis et al. (2000) ArticleTitlePreoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical resection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer Arch Surg 135 81–7 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.135.1.81 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7gtVejug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10636353
H Snady H Bruckner A Cooperman J Paradiso L Kiefer (2000) ArticleTitleSurvival advantage of combined chemoradiotherapy compared with resection as the initial treatment of patients with regional pancreatic carcinoma An outcomes trial Cancer 89 314–27 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1097-0142(20000715)89:2<314::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO;2-V Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czptlSjtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10918161
AG Kamthan JC Morris J Dalton et al. (1997) ArticleTitleCombined modality therapy for stage II and stage III pancreatic carcinoma J Clin Oncol 15 2920–7 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXls1Smurk%3D Occurrence Handle9256136
R Delcore FJ Rodriguez J Forster AS Hermreck JH Thomas (1996) ArticleTitleSignificance of lymph node metastases in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing curative resection Am J Surg 172 463–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FpvVSjtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8942545
A Tannapfel C Wittekind G Hunefeld (1992) ArticleTitleDuctal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Histopathological features and prognosis Int J Pancreatol 12 145–52 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FpsVKmsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1460329
AB Gorelick JM Scheiman AM Fendrick (1998) ArticleTitleIdentification of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer: at what stage are we? Am J Gastroenterol 93 1995–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvktlSktw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9772077
MJ Midwinter CJ Beveridge JB Wilsdon MK Bennett CJ Baudouin RM Charnley (1999) ArticleTitleCorrelation between spiral computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasonography and findings at operation in pancreatic and ampullary tumours Br J Surg 86 189–93 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7pvVyrtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10100785
EK Fishman KM Horton BA Urban (2000) ArticleTitleMultidetector CT angiography in the evaluation of pancreatic carcinoma: preliminary observations J Comput Assist Tomogr 24 849–53 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FmsVCjtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11105699
WM Tierney IR Francis F Eckhauser G Elta TT Nostrant JM Scheiman (2001) ArticleTitleThe accuracy of EUS and helical CT in the assessment of vascular invasion by periampullary malignancy Gastrointest Endosc 53 182–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzjslyjsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11174289
PC Freeny (2001) ArticleTitlePancreatic carcinoma: imaging update 2001 Dig Dis 19 37–46 Occurrence Handle10.1159/000050652 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzhtFOjtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11385250
HR Mertz P Sechopoulos D Delbeke SD Leach (2000) ArticleTitleEUS, PET, and CT scanning for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma Gastrointest Endosc 52 367–71 Occurrence Handle10.1067/mge.2000.107727 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvpsFCjtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10968852
CG Diederichs L Staib J Vogel et al. (2000) ArticleTitleValues and limitations of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography with preoperative evaluation of patients with pancreatic masses Pancreas 20 109–16 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00006676-200003000-00001 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ntVWqtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10707924
EA Minnard KC Conlon A Hoos EC Dougherty LE Hann MF Brennan (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic ultrasound enhances standard laparoscopy in the staging of pancreatic cancer Ann Surg 228 182–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czns1CjtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9712562
CL Fernandez-del Castillo AL Warshaw (1998) ArticleTitlePancreatic cancer. Laparoscopic staging and peritoneal cytology Surg Oncol Clin North Am 7 135–42 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7gvVSmuw%3D%3D
TC Bottger J Boddin C Duber A Heintz R Kuchle T Junginger (1998) ArticleTitleDiagnosing and staging of pancreatic carcinoma—what is necessary? Oncology 55 122–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7jvFWksg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9499186
P Marano MG Brizi N Cellini et al. (1993) ArticleTitleDiagnostic and therapeutic integration in ductal carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Preliminary note Radiol Med 85 615–24 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3szhsl2ltw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8392216
P Montemaggi R Dobelbower SuffixJr F Crucitti et al. (1991) ArticleTitleInterstitial brachytherapy for pancreatic cancer: report of seven cases treated with 125-I and a review of the literature Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21 451–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3M3osF2nuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle2061121
F Crucitti GB Doglietto D Frontera et al. (1998) ArticleTitleIntegrated radiosurgical treatment of resectable pancreatic head carcinoma Pancreas 16 31–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2Fpslelsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9436860
AG Morganti V Valentini G Macchia et al. (2004) ArticleTitle5-FU-based chemoradiation in unresectable pancreatic carcinoma: a phase II dose escalation study Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54 1454–60
Exocrine pancreas. In: American Joint Committee on Cancer: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 5th ed. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 1997; pp 121–6.
FL Kaplan P Meier (1958) ArticleTitleNonparametric estimation from incomplete observations Am J Stat Assoc 53 457–81
R Peto J Peto (1972) ArticleTitleAsymptotically efficient rank invariant procedures J R Stat Soc 135 185–207 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2344317
DR Cox (1972) ArticleTitleRegression model and life tables J R Stat Soc B 34 187–220
MB Sheridan J Ward JA Guthrie et al. (1999) ArticleTitleDynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase helical CT in the preoperative assessment of suspected pancreatic cancer: a comparison study with receiver operating characteristics analysis AJR Am J Roentgenol 173 583–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzpslCrtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10470884
A Tomazic V Pegan (2000) ArticleTitlePreoperative staging of periampullar cancer with US, CT, EUS and Ca19-9 Hepatogastroenterology 47 1135–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvmslGisQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11020897
A Riker SK Libutti DL Bartlett (1997) ArticleTitleAdvances in the early detection, diagnosis, and staging of pancreatic cancer Surg Oncol 6 157–69 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3js1Wlug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9576631
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morganti, A.G., Brizi, M.G., Macchia, G. et al. The Prognostic Effect of Clinical Staging in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 12, 145–151 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.02.021
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.02.021