Skip to main content
Log in

Mitotic Rate as a Predictor of Sentinel Lymph NodePositivity in Patients With Thin Melanomas

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy (LM/SL) provide important prognostic information for patients with early-stage melanoma. Although the use of this technique in patients with thin melanomas (≤1.00 mm) is not routine, risk factors that may predict sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity in this patient population are under investigation. We sought to determine whether mitotic rate (MR) is associated with SLN positivity in thin-melanoma patients and, therefore, whether it may be used to risk-stratify and select patients for LM/SL.

Methods

Clinical and histopathologic variables were reviewed for 181 patients with thin melanomas who underwent LM/SL from January 1996 through January 2004. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with SLN positivity. Risk groups were defined on the basis of the development of a classification tree.

Results

The overall SLN positivity rate was 5%. All patients with positive SLNs had an MR of >0. By univariate analysis, MR and thickness were significant predictors of SLN positivity. The association between MR and SLN positivity remained significant controlling for each of the other variables evaluated. On the basis of a classification tree, patients with an MR >0 and tumor thickness ≥.76 mm were identified as a higher-risk group, with an SLN positivity rate of 12.3%.

Conclusions

In patients with thin melanomas, MR >0 seems to be a significant predictor of SLN positivity that may be used to risk-stratify and select patients for LM/SL. To confirm these results, the predictive value of MR for SLN positivity needs to be validated in other populations of thin-melanoma patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DL Morton DR Wen JH Wong et al. (1992) ArticleTitleTechnical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma Arch Surg 127 392–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B3MrhtVU%3D Occurrence Handle1558490

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. JE Gershenwald W Thompson PF Mansfield et al. (1999) ArticleTitleMulti-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients J Clin Oncol 17 976–83 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7mvVymsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10071292

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. JJ Albertini CW Cruse D Rapaport et al. (1996) ArticleTitleIntraoperative radio-lympho-scintigraphy improves sentinel lymph node identification for patients with melanoma Ann Surg 223 217–24 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199602000-00016 Occurrence Handle8597518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. R Essner A Conforti MC Kelley et al. (1999) ArticleTitleEfficacy of lymphatic mapping, sentinel lymphadenectomy, and selective complete lymph node dissection as a therapeutic procedure for early-stage melanoma Ann Surg Oncol 6 442–9 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10434-999-0442-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzosFylsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10458681

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. L Jansen OE Nieweg JL Peterse CA Hoefnagel RA Olmos BB Kroon (2000) ArticleTitleReliability of sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging melanoma Br J Surg 87 484–9 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01362.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3itlWjtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10759748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. DL Morton JF Thompson R Essner et al. (1999) ArticleTitleValidation of the accuracy of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for early-stage melanoma: a multicenter trial. Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial Group Ann Surg 230 453–63 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199910000-00001 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvltVGmsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10522715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. D Reintgen CW Cruse K Wells et al. (1994) ArticleTitleThe orderly progression of melanoma nodal metastases Ann Surg 220 759–67 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD2sjkslM%3D Occurrence Handle7986143

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. CM Balch SJ Soong JE Gershenwald et al. (2001) ArticleTitlePrognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system J Clin Oncol 19 3622–34

    Google Scholar 

  9. BM Clary MS Brady JJ Lewis DG Coit (2001) ArticleTitleSentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma: review of a large single-institutional experience with an emphasis on recurrence Ann Surg 233 250–8 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200102000-00015 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ls1SmtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11176132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. N Cascinelli F Belli M Santinami et al. (2000) ArticleTitleSentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous melanoma: the WHO Melanoma Program experience Ann Surg Oncol 7 469–74 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10434-000-0469-z Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FlsFClsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10894144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. RJ Bleicher R Essner LJ Foshag LA Wanek DL Morton (2003) ArticleTitleRole of sentinel lymphadenectomy in thin invasive cutaneous melanomas J Clin Oncol 21 1326–31 Occurrence Handle10.1200/JCO.2003.06.123 Occurrence Handle12663722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. E Joseph A Brobeil F Glass et al. (1998) ArticleTitleResults of complete lymph node dissection in 83 melanoma patients with positive sentinel nodes Ann Surg Oncol 5 119–25 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7os1Cqtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9527264

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DF Roses MN Harris D Hidalgo QJ Valensi N Dubin (1982) ArticleTitlePrimary melanoma thickness correlated with regional lymph node metastases Arch Surg 117 921–3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi2B3s%2FkvFI%3D Occurrence Handle7092543

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. CL Nguyen EF McClay DJ Cole et al. (2001) ArticleTitleMelanoma thickness and histology predict sentinel lymph node status Am J Surg 181 8–11 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00533-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvit1Smug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11248167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. DM Agnese SF Abdessalam WE Burak SuffixJr CM Magro RV Pozderac MJ Walker (2003) ArticleTitleCost-effectiveness of sentinel lymph node biopsy in thin melanomas Surgery 134 542–7 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0039-6060(03)00275-7 Occurrence Handle14605613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. IA Jacobs CK Chang TK DasGupta GI Salti (2003) ArticleTitleRole of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with thin (<1 mm) primary melanoma Ann Surg Oncol 10 558–61 Occurrence Handle10.1245/ASO.2003.10.025 Occurrence Handle12794023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. I Bedrosian MB Faries DT Guerry et al. (2000) ArticleTitleIncidence of sentinel node metastasis in patients with thin primary melanoma (≤ 1 mm) with vertical growth phase Ann Surg Oncol 7 262–7 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10434-000-0262-z Occurrence Handle10819365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. CM Balch AC Buzaid SJ Soong et al. (2001) ArticleTitleFinal version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma J Clin Oncol 19 3635–48

    Google Scholar 

  19. PG Gimotty D Guerry ME Ming et al. (2004) ArticleTitleThin primary cutaneous malignant melanoma: a prognostic tree for ten-year metastasis is more accurate than AJCC staging J Clin Oncol 22 3668–76 Occurrence Handle10.1200/JCO.2004.12.015 Occurrence Handle15302909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. WH Clark SuffixJr DE Elder DT Guerry et al. (1989) ArticleTitleModel predicting survival in stage I melanoma based on tumor progression J Natl Cancer Inst 81 1893–904 Occurrence Handle2593166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. WH Clark SuffixJr L From EA Bernardino MC Mihm (1969) ArticleTitleThe histogenesis and biologic behavior of primary human malignant melanomas of the skin Cancer Res 29 705–27 Occurrence Handle5773814

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. A Spatz MG Cook DE Elder M Piepkorn DJ Ruiter RL Barnhill (2003) ArticleTitleInterobserver reproducibility of ulceration assessment in primary cutaneous melanomas Eur J Cancer 39 1861–5 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00325-3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szpsFOhsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12932663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. DL Morton (2001) ArticleTitleLymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for melanoma: past, present, and future Ann Surg Oncol 8 22S–28S Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mrlt12ltg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11599892

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. KM McMasters SL Wong MJ Edwards et al. (2001) ArticleTitleFactors that predict the presence of sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with melanoma Surgery 130 151–6 Occurrence Handle10.1067/msy.2001.115830 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvlsl2rsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11490343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. CL Slingluff SuffixJr RT Vollmer DS Reintgen HF Seigler (1988) ArticleTitleLethal “thin” malignant melanoma Identifying patients at risk. Ann Surg 208 150–61

    Google Scholar 

  26. OK Johnson SuffixJr LJ Emrich CP Karakousis U Rao WR Greco (1985) ArticleTitleComparison of prognostic factors for survival and recurrence in malignant melanoma of the skin, clinical stage I Cancer 55 1107–17 Occurrence Handle3967194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. L Schuchter DJ Schultz M Synnestvedt et al. (1996) ArticleTitleA prognostic model for predicting 10-year survival in patients with primary melanoma. The Pigmented Lesion Group Ann Intern Med 125 369–75 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA3s3htlY%3D Occurrence Handle8702087

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. VK Sondak JM Taylor MS Sabel et al. (2004) ArticleTitleMitotic rate and younger age are predictors of sentinel lymph node positivity: lessons learned from the generation of a probabilistic model Ann Surg Oncol 11 247–58 Occurrence Handle10.1245/ASO.2004.03.044 Occurrence Handle14993019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. JF Thompson HM Shaw (2004) ArticleTitleEditorial: should tumor mitotic rate and patient age, as well as tumor thickness, be used to select melanoma patients for sentinel node biopsy? Ann Surg Oncol 11 233–5 Occurrence Handle10.1245/ASO.2004.01.912 Occurrence Handle14993013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. JD Wagner MS Gordon TY Chuang et al. (2000) ArticleTitlePredicting sentinel and residual lymph node basin disease after sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma Cancer 89 453–62 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1097-0142(20000715)89:2<453::AID-CNCR34>3.0.CO;2-V Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czptlShsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10918179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. S Mraz-Gernhard RW Sagebiel M Kashani-Sabet JR Miller SuffixIII SP Leong (1998) ArticleTitlePrediction of sentinel lymph node micrometastasis by histological features in primary cutaneous malignant melanoma Arch Dermatol 134 983–7 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archderm.134.8.983 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czovF2msA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9722728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. DL Rousseau SuffixJr MI Ross MM Johnson et al. (2003) ArticleTitleRevised American Joint Committee on Cancer staging criteria accurately predict sentinel lymph node positivity in clinically node-negative melanoma patients Ann Surg Oncol 10 569–74 Occurrence Handle10.1245/ASO.2003.09.016 Occurrence Handle12794025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program Public-Use Data (1973–2000), National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch; http://www.seer.cancergov; released April 2003, based on the November 2002 submission

  34. RL Corsetti HM Allen HJ Wanebo (2000) ArticleTitleThin < or = 1 mm level III and IV melanomas are higher risk lesions for regional failure and warrant sentinel lymph node biopsy Ann Surg Oncol 7 456–60 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10434-000-0456-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FlsFCmuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10894142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. MF Azzola HM Shaw JF Thompson et al. (2003) ArticleTitleTumor mitotic rate is a more powerful prognostic indicator than ulceration in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma: an analysis of 3661 patients from a single center Cancer 97 1488–98 Occurrence Handle10.1002/cncr.11196 Occurrence Handle12627514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported by the SPORE on Skin Cancer (CA-093372; M. Herlyn, principal investigator).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis R. Spitz MD.

Additional information

Published by Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. © 2005 The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kesmodel, S.B., Karakousis, G.C., Botbyl, J.D. et al. Mitotic Rate as a Predictor of Sentinel Lymph NodePositivity in Patients With Thin Melanomas. Ann Surg Oncol 12, 449–458 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.04.027

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.04.027

Keywords

Navigation